Buy new:
-12% $34.99$34.99
Delivery January 6 - 9
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$31.59$31.59
Delivery Thursday, January 9
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Abundance Booksellers
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Secret History of Star Wars Paperback – November 18, 2008
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length626 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateNovember 18, 2008
- Dimensions6 x 1.41 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100978465237
- ISBN-13978-0978465230
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that ship from close to you
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book thoroughly researched and comprehensive, providing a detailed look into the history of the Star Wars saga. They find it fascinating and revealing, with a complete chronology for the storylines. Many readers consider it a worthwhile investment, though some have mixed opinions about the writing style. Some find it well-written and reasonably constructed, while others mention grammar errors and typos.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book thorough and informative, with direct quotes from George Lucas. They appreciate the detailed explanation and elaboration of Star Wars' evolution. The book is considered comprehensive and annotated, providing an interesting read.
"...this book - truly a masterpiece of investigation - I see, and much better understand, the much larger picture it paints than when I first wrote the..." Read more
"...Kaminski’s volume is the impressive and fascinating result of this prodigious research effort...." Read more
"...With this book, Michael Kaminski does a brilliant job debunking that myth, step by step through the entire chronology of the Star Wars saga...." Read more
"...After reading it cover to cover, I'd call it a great book, even if it's written by an amateur who is not a LucasFilm insider...." Read more
Customers find the book's saga history fascinating. They appreciate the thorough examination of the greatest movie saga in movie history. The book provides a chronology for the storylines, could-have-beens, and pie in the sky. It explores various versions of stories and the origins and development of the greatest sci-fi saga of all time. Readers mention that fantasy novels shaped the story, especially J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings. Overall, they describe the book as an exhaustive history of Star Wars universe creation.
"Find out the real history of Star Wars, and be in the know!..." Read more
"...homage to the B-serials of the 30's into a far deeper, grander epic of tragedy and gravitas, hurt only by occasional insecurity, a willingness to..." Read more
"...Fantasy novels also shaped the story, especially J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings and Frank Herbert's Dune...." Read more
"...for young directors, a story only Lucas could tell, a fantasy-adventure romp, a family saga, a picture of tragedy and redemption...." Read more
Customers find the book provides a detailed and comprehensive overview with numerous references. It covers multiple drafts, interviews, and various sources. The book offers a fuller picture that cannot be found anywhere else.
"...valid for me but this book really painted a much larger and more complex picture of a truly large complex history of the Star Wars "saga" than I had..." Read more
"...Because of its dense matter in untangling early drafts, numerous articles/interviews and various versions of stories, the author is not shy about..." Read more
"...This is how any work of art happens, really...." Read more
"...The book gives a fuller picture that you just can't find anywhere else...." Read more
Customers find the book offers good value for money. They mention it's worth the investment of both money and time.
"...read collection of Star Wars history, you surely get your money's worth with this book. Recommended A+++" Read more
"...That makes this book worth the extra cost...." Read more
"...meticulously researched, with some rare typos, and well worth the investment of both money and time." Read more
"...just don't care, but even doing that I felt like this books was a great bargain, full of facts that are almost all sourced...." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the writing style. Some find it well-written and easy to follow, with direct quotes from George Lucas. Others mention poor grammar, frantic writing style, and wordiness.
"...This book is an amazingly impressive piece of research and integrity. If I could have I would have given it more stars than can fit on this page...." Read more
"...Although the book will hook intrigued readers, the grammar in Kaminski’s writing is often poor, and the whole text of the book would have benefited..." Read more
"Kaminsky's rock-solid work unquestionably belongs alongside Rinzler's The Making of Star Wars, as both a companion piece and an in-depth exploration..." Read more
"...Getting to see the germination of certain ideas, the struggles of writing and rewriting, and how great ideas in one movie ended up becoming..." Read more
Reviews with images
Outdated book weighed down by way too much angst
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2011(Since writing this review a few months back when I had not completey finished reading this book I HAVE FINISHED THE BOOK AND I wish to add a few comments,which see at end of this review, indicated by ADDITIONAL LATER COMMENTS)I remember how I felt back in 83, sitting in the darkened theater, when I heard Obi Wan give that lame excuse to Luke's question/comment about how he had said Vader killed his dad....I felt sick and betrayed by Lucas....I smelled a rat....I didn't fall for it....but I couldn't quite feel as certain about the matter as I would have liked. WAS I missing something? HAD Lucas NOT actually pulled a fast one on all of us after all???????? I wondered and wondered.....AAAAAAAAAAALL these years BUT I was pretty sure this was a "stunt" that Georgie had pulled. This book I am reviewing settled the matter with the force of an atom bomb expoding. YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Lucas had indeed pulled a fast one. I have never felt so validated in all my life....and Lucas's credibility and integrity sank to the bottom of the list almost, for me anyway. This book is an amazingly impressive piece of research and integrity. If I could have I would have given it more stars than can fit on this page. The impact that those first TWO Star Wars films had in my life in the ensuing years thereafter is beyond description and that impact was in no small way plugged into the respect and trust I had in Lucas....but the third film with the above mentioned response to Luke's question bothered me greatly and disturbed me for a long time....UNTIL THIS BOOK. Now the haunting questions have been answered and as a result much of my initial respect and trust in Lucas is gone BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY this book has, in validating my initial suspicions, caused me to realize that YES, my mind....my guts....my intuition back then...and therefore NOW....was/is working JUST FINE....and I am feeling a lot of anger at the stunt/deception that Lucas pulled off in this matter. I do not like my intelligence being insulted and considering the "setting" in which this stunt of Lucas was pulled off in and that has been exposed in this fantastic book, I can only hope many many many people out there who had their minds messed with by Lucas in this matter, like me, will read this book. Great and loud, sky shattering "THANK YOUs" are in order for the author of this book....well done....WELL DONE,
(ADDITIONAL LATER COMMENTS: Now that I have finished this book - only last night, a few months after the above comments - I have to revise, SOMEWHAT, my above comments. Upon finishing reading this book - truly a masterpiece of investigation - I see, and much better understand, the much larger picture it paints than when I first wrote the above angry commentary on the story it presented, when I had not yet finished reading this book completely. Much of what I said above, late last fall, still remains largely valid for me but this book really painted a much larger and more complex picture of a truly large complex history of the Star Wars "saga" than I had expected/suspected and, likewise, a much more complex story about Lucas than I had expected. The result of all of this has been a tempering of my anger towards Lucas regarding the "changes" he made over time in the Father Skywalker/Darth Vader matter....ONLY TEMPERING my anger, NOT COMPLETELY REMOVING IT. This book is indeed, I do believe, the most fascinating book I have ever read...not only because of its "tale" but the way it was researched and written. Again I say, regarding this book and author.....WELL DONE.....WELL DONE indeed. Many many many stars for you!!!)
- Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2017Being published in 2008, Kaminski’s book long predates the advent of the most recent, 2015 onward, set of Star Wars movies. But Kaminski’s analysis does not need to be updated in light of these films because he is concerned with the development of George Lucas’ vision of the Star Wars story rather than with others’ continuations and variations on the Lucas-authored or -coauthored Star Wars instalments. Consequently, the end of George Lucas’ overseeing of the Star Wars films brings to a conclusion the matters that are the subject of Kaminski’s book.
In writing the book, Kaminski did not by any means have personal access to Lucas’ archival materials. However, because so many relevant script and other items have become publicly known, either via their appearing directly in print or by being referred to in public statements by Lucas (and by others who were at one time or another privy to those documents and discussions), Kaminski was able to develop an intricate analysis based on these published and publicly-available sources (which include, notably, Lucas notes that were published, excerpted, or summarized in previous books).
Kaminski’s volume is the impressive and fascinating result of this prodigious research effort. In the course of ascertaining the factually-correct record concerning the writing of Star Wars and its sequels and prequels, Kaminski is often highly critical of Lucas, particularly because of the latter’s contradictory and revisionist public statements concerning his development of the saga.
Although the book will hook intrigued readers, the grammar in Kaminski’s writing is often poor, and the whole text of the book would have benefited from a much more thorough and professional copyediting and proofing effort.
I also found myself parting company with the book on a number of factual matters. Specifically:
1. On page 43, Kaminski states: “According to the first issue of Bantha Tracks, the official Star Wars fan club newsletter, Lucas also researched where Alex Raymond, the author and illustrator of the 1930’s Flash Gordon comic strip, got his inspiration from, which led him to the John Carter of Mars novels by Edgar Rice Burroughs, which were similar in style and design.” A footnote adds: “Further research, the issue reports, led him to discover that the John Carter of Mars books were inspired by Edwin Arnold’s Gulliver of Mars, published in 1905.” I found this phrasing to be not only grammatically clumsy but also a curiously tentative and indirect manner in which to convey such highly important and specific information on the background of Star Wars’ writing and on Lucas’ research process. For one thing, the sourcing of the information in question to the first issue of Bantha Tracks (an issue published in 1978) suggests that Kaminski could not find that information in in earlier-published sources. However, it is the case that this information was actually publicly available earlier. It appeared in 1977 in a number of outlets—including Screen International (December 17, 1977) and Science Fiction Review #24 (December 1977). Indeed, the fact that this information appeared in multiple 1977 publications suggests that it was probably initially given in some of the official press-pack handouts that accompanied the original release of Star Wars. For another thing, Kaminski’s description of the information as arising from a Bantha Tracks third-person report suggests that he has not seen a direct quotation from George Lucas on the matter and that, relatedly, he has doubts about the accuracy of the information. But the aforementioned 1977 sources, and others, do give direct George Lucas quotations that relay this very information. Consequently, Kaminski’s tentative tone regarding the information is not in fact warranted.
2. On page 240, Kaminski endorses the notion that the public designation of the original Star Wars as Episode IV: A New Hope occurred first in Lucasfilm’s 1979 book, The Art of Star Wars, and was incorporated into Star Wars film prints only in 1981, with the U.S. rerelease of that year. In partial support of this claim, he quotes from what “[t]he Washington Post reported” in May 1980. However, the Washington Post item in question was not a news report but instead a film review—and that review contained what probably amounted merely to the reviewer’s surmise (rather than a conclusion derived from reporting) that the “Episode IV” designation originated in The Art of Star Wars in 1979 and that it was not in public Star Wars prints as of 1980. In contrast, Wikipedia, citing Marcus Hearn’s 2005 book on Lucas, suggests that the “Episode IV” designation appeared publicly in the prints used for the July 1978 U.S. rerelease of Star Wars. This is likely correct, as the “Episode IV” designation for Star Wars was noted in the press in July 1978 (see, in particular, Evening Standard (London), July 25, 1978).
3. On page 503, we are told that Star Wars and Empire Strikes Back producer Gary Kurtz resurfaced in 1999, making public comments after “nearly two decades of silence.” But between Empire Strikes Back in 1980 and the alleged 1999 resurfacing date, Kurtz made a number of public comments and appearances, including in publicity for The Dark Crystal (1982) and Return to Oz (1985) and the 1987 Starlog convention on the Star Wars tenth anniversary. Most notably for the purposes of Star Wars research, he was interviewed for Garry Jenkins’ 1997 book Empire Building—which is a rare instance of a Star Wars-history-related book of which Kaminski apparently makes no mention. The absence of a reference to the Jenkins book is especially surprising when one considers that the book is highly relevant to Kaminski’s subject matter and that it was issued by a major publisher, Simon and Schuster. (More recently, the Jenkins book has been prominently cited in Brian Jay Jones’ biography of George Lucas—a fact that reinforces the importance of the Jenkins book.)
- Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2024Find out the real history of Star Wars, and be in the know! An easy to read collection of Star Wars history, you surely get your money's worth with this book. Recommended A+++
Top reviews from other countries
MatthewReviewed in Japan on August 16, 20213.0 out of 5 stars Only for die hard fans
While I respect the author's intent and dedication to accuracy, this book is only for those who are absolute down-to-the-bone super fans or for those studying film history. The analysis and attention to detail regarding each script's iteration were interesting at first but quickly became way too much. There were some interesting ideas and connections made which made me appreciate the scripts more and understand where Lucas got ideas from but there were many times I found my eyes skipping whole sentences and even paragraphs. I cannot remember the last time I didnt finish a book, but this one kind of got away from me. I still have it in my Kindle library and intend to finish one day....but just not today...I dont have the energy. The author does deserve a lot of kudos for making a valiant effort.
MauroReviewed in Germany on March 29, 20155.0 out of 5 stars Illuminating!
Why shouldn't Darth Vader's story deserve its place alongside King Oedipus'? In times where "tragic" as an attribute is often misunderstood, Michael Kaminski shows us that, yes, it indeed does!
Amazon CustomerReviewed in Canada on May 31, 20125.0 out of 5 stars Must have for star wars fans.
For anyone who is into starwars this is a must have. This book for me was hard to put down.
The secret history of star wars, is about the movies story and script developement. It does not touch on any of the technical aspects of the movies. It starts with background on George Lucas, and how he ended up in the movie industry. Also what led up to his creation of starwars.
This book covers alot of the rumors I heard in the past about the prequels. Such as episode one was going to be released in may of 1997. I remember reading that news in a cinescape magazine back in 1995.
The one rumor I heard way back in 1993 that wasn't covered in this book was the rumor that Mark Hamill was going to play Anakin in the prequels. I read that in a sci-fi magazine somewhere.
This book is similar to William Shatner's Star Trek Movie memories. With the difference being that Star Trek memories dealt with all the politics, and drama that occured in the making of star trek. This book how ever only touches on that slightly. Focusing on how George Lucas developed the story, and characters of star wars.
Its interesting to read all the alternate ways this story could have went. It also touches on the sequel trilogy that was rumored for years, and where that story may have went.
So if you love star wars. Then get this book.
-
Andrea AnglaniReviewed in Italy on November 22, 20135.0 out of 5 stars L'evoluzione di Star Wars: la vera storia
Per anni Lucas ha raccontato versioni diverse sui progetti riguardanti gli episodi della sua saga: attraverso varie interviste ha parlato di una storia divisa in 12 capitoli, che sono diventati 9 nel corso del tempo e infine 6. Dopo tre decenni di contraddizioni, l'autore di The Secret History of Star Wars, Michael Kaminski, cerca di fare luce su quella che è l'effettiva evoluzione di Guerre Stellari, partendo dalle origini ed arrivano alla saga che conosciamo oggi.
Scopriamo dunque che Leia doveva essere una bambina, che Darth Vader non è sempre stato il padre di Luke (il cui cognome doveva essere Starkiller) e così via. Cito i casi più famosi, per non svelarvi le chicche più interessanti.
Il libro è molto lungo e conta 626 pagine (togliendo le note arriviamo a meno di 550) e descrive in modo dettagliato l'evoluzione della storia di Lucas. Avevo paura che la lunghezza rendesse il libro prolisso, eppure mi sono dovuto ricredere perché l'autore è riuscito ad approfondire il processo creativo alla base di Guerre Stellari senza annoiare, svelando particolari interessanti e dedicando attenzione a tutti i film della saga in egual misura (prequel compresi) e facendo un parallelo con la vita di Lucas, che ha ovviamente inciso sulla space opera. È proprio questo parallelo che mi ha colpito del libro.
Purtroppo il testo non è stato tradotto in italiano, ma per chi ha una preparazione media della lingua inglese può leggere questo libro in tranquillità.
Robert EvansReviewed in the United Kingdom on June 11, 20135.0 out of 5 stars Informative and authorative
Mr Kaminski has provided a well researched and informative book that deals with the history of the Star Wars movie franchise and its changing plot developments over time.
It is well referenced throughout, so you can check or refer to his sources if you are academically inclined. His references include interviews Lucas gave in the 70s and 80s before the original trilogy was complete, and the annotated screenplays. These are telling sources which show that the more recent hype that the movies were 'all about Darth Vader all along' is not what Lucas was saying all those years ago.
It also gives an interesting and well researched account of when Lucas decided that Darth Vader was Luke Skywalker and why.
With a more critical eye, there are not as many references when dealing with the more recent prequels, but I suspect that is because there is less material to draw from. In a couple of places it could have been better edited, but these are minor quibbles about an excellent book.





