The Self and Its Brain 1st Edition

by Karl Raimund Popper (Author), John C. Eccles (Author)

22 ratings

John C. Eccles
12
Paperback
$37.93 List: $46.95 (19% off)
Get it as soon as Monday, Jul 11
FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon

Products related to this item
Sponsored Hide feedback

Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1

Feedback

Steven E. Koonin

3,583

Hardcover

$18.99
FREE delivery: Monday, July 11 on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon.
Feedback

Benedict Anderson

652

Paperback

$13.17
FREE delivery: Monday, July 11 on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon.
Feedback

Robert Lanza

990

Paperback

$12.69
FREE delivery: Monday, July 11 on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon.
Feedback

Milton Friedman

A new edition with prefaces by Friedman, and a new foreword by Binyamin Appelbaum, lead economics writer for the New York Times editorial board.

1,808

Paperback

$15.14
FREE delivery: Monday, July 11 on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon.
Feedback

Edmund Burke

444

Paperback

$9.20
FREE delivery: Monday, July 11 on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon.
Feedback

Immanuel Kant

17

Paperback

$27.91
FREE delivery: Monday, July 11

Start reading The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism instantly on your Kindle Fire or on the free Kindle apps for iPad, Android tablet, PC or Mac. Don't have a free Kindle app? Get yours here

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Springer Verlag; 1st edition (October 1, 1977)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 597 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0387083073
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0387083070
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 2.5 pounds

Best Sellers Rank: #515,157 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #666 in Neuroscience (Books)
- #1,658 in Philosophy (Books)
- #3,607 in Medical General Psychology

Customer Reviews:
22 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload video

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Karl Raimund Popper
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
See more on the author's page
John C. Eccles
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
See more on the author's page

Products related to this item
Sponsored Hide feedback

Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1

Customer reviews

5 star		70%
4 star		9%
3 star		9%
2 star		3%
1 star		9%

How customer reviews and ratings work

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Todd Kliendienst

Popper is good for your mind

Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2015

Verified Purchase

Popper, who may in this century, rightfully become known as one of the greatest philosophers of all time, is a pleasure to read. Reading him really is good for your mind. He writes clearly and intelligently about a wide range of knowledge fields. His mixture of cosmology, evolution, epistemology, humanism, critical rationalism and psychology produces a unique philosophy that may well be a key part of the solution to the problems humanity is facing in the 21st century. Read this guy yourself, don't trust academic philosopher's assessments of his work. He is not widely known because his work has been so poorly accounted for by intellectuals. This may be because, as William Bartley the American philosopher one said, if Popper is on the right track, then most professional philosophers in the modern era, wasted their careers.

6 people found this helpful

Helpful

Martin Stein

Amazing book.

Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2022

Verified Purchase

What a classic. Must read.

Helpful

Born to Lose

A classic and actual book in the mind-body problem

Reviewed in the United States on September 4, 2010

Verified Purchase

Popper does not need any presentation, nor any apologetics. I just pretend to say a few words about this impressive book under the prism of the current mind-body philosophy.

I asked to my professor of mind-body philosophy if I could study Popper, and he told me "no, no, he is too complicated with his 3 worlds theory". Instead, he wanted me to study Kim Jaegwon, the hey day mind-body philosopher. I did it, but Kim represents a very narrow philosophy, in my opinion. Finally, I went to Popper, and I feel like home. I tell you why. Excellent and plain prose, focusing on the central problems from the very beginning, and impressive understanding of vast regions of knowledge, Popper does not hesitate in emitting a judgment about a certain theory, a humanistic thought.

His opponents will say that is a personal book, somehow oldie, overcome by recent books. But I don't agree. You will find in Popper a sound critic of: materialism as the deafault position in mind-body philosophy; a very interesting critic to the identity theory; interesting thought and critics about philosophical reduction; why does not help to equate minds to computers; how we are to understand correctly perception; etc. All this critics are still very pertinent to current mind-body philosophy. Popper is all the time offering arguments: I don't like that argument because of that; I like it because of that; that's my argument in defence of my position, etc. (Compare it with the ugly and difficult prose of Kim, for instance, where you are to find arguments camouflaged in a vegetation of long dissertations on history and ontology, whatever this words my be.)

On the other hand, Popper offers also his positive solution, a very interesting one which, I believed, needs to be considered carefully and with sympathy.

37 people found this helpful

Helpful

Tomás

Fantastic read, if a little dense

Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2016

Verified Purchase

I thought consciousness was a mystery, but Popper clears it up before the half-way point of this book. Fantastic read, if a little dense.

One person found this helpful

Helpful

Masayoshi Ishida

This book is still valuable when considering the body-mind problem!

Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2011

Verified Purchase

Obviously I do not have to mention the structure of this very old thick book first published in 1977. It seems that this book on the body-mind problem is already a classical one and almost fading out of the mind, or more appropriately, out of the brain, of current mainstream neuroscientists. The ideas of these dualist authors appear not favorable to the following authors, for example:
(1) Daniel Dennett in his book "Consciousness Explained (1991)" rejected the idea of Dualism from the start of his book based on the first law of thermodynamics: the law of conservation of energy.
(2) In his book "The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul (1994)," Francis Crick cited this classical book only in the further reading list, saying: "I myself have little sympathy with either of their points of view. They would probably say the same of mine."
(3) No reference to this classical book in Antonio Damasio's recent two books of (1) Descartes' Error (1994), and (2) Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain (2010).
I would like to mention only one point which was discussed in the dialogs of the two authors (in Dialog X) in the last part of the book: Would the dualistic idea of theirs violate the first law of thermodynamics: the law of conservation of energy?
In the history of physics there were times when the violation of the law was suspected by physicists. The examples cited by the authors are: (1) on the occasion of the discovery of electro-magnetism after the establishment of Newtonian mechanics, (2) in the process of radioactive beta-decay of nucleus before the discovery of neutron and the theoretical hypothesis of neutrino in the 1930s. These suspicions were eventually removed based on the development of novel physical theories.
Based on these historical facts and also referring to the physicist E.P. Wigner's idea, the philosopher Popper says "I think that this is only to say, in a different way, that physics is open to something as yet unknown." Popper's idea is that the physical dimension (World 1 in their terms) would be open to World 2 (the world of subjective experiences), though he never says that World 2 belongs to some non-physical dimensions. The two authors discussed further the interaction between Worlds 1 & 2, which might violate the law of conservation of energy, possibly in such a very minuscule amount as being difficult to detect.

Now, what I, just a curious reader of this book, wonder is that why all these scientists and philosophers do not mention the problem of "soul": does it have a physical weight, something like the amount 21 g? Or I should scientifically put it as follows: Is there really an unaccountable energy balance in the life-to-death transitions of human? If the 21 g (one of the reported four missing weights) is confirmed authentic, this means that the cherished law of conservation of energy is violated in the transition! I repeat the simple question: why don't they mention this problem? One may say that the experiment conducted by Dr. Duncan MacDougall published in 1907 is not any scientific experiment at all, but it was a scientifically uncontrolled sloppy one. Was it really so? Although physics Prof. Robert L. Park states in his book (Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science (2008)) to the effect that the missing weights are the result of MacDougall's wishful thinking and superstitious nonsense, no scientist has ever "scientifically" either refuted or confirmed the missing weights. Rather, recently a paper was published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2010 Spring Issue (Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 5-39: Rebuttal to Claimed Refutations of Duncan MacDougall's Experiment on Human Weight Change at the Moment of Death. [This Vol.24/No.1 is on sale at amazon.com.]), which supports MacDougall's experiment being scientifically sound on a basis of theoretical simulations of the weighing experiment.

9 people found this helpful

Helpful

Amazon Customer

Three Stars

Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2017

Verified Purchase

It arrived in a good situation

Reviewed in the United States on June 17, 2013

Verified Purchase

As a Popperian I have always admired him and will adhere to his philosophy throughout my life. I have been more than happy to read him and I am proud of being a contemporary of him.

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Patrick S Mahan

great book

Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2014

Verified Purchase

definitive work, still relevant, raises good questions still unanswered, offers an entirely amazing theory, - must read for all those interested in consciousness

Helpful

The Self and Its Brain 1st Edition

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Products related to this item
Sponsored Hide feedback

Product details

About the authors

Karl Raimund Popper

John C. Eccles

Products related to this item
Sponsored Hide feedback

Customer reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Top reviews from other countries

The Self and Its Brain 1st Edition

Sorry, there was a problem.

Sorry, there was a problem.

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Product details

Videos

About the authors

Karl Raimund Popper

John C. Eccles

Customer reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Top reviews from other countries