Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-41% $11.22$11.22
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$9.99$9.99
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Driftwood West
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Self-Editing for Fiction Writers, Second Edition: How to Edit Yourself Into Print Paperback – April 13, 2004
Purchase options and add-ons
Hundreds of books have been written on the art of writing. Here at last is a book by two professional editors to teach writers the techniques of the editing trade that turn promising manuscripts into published novels and short stories.
In this completely revised and updated second edition, Renni Browne and Dave King teach you, the writer, how to apply the editing techniques they have developed to your own work. Chapters on dialogue, exposition, point of view, interior monologue, and other techniques take you through the same processes an expert editor would go through to perfect your manuscript. Each point is illustrated with examples, many drawn from the hundreds of books Browne and King have edited.
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateApril 13, 2004
- Dimensions8.1 x 5.4 x 0.7 inches
- ISBN-109780060545697
- ISBN-13978-0060545697
"Layla" by Colleen Hoover for $7.19
From #1 New York Times bestselling author Colleen Hoover comes a novel that explores life after tragedy and the enduring spirit of love. | Learn more
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Get to know this book
What's it about?
This book teaches writers how to apply editing techniques to their own work, covering topics such as dialogue, exposition, point of view, and interior monologue.
Popular highlight
You don’t want to give your readers information. You want to give them experiences.1,539 Kindle readers highlighted this
Popular highlight
So when you come across an explanation of a character’s emotion, simply cut the explanation. If the emotion is still shown, then the explanation wasn’t needed. If the emotion isn’t shown, rewrite the passage so that it is.1,176 Kindle readers highlighted this
Popular highlight
A good rule of thumb is to give your readers only as much background information, or history, or characterization, as they need at any given time.893 Kindle readers highlighted this
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Inside Flap
From the Back Cover
Hundreds of books have been written on the art of writing. Here at last is a book by two professional editors to teach writers the techniques of the editing trade that turn promising manuscripts into published novels and short stories.
In this completely revised and updated second edition, Renni Browne and Dave King teach you, the writer, how to apply the editing techniques they have developed to your own work. Chapters on dialogue, exposition, point of view, interior monologue, and other techniques take you through the same processes an expert editor would go through to perfect your manuscript. Each point is illustrated with examples, many drawn from the hundreds of books Browne and King have edited.
About the Author
Renni Browne, once senior editor for William Morrow and other companies, left mainstream publishing in 1980 to found The Editorial Department, a national book-editing company.
Dave King is a contributing editor at Writer's Digest. He also works as an independent editor in his home in rural Ashfield, Massachusetts.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Self-Editing for Fiction Writers, Second Edition
By Browne, RenniHarperResource
ISBN: 0060545690Chapter One
Show and Tell
What's wrong with this paragraph?:The conversation was barely begun before I discovered that our host was more than simply a stranger to most of his guests. He was an enigma, a mystery. And this was a crowd that doted on mysteries. In the space of no more than five minutes, I heard several different people put forth theirtheories -- all equally probable or preposterous -- as to who and what he was. Each theory was argued with the conviction that can only come from a lack of evidence, and it seemed that, for many of the guests, these arguments were the main reason toattend his parties.
In a sense, of course, there's nothing wrong. The paragraphis grammatically impeccable, and it describes the mystery surrounding the party's host clearly, efficiently, andwith a sense of style.
Now look at the same passage as it actually appeared inF. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby:
"I like to come," Lucille said. "I never care what Ido, so I always have a good time. When I was here last,I tore my gown on a chair, and he asked me my nameand address -- within a week I got a package fromCroirier's with a new evening gown in it."
"Did you keep it?" asked Jordan.
"Sure I did. I was going to wear it tonight, but itwas too big in the bust and had to be altered. It was gasblue with lavender beads. Two hundred and sixty-fivedollars."
"There's something funny about a fellow that'll do athing like that," said the other girl eagerly. "He doesn'twant any trouble with anybody."
"Who doesn't?" I inquired.
"Gatsby. Somebody told me -- "
The two girls and Jordan leaned togetherconfidentially.
"Somebody told me they thought he killed a man."A thrill passed over all of us. The three Mr.Mumbles bent forward and listened eagerly.
"I don't think it's so much that," argued Lucilleskeptically; "it's more that he was a German spy duringthe war."
One of the men nodded in confirmation.
"I heard that from a man who knew all about him, grew up with him in Germany," he assured uspositively.
"Oh, no," said the first girl, "it couldn't be that,because he was in the American army during the war."As our credulity switched back to her, she leanedforward with enthusiasm. "You look at him sometimeswhen he thinks nobody's looking at him. I'll bet hekilled a man."
What's the difference between these two examples? Toput it simply, it's a matter of showing and telling. The firstversion is narrative summary, with no specific settings orcharacters. We are simply told about the guests' love of mystery,the weakness of their arguments, the conviction of thearguers. In the second version we actually get to see thebreathless partygoers putting forth their theories and canalmost taste the eagerness of their audience. The first versionis a secondhand report. The second is an immediatescene.
What, exactly, makes a scene a scene? For one thing ittakes place in real time. Your readers watch events as theyunfold, whether those events are a group discussion of themerits of Woody Allen films, a lone man running from anassassin, or a woman lying in a field pondering the meaningof life. In scenes, events are seen as they happen rather thandescribed after the fact. Even flashbacks show events as theyunfold, although they have unfolded in the past within thecontext of the story.
Scenes usually have settings as well, specific locations thereaders can picture. In Victorian novels these settings were"I heard that from a man who knew all about him, often described in exhaustive (and exhausting) detail.Nowadays literature is leaner and meaner, and it's often agood idea to give your readers just enough detail to jumpstarttheir imaginations so they can picture your settings forthemselves.
Scenes also contain some action, something that happens.Mary kills Harry, or Harry and Mary beat each otherup. More often than not, what happens is dialogue betweenone or more characters. Though even in dialogue scenes it'sa good idea to include a little physical action from time totime -- what we call "beats" -- to remind your readers ofwhere your characters are and what they're doing. We'll betalking about beats at length in chapter 8.
Of course, anything that can go into a scene can also benarrated. And since scenes are usually harder to write thannarration, many writers rely too heavily on narrative summaryto tell their stories. The result is often page after page,sometimes chapter after chapter, of writing that reads theway the first passage quoted above reads: clearly, perhapseven stylishly, but with no specific setting, no specific characters,no dialogue.
A century or so ago this sort of writing would have beenfine. It was the norm, in fact -- Henry James wrote at leastone entire novel composed largely of narrative summary.But thanks to the influence of movies and television, readerstoday have become accustomed to seeing a story as a seriesof immediate scenes. Narrative summary no longer engagesreaders the way it once did.
Since engagement is exactly what a fiction writer wantsto accomplish, you're well advised to rely heavily on imme-diate scenes to put your story across. You want to draw yourreaders into the world you've created, make them feel a partof it, make them forget where they are. And you can't dothis effectively if you tell your readers about your world secondhand. You have to take them there.
We once worked on a novel featuring a law firm in whichone of the new associates led a rebellion against the seniorpartners. The writer introduced the new associate and twoof his colleagues in the first chapter by describing their jobinterviews with senior partners. The interviews were given asnarrative summary -- she simply told her readers what thelaw firm was looking for in a new associate ...
Continues...Excerpted from Self-Editing for Fiction Writers, Second Editionby Browne, Renni Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- ASIN : 0060545690
- Publisher : William Morrow Paperbacks; Subsequent edition (April 13, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780060545697
- ISBN-13 : 978-0060545697
- Item Weight : 7.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 8.1 x 5.4 x 0.7 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #17,839 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #7 in Editing Writing Reference (Books)
- #10 in Authorship Reference
- #43 in Fiction Writing Reference (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book packed with examples and exercises, and appreciate the fresh clarity in showing versus telling. They also say it's worth every minute, with an appealing sense of humor. Opinions differ on the writing style, with some finding it slyly, hoarse, and garishly written, while others find it practically unreadable and inane.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book packed with examples and exercises, and say it's an excellent manual for anyone likely to find themselves in the role. They say it provides great information to look for in self-editing your own books. Customers also say it gives them a stronger understanding of the editing process and helps them create. They also say the simplest suggestions are the best, and it enriches the stories submitted. Readers also mention that the book covers common problems with point of view, character, dialogue, and practical tips.
"I found, and am using the advice in this book to be one of the most helpful I have ever read...." Read more
"...This book has a ton of fantastic information in it. I absolutely recommend it. But… take some of their opinions with a grain of salt...." Read more
"...Written by seasoned professionals, it covers common problems with point of view, character, dialogue, narration and interior monolog and gives..." Read more
"...put in his own books simply because it's condensed into a short, easily readable, book without an ounce of BS in it anywhere...." Read more
Customers find the book worth every minute, an exceptional resource, and a great investment for aspiring writers. They also say it lives up to its best-selling status.
"...This book is especially valuable for those who are pursuing publication, as (so it's said) the publishing houses don't edit like they used to...." Read more
"...Excellent. The book is certainly worth reading, but I am concerned they missed the forest for the trees in certain places...." Read more
"...the difference (and value) of both showing and telling are worth the price of the volume, and I can attest to more than one recent project in which..." Read more
"...Writers, Second Edition" by Renni Browne and Dave King is an exceptional resource that caters to both novice and experienced writers...." Read more
Customers find the humor in the book appealing, interesting, and contemporary. They also say the tone of the book is interesting and the use of examples is good.
"...They're not writers, although their prose is always spot-on, humorous, never condescending if sometimes stinging..." Read more
"...The authors' humor was dry and delicious. Excercises were challenging and benefitial, but beware instructions. I sometimes took them too literally...." Read more
"...It will put you on a fast track to good, contemporary writing. Believe me, your editor will love you for it." Read more
"...is because I thought the writer's at times came across as haughty and arrogant in calling some writer's 'hacks.'..." Read more
Customers find the book short, concise, and not overly wordy. They also say it's to the point.
"...Each excerpt is just long enough to illustrate the point being discussed -- there's no filler...." Read more
"...The length of the book is fine, and the authors have not stretched it too much, unlike how some other authors in this genre do...." Read more
"...Some of the simplest suggestions were the best – short sentences, 3 paragraphs to a page, use “said” almost every time a character speaks, try to..." Read more
"...If I had one complaint about this book, it would be its length...." Read more
Customers find the book helpful for narrative nonfiction, as it goes into dialogue, how to write sophisticated sentences, characters, and detail. They also appreciate the pointers on style and developing their own unique voice.
"...and interior monolog and gives pointers on style and developing your own unique voice...." Read more
"...all the basics and has examples of every concept, plus question-and-answer activities...." Read more
"...And then it also includes some well narrated sections on pace, sound, voice, beat and other components of the writing craft that cannot be addressed..." Read more
"Very glad I got this - the section on dialogue was excellent (haven't read the rest yet), I learned a lot about the punctuation side of the things,..." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the writing style. Some find it garishly, grammatically correct, and to-the-point. They also say it covers everything and gives the artist a slightly different perspective. However, others say it's practically unreadable, the captions under the illustrations are handwritten so sloppily, and the finished manuscript is not perfect.
"...' as used above are grammatically correct and express the action clearly and unambiguously...." Read more
"...Bloated, confusing, tedious, and (for this reader) practically unreadable. All that fat the editor cut turned a bad book into a great one...." Read more
"...view, character, dialogue, narration and interior monolog and gives pointers on style and developing your own unique voice...." Read more
"...1: formidably, physically, harshly, impressively, slyly, hoarsely, garishly, delicately, perfectly, mockingly, sadly, fiercely, strongly, shrewdly,..." Read more
Reviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book highlights what really are some of the most obvious fallacies a writer can make and it does it in the most poignant of ways. Everything they say is in the simplest terms. No bushes are being beaten and they don't cut any writer any slack. Chances are, your manuscript has at least three of the fatal errors outlined in this book. At the very least. More likely, it has nearly all of them. I'm unashamed to say that the latter is me, to one extent or another.
Probably one of the greatest things to come out of this book is the acronym R.U.E., Resist the Urge to Explain. This carries over in multiple chapters, from reiterating explanation in dialogue to redundant points being made and back again. I found that a common theme in many of the editing points they make boils down to over-explaining. Writers want to press the point so badly, and make sure the reader understands exactly what they're saying that that they'll flog the dead horse explaining it. Often the author, usually subconsciously, doesn't trust the reader to get it so important points are reiterated at the expense of the reader's intelligence.
As I write my fanfiction (yes, I write fanfiction) I'm more conscious of writing mistakes that I knew I shouldn't be making but it's something I need to re-reference in the book. For example, using dialogue tags such as "she said as she twirled her hair around her finger" are markedly amateurish. This is actually one of the points in the book I have the hardest time with. I get it but if the action is relevant, I don't see how it can weaken the writing. Here's a little further explanation on this from a comment I made on the original post--
. . . Chapter 11, Sophistication. According to the authors, "Both the 'as' construction and the '-ing construction' as used above are grammatically correct and express the action clearly and unambiguously. But notice that both of these constructions take a bit of action ("She pulled off her gloves") and tuck it away into a dependent clause ("Pulling off her gloves . . ."). This tends to place some of your action at one remove from your reader, to make the actions seem incidental, unimportant. If you use these constructions often, you weaken your writing.
The two examples they gave are, "Pulling off her gloves, she turned to face him" and "As she pulled off her gloves, she turned to face him."
They then go on to say-"We're not suggesting that you avoid these phrases altogether. There are going to be times when you want to write about two actions that are actually simultaneous and/or genuinely incidental-actions that deserve more than a dependent clause. And given the choice between an 'as' or '-ing' construction and a belabored, artificial alternative, you're well advised to use the 'as' or '-ing.' But be aware that hacks have long ago run these useful constructions into the ground. Learn to spot them in your own writing and, if you see more than one or two a page, start hunting around for alternatives."
This is the second to last chapter so most of the points made in this one and the following are more about fine-tuning the work after all the other stuff has been fleshed out. The authors are crazy adamant about eliminating hacks (I can't count how many times they repeat the word) so any style common in hack writing, they've pounced on. So it's not that it's wrong, it's just more of an easy, lazy way out. And I know I'm guilty a hundred times over, at least.
I still have the most trouble with that one and I'm more inclined to think they've just seen that technique used so much in writing that they want to see alternatives. Too much of anything is bad technique but I think this is the only borderline point they made.
I also see flaws in works that I read, ones that I didn't see before, especially in web serials, because of this book. I bite my tongue, of course, because I'm not these people's editor and it's much more than just an improperly punctuated sentence but this book has made me so much more aware of others' flaws as well as my own weaknesses.
For instance, I'm getting better at spotting redundant text in writing but that's still very hard for me. My eyes see someone making a point, not beating me over the head with it. That's another chapter I need to read again (as if I'm not going to read all of them again, right?) because I want to soak in all the information, make sure I'm getting it right and apply it to my own work. I want to recognize the redundancies, not just on a small scale but a much larger one in order to make my book better.
It comes with learning to be a better editor that the ability to look at works more for fun kind of starts to fade. It becomes harder and harder to turn that editor off and just read, especially after reading a book like this. I just have to keep telling myself to shut up and read because I like the story. But I think that's a small price to pay in order to make my work that much better. I can chain the inner editor up when I'm not using her, even though I might be able to hear her screams but I'd rather have that than no inner editor and novels that should never see the light of day.
So if you want to edit, you want to do it well, do it right and make your manuscript as good as it can be, pick up this book. I've even made it super easy for you. You don't even need to leave your seat. Just go to my Amazon widget to the right and click until you find the book and buy it. I promise you, you won't regret it.
Really, there's a reason why every writer I've met, both in person and over the internet, recommends this book to edit their novels. Just remember, these are not hard and fast rules. Keeping to them too strictly will just result in sterile writing and you don't want that. Listen to your own judgment and make the call based on that.
There are, however, a few things that made me full-on cringe. I should have done a search for the word “hack” before I posted this review, because I’m pretty sure it’s the most repeated noun in the whole book. Considering the authors’ cautions against repetition, I can only see it as painfully ironic that they didn’t follow their own advice. The first two or three times I saw the word, I didn’t really have an issue with it, but by the 70 percent mark, it was ceasing to look like a real word anymore. Every time I read it, it turned into a mustached bald guy sitting behind a desk yelling “hack, hack, hack!” in a voice that sounded like the short guy who tries to poison Westley in The Princess Bride.
Also, the advice regarding sex scenes is so out of touch with the romance market, that I legitimately feel bad for anyone who tries to use it. They want writers to shy away from descriptions of action because in their opinion, people are just inured to sex any more. It’s so PATENTLY against what actual sales figures show that it’s going to hurt a romance writer’s bottom line to follow their advice.
They want writers to pattern their sex scenes a la Margaret Mitchell. There is a euphemism and fade to black market. Absolutely… but in the greater majority of romance sales, and what the romance community calls “spicy” books, that kind of thing will literally change your genre. And the fact that they quite literally encourage writers to write a la Gone With the Wind even if they are writing books titled “Lust Motel” (in the authors’ words) just tells me they do not understand the genre. At all.
If you actually want to improve sex scene writing, read Diana Gabaldon’s book “I Give You My Body”.
This book has a ton of fantastic information in it. I absolutely recommend it. But… take some of their opinions with a grain of salt. Some of it is their personal taste wrapped up and presented as pure fact.
Top reviews from other countries
A lot of it will be stuff you already know—create an ebbing and flowing rhythm between Showing and Telling; write your expositions in your POV character’s voice; Show emotion rather than explaining; use action ‘beat’s in your scenes and dialogue; use dialogue and interior monologue to portray your characters; Tell about setting in action and dialogue; don’t give us all the answers to the questions all at once; go easy on the speaker and thinker attributions; don’t use two characters or two scenes to do the work of one.
I’ve read this stuff many times, but it does not hurt to go over it once again. And each chapter ends with a few useful exercises where Browne and King show how editing looks in practice. (I would have liked even more)
Certain chapters, in particular Proportion and Sophistication, taught me things I did not know.
Proportion deals with identifying the main import of what you are writing. I’m often suggesting, in novels I edit, that authors should have no more than one or two beautiful metaphors or highly descriptive adverbs or adjectives per page. But it’s not a question of quantity, but rather of quality. Don’t go on and on, waxing lyrical with beautiful metaphors, about things which aren’t very important in the grand scheme of things. If plot developments are minor, they may not be worth a scene. If you spend time and energy establishing a state of mind, make sure it makes a difference, a turning point in their life.
Dialogue, mechanics and style are things you must develop as your writing matures. But some tips were a revelation to me. We should limit ‘doing x, she did y’ and ‘as she did x, she did y’ sentence structures, and don’t use adverbs. Instead, reframing them using dynamic verbs in action or dialogue. Instead of ‘you cretin, she said angrily, setting the cup down’, write ‘‘You cretin’. She slammed the cup down.’
Above all, read it out loud. Highlight in yellow passages that make you say, ‘ah, yes’, and those that don’t, edit.
Knowing what the work of an editor entails has made me a much better writer! Personally, I will still hire someone to edit my book but self-editing it first will make their job easier so that they can focus on the things I might have missed.
If you're a language nerd (like me) and want to self-edit your book you should DEFINITELY read this book first!!













