Shattered Consensus does a fine job of reviewing each step along the path creating the deeply divided American electorate of the current era. Before reading this book I often found myself watching the news or reading online commentaries and struggling to understand how we could devolve from the the united people that destroyed the Third Reich and rebuilt the modern world from the ashes of World War Two into this place where no one listens to anyone while everyone assumes they each individually hold the sole absolute truth of what kind of future we are building. If, like me, you are completely baffled by the way extremists have come to define both our political and social discourse, then this book will lay it out for you step by step.
Unfortunately, for all his skill at delineating how we got here, James Pierson has no suggestions for how we can reach across the divided aisles of our homes and townhalls to restore faith in one another and reopen the honest dialogue we will need to manage the chaos we face on the global stage. Four stars for showing how we got here, but only four. This book is only half the story. What we really need is a guidebook to getting ourselves out of this chaos and back to a respectful understanding of our differences.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$11.19
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
Bestroll
Sold by:
Bestroll
(64 ratings)
98% positive over last 12 months
98% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$13.84
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
Mellow Mall
Sold by:
Mellow Mall
(458 ratings)
100% positive over last 12 months
100% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$10.08
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
isellhomeszach
Sold by:
isellhomeszach
(2061 ratings)
94% positive over last 12 months
94% positive over last 12 months
In Stock.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Shattered Consensus: The Rise and Decline of America s Postwar Political Order Hardcover – Illustrated, July 14, 2015
by
James Piereson
(Author)
|
James Piereson
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length416 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherEncounter Books
-
Publication dateJuly 14, 2015
-
Dimensions5.9 x 1.6 x 9.1 inches
-
ISBN-101594036713
-
ISBN-13978-1594036712
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Editorial Reviews
Review
This collection of James Piereson’s lapidary essays secures his place among America’s leading conservative intellectuals and cultural critics.”
George F. Will
James Piereson’s insights into various aspects of America’s current political order are always well-grounded and well-argued, often unconventional, and sometimes alarming. This is one of the most thought-provoking volumes I’ve read in a long time.”
William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard
The timeliest of books, Shattered Consensus is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the 2016 election campaign. The book is also crucial reading for those who seek to gain a better understanding of our financial crises, both past and future.”
Amity Shlaes, author of Coolidge and The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression
James Piereson reminds us that so much of what we have been told by modern-day economists is flat-out wrong. America needs to relearn how economies really work, and reading this book is a good start.”
Stephen Moore, chief economist at the Heritage Foundation
About the Author
James Piereson is president of the William E. Simon Foundation and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, where he directs the Center for the American University. He has served as executive director and trustee of the John M. Olin Foundation, and has taught political science at several prominent universities. He is a frequent contributor to various journals and newspapers, including "The New Criterion, Commentary, " and "The Weekly Standard." He is the author of "Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism." Mr. Piereson lives in New York City.
Start reading Shattered Consensus on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Encounter Books; Illustrated edition (July 14, 2015)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1594036713
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594036712
- Item Weight : 1.66 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.9 x 1.6 x 9.1 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#931,451 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,444 in Political Economy
- #1,869 in United States National Government
- #2,419 in Economic Conditions (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
57 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
4.0 out of 5 stars
Clearly lays out the path that brought us here, but offers no hope for the future
Reviewed in the United States on November 30, 2015Verified Purchase
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2020
Verified Purchase
Shattered Consensus is well worth the money and an insightful read on a number of topics tracking the origins and evolution of thinking on the left and right. In the latter half of the book the author tracks over the last several decades the bizarre cancer like transformation of our higher education from a healthy system striving to inculcate an open liberal attitude in graduates to one focused on closing down analytical thought and imposing far left ideological ‘woke’ talking points. However, the author pretty much leaves out any practical solutions to this problem.
How did this shift happen? They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. The expansion of leftism tracks the growth and availability of easy money for student loans intended to help as many as possible attend college. But offer unlimited free money (it’s free to the schools who in the current system suffer few if any consequences for facilitating what often become ‘bad’ loans) and that leads to schools’ incentives shifting from striving for teaching excellence and scholarly reputation to pleasing (and retaining) customers (students). Even though the schools are front and center in this shift the role of easy loan money in facilitating this has gone unnoticed.
Student loan programs have had a structural flaw from inception - they focus concerns for repayment on two beneficiaries, the taxpayers and the students/borrowers, when there is an important third. Ignoring that third beneficiary, the schools themselves, is the root cause of rampant creation of too many loans, so many graduate burdened with obligations that many can never repay, and for the taxpayer being left to pay for ever more defaulted loans. There’s simply no incentive for schools not to make a loan. By the time the issue of nonpayment arises their former student (the customer) is long gone. And it’s this lack of consequences that led to the loss of standards as schools competed to drop standards to please their customers and also allowed the proliferation of the many new woke departments teaching useless classes, topics and majors.
The remedy is simple. While we probably politically speaking cannot shut down the system of student loans we can achieve a better balance by adjusting incentives so that the system heals itself and by heal I mean we stop feeding the cancer and begin forcing it to shrink. Schools in order to participate in the loan program should become liable for some percentage of any eventual future defaults for loans their students borrow. This could be 5%, or 25%, or more. The consequence will be that schools will turn their attention from short term considerations such as making students happy to considerations of quality, or in other words whether the student and the student’s program of study are likely to ensure repayment of their loans, or, in other words whether the loan represents a worthy risk of their (the school’s) resources. Too many bad loans will eventually mean bankruptcy for most schools.
If the system is re-structured so that there is a cost to graduating a woke indoctrinated product that can’t think and won’t ever earn compensation (as a valued employee or a value generating entrepreneur) sufficient to repay their loans (i.e. a bad investment for the student, taxpayers and, under this new system, also for the school) the newly aware school management will be incentivized to care very much that they invest in employable graduates. School management in order to survive will impose controls on what is taught and quotas on numbers of majors. Loans for Physics or Chemistry majors will be approved but pretty much any major in any leftist topic area will be deemed too risky i.e. costly. The solution won’t happen overnight but then the cancer took decades to metastasize, but with time the cancer will be starved and die out not only in the schools but in every nook and cranny of our society.
How did this shift happen? They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. The expansion of leftism tracks the growth and availability of easy money for student loans intended to help as many as possible attend college. But offer unlimited free money (it’s free to the schools who in the current system suffer few if any consequences for facilitating what often become ‘bad’ loans) and that leads to schools’ incentives shifting from striving for teaching excellence and scholarly reputation to pleasing (and retaining) customers (students). Even though the schools are front and center in this shift the role of easy loan money in facilitating this has gone unnoticed.
Student loan programs have had a structural flaw from inception - they focus concerns for repayment on two beneficiaries, the taxpayers and the students/borrowers, when there is an important third. Ignoring that third beneficiary, the schools themselves, is the root cause of rampant creation of too many loans, so many graduate burdened with obligations that many can never repay, and for the taxpayer being left to pay for ever more defaulted loans. There’s simply no incentive for schools not to make a loan. By the time the issue of nonpayment arises their former student (the customer) is long gone. And it’s this lack of consequences that led to the loss of standards as schools competed to drop standards to please their customers and also allowed the proliferation of the many new woke departments teaching useless classes, topics and majors.
The remedy is simple. While we probably politically speaking cannot shut down the system of student loans we can achieve a better balance by adjusting incentives so that the system heals itself and by heal I mean we stop feeding the cancer and begin forcing it to shrink. Schools in order to participate in the loan program should become liable for some percentage of any eventual future defaults for loans their students borrow. This could be 5%, or 25%, or more. The consequence will be that schools will turn their attention from short term considerations such as making students happy to considerations of quality, or in other words whether the student and the student’s program of study are likely to ensure repayment of their loans, or, in other words whether the loan represents a worthy risk of their (the school’s) resources. Too many bad loans will eventually mean bankruptcy for most schools.
If the system is re-structured so that there is a cost to graduating a woke indoctrinated product that can’t think and won’t ever earn compensation (as a valued employee or a value generating entrepreneur) sufficient to repay their loans (i.e. a bad investment for the student, taxpayers and, under this new system, also for the school) the newly aware school management will be incentivized to care very much that they invest in employable graduates. School management in order to survive will impose controls on what is taught and quotas on numbers of majors. Loans for Physics or Chemistry majors will be approved but pretty much any major in any leftist topic area will be deemed too risky i.e. costly. The solution won’t happen overnight but then the cancer took decades to metastasize, but with time the cancer will be starved and die out not only in the schools but in every nook and cranny of our society.
Reviewed in the United States on November 29, 2015
Verified Purchase
The United States of America has arrived at a dismal place in history. All the promise of the Revolution, all the ideas of Locke and Paine and Jefferson, all the potential reported by de Tocqueville, all the entrepreneurial brilliance of Ford and Edison and Jobs have been undermined. Instead of a shining city on a hill illuminated by individual values of liberty, courage, initiative and resilience, we live in a dark administrative state in which individual achievement and voluntary collaboration have been replaced by the sacrifice of achievement to appease the needy and discontented. The author tracks the antagonism between the two sets of ideas represented by what he calls liberalism and conservatism, and which he equates with politics and the Republican and Democratic parties. He expresses some optimism (if that's the right word) that the Democratic consensus is unsustainable - that unlimited government spending and unrepayable debt, slow growth and bad demographics will bring down the distributional coalitions that, by government fiat, redistribute to collectivist dependents the rewards that should accrue to individual effort. However, he also points out that the protagonists for individualism have failed to articulate the morality and values that will provide a convincing and broadly persuasive impetus for a shift away from collectivism. This book will not leave you hopeful about the future.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse

