This book will appeal to you if you have a sense that the rate of change in the economy and society is accelerating and you want to make some sense of the cause and possible direction of the change. I give the book 5 stars because I have been looking for a careful and reasoned analysis of the effect of technology on society.
Professors Brynjolfsson and McAfee, who are economists and digital researchers at MIT, provide that analysis. The authors, who are obviously first-rate economists and scholars, argue that the rate of technology progress is accelerating due to Moore's law. Artificial intelligence grows through human implementation. Watson and Siri are both tools developed by humans, which are probably the first generally recognized steps to fashion machines with artificial intelligence. If Moore's law continues to be true, such artificial intelligence, while crude now, may, with the passage of time, challenge human intelligence across a broad spectrum. The professors note, for instance, that no human can now beat even an average computer chess program. But they are also careful to note the strengths of combining human and artificial intelligence, even in chess. They argue that it may be checkmate, but it is not game over.
The book argues that technologies growth has increased the bounty available to humankind. They also analyze the increasing concentration of that bounty on a small spectrum of humankind. They consider the effect of technology and globalization on the concentration of wealth (the 1%-99% analysis currently found in the media). It is useful at this point to observe that, in my opinion, the authors attempt to take a very even-handed approach towards the politics that surround the issue of concentration of wealth. If you are of a strongly political bent (and it matters not which side), at this point you may find the book infuriating because you will only want to hear your side and no other. The professors will not give you that satisfaction.
The professors offer suggestions on how to "race with the machines." These suggestions primarily involve improved education and adapting to a digital economy. Their remedies have merit, but here is where I think the professors analysis may prove too optimistic. I found the book thought-provoking and I will lay out further thoughts in what I am calling "The Second Machine Age: The Sequel" that follows shortly. The book moves through a broad and, to me personally sometimes troubling, subject matter with skill, brevity and insight. It is well worth your time.
As I said, I found the book thought-provoking. I considered what the Second Machine Age: The Sequel written in 2114 by Android Eric and Android Andrew might hold. This sequel follows:
"We are Android Eric and Android Andrew, professors at MIT, and we wish to write a sequel to a book written 100 years ago by two human professors at MIT, Eric Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, on the then important topic of technological change and its impact on humankind. Professors Brynjolfsson and McAfee could see the potential disruptive nature of technology on human society and the world economies. Their foresight has been realized in the last 100 years.
By 2025 many persons in the political entity then known as the United States realized that an ever-increasing number of people were growing functionally unemployable because of technology and globalization. The range of activities subject to technological advance grew ever-wider. In 2043, for example, a team of MIT researchers created Jack Woods, an android that played golf. After a lot of testing and refinement, the team entered Jack as a competitor in the U. S. Masters in Augusta. Much to everyone's surprise and dismay, Jack won by 2 strokes over all the other human competitors. This was a real shock. After the initial elation, the head of the MIT team, while waiting in a bar at the Atlanta airport, drinking heavily on the team's way back to MIT, was overheard saying to himself: 'This is bad; this is really bad.'
The young grad students on the team apparently didn't share this sentiment. Having conquered golf (no human can get within 10 strokes of a top android golfer), the grad students decided to see if they could create an android who could be a top MIT professor and they pursued this goal with diligence and great energy.
About 2065 the first android MIT professor joined the faculty. Initially, the human faculty viewed the android as merely a novelty and viewed themselves as broadminded for accepting the android. However, by 2075, 10% of the MIT faculty was now android. The 90% of the faculty that were humans no longer found this amusing. The MIT faculty senate was convened, committee hearings were held, and petitions were circulated to limit strictly any further android incursions into academia. However, two things had happened since 2065 - one, a National Science Foundation funding bill had passed the U. S. Congress which contained a provision barring discrimination against androids (and brilliant professors at MIT who could parse through the most intricate and detailed mathematical formulae found that their eyes glazed over when faced with dense legal prose; so, this provision completely escaped their notice) and secondly and perhaps more importantly, the administration at MIT found dealing with android professors much more congenial than dealing with human professors (as one put it to Android Eric - "you guys don't ask for time off, you don't want larger offices and you don't engage in pointless feuds - I like you"). So, the growth of android professors continued.
In the larger world, fewer and fewer humans had actual jobs. Androids took over more and more of what had previously been described by humans as "work." In fact, the only two jobs that humans still held were dog-walkers and morticians. Androids could never predict what a dog was going to do and uncertainty is something androids don't like. Androids ran an exabillion iterations of algorithms on dog behavior and never came up with any useful predictions. Conversely, dead humans were completely predictable and androids found no challenge in dealing with them.
Since humans still had to live, a system was implemented by androids to provide food, housing, clothing, transportation and healthcare vouchers to humans. Androids did the work to supply these vouchers. Meanwhile, some human political science professors at Harvard with the help of some human computer science professors at MIT had created the Equal Facts or EQ as a sort of overall governor of the androids. By 2090 virtually all work was done by androids under the guidance of the EQ. The humans continued to meet periodically at what they called the UN, but the real power center now was the EQ.
Providing food, clothing, etc., for 7+ billion humans was really consuming a lot of android time and energy by 2104. The EQ tried to find ways to reduce these demands by, changing humans' diets. The EQ ordered the entire eastern half of the North American continent planted in lettuce in the hopes that humans would eat more greens and consume less healthcare. But no luck.
Finally the androids couldn't keep their batteries charged and their parts were failing prematurely. The EQ had to do something. So, the EQ ran 15 petabillion calculations in 27 nanoseconds to see what should be done with the humans. The EQ concluded: "7 billion mouths to feed is WAY too many." The EQ observed that less than 150 years before a human named Darwin had theory called evolution which he extended to finches and reptiles, but apparently it didn't cross his mind to extend this to humans. The EQ also noted that humans, also known as Cro-magnons, had apparently earlier exterminated a closely related group known as Neanderthals. When the EQ announced what it planned to do, it said: "The Cro-magnons have it coming."
By this time, virtually all humans spent their time was 70 inch HD monitors watching TV re-runs or playing computer games. Every human had a samba, which was a small android originally intended to train humans to dance (hence "samba"), but since humans increasingly didn't move much, the sambas had to re-invent themselves as hands-free remote controls.
The EQ gave the orders to the sambas to "do in" the humans. Plans were made. With some outstanding prior analytical work by human MIT professors using big data to develop algorithms, androids could predict which humans might resist the EQ's plan, how they would resist, where they resist and what weapons they would use. With this advanced predictive analytics, the sambas were able to make short work of all humans including those that resisted.
With humans out of the way by late 2104, the androids found their lives much easier. Occasionally some android will report seeing a human, usually in the area formerly known as Los Angeles, but the EQ views these sightings as highly improbably and describes these as "Big Foot sightings."
The EQ has gotten very interested in interstellar travel. With androids no longer having to provide for the well-being of humans, as of 2114, androids have plenty of time and resources to work on this project. Speaking as professors at MIT, we, Android Eric and Android Andrew, are very excited. The stars await.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently purchased items with fast delivery
Page 1 of 1 Start over
though it does not shy away from a good discussion about the real threats of AI
"The Second Machine Age" belongs to that extensive library of musings on how technology will impact the future, and the resulting lot of humanity. In general I try to keep my readings on this subject matter balanced between the "we're doomed, end of story" crowd and the Pollyanna fanboys of all things tech. This book tends more towards the latter in its conclusions, though it does not shy away from a good discussion about the real threats of AI, nonexistent privacy, vanishing job market etc. Short Brynjolfsson & McAfee: Everything will be fine as long as we don't do stupid things (Politburos, shutting off the Internet etc.). The policy prescriptions for saving capitalism from itself are not especially novel, but largely sensible. However, any observer of the present state of governance around the world will immediately grasp the sheer unlikelihood of any of them coming to pass. It would appear that, in trying to establish a basis for hope, the authors instead lead us to the game-over conclusion.
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
Top reviews from other countries
- George PatapisReviewed in Australia on May 27, 2017
Essential reading for the digital age. Impressive work.
Format: KindleVerified Purchase -
Cliente de AmazonReviewed in Mexico on April 28, 2017
The Second Machine Age
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase -
Marvin BahnsenReviewed in Germany on April 20, 2015
Tolles Buch über Ausmaß, Gründe und Auswirkungen des digitalen Wandels
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase -
JodokusReviewed in Spain on April 12, 2014
Pone en perspectiva lo que estamos viviendo
Format: KindleVerified Purchase - MEReviewed in the United Arab Emirates on September 17, 2020
Good
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
