- Hardcover: 224 pages
- Publisher: The MIT Press (January 22, 1999)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0262032570
- ISBN-13: 978-0262032575
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.4 x 9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 1 customer review
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #190,359 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.
If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you increase your sales. We invite you to learn more about Fulfillment by Amazon .
See the Best Books of 2018 So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the year so far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
In this unusual, challenging, interdisciplinary book, Collins and Kusch have provided us with the best analysis we currently have of the determinants of the possibilities of automation.(Donald MacKenzie, Department of Sociology, University of Edinburgh)
About the Author
Harry Collins is Professor at the Center for the Study of Knowledge, Expertise, and Science, University of Wales. Martin Kusch is Lecturer in the Department for the History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Can technology ever duplicate (and perhaps replace) people? This is actually an ancient question which has sparked debate from many positions (yes, no, it depends, etc.). Both recent trends (i.e., modernity ever since Francis Bacon) AND its aesthetic imagination (i.e., modern science fiction) have given new life (and perhaps urgency) to this debate. So?!
Mechanization, automation, and cybernation have certainly replaced people in many repetitive tasks (a process Noah Kennedy aptly calls "The Industrialization of Intelligence"). But what about fully automated factories, or a computer like HAL, or androids, or whatever? Some with generally respected bona fides (Arthur C. Clarke, Raymond Kurzweil, etc.), have speculated that eventual duplication is possible. Others with equally impressive bona fides (John Searle, Hubert Dreyfus, etc.), have argued that duplication is essentially impossible.
If you have already decided an answer for yourself, such debates may not change your mind. But if you really are both interested and open to credible arguments, where does plausibility reside? Collins and Kusch have definitively answered the question (at least for the present). They have developed a theory of what distinguishes human action from machine behaviour, and have shown why there is an impenetrable barrier between the two.
Collins & Kusch's conclusion is basically a theory of contrivance, something which is both very rare and very important. To my knowledge, only Aristotle's Four Causes and McLuhan's Four Effects are in the same class of explanations. The Collins & Kusch typology is different from other classifications of technologies. It essentially distinguishes between contrivances which embody and imply social context (polimorphic), and those contrivances with do not involve such context in use (mimeomorphic).
Technology is limited to the mimeomorphic, and there are four types of possible gizmos:
Simple capability (embodying a single process); Branching capabilities (a limited number of alternatives); Feedback capabilities (built to adjust and regulate performance); Learning capabilities (incorporating the patterns of time-series summaries).
What this amounts to, is that there can be (and are) Expert Systems (knowledgeable technologies), because they are confined to a domain. BUT there can never be Artificial Intelligence (contextualized comparing across domains). And even Expert Systems (and the multitude of lesser gizmos) only function because the faults in their processes are continually corrected by human intervention. Few, if any, gizmos ever live up to their hype! For every other explanation, there is a RAT in the practice. Read the book to see what this means, and why.