Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
A Separate Peace Mass Market Paperback – January 1, 1966
- Print length196 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherDELTA
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1966
Similar items that may ship from close to you
It was only long after that I recognized sarcasm as the protest of people who are weak.Highlighted by 1,896 Kindle readers
If you broke the rules, then they broke you. That, I think, was the real point of the sermon on this first morning.Highlighted by 1,012 Kindle readers
Everything at Devon slowly changed and slowly harmonized with what had gone before.Highlighted by 888 Kindle readers
Product details
- ASIN : B000PCB5WK
- Publisher : DELTA (January 1, 1966)
- Language : English
- Mass Market Paperback : 196 pages
- Item Weight : 6.4 ounces
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

John Knowles, who died in 2001, was a graduate of Phillips Exeter Academy and Yale University, as well as a recipient of the William Faulkner Award and the Rosenthal Award of the National Institute of Arts and Letters.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images

-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
First, I'm middle class. I'm middle-aged and white woman. I've never lived at a prep school. Therefore, the setting was intriguing. I'm discovering that I'm very interested in WWII, so the time period was fascinating. Those two elements would of hooked me anyway, but the story of a friendship gone awry in one boy's mind and the other boy oblivious (although he lived with the quiet introvert) to tensions. That they are 16 years old and given to peer pressure is a given, but there is nothing raw and dirty. Snowball fights, Blitzball games, Olympics. Who led the way? The oblivious friend, Finny.
This is almost a total ode to Finny and his way of looking at the world. Finny was an athletic charmer and he charmed students, faculty with his incessant talking in such round-a-bout ways that even when he is off-topic he comes back to the original thought and ever so Finny way. You cannot help but like him.
Finny is impulsive and brave. The senior class use a tree to jump off into the river. Finny and his roommate go along with other boys. Finny bravely jumps off into the deep part of the river. This sums up Finny. He asks others to do, but he'll do it himself, first. The branch is high off the ground and has lots of land under it. You have to leap into the river or come to serious harm.
While that is said there is another story. Young men going to war. They are a year away from enlistment and the US is at fever pitch. War preparation: materials, young men in senior class is pressed into this book. Shoved. Contaminates peace of mind. The boys know they have a little over a year to face possible death at the hands of two possible enemies. As the book comes to a close you read about how they work to stay out of the front lines. They do not want death. Life.
Therefore, Finny constructs his world in NOW and the narrator, roommate, always joins in. Always. The storyteller walked in good shoes threw slush and mud to find the tree. He was forced out of his shell around Finny and even 15 years later Finny goads him to be not careful. His over concentration on Finny's character is what led to the book to be penned. He had to come gripes with the fact that Finny had no malice while he himself held malice toward Finny. He shook the branch that Finny stood on because he hate Finny and did not trust him. He has to live with ending Finny's athletic career and later life. After he does this disputable thing he tries once to tell his roommate that he shook the tree limb on purpose, but Finny cannot believe this.
War presses on and comes close. Finally, its their senior year and Finny is still roommates with the boy telling the story. He's still oblivious to the cruel nature of man, but the storyteller cannot live with himself. And, then Finny creates this grand story about the wars being fake run by rich men all-the-while Finny is applying for places in the forces which turn him down due to his shattered leg. A neighbor boy, Brinker, brings both of them to the auditorium and questions both of them about the incident that left Finny crippled. Other have questions about how someone so good at sport could lose his balance on the limb.
War is dripping. Enlistments are told and flashes of the war are told. So, at the time of questioning war is also the time of questioning how Finny got hurt. John Knowles just intertwines these threads tightly. A vice grip comes to head and Finny curses the puppet court and walks out, but falls.
The boys talk honestly and then you find out Finny died while the leg was being set. Bone marrow clotting.
Devastating. I knew the end was close. I had a few pages, but I miss Finny. His lightness and his inability to hold malice.
You know darkness can be illuminated and I think the narrator of this story is so dark and cold, but with Finny's closeness he seems less remote and less human.
Worth a re-read.
Set in 1942, intellectual Gene and athletic Phineas are best friends. They are having a great summer at school until a tragic accident. How will these two friends move forward? I had never read this book and was surprised by the story. I don’t want to ruin it for anyone else.
I liked the deep look at friendship and at bullying in this novel as it related to the different boys at the school. It was interesting to me to also look at how often there is a dominate friend and how does that impact your friendship? It was a good coming of age story that looked at male bonding, friendship, jealousy, and betrayal.
This was a quick and thoughtful read that is interesting to discuss. I really liked that it was set as a reflection of a man in the future looking back at the events that happened that summer and how they shaped him. I thought the setting was fascinating as it was set in 1942 as this generation saw their friends graduate and go off to war.
My edition had a great afterward as well as good questions for a book club. We went over some of the selections during our meeting.
I did not read this in high school or college, but I think it would be a great book to read in high school. Although set in a different time period, it involves teenagers and would be more relatable than many of the classic books I read in high school.
Favorite Quotes:
“Nothing endures, not a tree, not love, not even a death by violence.”
“All of them, all except Phineas, constructed at infinite cost to themselves these Maginot Lines against this enemy they thought they saw across the frontier, this enemy who never attached that way – if he ever attacked at all; if he was indeed the enemy.”
Book Source: Purchased from Amazon.com
Top reviews from other countries
The school and landscape are described vividly, as are the characters , immediately drawing you in.
I was not prepared for the ‘event’ that was the focus of the book. This event, and the consequences of it, linger on in every page thereafter, reminding us that split second decisions can shape the rest of yours, and others, lives.
Although this seems to be reviewed as a teenage read I think it is just as much an adult book. One of the main characters is telling the story as an adult, with the insight and hindsight that mature reflection brings.
I would definitely recommend this book. It is quick to read, is thought provoking and beautifully written.
En general me agradó la novela como la posible metáfora que el autor quiere dar a entender, pero no es mi fav.

















