Simulating War: Studying Conflict through Simulation Games Reprint Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Over the past fifty years, many thousands of conflict simulations have been published that bring the dynamics of past and possible future wars to life.
In this book, Philip Sabin explores the theory and practice of conflict simulation as a topic in its own right, based on his thirty years of experience in designing wargames and using them in teaching. Simulating War sets conflict simulation in its proper context alongside more familiar techniques such as game theory and operational analysis. It explains in detail the analytical and modelling techniques involved, and it teaches you how to design your own simulations of conflicts of your choice. The book provides eight simple illustrative simulations of specific historical conflicts, complete with rules, maps and counters.
Simulating War is essential reading for all recreational or professional simulation gamers, and for anyone who is interested in modelling war, from teachers and students to military officers.
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Philip Sabin is Professor of Strategic Studies in the Department of War Studies at King's College, London, UK. He has worked closely with the armed services and appears regularly on TV and radio. He has also co-edited the two volume Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare (2007).
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Bloomsbury Academic; Reprint edition (June 19, 2014)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1472533917
- ISBN-13 : 978-1472533913
- Item Weight : 1.43 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.2 x 1.15 x 9.15 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,012,422 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #242 in Military Sciences
- #665 in Media Studies (Books)
- #773 in Military History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
A wargamer designer looking for useful design guidance won't find it in here. As an experienced wargamer it was an interesting read. I found the idea of supplementing the usual methods of instruction with simulation games very intriguing. But as an experienced wargamer, I fear that exposing students to simulation games this simple will give them a very biased view of the hobby -- other educators please take notice. Sabin writes about the biased view many have of wargaming -- 'just games' or 'childish play' -- and how he had to work to get wargaming accepted in class, but his simple simulations are not doing much to change that view. From my own experience, once you grasp the basics common to all simulation games, learning complex games comes easier than learning the first simple game.
I was surprised that no alternative approaches were considered to allow students to experience the games fuller, or to expose them to more complex simulations. Since most of the games used have minimal piece count, it would be simple to record the position and split the play across two days (using VASSAL would make this trivial), or play could be homework. I would have been interested to learn if those approaches were workable, or if they had been tried.
All-in-all an interesting book about a minimalist approach to using simulation games to educate students, but a book that leaves you wondering "why doesn't he do more?".
If you read one book on contemporary security issues this year, let it be this one.
I have been a wargamer for a good part of my life and over the years have collected a sizeable group of different types of games. This book goes into the details of items that are present in a lot of wargames like zones of control and explains what they are representing and not treating is just as a game mechanic. The author spends a lot of time describing how different types of conflict situations (or wargames) are designed and developed. He talks about the differences that you would see about fighting in Ancient Roman times versus a more modern conflict like World War II.
One thing I have noticed that since I started reading this book, whenever I am playing either a board wargame or a computer version, I seem to be examining and thinking about what the designer was thinking or try to get across regarding certain elements of their design. What are they stressing as being important versus what might have been glossed over as a simple side-note or something beyond the player's control. Before reading this book, I do not remember thinking about such items in the games I play.
I would recommend this book to anyone who has every played a board wargame and might have wondered what has gone into the making of it. He even discusses computer wargames and indicates which ones he thinks are good simulations and which ones are more geared less toward recreating a conflict and more towards the general entertainment category. This book will get you thinking differently about the games and how the modern military in a lot of countries use very similar games to train the soldiers of today.
Top reviews from other countries
As someone who has edited and written more wargaming books than most, I am always pleased when a new book says something original about wargaming. This book has a message. The message is micro board wargames are good for education and training. This book argues the case that wargames, in particular manual board games, are an invaluable tool for examining tactical and operational military history. The best of these games are worthy of inclusion of any study of military history.
The first part of the book is a summary of the academic potential of wargaming techniques. The value of games to education and training is indisputable in the academic and business world. Phil takes that view and argues that wargaming can be used as tool to understand military history, supporting this with some academic evidence and his own experiences of using games as part of his teaching of military history at Kings College London.
The second part of the book is a straightforward guide to building simple `micro-board games'. These are games that are smaller than even the smallest of commercial `folio' type board games. Small and simple enough to be used as part of a two hour teaching session. Building on the work of Peter Perla's Art of Wargaming and James Dunnigan's The Complete Wagames Handbook, the book offers a recipe for analysing historical conflicts and distilling them into a board game format.
The third part of the book gives a number of worked examples of such micro-board games. It includes games from the ancient world and World War II. There are also two tactical games; one about a battalion attack in WWII and the other about a company level assault on a built up area. The latter is still relevant to modern conflict. Although one could cut up the colour plates in the book to play the games, most people will download the game components from the book's web site and print them themselves or use play them on the computer using the free Cyberbox software.
The book may not appeal to all parts of the disparate hobby of wargaming. Some miniature (figure) gamers are sometimes overly keen with their mental model of wargaming that is based around a game with realistic terrain features using miniature figures to represent every battle. Such miniature wargamers may `scratch their heads' about the large number of references to classic board games within this book.
Board gamers have often spent years developing their skills on a variety of complex simulation and so they may look upon the games within the book as too simple for their own tastes. Personally, I would hope they will be inspired by the book to take their wargaming to the next level and start to develop their own board games. The act of creating one's own game is a very interesting learning experience and one that Donald Featherstone, and the other early pioneers, would all thoroughly approve of.
Professional wargaming, practised by the military, is largely insular and inward looking. Many of these professional wargamers are in apparent ignorance of the wider developments of the commercial and hobby wargaming, so some of these professionals will see little relevance to any book giving examples that are not from the immediate past, current operations or probable immediate future. However, attitudes can change. The British Army has recently started doing study tours of the 1944 Battle for Normandy and the American military has a long tradition of scholarship about military history that is often the envy of other nations. The American armed forces have long placed great value on studying military history as an essential part of the education for their potential senior commanders. Many of the books by recent American commanders make reference to historical strategies which demonstrates they have at least a passing knowledge of military history.
The book is clearly a work of scholarship, but what will the wider academic community make of the book? Phil's writes in a lively accessible way, using many anecdotes from his own experience. This is in contrast to the many academic text books that are written in a style as `dry as dust'. A purely academic book would have had more on games theory (and less on practical examples) and would have included some quantitative studies of the impact of using board games for studying military history compared with traditional teaching methods (supported with statistics and graphs). I have used such games in my own teaching and I have no doubt they encourage `active' and `deep' learning. Many teachers struggle with using games in their teaching. Games are outside their comfort zone, games (especially ones created by the teacher) may apparently `fail' or descend into lively chaos. My own experience is that such failures do not matter, the students always find the games interesting and rewarding, even if the game does not actually work that well. However, this book is aimed at the wider world of wargaming rather than just the tiny world of academic wargames.
I can whole heartedly recommend this new book to anyone who is looking to develop their understanding of wargaming. Developing wargames is great fun and this book will help get started on that path.
John Curry, Editor of the History of Wargaming Project.
A successful war game has particular characteristics and advice is given on how to design games that will work well. In particular the secret lies in balancing simplicity and brevity with historical accuracy - as the author explains, this is more of an art than a science.
The other key point he makes is the efficacy of playing these models with students as a teaching technique. In this case the author cites his long experience of playing war games with both military and civilian students as evidence. This is perhaps the most contentious part of the book as war games seldom seem to be used in this context (Philip Sabin is obviously something of a pioneer in this field). However the book also discusses the stigma that has unfairly arisen around war gaming and explains how this has acted to discourage their use beyond hobbyists and a small cadre of professional military designers.
A discussion of published war games points out that academic historians, hobbyists and military professionals would all have different requirements and therefore games designed for one sphere might not work in another context. For example, for teaching purposes the hobby games tend to be far too complicated (without necessarily being better historical models) while professional military games tend to be "command simulations" based on potential future conflicts rather than historical investigations.
I had no previous experience with war games before reading this book beyond popular computer simulations like Total War or Call of Duty (the shortcomings of which are explained in detail). I am now keen to discover more although unlike the author I believe the digitization of these games will ultimately prove completely irresistible so I don't think I'll actually buy any of the physical board games listed in the bibliography.
I was a bit disapointed because I was expecting the games components to be better presented (like some sort of annexes) but nonetheles it still is a must have for the gronard wargamers and anyone who may also be a fan of this kind of simulations.








