- Mfr Part Number: ST2000DL003
- Capacity: 2 TB
- Rotational Speed: 5900 rpm
- Cache: 64 MB
- Interface: SATA 6Gb/s NCQ
- Average latency: 4.16ms
- Seek Time:
- Read: 12ms
- Write: 13ms
- Operating: 80G @ 2ms
- Non-operating: 300G @ 2ms
- Startup Current +12V Peak: 2.0A ±10%
- Operating, Typical: 5.8 W
- Idle: 4.5 W
- Standby: 0.5 W
- Sleep: 0.5 W
- Dimensions (WxLxH): 4.0 x 5.78 x 1.028 inch / 101.6 x 147.0 x 26.1 mm
- Weight: 1.39 lbs / 635.0 g
- Support NCQ (Native Command Queuing) Technology
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB Cache 3.5-Inch Internal Bare Drive ST2000DL003
- Enter your model number to make sure this fits.
- A unique 5900-RPM speed delivers faster performance than 5400-RPM drives
- Seagate SmartAlign technology provides the benefits of the new Advanced Format 4K sector standard without the hassles - not utilities, no extra steps
- Plenty of capacity for storage-hungry applications
- The SATA 6Gb/s interface and 64MB cache maximize performance, especially in cache-intensive applications
- Best-Fit Applications include: High-capacity desktop storage, Direct Attached Storage devices - USB/Firewire/eSata, Network Attached Storage devices and Windows storage servers, PCs
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
The problem I am discovering is a greatly reduced reliability in Seagate 1.5 and 2TB disks. I currently have about a dozen 2TB Seagates in active use. 7 of them are beginning to fail, in under 4,000 hours of use. These are disks which were burned in by certifying them for about 3 days with an intensive read/write pattern, to eliminate early failure disks. In the general disk population, I have also seen a high failure rate. This is unacceptable.
Google performed a study using over 100,000 disks a few years back. Google found statistical differences in failure rates between manufacturers, that they did not publish. They also noted that "enterprise" drives did not result in longer lifespans. They found NO correlation between heavy duty or light duty use in failure. What Google did report was that a handful of SMART parameters could be used to predict drives that would soon fail. Among these are reallocated sectors. Once a drive begins reallocating, they generally fail within 6 months or less. There are SMART utilities which are starting to implement this knowledge and alerting users to predicted failures.
For a long time, Seagate was the premium brand of hard drives, along with Hitachi. They may still be. However, this failure rate on the 1.5 and 2TB drives, in addition to the major firmware flaw on the 1.5TB drives (Many customers lost data on the 1.5TB drives, where drives suddenly failed from a firmware flaw), makes me very cautious on Seagate now.
I am recommending Hitachi for now, they will cost a little more, but until more data is in, be alert if Seagates are installed and perhaps avoid them in servers and mission critical installations. I have no data yet on the 3TB drives.
I purchased and installed and immediately noticed that on Power ON, it would take few seconds for my Server to reach POST screen, which is surprising. I have 850W power supply, and 2 video cards, but still have plenty of spare power capacity left.
So I disconnected these 2 new drives, and guess what, system immediately comes to POST on power up.
I did some research and found that this model drives draws more power on start up. Once started, they behave nicely, just the initial power ON current draw is higher than other drives. Long story short, I swapped the drives from my NAS enclosure to my server and installed these 2 drives in my NAS.
1) whopping 64MB cache....!!!!
2) Fast SATA 6Gb/s interface
3) Sustained high data transfer rate, (recreating RAID was much faster on these drives)
4) Light weight since it has only 3 platters
5) Runs cool, even with sustained data in/out operation
6) Quiet, even when transferring, reading/writing data
1) Higher start-up current draw
2) 4K sector size, which may or may not be a problem for you, depending on your application, OS etc.
3) Only 3 year warranty
The new drives run cooler than the old 500's, are amazingly quiet, and fast-- so far I'm quite impressed with their performance (especially with the 64mb cache). While I haven't seen their long-term viability yet, I'm pleasantly surprised by how well they work.
Bjorn3d has a good review of the drive here:
I saw other reviewers commenting about them not being "high-performance" drives. That is correct, this drive was never intended to be used as your primary drive for your system. If you're looking for a high-performance drives, you should definitely look for 7,200/10,000rpm drives with 16/32MB cache.
However, when used in a RAID configuration, these drives will deliver high-performance with overall reduced power consumption. In my NAS I was able to sustain around 160MB/S throughput writing to NAS over gigabit network (and even faster reading from it). There's nothing low-performance about these drives when used in a proper setting. The drive is also quiet. Standing next to my NAS, I can't hear any drive noise even with 5 drives side-by-side.
Bottom line, don't purchase drives purely based on price and capacity. You don't buy Prius for high-performance, why expect high-performance from a "Green" drive? Identify what you're going to do with it, then look for qualifying drives for best result. I would have never purchased this to be used in my desktop (for performance) and neither should you.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
I am overall very pleased with this drive. I purchased four of them to go into a Synology NAS and the first failure I had was 4 and a half years into running the NAS. Read morePublished 16 days ago by Darren O'Neill
These drives are shipped with a bad firmware bug that Seagate refuses to release the fix for. All of my data is gone and I'm gonna have to pay thousands of dollars to get it... Read morePublished 22 days ago by Viddy
Purchased from Amazon June 2012 - failed on July 2016.
This was in my HP, Microsoft Home Server, so it was spinning 24x7 all that time. Read more
Seagate quality is terrible and is getting worse. Several things support this trend.
1. Barracuda drives use to have a five year warranty - activated on the date of... Read more
One drive failed after exactly 3 years. Seagate says out of warranty. Vendor says out of warranty. Replaced with a WD 2TB drive with 5 year warranty. Read morePublished 9 months ago by Matt Dunn
1 of 3 failed 4 months after warranty expired.
Have them installed in a DS411 NAS which has low to moderate usage. Read more