I thoroughly enjoyed this book. In it, Peter Biskind examines a host of films from the fifties (and a few from surrounding years), putting them onto the sociological equivalent of an analyst's couch, so to speak. Through the aperture of these movies, all the conflicting social forces that were vying with one another in the U.S. during 1950s can be seen at work: Liberalism versus conservatism, individualism and personal freedom versus community and conformism, expanding opportunities for women versus reactionary antifeminist backlash, and lots more.
For the most part Biskind presents a convincing case that the movies he looks at stake out this or that position on this or that spectrum of conflicting social opinions and trends, but I'm certainly not saying that I agreed with all of his points. A thinking, critical reader is always unlikely to agree with everything they find in an opinion-packed, interpretation-packed book like this one. In particular, I was profoundly unconvinced by Biskind's argument that the 1954 giant-ant movie Them! carried an anti-feminist subtext. But disagreements like this were the exception rather than the rule for me, and in any case I always found his discussions and analyses to be interesting, engaging, and entertaining.
As an example, here's a passage I particularly enjoyed from a section on the James Dean vehicle Rebel Without a Cause (1955): "With its trilogy of sick families, Rebel touches all the bases. Parents are criticized for being too strong and too weak, too authoritarian and too permissive, for being absent when the kids need them and smothering them with affection when they don’t. If it’s bad to treat teen-agers like children, it’s also bad to treat them like adults. In Rebel, parents can’t do anything right."
Quite a bit of the book is devoted to examining gender roles -- how views about these roles were changing during the 50s, and how a range of movies portrayed and commented, either positively or negatively, on this change. The book's evisceration of the savagely anti-feminist Mildred Pierce (1945) was a particular delight for me in the text.
So again, this is a deeply interesting, engaging, and entertaining book!
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Seeing Is Believing: How Hollywood Taught Us to Stop Worrying and Love the Fifties Paperback – September 11, 2000
by
Peter Biskind
(Author)
|
Peter Biskind
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length384 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherHolt Paperbacks
-
Publication dateSeptember 11, 2000
-
Dimensions6.38 x 1.2 x 8.3 inches
-
ISBN-100805065636
-
ISBN-13978-0805065633
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex-Drugs-and-Rock 'N' Roll Generation Saved HollywoodPaperback
Gods and Monsters: Thirty Years of Writing on Film and Culture from One of America's Most Incisive Writers (Nation Books)Paperback
Down and Dirty Pictures: Miramax, Sundance, and the Rise of Independent FilmPaperback
The Sky Is Falling: How Vampires, Zombies, Androids, and Superheroes Made America Great for ExtremismPeter BiskindHardcover
The Godfather Companion: Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About All Three Godfather FilmsPaperback
Before the Deluge: A Portrait of BerlinHardcover
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood: A NovelMass Market Paperback
Make My Day: Movie Culture in the Age of ReaganHardcover
CIty of Nets: A Portrait of Hollywood in the 1940'sPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Nothing escapes Peter Biskind and he is very funny. His book is indispensable reading for anyone interested in American cinema or recent American history."--Michael Wood, author of America in the Movies
"A brilliant and imaginative analysis of the political and sexual crosscurrents of the fifties in the movies."--Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Blood Rites
"A brilliant and imaginative analysis of the political and sexual crosscurrents of the fifties in the movies."--Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Blood Rites
About the Author
Peter Biskind is the author of The Godfather Companion and Easy Riders, Raging Bulls. A contributing editor at Vanity Fair, he has written for The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, and Rolling Stone, among other publications. He lives in New York City.
Start reading Seeing Is Believing on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
New releases
Explore popular titles in every genre and find something you love. See more
Product details
- Publisher : Holt Paperbacks; 1st edition (September 11, 2000)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0805065636
- ISBN-13 : 978-0805065633
- Item Weight : 13.1 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.38 x 1.2 x 8.3 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,815,242 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5,417 in Movie History & Criticism
- #9,100 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- #30,733 in Performing Arts (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
3.9 out of 5 stars
3.9 out of 5
19 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on October 11, 2015
Verified Purchase
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2017
Verified Purchase
While but a segment of his book, Biskind's discussion of 1950s SF has become foundational, whether or not scholars agree with his assertions. More often disagreed with, Biskind's analysis of 1950s film history nonetheless serves as far more than a straw man. Seeing is Believing is a significant work and well worth the time of film genre scholars.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2009
Verified Purchase
I am a big fan of Peter Biskind's Easy Riders, Raging Bulls. That book tells a story of the evolution of film in the 60s and the 70s and who contributed to those changes. Unfortunately, Seeing is Believing tells us less about the evolution of film through the 50s and how it evolved and digs much deeper into more academic film criticism. As Biskind writes in the introduction, "my concern is not so much with the intentions of the filmmakers as with the outcome of the filmmaking process." I interpret this phrase to mean that Biskind is writing about what he sees in the movies, not what the filmmaker intended or what others might see.
Biskind goes from genre to genre and applies the films he reviews to specific liberal and conservative ideological positions he has identified. As he does so, the occasional anecdote about a film is mentioned, but only fleetingly. For example, some movies had their endings changed by the studios. I was interested in hearing more about the changed endings, why they were changed, and what directors fought the changes, then Biskind's discussion of how the ending fits into his ideological spectrum.
One thing that really bothered me was that in discussing The Court Martial of Billy Mitchell, Biskind ignored that the movie was based on true events of the 1920s and was not an entirely Hollywood creation. In excluding that information, Biskind betrays the problem of ignoring the filmmakers in telling us what the film means. Of course, Billy Mitchell can still fit into an interesting ideological discussion of the 1950s. Gary Cooper's decision to play him fits into a broader pattern of playing individualists and why the movie was made when it was could have some relevance. But Biskind does not discuss that context and instead focuses on the ideological categories he has conjured up.
If you liked Easy Riders, Raging Bulls and thought you would check out Biskind's other work, I would save this for last or skip it all together. That said, it did give me a neat list of 50s films to add to my list.
Biskind goes from genre to genre and applies the films he reviews to specific liberal and conservative ideological positions he has identified. As he does so, the occasional anecdote about a film is mentioned, but only fleetingly. For example, some movies had their endings changed by the studios. I was interested in hearing more about the changed endings, why they were changed, and what directors fought the changes, then Biskind's discussion of how the ending fits into his ideological spectrum.
One thing that really bothered me was that in discussing The Court Martial of Billy Mitchell, Biskind ignored that the movie was based on true events of the 1920s and was not an entirely Hollywood creation. In excluding that information, Biskind betrays the problem of ignoring the filmmakers in telling us what the film means. Of course, Billy Mitchell can still fit into an interesting ideological discussion of the 1950s. Gary Cooper's decision to play him fits into a broader pattern of playing individualists and why the movie was made when it was could have some relevance. But Biskind does not discuss that context and instead focuses on the ideological categories he has conjured up.
If you liked Easy Riders, Raging Bulls and thought you would check out Biskind's other work, I would save this for last or skip it all together. That said, it did give me a neat list of 50s films to add to my list.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 23, 2013
Verified Purchase
This is a fascinating, deep dive in the cinema of the 1950s. It is a perfect book to read in the era of streaming movies, because Biskind goes much deeper than the the surface and references many films that younger readers are likely to have missed. I would finish a chapter and set the book aside to stream a film (or two) and then resume reading. It made for a long, but worthwhile read. I feel like I know a lot more about pop culture in the middle of the past century than I did.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 4, 2009
Verified Purchase
Biskind writes about Hollywood like a great screenwriter - keeping the story flowing and building on the insider excitement - at least he does in Easy Riders to Raging Bulls. and Down and Dirty Pictures. Seeing is believing is more of an intellectual dissection of 50's politics with movies as the lab animal. It's fascinating, but not nearly as fun.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 10, 2016
Verified Purchase
The item arrived in a timely manner and as described.
Top reviews from other countries
Michael J. Oldfield
2.0 out of 5 stars
Spare Us The Deep Analysis !
Reviewed in Canada on February 14, 2021Verified Purchase
Any book in which the author spends most of his time showing off his deep intellect is a book which gets very tiresome very quickly. Author Peter Biskind goes on for chapter after chapter discussing whether the films of the 1950's were populist or pluralist in content and what psychological effect they had on their audiences. There were some very interesting films made in the 1950's which reflected on the aftermath of World War Two, changing morals, teenage rebellion and the breakdown in authority. However, author Biskind seems to ignore the effect that these films had on ordinary audiences and instead, dissects them as he looks for hidden meanings in every other scene. Most movie-goers of that era either liked or disliked a film and did not wonder what the Freudian implications of the plot might have been.
Laura
5.0 out of 5 stars
Para una buena lectura
Reviewed in Spain on July 17, 2016Verified Purchase
El libro cumple las exectativas. Ya había leido varios del mismo autor, y este no desmerece, si te gusta el cine y un buen análisis del mismo.
