Buying Options
| Kindle Price: | $7.00 |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Author
OK
Searching for the Catastrophe Signal: The Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Kindle Edition
| Bernie Lewin (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Yet the surprising story of how it came to prominence is little known. Its origins can be traced back to earlier panics over the effects of supersonic transportation and ozone layer depletion, which taught political elites that science-based scares could be powerful drivers of policy action. It was as an authority fit to deliver the required evidence on climate change that the IPCC came into being.
However, in the rush towards a climate treaty, IPCC scientists continued to report that evidence of manmade climate change was scarce and that confirmation of a manmade effect should not be expected for decades. Without a `catastrophe signal' that could justify a policy response, the panel faced its imminent demise.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateNovember 20, 2017
- Reading age18 years
- File size12056 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- ASIN : B077N36Q3Z
- Publisher : Global Warming Policy Foundation (November 20, 2017)
- Publication date : November 20, 2017
- Language : English
- File size : 12056 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 387 pages
- Lending : Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,183,226 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #2,196 in Science History & Philosophy
- #2,545 in Climatology
- #4,425 in History of Science & Medicine
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Bernie Lewin is an amateur historian and philosopher of science based in Melbourne, Australia.
His historical interests include: ancient Pythagorean mathematics; Catholic skepticism of the 16th Century; the epistemological revolution begun during the Restoration of the British monarchy in the 17th Century; and the 'Foundation of Mathematics' controversy that started in the late 19th century. A recent interest in the corruption of post-WWII state-funded natural science led to his first published book, 'Searching for the Catastrophe Signal'.
If there is one word to describe his philosophical view it is Platonism. This underlies his history investigations as well as his approach to George Spencer Brown's 'Laws of Form' (1969). 'Laws of Form' presents the 'Boolean arithmetic' elementary to logic and all forms of arithmetic. For Lewin, 'Laws of Form' might well herald a revival of Platonic science by showing a better way -- a more Pythagorean way (i.e., self-referencing, non-analytical) -- to build a hierarchy of infinite numbers and, in doing so, forge a new relationship with geometry. This view is carefully developed through an historical narrative in his second book, Enthusiastic Mathematics.
Lewin is the founding director of the Platonic Academy of Melbourne.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
"ozone" hole and subsequently the "global warming" issue. Great read for those interested in either but particularly the global warming issue and how the world nations approached both subjects.
Top reviews from other countries
Lewin lets the reader draw his own conclusions from the facts of who did what to promote the scientific and political movement, alongside the effects of the press in selecting what to report and how. One day this book will be very useful to historians unravelling the sad story of how "science" fooled us all, and pointing the fingers at key politicians and well-known scientists who enabled it.
Essential for outsiders wishing to get a grip on this baffling madness.
There are three problems, however.
First, Lewin embraces scientism, the odd belief that political action linearly and simply follows from scientific knowledge. In this case, Lewin argues that the science is insufficient for action, which is just as foolish as environmentalists arguing that the science demands action.
Second, Lewin argues that the science-policy interface for climate change was modelled on that for depletion of the ozone layer. He does not investigate alternative hypotheses. Others have argued the climate policy borrowed heavily from acidification policy.
Third, Lewin stops at the Second Assessment Report. The IPCC has substantially evolved since, for better and worse.











