I am writing this review from the perspective of a former user of the Nikon 80-400VR (2 years) and Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 (3 years). The Sigma 120-300 is incredible piece of glass that is even sharper than Sigmas 300mm f/2.8 prime. The Sigma 120-300 works very well with a matching Sigma 1.4x TC which is how I used it 80% of the time. Even with a TC is matches or slightly exceeds the 150-500 in the overlapping range but is obviously much faster glass and thus freezes motion and blurs backgrounds better. But the range is more limited, the lens is heavier, costs 3x more and doesn't go to 500mm which is what I wanted. The hood and tripod collar construction is inferior to the faster pro lens. For example, the hood can easily be crushed in your hand like a plastic cup, and the tripod collar cannot be removed without removing the lens but both are functional and quality is very acceptable at this price point.
The Sigma compares favorably to the Nikon 80-400 in that is focuses faster since it has a built in HSM motor. 150-500mm is more desirable range than 80-400, at least for my needs, and I shoot DX format. I also own a Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 which pairs much better with a 150-500 than either of these two lens mentioned above - the Nikon 70-200 performs very well with a Nikon 1.4x TC so I have a 105 - 280mm f/4 as well. With proper technique the Sigma matches and possibly exceeds the sharpness of the Nikon 80-400 but again, it has a better/different range.
The lens seems sharpest at 150-400mm and a tad soft near the 500mm end so you definitely need to stop down with f/9.5 being a good compromise if you have the light, else f/8. OS works very well and unlike other reports mine (purchased in June 2010) does not make very loud clicking sounds when OS is engaging. It is important to wait until OS is engaged which may take about a second else your shots will not be sharp. The best way to tell is to look through the viewfinder with the shutter pressed halfway and wait until gyro is spinning and the 'obvious shake subsides'. Then squeeze, don't press the shutter by rolling your finger down.
Tip, the zoom ring is stiff and can be aggravating to turn. However, instead of using the zoom ring to zoom, instead grab the end and use it like a push-pull zoom. This method works very well and very smoothly. Also, with long lenses you must avoid shutter speeds of 1/8 - 1/60 sec unless you are using some type of mirror lock up since mirror slap vibration with FL's over 100mm are a known cause of slight blurring.
This is not a pro lens but a very good lens with a very good range that will take very good pictures if, and only if, you exercise good long lens technique. With manual focus a Sigma 1.4x TC can work if stopped down and when you are not after large prints but smaller, or especially web-sized images. With such a narrow field of view the slightest movement can cause blur - the nature of all long lenses. This lens is a great value, I just wish they could have made it an f/5.6 instead of f/6.3 and I think most people would not mind paying about 20% more for that half stop. Also, the lens has a zoom lock to prevent lens creep which is great. I only wish sigma also included a limit switch like the Nikon 80-400 has and which is very useful for faster focusing.
Note: At the time of this review Sigma has issued a notice that there may be a problem with some lenses with regard to Auto Focus (keeps hunting) with serial numbers between 10674301 and 10972000. Mine is in this range but does not have the problem. If yours does have the problem it may be best to return/exchange the lens since Sigma service will return the lens to Japan to be fixed instead of repairing in the US and this can take 4-6 weeks - see report here [..]
There is a newer model of this item:
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Compare with similar items
 | Sigma 150-600mm 5-6.3 Contemporary DG OS HSM Lens for Canon | Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens for Canon EF | Tamron AF 200-500mm f/5.0-6.3 Di LD SP FEC (IF) Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras (Model A08E) (Discontinued by Manufacturer) | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Rating | (973) | (4801) | (370) | (110) | (4365) |
| Price | $698.00 | $879.00 | $689.00 | $478.00 | $199.00 |
| Sold By | Premier Camera =Japan= Our Japanese staff will send you with care. | Digital Goja | Digital Village | TONY'S Camera Shop | Amazon.com |
| Item Dimensions LxWxH | 9.92 x 3.74 x 3.74 inches | 10.2 x 4.1 x 4.1 inches | 3.39 x 3.39 x 7.17 inches | 8.94 x 3.7 x 3.7 inches | 4.8 x 2.8 x 2.8 inches |
| Item Weight | 3.92 lbs | 4.25 lbs | 2.56 lbs | 2.73 lbs | 1.06 lbs |
| Lens Type | Telephoto | Telephoto | zoom | Telephoto | Telephoto |
| Maximum Aperture | 5 | f/5 | f/6.3 | 5 | f/4 |
| Maximum Focal Length | 500 millimeters | 600 millimeters | 400 | 500 millimeters | 300 millimeters |
| Maximum Aperture Range | F5.0 - F6.3 | 5 - 6.3 | 5 | F5.0-6.3 | F4.0 - F5.6 |
| Maximum Format Size | 35mm full frame | Full Frame | — | 35mm full frame | 35mm full frame |
| Minimum Aperture | 28 | 6.3 | 5 | 32 | f/45 |
| Minimum Focal Length | 150 millimeters | 150 millimeters | 100 | 200 millimeters | 75 millimeters |
| Minimum Operating Distance | 2.2 meters | — | — | 2.5 meters | 1.5 meters |
| Photo Filter Thread Size | 86 millimeters | 95 millimeters | 67 millimeters | 86 millimeters | 58 millimeters |
Videos
Page 1 of 1Start OverPage 1 of 1
Videos for this product
2:37
Click to play video
Sigma APO 150-500mm Lens
Merchant Video
Videos for this product
2:09
Click to play video
Sigma 0029 Video
Merchant Video
Videos for related products
0:43
Click to play video
Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Lens
Mike Lucas Media
Videos for related products
2:51
Click to play video
Sigma 50-500mm Lens
Merchant Video
Videos for related products
2:24
Click to play video
Sigma 0004 Video
Merchant Video
Videos for related products
0:41
Click to play video
canon telephoto lens review - watch before you buy!
strawberrii.mochii
Videos for related products
38:08
Click to play video
DPReview: Rise of the Enthusiast: Part 2
DPReview
Videos for related products
2:21
Click to play video
is this telephoto sigma 100 400 lens worth it ?
all day i eat like a shark
Videos for related products
0:44
Click to play video
JINTU 420-800mm Lens Feature
SZJINTU
From the manufacturer
150-500 mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Reinventing Telephoto Zooms
The Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 is ultra telephoto zoom designed for Full Frame sensors but may also be used with smaller APS-c size sensors with a corresponding effective increase in focal length to about 255 mm to 850 mm on the Sigma SD format. An Optical Stabilizer (OS) allows for handheld photography even in low light scenarios, while a Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM) ensures quiet, high speed, and accurate autofocusing. This unique lens is an excellent optical performer featuring three SLD (Special Low Dispersion) glass elements for optimum color correction and sharpness throughout the entire zoom range, rear focusing system corrects for fluctuation of aberration due to focusing. It compact size of a mere 10 inches and weight of only 4 pounds for its focal length make it a must have for any camera bag.
Dimensions (Diameter x Length): 94.7 x 252 millimeter /3.6 x 9.9 inches
Weight: 1,780 grams / 62.8 ounces
About Sigma
Since 1961, and with the recent introduction of Sigma Global Vision, we have worked toward one single, simple goal: To hold ourselves to the highest standard of design & manufacturing of imaging products. Photography is all we do. And it’s all we’ve done. So you can rest assured that it’s something we know extensively and care deeply about. You have a vision. We’ve made it our mission.
- Affordable long range telephoto zoom lens
- Optical stabilization compensates for camera shake (not available on Sony & Pentax mounts)
- Carrying case, lens hood, front & rear caps
Reviews with images
Submit a report
A few common reasons customers report reviews:
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
When we get your report, we'll check if the review meets our Community guidelines. If it doesn't, we'll remove it.
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on July 9, 2010
Style: for Nikon Digital SLR CamerasVerified Purchase
I am writing this review from the perspective of a former user of the Nikon 80-400VR (2 years) and Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 (3 years). The Sigma 120-300 is incredible piece of glass that is even sharper than Sigmas 300mm f/2.8 prime. The Sigma 120-300 works very well with a matching Sigma 1.4x TC which is how I used it 80% of the time. Even with a TC is matches or slightly exceeds the 150-500 in the overlapping range but is obviously much faster glass and thus freezes motion and blurs backgrounds better. But the range is more limited, the lens is heavier, costs 3x more and doesn't go to 500mm which is what I wanted. The hood and tripod collar construction is inferior to the faster pro lens. For example, the hood can easily be crushed in your hand like a plastic cup, and the tripod collar cannot be removed without removing the lens but both are functional and quality is very acceptable at this price point.
The Sigma compares favorably to the Nikon 80-400 in that is focuses faster since it has a built in HSM motor. 150-500mm is more desirable range than 80-400, at least for my needs, and I shoot DX format. I also own a Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 which pairs much better with a 150-500 than either of these two lens mentioned above - the Nikon 70-200 performs very well with a Nikon 1.4x TC so I have a 105 - 280mm f/4 as well. With proper technique the Sigma matches and possibly exceeds the sharpness of the Nikon 80-400 but again, it has a better/different range.
The lens seems sharpest at 150-400mm and a tad soft near the 500mm end so you definitely need to stop down with f/9.5 being a good compromise if you have the light, else f/8. OS works very well and unlike other reports mine (purchased in June 2010) does not make very loud clicking sounds when OS is engaging. It is important to wait until OS is engaged which may take about a second else your shots will not be sharp. The best way to tell is to look through the viewfinder with the shutter pressed halfway and wait until gyro is spinning and the 'obvious shake subsides'. Then squeeze, don't press the shutter by rolling your finger down.
Tip, the zoom ring is stiff and can be aggravating to turn. However, instead of using the zoom ring to zoom, instead grab the end and use it like a push-pull zoom. This method works very well and very smoothly. Also, with long lenses you must avoid shutter speeds of 1/8 - 1/60 sec unless you are using some type of mirror lock up since mirror slap vibration with FL's over 100mm are a known cause of slight blurring.
This is not a pro lens but a very good lens with a very good range that will take very good pictures if, and only if, you exercise good long lens technique. With manual focus a Sigma 1.4x TC can work if stopped down and when you are not after large prints but smaller, or especially web-sized images. With such a narrow field of view the slightest movement can cause blur - the nature of all long lenses. This lens is a great value, I just wish they could have made it an f/5.6 instead of f/6.3 and I think most people would not mind paying about 20% more for that half stop. Also, the lens has a zoom lock to prevent lens creep which is great. I only wish sigma also included a limit switch like the Nikon 80-400 has and which is very useful for faster focusing.
Note: At the time of this review Sigma has issued a notice that there may be a problem with some lenses with regard to Auto Focus (keeps hunting) with serial numbers between 10674301 and 10972000. Mine is in this range but does not have the problem. If yours does have the problem it may be best to return/exchange the lens since Sigma service will return the lens to Japan to be fixed instead of repairing in the US and this can take 4-6 weeks - see report here [..]
The Sigma compares favorably to the Nikon 80-400 in that is focuses faster since it has a built in HSM motor. 150-500mm is more desirable range than 80-400, at least for my needs, and I shoot DX format. I also own a Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 which pairs much better with a 150-500 than either of these two lens mentioned above - the Nikon 70-200 performs very well with a Nikon 1.4x TC so I have a 105 - 280mm f/4 as well. With proper technique the Sigma matches and possibly exceeds the sharpness of the Nikon 80-400 but again, it has a better/different range.
The lens seems sharpest at 150-400mm and a tad soft near the 500mm end so you definitely need to stop down with f/9.5 being a good compromise if you have the light, else f/8. OS works very well and unlike other reports mine (purchased in June 2010) does not make very loud clicking sounds when OS is engaging. It is important to wait until OS is engaged which may take about a second else your shots will not be sharp. The best way to tell is to look through the viewfinder with the shutter pressed halfway and wait until gyro is spinning and the 'obvious shake subsides'. Then squeeze, don't press the shutter by rolling your finger down.
Tip, the zoom ring is stiff and can be aggravating to turn. However, instead of using the zoom ring to zoom, instead grab the end and use it like a push-pull zoom. This method works very well and very smoothly. Also, with long lenses you must avoid shutter speeds of 1/8 - 1/60 sec unless you are using some type of mirror lock up since mirror slap vibration with FL's over 100mm are a known cause of slight blurring.
This is not a pro lens but a very good lens with a very good range that will take very good pictures if, and only if, you exercise good long lens technique. With manual focus a Sigma 1.4x TC can work if stopped down and when you are not after large prints but smaller, or especially web-sized images. With such a narrow field of view the slightest movement can cause blur - the nature of all long lenses. This lens is a great value, I just wish they could have made it an f/5.6 instead of f/6.3 and I think most people would not mind paying about 20% more for that half stop. Also, the lens has a zoom lock to prevent lens creep which is great. I only wish sigma also included a limit switch like the Nikon 80-400 has and which is very useful for faster focusing.
Note: At the time of this review Sigma has issued a notice that there may be a problem with some lenses with regard to Auto Focus (keeps hunting) with serial numbers between 10674301 and 10972000. Mine is in this range but does not have the problem. If yours does have the problem it may be best to return/exchange the lens since Sigma service will return the lens to Japan to be fixed instead of repairing in the US and this can take 4-6 weeks - see report here [..]
Images in this review
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2009
Style: for Canon Digital SLR CamerasVerified Purchase
Essentially, the Sigma 150-500 OS is an indirect answer to the Canon 100-400mm F4 IS L lens. The problem with most comparisons is that the Canon F4 costs significantly more.
The direct point is that the Canon does perform marginally better in every aspect. The Sigma clearly wins in cost-performance ratio but that also varies based on your intended use and preferences. The main difference is the 70%+ price in the lenses.
The Sigma 150-500 is *NOT* a substitute for a low-light high speed use telephoto lens such as F2.8 lenses. However, the 2.8 lenses are an apples to oranges comparison - comparing a 400mm 2.8 that costs several times more ($6500) and suited to a different purpose. The Sigma lens is suited more towards daytime wildlife as opposed to sports events in varying conditions or poor lighting in any situation.
The 150-500 has shortcomings compared to the more expensive lenses - which is typically the case for any brand. I still highly recommend the lens & have enjoyed 600+ pictures within 7 days of owning it. The lens is excellent for wildlife, a great "out-of-box" experience with accessories, and will serve most a long time.
+ Optics are outstanding considering the market price.
+ Less than $1000 USD as of this writing
+ 500mm without use of a teleconverter
- Not as sharp compared to the 50-500 Sigma but the 50-500 lacks OS/IS
+ Light build quality considering lens class
- Durability trade-off for lower weight. Sealing not optimal, housing uses plastic.
+ Aesthetics. Rubberized/tactile feel with a sleek dark gray body.
- Aesthetics/durability. Coating on body prone to marks/scratches.
- Stiff zoom ring takes effort to operate.
+ Durable OEM lens hood included
+ Solid OEM hard lens case included (in fact it is shipped in the case)
+ OEM Tripod collar included
+ Excellent industry warranty (3 years USA)
+ HSM motor quick but not the fastest.
- Seeks a bit for focus in less-than-optimal light a bit earlier than the Canon equivalents.
- Autofocus a bit more finicky than lens-class equivalents.
- OS certainly does not reach the claimed 4 stop benefit
+ OS obtains a clear 2 stop advantage
- Noisy OS
- Image appears to shake a bit in viewfinder w/ OS operating
A final note: Most lenses (except prime non-zoom lenses) are a bit soft at the widest aperture (f/5) - this Sigma included. I certainly do not dock a non-prime lens for this as others have.
Updated 10-13-2009
I pushed several hundred more pictures through the lens and I am still satisfied. I will note a few observations including those not associated with the lens performance.
The Sigma feels a bit loose on my 450D/XSi when mounted. This is pronounced when adjusting the zoom ring which is rather stiff. Research indicates this is normal due to manufacturing tolerances, especially concerning the lens release/lock pin on the body mount. This issue varies depending on the camera body and lens - thus not a Sigma issue per say. An associate w/ the Canon 100-400 F/4 L IS lens reports similar behavior on his camera body (40D) but not on other camera bodies. I can't fault Sigma for this issue and I doubt everyone experiences this.
I mentioned a stiff zoom ring but I wasn't concerned with this initially. I thought the same about my Canon 24-70 F/2.8 L lens when I first received it. However, the stiff zoom ring coupled with the slight camera body shift seems to amplify the annoyance. Buyers should be very aware of the stiff zoom ring which I had not originally mentioned.
86mm filters are rather expensive. Tiffen offers a $30 UV filter solution but my experience is that Tiffen are poor quality products. Admittedly, I'm using one for the moment but have not noticed any reflections/aberrations. An 86mm Hoya UV filter runs almost $100 which I will purchase at a later date. I would not recommend a polarizer due to the loss of light.
I have gone through several camera bags - swapping and storing the lens in the field is a task. I am currently using the Lowepro Flipside 300 but that tends to be a snug fit w/ body attached. I will likely purchase a Lowepro Stealth Reporter D400 AW to carry my flash, 24-70 L lens, Sigma, and other necessities. The lens measures almost 9.5 inches in length.
The direct point is that the Canon does perform marginally better in every aspect. The Sigma clearly wins in cost-performance ratio but that also varies based on your intended use and preferences. The main difference is the 70%+ price in the lenses.
The Sigma 150-500 is *NOT* a substitute for a low-light high speed use telephoto lens such as F2.8 lenses. However, the 2.8 lenses are an apples to oranges comparison - comparing a 400mm 2.8 that costs several times more ($6500) and suited to a different purpose. The Sigma lens is suited more towards daytime wildlife as opposed to sports events in varying conditions or poor lighting in any situation.
The 150-500 has shortcomings compared to the more expensive lenses - which is typically the case for any brand. I still highly recommend the lens & have enjoyed 600+ pictures within 7 days of owning it. The lens is excellent for wildlife, a great "out-of-box" experience with accessories, and will serve most a long time.
+ Optics are outstanding considering the market price.
+ Less than $1000 USD as of this writing
+ 500mm without use of a teleconverter
- Not as sharp compared to the 50-500 Sigma but the 50-500 lacks OS/IS
+ Light build quality considering lens class
- Durability trade-off for lower weight. Sealing not optimal, housing uses plastic.
+ Aesthetics. Rubberized/tactile feel with a sleek dark gray body.
- Aesthetics/durability. Coating on body prone to marks/scratches.
- Stiff zoom ring takes effort to operate.
+ Durable OEM lens hood included
+ Solid OEM hard lens case included (in fact it is shipped in the case)
+ OEM Tripod collar included
+ Excellent industry warranty (3 years USA)
+ HSM motor quick but not the fastest.
- Seeks a bit for focus in less-than-optimal light a bit earlier than the Canon equivalents.
- Autofocus a bit more finicky than lens-class equivalents.
- OS certainly does not reach the claimed 4 stop benefit
+ OS obtains a clear 2 stop advantage
- Noisy OS
- Image appears to shake a bit in viewfinder w/ OS operating
A final note: Most lenses (except prime non-zoom lenses) are a bit soft at the widest aperture (f/5) - this Sigma included. I certainly do not dock a non-prime lens for this as others have.
Updated 10-13-2009
I pushed several hundred more pictures through the lens and I am still satisfied. I will note a few observations including those not associated with the lens performance.
The Sigma feels a bit loose on my 450D/XSi when mounted. This is pronounced when adjusting the zoom ring which is rather stiff. Research indicates this is normal due to manufacturing tolerances, especially concerning the lens release/lock pin on the body mount. This issue varies depending on the camera body and lens - thus not a Sigma issue per say. An associate w/ the Canon 100-400 F/4 L IS lens reports similar behavior on his camera body (40D) but not on other camera bodies. I can't fault Sigma for this issue and I doubt everyone experiences this.
I mentioned a stiff zoom ring but I wasn't concerned with this initially. I thought the same about my Canon 24-70 F/2.8 L lens when I first received it. However, the stiff zoom ring coupled with the slight camera body shift seems to amplify the annoyance. Buyers should be very aware of the stiff zoom ring which I had not originally mentioned.
86mm filters are rather expensive. Tiffen offers a $30 UV filter solution but my experience is that Tiffen are poor quality products. Admittedly, I'm using one for the moment but have not noticed any reflections/aberrations. An 86mm Hoya UV filter runs almost $100 which I will purchase at a later date. I would not recommend a polarizer due to the loss of light.
I have gone through several camera bags - swapping and storing the lens in the field is a task. I am currently using the Lowepro Flipside 300 but that tends to be a snug fit w/ body attached. I will likely purchase a Lowepro Stealth Reporter D400 AW to carry my flash, 24-70 L lens, Sigma, and other necessities. The lens measures almost 9.5 inches in length.
Images in this review
Top reviews from other countries
Giuseppe M.
Tutto ok
Reviewed in Italy on March 7, 2023Style: for Canon Digital SLR CamerasVerified Purchase
Emilius
Ideale Einsteigerlinse für Vogelfotografen mit sehr gutem Preis Leistungsverhältnis
Reviewed in Germany on January 15, 2014Style: for Nikon Digital SLR CamerasVerified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Sigma 150-500 mm F5,0-6,3 DG OS HSM – Unter bestimmten Bedingungen eine absolute Kaufempfehlung
Reviewed in Germany on July 1, 2013Style: for Nikon Digital SLR CamerasVerified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Reviewed in Germany on July 1, 2013
150-500 mm Brennweite sind nun schon einmal wirklich ein sehr beachtlicher Brennweiten-Umfang und auch die 500 mm maximal Brennweite ins Kalkül gezogen, haben wir es hier mit einem echten Mega Tele-Zoomobjektiv zu tun. Diese Angaben beziehen sich natürlich auf eine Vollformat-Kamera, d. h. dass mit eine Kamera mit einem APS-C-Sensor (Crop-Faktor = 1,5) sogar eine Endbrennweite von sagenhaften 750 mm erzielt werden kann.
Die „Äußerlichkeiten“ dieses Objektivs. Das Sigma 150-500 mm F5,0-6,3 DG OS HSM ist schon recht groß und mit voll ausgefahrenem Tubus und inklusive Gegenlichtblende, könnte man es sicherlich als riesig bezeichnen. Die Optik und Haptik dieses Objektivs würde ich persönlich wirklich als sehr gelungen titulieren, aber hier muss jeder für sich selber entscheiden. Das Objektiv ist trotz seiner beachtlichen Größe relativ leicht (beruht natürlich auf den verbauten Materialien) und macht in Verbindung mit meiner D800 und dem Batteriegriff MB-D12 eine schon ansehnliche Figur und lässt sich auch noch recht angenehm aus der Hand bedienen, obwohl dies für den einen oder anderen schon grenzwertig sein dürfte.
Der Fokusring läuft sehr flüssig und lässt sich ausgezeichnet einfach bedienen. Der Zoom-Ring hingegen ist ein wenig schwergängig, was aber meiner Meinung nach einfach nur gewöhnungsbedürftig ist. Ein kleiner Kritikpunkt ist die Tatsache, dass der Tubus in der Vertikalstellung des Objektivs eigenständig aus- respektive einfährt. Es gibt aber zusätzlich einen Lock-Schalter in der 150mm-Stellung des Objektivs, der das Aus-/Einfahren des Objektiv-Tubus verhindert.
Betrachten wir nun einmal einen mitentscheidenden Faktor für den „normalen“ Hobby-Fotografen für den Objektivkauf, den Preis. Man bekommt aktuell für diesen Preis (augenblicklich ca. 800€ bei Amazon) kein Objektiv mit einer ähnlichen Brennweite. Vergleichbare Objektive von Nikon in diesem Brennweitenbereich sind 2-4-fach teurer. Natürlich sagt der Preis erst einmal gar nichts aus, ein günstiges Objektiv, das keine entsprechenden Fotos abliefert, ist immer zu teuer, egal wie günstig der Preis ist.
Kommen wir nun aber zu den wirklich wichtigen Kriterien, den zu erzielenden Bildern. Ich habe das Objektiv unter den drei gängigen Bedingungen, aus der Hand, montiert auf einem Monopod (Manfrotto 680B + Novoflex Magic-Ball Mini) und einem Tripod (Slik Pro 700 DX Tripod + Novoflex Magic Ball 50) getestet. Was soll ich sagen, sogar aus der Hand lassen sich bis ca. 400 mm erstaunlich gute Bilder erzielen. Natürlich mit der Restriktion der entsprechenden Verschlusszeiten < 1/250, aus meiner Sicht. 500mm lassen sich zwar auch noch aus der Hand fotografieren, aber ich habe bei der Kontrolle der Bilder jeweils Bewegungsunschärfe entdeckt, wenn auch bei entsprechender Vergrößerung.
Die Möglichkeiten in Verbindung mit einem Tripod sind fast schon als sehr gut zu bezeichnen. Ich habe Aufnahmen über den gesamten Brennweiten- und Blendenbereich gemacht, wobei ich jeweils den Selbstauslöser und die Spiegelvorauslösung verwendet habe. Die Bilder sind sehr scharf und selbst in Randbereichen lassen sich erst gegen Ende des Brennweitenbereichs Unschärfe enddecken.
Der Einsatz eines Monopods ist aus meiner Sicht genau die richtige Kombination für unterwegs und ich war wirklich überrascht welch gute Bilder sich auf dieser Art und Weise erzielen lassen. Selbst im DX-Format (die D800 lässt sich in das DX-Format umschalten), also maximal 750mm Brennweite, können mit einem Monopod sehr scharfe Fotos erzielt werden, vorausgesetzt man arbeitet mit den entsprechenden Verschluss Zeiten und erhöht den ISO-Wert, wenn nötig.
Der AF ist aus meiner Perspektive ausreichend schnell, wenn auch nicht ganz lautlos. Der Fokus sitzt aber perfekt, was natürlich den gewichtigsten Faktor in diesem Zusammenhang darstellt. Der OS (Optical Stabilizer) ist vielleicht ein wenig gewöhnungsbedürftig – setzt nach ca. einer halben Sekunde des Fokussierens ein, was natürlich u. U. zu langsam sein kann, z. B. bei der Tierfotografie.
Zugegebener Maßen muss man sagen, dass es sich hierbei um ein „Schönwetter-Objektiv“ handelt, wie bereits in einigen anderen Rezensionen erwähnt. Natürlich erlauben leistungsstärkerer Mega Tele-Zoomobjektive auch unter schlechteren Lichtbedingungen adäquate Aufnahmen, diese Objektive haben aber natürlich, wie bereits erwähnt, einen stolzen Preis.
Nimmt man die erwähnten Rahmenbedingungen in Kauf, bekommt man mit dem Sigma 150-500 mm F5,0-6,3 DG OS HSM ein hervorragendes Mega Tele-Zoomobjektive, das in dieser Preisklasse im Augenblick nicht zu schlagen ist.
Wie sich das Objektiv in Verbindung mit anderen Kameras, wie z. B. Canon, Sony, usw. schlägt, kann ich nicht sagen, aber zumindest mit einer Nikon-Kamera sollen Sigma-Objektive bekanntlich gut harmonieren.
Images in this review
Landshövding Wibelius
Wunderbares Tele-Zoom
Reviewed in Germany on November 4, 2013Style: for Nikon Digital SLR CamerasVerified Purchase
