| Print List Price: | $31.00 |
| Kindle Price: | $0.00 Save $31.00 (100%) |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to See and Shape Ourselves 2014th Edition, Kindle Edition
- Edition2014th
- PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
- Publication dateOctober 2, 2014
- LanguageEnglish
- File size1045 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B00O4CHBKM
- Publisher : Palgrave Macmillan; 2014th edition (October 2, 2014)
- Publication date : October 2, 2014
- Language : English
- File size : 1045 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 111 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #34,196 Free in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #20 in Psychology of Personalities
- #22 in Family & Parenting Literature Guides
- #87 in Media Studies (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

I'm Jill Walker Rettberg, a professor of Digital Culture at the University of Bergen in Norway, and I do research on how people tell stories online.
My new book, "Machine Vision: How Algorithms Change the Way We See the World," will be out on Polity in September 2023, and will be available to purchase in print and as an open access publication digitally.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Rettner's hot linked bibliography is a rabbit hole leading the reader further into the internet labyrinth of machine vision, how the advertisers see us and our illusions of control.
I appreciate, too, that Rettner chose to publish this fine document for free and under a creative commons license--way to subvert the culture of copyright!
The first day I wore my Narrative Clip I fastened it to my shirt at chest
height. Downloading the images at the end of the day, I found dozens
of photos of trees and clouds, some obscured by my long hair partially
covering the camera. The camera had been tilted upwards due to the
angle of my breasts. Looking at the Wikipedia entry for ‘Lifelogging’
I noticed a composite image of four phases of wearable camera from
Steve Mann in the 1980s until today, where the cameras were all worn
on necklaces, by flat chested men in t-shirts. Lifelogging cameras were
designed for people with flat chests, I concluded.
So I tried wearing the camera higher, clipping it to the top of my
shirt’s neckline, almost up by my shoulder, hoping that this would tilt it
to capture more of what I saw when looking straight ahead. The results
weren’t much better, but the device did capture some faces of passersby
in addition to the clouds and trees. I wore it walking to my six-year-old’s
school to pick her up and walking home with her as she cheerfully rode
her scooter beside me. To my disappointment, when I viewed the images,
my daughter was not in any of the photos. Neither did the Narrative Clip
capture any photos of my four-year-old son when I wore the camera
while playing with him at a playground. My children were invisible to
the camera. I tried wearing it clipped to the pocket of my jeans instead,
thinking I just needed to get the camera closer to their height. This time
it did capture a couple of blurry photographs of the backs of my kids’
heads as they shot off ahead of me on their scooters. But the photos from
the playground itself were mostly of the clouds again, because when I
sat down to watch the kids play the camera, still fastened to the front
pocket of my jeans, tilted upwards. After the playground we went to a
café, and there the camera captured its hitherto clearest images of people.
Unfortunately, the people captured were the people at the table next to
ours, people I had barely noticed at the time. The next day, I walked with
my daughter again, and we sat down to eat our lunch, happening to sit
across from a large advertisement pasted to the brick wall. My Narrative
Clip captured several photos of the model’s face, and its facial recognition
algorithms marked this as an important moment, making the ad the cover image for the series of photos from that afternoon. Later,
my daughter wore the camera during her ballet class. Even there, with
mirrors covering the walls and the camera clipped to the chest of her
leotard, at the same height as the other children, almost all the images
were of the ceiling, or her long hair falling in front of the lens, or the
back of another child’s head.
Clearly, the Narrative Clip doesn’t record my subjectively memorable
moments. It doesn’t even record what I see: in fact, the ‘best’ images – such
as those of the people at the table next to ours at the café or the photo of
the advertisement pasted on the wall – are photos of people and things
that were outside of my field of vision or that I had quickly dismissed
as unimportant. Strikingly, my children were almost completely erased
from my life as envisioned by the Narrative Clip. That is certainly not the
intention of the camera. On the contrary, their marketing videos show
parents capturing everyday moments with children. The Narrative Clip photographs indiscriminately. A photo is taken
every 30 seconds no matter what is in the frame.






