Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Siberiade (Complete and Uncut Version)
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers who bought this item also bought
Spanning more than six decades of Russian history encompassing the Bolshevik Revolution, Siberiade is Andrei Konchalovsky's (Runaway Train) passionate and ambitious examination of the Soviet spirit, as represented in two families of opposing ideologies: the proletariat Ustyuzhanins and the wealthy Solomins. Through their multi-generational conflicts and alliances, Konchalovsky dramatizes the evolution of the Russian people, bound together by the common struggle for survival and faithfulness to the motherland. Yet Siberiade is more than an immense historical epic. It is a hauntingly beautiful spectacle reminiscent of the finest woks of visionary filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky (whose Andrei Roublev was co-written by Konchalovsky). Though cinematographer Levan Paatashvili's lens, the Siberian wilderness becomes a mesmerizing universe unto itself, whose forests and swamps are populated by near-mythical characters. Tied to ancient tradition, these spirits seek to protect the countryside from the ravaging forces of time and technology. When a rural village is invaded by an oil-drilling crew that encroaches upon their hallowed burial grounds, generating conflict between ancestral reverence for the earth and government-ordained industrialization. Siberiade comes to an explosive and unforgettable climax.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Afanasi is the only one who does not come back. He is always there and lives alone with his son and no wife.
Nikolai comes back as a Soviet officer, a Communist cadre and it is dramatic because he had been thrown away at the beginning of the revolution and his paramour, from the other family, had escaped from the village to find him and follow him. It will be a difficult situation since she will be burned to death by the white Cossacks during the civil war after the revolution. He comes back with his young son in the 1930s and is killed by the other paramour of his wife, the one she left behind.
Aleksei is sent to an orphanage, then on one visit to the village and his relatives a recruiting unit at the very beginning of the war against Nazi Germany accepts his enlisting, though he is slightly too young, and he will be a hero in the war, saving his captain all by himself. But in the 1960s he comes back as a master driller to drill for oil in his village because he knows there is some: he discovered it with his father when he was a kid when they marched into the marsh known as the Devil's Mane and there oil was oozing out all over the place and they managed to set it on fire, accidently. Aleksei though wants to leave after a while, with the woman he had taught how to dance when just under 18 before he enlisted, and it is when he finally can go and is going to go, alone because the woman refuses to follow him, he goes say goodbye to his drilling mates and it is then oil is struck and starts bursting out. But it gets on fire for some unimportant reason and the derrick falls and traps one man. All the others go and Nikolai manages the situation to save that man, but Nikolai is caught by the fire and dies.
But the film is a lot more important than that. It is a real film about history. You cannot force history to do something it does not want to do because you have to work with people and people do not necessarily want to change and you have to convince them. It may take three generations to move from the superstition about the Devil's Mane to the acceptance that the village is going to be completely transformed by that oil, and the most dramatic war possible in the meantime after a very dramatic and heroic revolution.
The film then shows how at the beginning of this political revolution Nikolai was naïve and thought it was easy to make people do what they did not want to do, and he is killed just because his rival in love refuses to follow him and kills him. It fails because of some private business and affair, a love story that had not gone the way one of the lovers wanted. Trite, and yet history is also the result of such capricious and unpredictable elements. It will take thirty years and one generation for what was then possible in the 1930s to become a reality in the 1960s.
And in the 1960s we are no longer speaking of that kind of romantic revolution Nikolai had in mind. Aleksei and the other oil drillers around him are confronted to the stubborn desire of the central authorities in Moscow to develop the country and to decide in Moscow what is best for everyone and the small village and the country around is going to become the largest man-made sea with the largest hydroelectric dam and factory on the Volga. It is a pure miracle that makes oil burst out of its underground lair on the very same day, killing Aleksei, as the central committee of the Communist Party or some other bureaucratic authority like this one is meeting to take a decision in favor of the dam. The events stop the dam project in its shoes and in its trail. Unluckily, and Konchalovsky knew all about it in 1979, that was the last moment when history was right against the bureaucrats. After that the USSR entered a very dark time when bureaucracy was the only possible authority and initiative from people was discouraged and even choked, and stagnation started, leading finally to regression and the fall of the USSR. We feel that end the director could not know under the open discourse about the heroism of this Aleksei.
The last but one thing about the film that has to be said is that the director chose to always look at historical events through the intimate eyes of one character or another, mainly the Ustyuzhanins. The truth is in the eyes of the beholders and not in the brains of the leaders. The death of Lenin is actually shown, but the death of Stalin is not and when the older Aleksei revisits as a dream his visit as a child of the Devil's Mane with his father, he gets inside a small hut that had been used by some hypothetical drillers. Aleksei is dreaming of course at this moment and he gets afraid and starts calling his father, as he had done when a child, and to get out of the hut he has to tear up a portrait of Stalin. This scene is of course very symbolical, especially since in the next minute he sinks in some quicksand and drowns, another symbolical act in that dream of his.
The last element I would like to emphasize is the way the director plays on the fake black and white (always in a shade that is not black, sepia or green, etc) to have archives images of some historical moments, Lenin's arrival in Petrograd, his funeral, and later on Gagarin, for example. At the same time the same fake black and white sequences are used to bring the wishes, the dreams, the recollections of the characters. The real time of each episode is in full colors. That gives a real density to the film as if we constantly had a film in the film with flashbacks and at times flash-forwards into the future (rarely) and into dreams (more often).
I must reckon it is not easy to find that film in DVD. I got the US edition in NTSC in Russian with English subtitles. But it was worth it.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
''Siberiade'' begins in 1909 and covers approximately 60 years in the lives of two families in the tiny Siberian town of Elam: the Ustyuzhanins are poor foresters and shepherds (working folk), while the Solomins are relatively wealthy middle men. Obviously, it is not easy to cover 60 years of history in only three hours: the film starts in pre-revolutionary Siberia and briefly touches on the civil war, the 1930s, 1939-1945 war, and finally the 1960s with the industrial development in Siberia.
While this film is very good, I gave it a four-star rating (instead of five stars) because the director and editor could have done a much better job creating a coherent story. The lack of coherency may be due to the fact that this film was originally intended to be longer.
The performances are extremely good, especially the performances by Lyudmilla Gurchenko (as the older Taya Solomina) and Nikita Mikhalkov (as Alexei Ustyuzhanin). As with most Soviet films, the characters act like real, complex people most of the times, with some Moscow Circus exaggeration thrown in from time to time.
The cinematography by Levan Paatashvili is the best part of this film.
I was greatly interested in the old (real life) film footage that was used to show periods of Soviet history.
Top international reviews
Set over six decades of Russian 20th Century history, it is essentially the struggle of two families & differing ideologies in a remote Siberian village which resists the changes being forced upon it by political & industrial development. That is - the discovery of oil in the marshy, wooded wastelands which are nevertheless respected & feared by the peasants in almost medievally superstitious perpetuation.
Needless to say, nature rules in a very demonstrable regular undercurrent & climax!
Excellently photographed & acted. Eco-warriors, Luddites & Tree-Huggers everywhere will have a field day & claim 'I told you so'. But, ignoring all that crap, it is a good film to watch if you like arty Russian movies with subtitles. If you don't or have a short attention span - don't bother. Me? -I fracking loved it but for the art - not the message.
Exactement comme promis et selon la réputation du fournisseur.
It's a "must see" for any serious motion picture lover.
Vous l'avez compris j'ai tout aimé dans Sibériade, mais pour les plus jeunes je le recommande vivement pour comprendre les événements de l'époque de 1900 à 1970.