Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Silent Spring at 50: The False Crises of Rachel Carson Hardcover – September 16, 2012
|New from||Used from|
Up to 50% off select Non-Fiction books
Featured titles are up to 50% off for a limited time. See all titles
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
The authors, almost none of whom are scientists, pick and chose which subjects to investigate and they use methods that would be laughed from the real scientific community. Let's take Carson's words on cancer. She predicted that cancer cases would increase with the increasing use of synthetic chemicals. The authors, for some reason, chose to examine cancer deaths rather than cancer cases, which is like comparing apples and bananas. Treatment of numerous cancers has improved markedly since the book was written. Just because the death rates haven't increased, or have decreased, does not mean the number of cases hasn't. In addition, the death rates from the cancers most likely to be caused by chemical exposure are beginning to increase considerably and in the people (age wise) who would have been the most exposed. These include liver, pancreatic and lymphoma cancers.
Ironically, the authors took her to task for not pointing out the link between cigarettes and cancer. However, that really was not the point of the book…it was to warn about synthetic chemical use in the environment so why would Carson have addressed cigarettes. If we follow that logic, she also failed to link asbestos to cancer and the link was known then too. In addition, it was way outside her field of expertise.Read more ›
The authors say, "Despite her reputation as a careful writer widely praised for building her arguments on science and facts, Carson’s best-seller contained significant errors and sins of omission."
A "sin of omission" is by definition an omission that someone is aware of. Obviously if there was an omission, Carson wasn't aware of it: that wasn't her style. So there were no "sins" committed in writing her book.
They accuse her of "deliberate ignorance." Anyone who knows anything at all about Rachel Carson would bite their tongue before accusing her of unethical behavior of any kind, much less "deliberate ignorance." It's a simple insult leveled by simple people.
They continue: " Much of what was presented as certainty then was slanted, and today we know much of it is simply wrong."
"Slanted" is certainly an opinion. Many held that opinion. Many others did not. But an investigation to uncover the fact that things that were known 50 years before are "simply wrong" today is not a very productive use of these gentlemen's time. Much of what ANY scientist knew 50 years ago is known to be wrong today. Not, in other words, a heart-stopping statement. (And anyway, "much" is quite an exaggeration).Read more ›
I've even read where one company plans on injecting pesticides inside the plant/fruit so that it won't hurt the environment------what about the people eating the food?
This is an obvious long-stretch and shallow attack on Rachel Carson - an attack on the person, more than her book, who died of cancer shortly after publishing so she's not here to defend herself. This book inspired a huge movement towards saving our planet's life support system, a legacy under-appreciated, and if the capitalist movement wanted to debunk Carson's statements they're more than a day late and a dollar short... it's 50 years late and even shorter. I'm guessing no one expected her legacy to live on this long and now that the Millennial generation is embracing this legacy, carrying it with them into their next generation, it's time to try to destroy it? Clearly the authors and supporters of this wasted literature are clueless about, among many other things, understanding how modern people which span across generations think, feel, and actually understand.
It's worth breezing through this, which is all I could stomach doing, though not worth putting $$ into-borrow if you can. It's worth it because it's always good to understand what the opponent thinks, how the enemy strategizes.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Complete waste of time to read. Read Silent Spring instead and make up your own mind.Published 2 months ago by Book Lover
Wish I could give it zero stars. If the Cato Institute and the likes of the Kochs had any role in this publication you can rest assured it lacks scientific credibility. Read morePublished 6 months ago by JFC
I attended the Rudolf Steiner School and in fourth grade this book was treated like a biblical text, plus Ms Carson was looked up to like a [false] god! Read morePublished 6 months ago by Tony Meyer
The authors' association with the Cato Institute should alert readers to a pre-existing orientation against all regulation of corporate activity, against independent study of... Read morePublished 6 months ago by P
Read Silent Spring in 60's. As usual making the news is more important than REPORTING THE NEWS!Published 17 months ago by Dr. James L. Griffin, Ph.D.
I expected more of a review on the science behind Silent Spring. Most of the reviews looked at the social aspect of the book. Read morePublished 19 months ago by Emily