Buy new:
$50.67$50.67
$3.99
delivery:
June 7 - 13
Ships from: TruFlair95 Sold by: TruFlair95
Buy used: $11.47
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers Paperback – Bargain Price, May 7, 2002
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $37.69 | — |
- Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 4 million more titles $11.99 to buy -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial - Hardcover
$9.05 - $18.771 New from $19.00 - Paperback
$50.674 Used from $10.27 2 New from $50.67 - MP3 CD
$37.692 New from $37.69
Purchase options and add-ons
Winner of the William James Book Award
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherMariner Books
- Publication dateMay 7, 2002
- Dimensions6 x 0.69 x 9 inches
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Lowest Pricein this set of products
The Memory Illusion: Remembering, Forgetting, and the Science of False MemoryDr. Julia ShawPaperback - Most purchased | Highest ratedin this set of products
Make It Stick: The Science of Successful LearningHardcover
The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual AbuseDr. Elizabeth LoftusPaperback
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B003IWYK30
- Publisher : Mariner Books (May 7, 2002)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- Item Weight : 0.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.69 x 9 inches
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
(How the Mind Forgets and Remembers)
Daniel L. Schacter
Chair of Harvard University's Department of Psychology
Quotes from the book:
... memory's malfunctions can be divided into seven fundamental transgressions or "sins," which I call transience, absent-mindedness, blocking, misattribution, suggestibility, bias, and persistence. Just like the ancient seven deadly sins, the memories sins occur frequently in everyday life and can have serious consequences for all of us.
Transients, absent mindedness, and blocking our sins of omission: we failed to bring to mind a desired fact event or idea. Transience refers to a weakening or loss of memory over time. Absent-mindedness involves a breakdown at the interface between attention and memory.... Blocking, entails a thwarted search for information that we may be desperately trying to retrieve.
The sin of misattribution involves assigning of memory to a wrong source: mistaking fantasy for reality, or incorrectly remembering that a friend told you a bit of trivia that you actually read about in a newspaper. Misattribution is far more common than most people realize, and has both potentially profound implications in legal settings. The related sin of suggestibility refers to memories that are implanted as a result of leading questions, comments, or suggestions when a person is trying to recall up a past experience. Like misattribution, suggestibility is especially relevant to -- and sometimes can wreck havoc within -- the legal system.
The sin of bias reflects the powerful influences of our current knowledge and beliefs on how we remember our pasts. We often edit or entirely rewrite our previous experiences -- unknowingly and unconsciously -- in light of what we now know or believe. The result can be a skewed rendering of a specific incident, or even expanded. In our lives, which says more about how we feel now than about how what happened then.
The seventh sin -- persistence -- entails repeated recall of disturbing information or events that we would prefer to banish from our minds altogether: remembering what we cannot forget, even though we wish that we could.
People incorrectly claim -- often with great confidence -- having experienced events that have not happened. ... is there a way to tell the difference between true and false memories?
... we tend to think of memories as snapshots from family albums that, if stored properly, could be retrieved in precisely the same condition in which they were put away. But we now know that we do not record our experiences the way the camera records them. Our memories work differently. We extract key elements from our experiences and store them. We then re-create or reconstruct our experiences rather than retrieve copies of them. Sometimes, in the process of reconstructing we add on feelings, beliefs, or even knowledge we obtained after the experience. In other words, we bias our memories of the past by attributing to them emotions or knowledge we acquired after the event.
... several different types of biases that sometimes skew our memories. For instance "consistency biases" lead us to rewrite our past feelings and beliefs so that they resemble what we feel and believe now. "Egocentric biases," in contrast, reveal that we often remember the past and self-enhancing manner.
... misattribution arises because our memory systems encode information selectively and efficiently, rather than indiscriminately storing details, ... bias can facilitate psychological well-being.
Five major types of biases illustrate the ways in which memory serves its masters.
Consistency and change biases show how our theories about ourselves can lead us to reconstruct the past as overly similar to, or different from, the present. Hindsight biases reveal that recollections of past events are filtered by current knowledge.
Egocentric biases illustrate the powerful role of the self in orchestrating perceptions and memories of reality.
And stereotypical biases demonstrate how generic memories shape interpretation of the world, even when we are unaware of their existence or influence.
This effects of consistency and change bias are perhaps nowhere more evident than in recollections of close personal relationships. Recall the 1970s Barbara Streisand tune "The Way We Were":
Memories
May be beautiful, and yet
What's too painful to remember
We simply choose to forget;
For it's the laughter
We will remember
Whenever we remember
The way we were.
Such biases can lead to a dangerous downward spiral. The worst your current view of your partner is, the worst your memories are, which only further confirms your negative attitudes.
Objectively, the couples did not love each other more today than yesterday. But through the subjective lenses of memory, they did.
When reflecting back on the first 10 years of their marriages, wives showed a change bias: they remembered their initial assessments as worse than they actually were. The bias made their present feelings seem an improvement by comparison, even though the wives actually felt more negatively 10 years into their marriage than they had at the beginning. When they had been married for 20 years and reflected back on their second 10 years of marriage, the women now showed a consistency bias: they mistakenly recalled that feelings from 10 years earlier were similar to their present ones. In reality, however, they felt more negatively after 20 years of marriage then after 10. Both types of bias helped women cope with their marriages. The more women's recollections were bias toward improvement at the 10 year mark, the happier they were with their marriages at the 20 year mark. By the 20 year mark wives who were most satisfied with their marriages showed the least memory bias, whereas those who were least satisfied showed the most biased -- perhaps reflecting ongoing attempts to cope with unhappy present by distorting the past. Memories of "the way we were" are not only influenced by, but also contribute to, "the way we are."
Judgments about sports events and O.J. Simpson trial illustrated a familiar occurrence in everyday life: once we learn the outcome of an event, we feel as though we always knew what would happen. Called hindsight bias by psychologists, this tendency to see an outcome as inevitable in retrospect is a close cousin of consistency bias: we reconstruct the past to make it consistent with what we know in the present.
Something similar occurs among courtroom jurors. Suppose that the prosecution introduces evidence from a seemingly incriminating telephone conversation, the defense objects to it, and the judge rules that the evidence is inadmissible. He then sternly instructs the jurors to disregard the evidence in their deliberations. Numerous studies have shown that mock jurors placed in such a situation cannot disregard inadmissible evidence, even in the face of explicit instructions to ignore it: they are more likely to convict then our jurors who never hear the inadmissible evidence. The same holds for incriminating pretrial publicity that jurors are instructed to ignore. Once the evidence enters the memories of jurors, they are biased to feel that they "knew all along" that the defendant was guilty.
Even though they often seem like our enemies, the seven sins are an integral part of the mind's heritage because they are so closely connected to features of memory which make it work well. The seemingly contradictory relationship between memory's sins and virtues captured the attention of Fanny Price, that heroine of Jane Austen's 19th-century novel Mansfield Park. Admiring a beautiful shrub -- lined walkway that had emerged from a formally rough patch of ground, she recalled what the walkway had looked like years earlier, and wondered whether she would lose this memory in the future. The moment inspired her to contemplate seemingly contradictory properties of memory.
If any one faculty of our nature may be called more wonderful than the rest, I do think it is memory. There seems something more speakingly incomprehensible in the powers, the failures, than in the qualities of memory, than any other of our intelligences. The memory is sometimes so retentive, so serviceable, so obedient; at others, so bewildered and so weak; and at others again, so tyrannically, so beyond control! We are to be sure a miracle every way -- but our powers of recollecting and forgetting, do seem particularly past finding out.
The seven sins are not merely nuisances to minimize or avoid. They also illuminate how memory draws on the past to inform the present, preserve elements of present experience for future reference, and allows us to revisit the past at will. Memory's vices are also its virtues, elements of a bridge across time which allows us to link the mind with the world.
The problem I had however, is that the book really could have been magazine-article length instead of book-length. The 7 sins are set out right in the Introduction and it took about 1 page to do it. Obviously each of the chapters goes into greater detail as to each of the sins, but most of that detail was of a fairly scientific bent or, sad to say, just not that interesting. This is particularly true with respect to the author's very frequent discussions of the brain and how its function (or malfunction) affects memory.
The following sentences are just a few examples of what I am talking about, which appear over and over again in the book, almost as if he is writing to medical doctors:
"Shallice's experiment suggests that dividing attention prevents the lower left frontal lobe from playing its normal role in elaborative encoding."
"In a more recent fMRI study conducted by Anthony Wagner in my laboratory, we saw further evidence of how automatic behavior, reflected by reduced activity in the left inferior prefrontal cortex, works against forming vivid recollections."
"Could this interplay between the precuneus and the frontal system represent the neural signature of a type of blocking that resembles Freud's dynamically inspired concept of repression?"
"Buried in the inner regions of the temporal lobe, the amygdala abuts the nearby hippocampus, but performs quite different functions than does its neighbor."
Sentences like these go on and on, but you get the idea. It's almost as if the author periodically forgot his intended (lay) audience and instead was writing for the benefit of his fellow professionals. A month (or even a week) after reading this book, how much of any of this type of information about the inner-workings of the brain will anyone remember? We will remember the 7 sins themselves however and for this alone, this is a valuable contribution. I just didn't need a whole book to tell me about the 7 sins.






