Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Qty:1
  • List Price: $25.95
  • Save: $6.93 (27%)
FREE Shipping on orders with at least $25 of books.
Only 7 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Silent Spring at 50: The ... has been added to your Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Good condition book with light reader wear. No writing. Some light cover wear. Ships from Amazon. Fast shipping. Buy with confidence
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Silent Spring at 50: The False Crises of Rachel Carson Hardcover – September 16, 2012

2.8 out of 5 stars 33 customer reviews

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Price
New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$19.02
$8.98 $2.39

Up to 50% off select Non-Fiction books
Featured titles are up to 50% off for a limited time. See all titles
$19.02 FREE Shipping on orders with at least $25 of books. Only 7 left in stock (more on the way). Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Frequently Bought Together

  • Silent Spring at 50: The False Crises of Rachel Carson
  • +
  • Silent Spring
Total price: $29.80
Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Roger E. Meiners is chairman of the department of economics at the University of Texas at Arlington and a senior fellow at the Property & Environment Research Center, Bozeman, MT. Pierre Desrochers is associate professor of geography at the University of Toronto and senior research fellow at the Center for the History of Political Economy at Duke University. Andrew P. Morriss is professor of law and business at the University of Alabama and a senior fellow at the Property & Environment Research Center, Bozeman, MT.


NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 344 pages
  • Publisher: Cato Institute (September 16, 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1937184994
  • ISBN-13: 978-1937184995
  • Product Dimensions: 6.3 x 1.2 x 9.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (33 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #562,002 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

By Frederick S. Goethel VINE VOICE on June 27, 2014
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Right from the beginning, I think anyone reading this should note that any scientific work will suffer somewhat from scrutiny 50 years after the original work was done. It is the nature of science to continuously improve and investigate and as new and better equipment and tests are created, a certain amount of information will become stale and dated. With that said, it should also be noted that Silent Spring has held up quite well to this scrutiny a half a century later.

The authors, almost none of whom are scientists, pick and chose which subjects to investigate and they use methods that would be laughed from the real scientific community. Let's take Carson's words on cancer. She predicted that cancer cases would increase with the increasing use of synthetic chemicals. The authors, for some reason, chose to examine cancer deaths rather than cancer cases, which is like comparing apples and bananas. Treatment of numerous cancers has improved markedly since the book was written. Just because the death rates haven't increased, or have decreased, does not mean the number of cases hasn't. In addition, the death rates from the cancers most likely to be caused by chemical exposure are beginning to increase considerably and in the people (age wise) who would have been the most exposed. These include liver, pancreatic and lymphoma cancers.

Ironically, the authors took her to task for not pointing out the link between cigarettes and cancer. However, that really was not the point of the book…it was to warn about synthetic chemical use in the environment so why would Carson have addressed cigarettes. If we follow that logic, she also failed to link asbestos to cancer and the link was known then too. In addition, it was way outside her field of expertise.
Read more ›
Comment 78 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
What was even the purpose of this book? The authors say that "Silent Spring" was never properly criticized, so now it is time for them to do so. That in itself is an erroneous statement. Anyone alive at the time remembers that the book and the author were dragged over the grill of public, media, scientific, political, and industry criticism until the day of her death. What on earth could have been left out at the time?

The authors say, "Despite her reputation as a careful writer widely praised for building her arguments on science and facts, Carson’s best-seller contained significant errors and sins of omission."

A "sin of omission" is by definition an omission that someone is aware of. Obviously if there was an omission, Carson wasn't aware of it: that wasn't her style. So there were no "sins" committed in writing her book.

They accuse her of "deliberate ignorance." Anyone who knows anything at all about Rachel Carson would bite their tongue before accusing her of unethical behavior of any kind, much less "deliberate ignorance." It's a simple insult leveled by simple people.

They continue: " Much of what was presented as certainty then was slanted, and today we know much of it is simply wrong."

"Slanted" is certainly an opinion. Many held that opinion. Many others did not. But an investigation to uncover the fact that things that were known 50 years before are "simply wrong" today is not a very productive use of these gentlemen's time. Much of what ANY scientist knew 50 years ago is known to be wrong today. Not, in other words, a heart-stopping statement. (And anyway, "much" is quite an exaggeration).
Read more ›
Comment 21 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Too bad the authors did not have the courage, compassion, and vision of Rachel Carson. They appear to be shills (cloaked in university degrees) for the powerful and profitable chemical and pesticide industries. They did not change the course of history for the greater good as did the remarkable Rachel Carson.
Comment 37 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
It's clear that with the new generation of food production----GMO, cross breeds, and moving the production further and further away from the public and putting the smaller farmers out of business....and the USDA really being useless--no doubt in the pocket of the big meat corps and agriculture groups, that this book would disclaim the work of Rachel Carson.
I've even read where one company plans on injecting pesticides inside the plant/fruit so that it won't hurt the environment------what about the people eating the food?
Comment 24 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
I wish we could rate with negative stars.
This is an obvious long-stretch and shallow attack on Rachel Carson - an attack on the person, more than her book, who died of cancer shortly after publishing so she's not here to defend herself. This book inspired a huge movement towards saving our planet's life support system, a legacy under-appreciated, and if the capitalist movement wanted to debunk Carson's statements they're more than a day late and a dollar short... it's 50 years late and even shorter. I'm guessing no one expected her legacy to live on this long and now that the Millennial generation is embracing this legacy, carrying it with them into their next generation, it's time to try to destroy it? Clearly the authors and supporters of this wasted literature are clueless about, among many other things, understanding how modern people which span across generations think, feel, and actually understand.
It's worth breezing through this, which is all I could stomach doing, though not worth putting $$ into-borrow if you can. It's worth it because it's always good to understand what the opponent thinks, how the enemy strategizes.
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Set up an Amazon Giveaway

Silent Spring at 50: The False Crises of Rachel Carson
Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers. Learn more about Amazon Giveaway
This item: Silent Spring at 50: The False Crises of Rachel Carson