Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$85.00$85.00
FREE delivery:
Tuesday, Aug 22
Payment
Secure transaction
Ships from
Amazon
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Buy used: $34.40
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters Hardcover – October 29, 2001
There is a newer edition of this item:
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length296 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherViking Studio
- Publication dateOctober 29, 2001
- Dimensions9.8 x 1.25 x 12.2 inches
- ISBN-100670030260
- ISBN-13978-0670030262
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest ratedin this set of productsThis item:
Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old MastersHardcover - Lowest Pricein this set of products
Vermeer's Camera: Uncovering the Truth behind the MasterpiecesPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Viking Studio; 1st edition (October 29, 2001)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 296 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0670030260
- ISBN-13 : 978-0670030262
- Item Weight : 4.3 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.8 x 1.25 x 12.2 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,034,396 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #214 in Oil Painting
- #3,620 in Arts & Photography Criticism
- #4,997 in Art History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It's true that some of the paintings look like photographs. In some cases, as with Van Eyck's paintings for instance, faces have the translucent quality of real flesh. But it's a mistake to assume, as Hockney does, that a painting that has the "look" of a photograph is evidence that camera optics were involved. Realism and fine detail in a painting would more plausibly pass as evidence that painters observed their subjects directly, not by tracing optical projections, or more specifically, optical projections made with primitive, long focal length lenses. Such projections have extremely poor depth of field and very low resolution. The so called Flemish "primitive" paintings have astonishing detail, images projected from primitive lenses do not.
Hockney points to the "perfect" perspective of some paintings as evidence of optics, but many of Hockney's examples are paintings that have imperfect perspectives. So he then proceeds to devise far-fetched explanations of how such distortions could be evidence of optics. Thus, according to Hockney's convoluted logic, both perfect perspective and distorted perspectives are evidence of the use of optics.
When we finally get to see projections that Hockney makes with a convex mirror, the poor resolution is notable. Curiously, after many pages of referring to the "optical look" of paintings, Hockney marvels at the "painterly look" of his optical projections. Indeed, his projections compare favorably with a still life by Chardin, an eighteenth century artists known for his "painterly" brushwork.
We also see Hockney tracing a man's portrait from a projected image (Hockney draws in a darkened room while his subject sits outside squinting in bright sunlight so the projected image will be bright enough to see). The result is a drawing, not a painting. And most of that drawing is filled in with details drawn by Hockney observing his subject directly.
Hockney never discusses painting technique - the importance of oils, brushes, glazes, surface preparations or any other technical matters relevant to applying paint to canvas. If paintings are primary documents, surely the paint, and how it was applied to the substrate, has some bearing on the "secret techniques "of the old masters. But to Hockney it's all optics -fuzzy logic as seen through a fuzzy lens.
Hockney has changed the way we will consider the paintings of the old masters, and the historical basis for the newest art of our times.
The amazing thing is, that we've all looked at these same paintings, seen the same clues, perhaps even had the same alarm bells go off in our heads, but we allow inquiries to be stifled by accepeted art historical explanations. That is, until David Hockey applied the reason and passion for observation that only an artist can bring to the subject.
The book's arguments are beutifully illustrated, first visually, using the artworks themselves as historical documentation. Next with scholary reasearch whose meaning, in light of Hockney's visual arguments, brings the correspondence and criticism of the time into sharp focus. And finally, and most lively, you get to see the artist's theory evolve in the form of correspondence with scientists and scholars of today discussing cutting edge technological examinations of the old masterworks previously illustrated.
Quite simply, a MUST READ book!
- Ken Mora
kenmora.com
I will be re-reading this book for many years. Mr. Hockney has done Art a huge service through his investigation and experimentation to help us understand more about the craft as well as the art of painting and drawing. I hope he gets knighted for it if he isn't already.
It is truly a scholarly work with the excitement of a mystery.
One of the best parts is that he is unafraid to make bold statements that a lesser person would be hooted down for by the "establishment". Bravo to him. Bravery comes in many forms and this is a brave book.
If you love art and seek a deeper understanding of how it has evolved you must read this book.
LOTS of photographs, LOTS of illustrations and step by step explanations of his theories. More books should be written this way, especially art books. Many artists seem to be unable to explain themselves, perhaps their minds don't work in that way. Thank goodness Hockney was blessed with both fully functioning right and left brains.
Top reviews from other countries
Life is unfair. Hockney has become a National Treasure, because he is an excellent artist, but also, perhaps, because he has not only survived to a ripe old age but achieved "grumpy but lovable old fart" status. Yet many of his contemporaries, equally skilled, are completely unknown or known only to a few knowledgable fellow artists.
Of course Hockney can draw. Anyone who says he cannot draw or paint "properly" is either blinded by professional jealousy or simply does not know what he is talking about. There is ample evidence on record in his published work. His teenage paintings and drawings show ample evidence of a great artist in the making. His few representational portraits, throughout his career, as well as many conventional pencil and colour pencil drawings, are clear evidence of classic drawing and painting skills. I am a particular admirer of his charcoal drawings, which show a remarkable ability to convey softness and tonal range as well as the high contrast and hard edges more typical of this medium.
As for his theories on the use of optical aids by great artists of the past, there can be little doubt that leading artists have, when required, used every aid technically available to achieve precision when needed - and why not? Grids, shadowgraphs and the camera lucida are techniques which would have been fascinating and irresistable to a skilled artist seeking to perfect his craft. Such techniques are taught in the better art schools alongside the more traditional skill of draughtsmanship.
It is also unarguably true that some great artists have, by hard work and enormous dedication, achieved the ability to reproduce the three-dimensional world they see onto a two-dimensional surface with extraordinary perceptual skill, so as to make the image appear convincingly accurate, without the use of instrumental aids. Some of Hockney's early paintings show that he was quite competent at that when he wanted to be.
Whether particular artists used optical aids to the full extent hypothesised by Hockney cannot now be known for sure. Nor is the Scientific American article a definitive "debunking" as claimed. It is a contrary opinion as subjective as Hockney's. We shall never know for sure, but the single-minded skilled professional striving for perfection is not something that has appeared only in the last century, and I suspect Hockney's theory, if not 100% correct, is nearer the truth than the denials of his critics.
This book is a fascinating exposition of some of the clever techniques the Old Masters could have used, and probably, in many cases, did use to achieve their extraordinary results. In no way does it denigrate their skills - on the contrary, it shows the amount of study and research needed to become a great artist. If you are interested in the craft of painting, this is required reading.



