A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama's Diplomacy with Iran
Comprar nuevo
-49% US$8.75US$8.75
Entrega por US$3.99 entre el 4 - 7 de enero
Enviado por: powells_chicago Vendido por: powells_chicago
Más información
Ahorra con Usado - Muy Bueno
US$6.37US$6.37
Entrega GRATIS entre el 6 - 9 de enero
Enviado por: ThriftBooks-Atlanta Vendido por: ThriftBooks-Atlanta
Devolver gratis este producto
Ofrecemos retornos fáciles y prácticos con al menos una opción de retorno gratuito: sin gastos de envío. Todos los retornos deben cumplir con nuestra política de retornos.
Más información sobre las devoluciones gratis.- Ve a tus pedidos y empieza el proceso de devolución
- Seleccione su opción de envío gratis preferida
- Entregar y marcharse
Detalles del libro
- Número de páginas312 páginas
- IdiomaInglés
- EditorialYale University Press
- Fecha de publicación29 Enero 2013
- Dimensiones6.3 x 0.81 x 9.23 pulgadas
- ISBN-100300192363
- ISBN-13978-0300192360
The first objective assessment of the high-stakes diplomatic sparring between Washington and Tehran during President Obama’s first years in office
Have the diplomatic efforts of the Obama administration toward Iran failed? Was the Bush administration's emphasis on military intervention, refusal to negotiate, and pursuit of regime change a better approach? How can the United States best address the ongoing turmoil in Tehran? This book provides a definitive and comprehensive analysis of the Obama administration's early diplomatic outreach to Iran and discusses the best way to move toward more positive relations between the two discordant states.
Trita Parsi, a Middle East foreign policy expert with extensive Capitol Hill and United Nations experience, interviewed 70 high-ranking officials from the U.S., Iran, Europe, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Brazil—including the top American and Iranian negotiators—for this book. Parsi uncovers the previously unknown story of American and Iranian negotiations during Obama's early years as president, the calculations behind the two nations' dealings, and the real reasons for their current stalemate. Contrary to prevailing opinion, Parsi contends that diplomacy has not been fully tried. For various reasons, Obama's diplomacy ended up being a single roll of the dice. It had to work either immediately—or not at all. Persistence and perseverance are keys to any negotiation. Neither Iran nor the U.S. had them in 2009.
Críticas
"The most incisive account available. . . . Eminently readable, sometimes gripping."--L.#160; "--L. Carl Brown "Foreign Affairs "
"With this book, Trita Parsi has given us an authoritative document on one of today's most urgent and nettlesome foreign policy challenges. He not only draws on the published record, but contributes original reporting from the vantage points of all the players, including the Iranian perspective. It will be edifying for a wide range of readers, from foreign policy specialists to anyone with a stake in the outcome--which is all of us."--David Shorr, "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists"--David Shorr "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists "
"You gotta get this. . . . Really, it is an amazing perspective on all the elements that go into even the smallest of diplomatic deals./i>--Jon Stewart "The Daily Show "
Biografía del autor
Trita Parsi is president of the National Iranian American Council and a former Public Policy Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. In 2010 he received the Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order, and he is frequently consulted by Western and Asian governments on foreign policy matters. He lives in McLean, VA.
Sobre el autor
Sigue a los autores para recibir notificaciones de sus nuevas obras, así como recomendaciones mejoradas.Trita Parsi is the 2010 recipient of the $200,000 Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order. He is an award-winning author with a focus on US foreign policy in the Middle East. His first book, Treacherous Alliance - The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran and the US (Yale University Press, 2007) won the Grawemeyer award and Council of Foreign Relations Arthur Ross Award in 2008 (Silver Medallion).
His second book, A Single Roll of the Dice - Obama's Diplomacy with Iran (Yale University Press, 2012) was selected as The Best Book on The Middle East in 2012 by Foreign Affairs. His latest book - Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran and the Triumph of Diplomacy (Yale University Press, 2017) - reveals the behind the scenes story to the historic nuclear deal with Iran. Dr. Parsi is the President of the largest Iranian-American grassroots organization in the US, the National Iranian American Council and has taught at Johns Hopkins University and George Washington University. He currently teaches at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University in Washington DC.
Comprados juntos habitualmente
Comprados juntos habitualmente

También podría interesarte
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
Información de producto
| Editorial | Yale University Press; Reimpresión edición (29 Enero 2013) |
|---|---|
| Idioma | Inglés |
| Tapa blanda | 312 páginas |
| ISBN-10 | 0300192363 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-0300192360 |
| Dimensiones | 6.3 x 0.81 x 9.23 pulgadas |
| Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon |
nº2,458,120 en Libros (Ver el Top 100 en Libros)
nº868 en Historia de Irán (Libros)
nº1,755 en Diplomacia Internacional (Libros)
nº3,171 en Política de Medio Oriente
|
| Opinión media de los clientes | 4.2 de 5 estrellas 71Opiniones |
Los clientes que compraron este producto también compraron
También podría interesarte
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
Opiniones con imágenes
Reporta una opinión
- Acoso, lenguaje ofensivo
- Spam, publicidad, promociones
- Otorgado a cambio de efectivo, descuentos
Lo sentimos, se produjo un error
Inténtalo de nuevo más tarde.Opiniones destacadas de los Estados Unidos
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaThis book is indispensableCalificado en Estados Unidos el 3 de enero de 2012This book is so good that even though I purchased it for my kindle, I will buy the hardcover too so I can thoroughly mark it up for future reference. Dr.Parsi, an Iranian-American who clearly feels nothing but contempt for the current regime, describes how the United... Ver másThis book is so good that even though I purchased it for my kindle, I will buy the hardcover too so I can thoroughly mark it up for future reference.
Dr.Parsi, an Iranian-American who clearly feels nothing but contempt for the current regime, describes how the United States has mishandled Iran for decades. Opportunities for engagement (i.e., changing Iran's behavior) were missed over and over again largely due to intellectual rigidity on the part of successive administrations and the influence of lobbyists with a vested interest in continuation of the conflict.
Hopes for a breakthrough came with the election of President Obama whose natural instinct is toward diplomacy, not confrontation, but he was boxed in by lobbyists and by a Congress that takes its marching orders from them.
Obama has been president for 3 years, during which time the US has directly communicated with Iranian officials for a grand total of 45 minutes.
And now, following Obama's approval of a sanctions bill that will accomplish nothing other than to harm our allies and the Iranian people while, quite likely, strengthening the regime, we may be on the road to war.
This is insane. Although we should do what we can to prevent development of an Iranian bomb, the best means to achieve that goal is through dialogue not dumb (i.e., the opposite of "smart") sanctions and mindless rhetoric designed to impress domestic U.S. interest groups (i.e, the "pro-Israel" lobby and end-of-days Christian zealots.
It should also be said that Iran is likely to develop nuclear weapons, no matter what we do. That being the case, lessening and not exacerbating tensions would seem to be wise.
Parsi's book explains how we got to this awful pass and how, despite overwhelming opposition on the part of Americans to another Middle East war, we could find ourselves in one very soon.
Parsi's book reminds me off David Halberstam's classic, "The Best and the Brightest," about the government officials and media figures who lied us into Vietnam. Sadly, Halberstam's book was written after the war. Parsi's is written before the war starts. In short, this book can help prevent an unnecessary and catastrophic war that could lead to many dead, an Iranian rush to develop nuclear bombs, attacks on our troops in the Middle East, thousands of Hizbullah missiles devastating Israel, and the end of any chance for economic recovery (oil prices would skyrocket).
In short, this is must reading by one of America's leading analysts of US-Iranian relations.
MJ Rosenberg
Washington, DC
This book is so good that even though I purchased it for my kindle, I will buy the hardcover too so I can thoroughly mark it up for future reference.
Dr.Parsi, an Iranian-American who clearly feels nothing but contempt for the current regime, describes how the United States has mishandled Iran for decades. Opportunities for engagement (i.e., changing Iran's behavior) were missed over and over again largely due to intellectual rigidity on the part of successive administrations and the influence of lobbyists with a vested interest in continuation of the conflict.
Hopes for a breakthrough came with the election of President Obama whose natural instinct is toward diplomacy, not confrontation, but he was boxed in by lobbyists and by a Congress that takes its marching orders from them.
Obama has been president for 3 years, during which time the US has directly communicated with Iranian officials for a grand total of 45 minutes.
And now, following Obama's approval of a sanctions bill that will accomplish nothing other than to harm our allies and the Iranian people while, quite likely, strengthening the regime, we may be on the road to war.
This is insane. Although we should do what we can to prevent development of an Iranian bomb, the best means to achieve that goal is through dialogue not dumb (i.e., the opposite of "smart") sanctions and mindless rhetoric designed to impress domestic U.S. interest groups (i.e, the "pro-Israel" lobby and end-of-days Christian zealots.
It should also be said that Iran is likely to develop nuclear weapons, no matter what we do. That being the case, lessening and not exacerbating tensions would seem to be wise.
Parsi's book explains how we got to this awful pass and how, despite overwhelming opposition on the part of Americans to another Middle East war, we could find ourselves in one very soon.
Parsi's book reminds me off David Halberstam's classic, "The Best and the Brightest," about the government officials and media figures who lied us into Vietnam. Sadly, Halberstam's book was written after the war. Parsi's is written before the war starts. In short, this book can help prevent an unnecessary and catastrophic war that could lead to many dead, an Iranian rush to develop nuclear bombs, attacks on our troops in the Middle East, thousands of Hizbullah missiles devastating Israel, and the end of any chance for economic recovery (oil prices would skyrocket).
In short, this is must reading by one of America's leading analysts of US-Iranian relations.
MJ Rosenberg
Washington, DC
- 4.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaObama's Diplomacy with IranCalificado en Estados Unidos el 17 de abril de 2012I enjoyed reading this book and found it informative. Was looking for specifics on why the two sides, USA and Iran had not been able to meet and resolve their issues before. Timely book given the recent gathering in Istanbul where all parties involved seem to agree on the... Ver másI enjoyed reading this book and found it informative. Was looking for specifics on why the two sides, USA and Iran had not been able to meet and resolve their issues before. Timely book given the recent gathering in Istanbul where all parties involved seem to agree on the positive outcome. I find the book well written and easy to read and digest. As a Iranian American I have been obviously interested in the relationship between the two countries. Trita also an Iranian American has demonstrated access to key players on both sides. The book could have been more informative if it also expanded on the trade history between the two countries and promote the trade upside potential for US firms that are now locked out. The book while factual is still considered an overview of powers at play in political decision making missing out on the impact business trade has on relationships. Ultimately it is not the governments that decide but businesses that drive politics. US corporations thanks to the sanctions are losing market share in a very lucrative part of the world given Iran's rich oil and gas industries and large educated pro American population. The ramifications of the political decisions on trade or lack of it in $ and cents would have added to the book's representation of the facts on the ground. The book all the same is a timely review of how political decisions are made in a difficult environment when many special interest groups on both sides attempt to promote their own agenda.
I enjoyed reading this book and found it informative. Was looking for specifics on why the two sides, USA and Iran had not been able to meet and resolve their issues before. Timely book given the recent gathering in Istanbul where all parties involved seem to agree on the positive outcome. I find the book well written and easy to read and digest. As a Iranian American I have been obviously interested in the relationship between the two countries. Trita also an Iranian American has demonstrated access to key players on both sides. The book could have been more informative if it also expanded on the trade history between the two countries and promote the trade upside potential for US firms that are now locked out. The book while factual is still considered an overview of powers at play in political decision making missing out on the impact business trade has on relationships. Ultimately it is not the governments that decide but businesses that drive politics. US corporations thanks to the sanctions are losing market share in a very lucrative part of the world given Iran's rich oil and gas industries and large educated pro American population. The ramifications of the political decisions on trade or lack of it in $ and cents would have added to the book's representation of the facts on the ground. The book all the same is a timely review of how political decisions are made in a difficult environment when many special interest groups on both sides attempt to promote their own agenda.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadarecommended wholeheartedlyCalificado en Estados Unidos el 14 de septiembre de 2012An exhaustive, accessibly written account of US policy towards Iran in the last 3 years and as such the only one of its sort. As in his previous books, Parsi can draw from extensive primary sources, mainly interviews conducted by himself with senior administration... Ver másAn exhaustive, accessibly written account of US policy towards Iran in the last 3 years and as such the only one of its sort. As in his previous books, Parsi can draw from extensive primary sources, mainly interviews conducted by himself with senior administration officials, policy makers and foreign diplomats. The complex interplay between US domestic politics (that is, mainly, Congress' push for harsher sanctions), Israeli security interests, the needs of European allies and the uncertainty of domestic developments in Iran is depicted accurately and yields some interesting new insights.
Parsi puts forward the hypothesis, that the main reason for the ongoing stagnation in nuclear negotiations is a fundamental lack of trust. However, that both parties seem unable to overcome their mutual mistrust is grounded not in confindence building having failed, but rather in it never really having been tried. Every time one side has shown the smallest sign of good will, the other has been unable or unwilling "to take yes for an answer". While this hypothesis is supported by a number of events portrayed in the book, the density of facts leaves room for other interpretations. The main goal of the book is not to give an overall explanation but a balanced description of what happened.
All in all, this makes the book an excellent read for the interested public and practioners in the field, as well as an abundant empirical source for scholars who try to explain US - Iranian relations from a theoretical perspective.
An exhaustive, accessibly written account of US policy towards Iran in the last 3 years and as such the only one of its sort. As in his previous books, Parsi can draw from extensive primary sources, mainly interviews conducted by himself with senior administration officials, policy makers and foreign diplomats. The complex interplay between US domestic politics (that is, mainly, Congress' push for harsher sanctions), Israeli security interests, the needs of European allies and the uncertainty of domestic developments in Iran is depicted accurately and yields some interesting new insights.
Parsi puts forward the hypothesis, that the main reason for the ongoing stagnation in nuclear negotiations is a fundamental lack of trust. However, that both parties seem unable to overcome their mutual mistrust is grounded not in confindence building having failed, but rather in it never really having been tried. Every time one side has shown the smallest sign of good will, the other has been unable or unwilling "to take yes for an answer". While this hypothesis is supported by a number of events portrayed in the book, the density of facts leaves room for other interpretations. The main goal of the book is not to give an overall explanation but a balanced description of what happened.
All in all, this makes the book an excellent read for the interested public and practioners in the field, as well as an abundant empirical source for scholars who try to explain US - Iranian relations from a theoretical perspective.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaExcellent Read That Cuts Through The Thick Fog Of DisinformationCalificado en Estados Unidos el 23 de diciembre de 2012This is an antidote to poisonous political posturing that promotes an atmosphere of conflict, aimed at limiting--if not altering--the administration's policy options. The author reveals lost opportunities to settle outstanding issues by both Iran and the United States.... Ver másThis is an antidote to poisonous political posturing that promotes an atmosphere of conflict, aimed at limiting--if not altering--the administration's policy options. The author reveals lost opportunities to settle outstanding issues by both Iran and the United States. Legislative pressure to direct Obama's foreign policy, has undermined US diplomacy with unfortunate results that could not be easily or quickly undone. The author correctly states that "The thirty-year-old U.S. -Iran enmity is no longer a phenomenon; it is an institution." He could have added that it is an industry as well. Several states in the region fear normalization of US-Iranian relations may occur at their expense, or at the very least diminish their current importance in US foreign policy and security calculations. Continuous tension also diverts attention away from thorny concerns regarding peace, human rights, and good governance. The fear expressed by a Natanyahu advisor that "[T]he Great Satan will make up with Iran and forget about Israel," is shared by the ruling elite of several Persian Gulf states. The "dual track" policy that finally evolved during Obama's Presidency was in Zbigniew Brezezinski's words engagement in "polemics and diatribes with the Iranians while at the same time engaging seemingly in a negotiating process... The first is not conducive to the second." The Iranian government did not help matters either, particularly with Ahmadinejad's 2009 re-election and the crack-down that followed it. When Turkey and Brazil, encouraged by the US President succeeded in negotiating a nuclear fuel deal with Iran in May 2010, Washington reacted as it had done in May 2003 to the Swiss Ambassador to Iran's arrival in Washington with a comprehensive proposal the Iranian leadership had given him to deliver to the Bush Administration, that addressed all outstanding US concerns. The nuclear fuel swap that was to be a confidence-building measure to facilitate further negotiation, became a pre-condition for diplomacy. The Turks and the Brazilians had been expected to fail, to enhance legitimacy of sanctions to be imposed on Iran, but they succeeded. The choice was to see the efforts invested to gain international support to impose sanctions on Iran go to waste; or accept yes for an answer!
This is an antidote to poisonous political posturing that promotes an atmosphere of conflict, aimed at limiting--if not altering--the administration's policy options. The author reveals lost opportunities to settle outstanding issues by both Iran and the United States. Legislative pressure to direct Obama's foreign policy, has undermined US diplomacy with unfortunate results that could not be easily or quickly undone. The author correctly states that "The thirty-year-old U.S. -Iran enmity is no longer a phenomenon; it is an institution." He could have added that it is an industry as well. Several states in the region fear normalization of US-Iranian relations may occur at their expense, or at the very least diminish their current importance in US foreign policy and security calculations. Continuous tension also diverts attention away from thorny concerns regarding peace, human rights, and good governance. The fear expressed by a Natanyahu advisor that "[T]he Great Satan will make up with Iran and forget about Israel," is shared by the ruling elite of several Persian Gulf states. The "dual track" policy that finally evolved during Obama's Presidency was in Zbigniew Brezezinski's words engagement in "polemics and diatribes with the Iranians while at the same time engaging seemingly in a negotiating process... The first is not conducive to the second." The Iranian government did not help matters either, particularly with Ahmadinejad's 2009 re-election and the crack-down that followed it. When Turkey and Brazil, encouraged by the US President succeeded in negotiating a nuclear fuel deal with Iran in May 2010, Washington reacted as it had done in May 2003 to the Swiss Ambassador to Iran's arrival in Washington with a comprehensive proposal the Iranian leadership had given him to deliver to the Bush Administration, that addressed all outstanding US concerns. The nuclear fuel swap that was to be a confidence-building measure to facilitate further negotiation, became a pre-condition for diplomacy. The Turks and the Brazilians had been expected to fail, to enhance legitimacy of sanctions to be imposed on Iran, but they succeeded. The choice was to see the efforts invested to gain international support to impose sanctions on Iran go to waste; or accept yes for an answer!
- 4.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaOutstanding behind the scenes view!Calificado en Estados Unidos el 21 de junio de 2013Trita Parsa had incredible access to people on all sides of the Iranian nuclear issue. The insight provided was invaluable to learning what was at stake, when, and how one misstep after another led us to where we are today. Knowing this information allows the reader to be... Ver másTrita Parsa had incredible access to people on all sides of the Iranian nuclear issue. The insight provided was invaluable to learning what was at stake, when, and how one misstep after another led us to where we are today. Knowing this information allows the reader to be better informed to follow the current happenings and make their own educated predictions (or at least have an opinion) on what may happen in the future. I highly recommend this very readable account to anyone interested in learning more about one of the most contentious topics on the international scene today.
Trita Parsa had incredible access to people on all sides of the Iranian nuclear issue. The insight provided was invaluable to learning what was at stake, when, and how one misstep after another led us to where we are today. Knowing this information allows the reader to be better informed to follow the current happenings and make their own educated predictions (or at least have an opinion) on what may happen in the future. I highly recommend this very readable account to anyone interested in learning more about one of the most contentious topics on the international scene today.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA thorough and objective treatment of Obama's Iran policyCalificado en Estados Unidos el 4 de marzo de 2012I would recommend this book to anyone who wants a better understanding of not just what the Obama administration's Iran policy has been but also all the different elements and pressures that have influenced Iran policy to date. This book, while perhaps not as good as... Ver másI would recommend this book to anyone who wants a better understanding of not just what the Obama administration's Iran policy has been but also all the different elements and pressures that have influenced Iran policy to date. This book, while perhaps not as good as his previous book Treacherous Alliance, which is pone of the best Middle East foreign policy books I have ever read, is well written and is filled with a healthy dose of anecdotes and conversations with key policy makers involved in US-Iran relations. As such, the book is more than just one man's take on US policy -- it is an account of what the critical decision makers believe and how their perceptions steered policy in the direction it has gone. Overall this book is both entertaining and informative a must read for anyone trying to getting a better handle on US-Iran relations.
And on a side note, do be deterred by the people giving the book one star ratings and calling him an agent of the Iran regime. Dr. Parsi is well known for having taken on the MEK terrorist/cult group and fighting to keep them on the State department's terrorist list, a campaign which has gained him the ire of many of their fanatical supporters who take every opportunity to slander Dr. Parsi's good name.
I would recommend this book to anyone who wants a better understanding of not just what the Obama administration's Iran policy has been but also all the different elements and pressures that have influenced Iran policy to date. This book, while perhaps not as good as his previous book Treacherous Alliance, which is pone of the best Middle East foreign policy books I have ever read, is well written and is filled with a healthy dose of anecdotes and conversations with key policy makers involved in US-Iran relations. As such, the book is more than just one man's take on US policy -- it is an account of what the critical decision makers believe and how their perceptions steered policy in the direction it has gone. Overall this book is both entertaining and informative a must read for anyone trying to getting a better handle on US-Iran relations.
And on a side note, do be deterred by the people giving the book one star ratings and calling him an agent of the Iran regime. Dr. Parsi is well known for having taken on the MEK terrorist/cult group and fighting to keep them on the State department's terrorist list, a campaign which has gained him the ire of many of their fanatical supporters who take every opportunity to slander Dr. Parsi's good name.
- 1.0 de 5 estrellasMouthpiece of Islamic RepublicCalificado en Estados Unidos el 1 de noviembre de 2022The author of this book is Trita Parsi, the president of NIAC which he helped create in USA. This organization and he appear to be mouthpieces for the Islamic Republic of Iran and on their payroll. Their goal appears to be to use the freedoms offered in United States to... Ver másThe author of this book is Trita Parsi, the president of NIAC which he helped create in USA. This organization and he appear to be mouthpieces for the Islamic Republic of Iran and on their payroll. Their goal appears to be to use the freedoms offered in United States to lobby for the Islamic Republic and are generally accused by Iranians in the west of having attempted to influence policies and even elections to the benefit of Islamic Republic. It is important for the readers to be aware of this as they read this book and understand this book seems to be as if the reader is reading the propaganda of Islamic Republic. Happy reading.
The author of this book is Trita Parsi, the president of NIAC which he helped create in USA. This organization and he appear to be mouthpieces for the Islamic Republic of Iran and on their payroll. Their goal appears to be to use the freedoms offered in United States to lobby for the Islamic Republic and are generally accused by Iranians in the west of having attempted to influence policies and even elections to the benefit of Islamic Republic. It is important for the readers to be aware of this as they read this book and understand this book seems to be as if the reader is reading the propaganda of Islamic Republic. Happy reading.
- 4.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA technical masterpiece with a slghtly flawed deliveryCalificado en Estados Unidos el 17 de marzo de 2012I'll keep this short, as other reviewers have already done more verbose reviews: Parsi has done a marvelous job of documenting the 2003-2012 period in US-Iranian diplomacy. Nearly every source is cited (something shamefully rare in political writing these... Ver másI'll keep this short, as other reviewers have already done more verbose reviews:
Parsi has done a marvelous job of documenting the 2003-2012 period in US-Iranian diplomacy. Nearly every source is cited (something shamefully rare in political writing these days), and he is able to provide solid interpretations and insight into the specific actions of the major players in mid-east diplomacy.
The only area Parsi seems weak is in his general analysis of the region. Here, he too often paints Iran as a victim, and occasionally draws conclusions that seem quite subjective. This isn't to say that Iran has never been victimized by US policy/diplomacy, merely that Parsi seems too ready to declare absolutes in murky waters.
Other than that one minor criticism, this book is excellent, and is highly recommended. Read it for its factual accounting and wonderful primary sources, and overlook Parsi's occasional meandering.
I'll keep this short, as other reviewers have already done more verbose reviews:
Parsi has done a marvelous job of documenting the 2003-2012 period in US-Iranian diplomacy. Nearly every source is cited (something shamefully rare in political writing these days), and he is able to provide solid interpretations and insight into the specific actions of the major players in mid-east diplomacy.
The only area Parsi seems weak is in his general analysis of the region. Here, he too often paints Iran as a victim, and occasionally draws conclusions that seem quite subjective. This isn't to say that Iran has never been victimized by US policy/diplomacy, merely that Parsi seems too ready to declare absolutes in murky waters.
Other than that one minor criticism, this book is excellent, and is highly recommended. Read it for its factual accounting and wonderful primary sources, and overlook Parsi's occasional meandering.
Opiniones más destacadas de otros países
- Traducir todas las opiniones al Español
Tony Jefferies5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA good readCalificado en Canadá el 4 de junio de 2018In the age of Trump this is a sobering read of the diplomatic process that Trita tells wellIn the age of Trump this is a sobering read of the diplomatic process that Trita tells well
Mr. D. J. Walford5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaClear Analysis Identifying the Crucial Issues.Calificado en Reino Unido el 20 de febrero de 2014Trita Parsi has delivered a sound analysis and pinpoints the precise problems that the United States faces when trying to deal constructively with Iran... and vice versa. Unfortunately, the situation has little promise of being resolved anytime soon. Back in 2008, when...Ver másTrita Parsi has delivered a sound analysis and pinpoints the precise problems that the United States faces when trying to deal constructively with Iran... and vice versa. Unfortunately, the situation has little promise of being resolved anytime soon. Back in 2008, when Barack Obama was campaigning to be the 44th President of the United States, he made a solid commitment to engage with his nation's adversaries and enemies if and when he was elected to office. Diplomacy was the new way forward in dealing with the Iranian conundrum and it worked, at least at first. Obama was to find himself facing opposition from all angles, forcing through another series of sanctions against the nation he was originally aiming to create dialogue with. This is a short but detailed book, Trita Parsi presents an easily readable account of where Obama failed in his diplomacy with Iran. A bright start was ultimately flawed by indecision, mistrust, domestic opposition (in Iran also), a lack of political will towards warmer relations, fraudulent elections and duplicitous allies reheating old ideas. And that is where Parsi hits the nail on the head; a lack of political will in both the United States and Iran to engage in diplomacy and revert to the reassuring feeling of entrenched animosity, dominated this latest attempt to end thirty years of distrust between the United States and Iran. As Parsi rightly points out, this needs to change if any progress is to be made towards a reconciliation.Trita Parsi has delivered a sound analysis and pinpoints the precise problems that the United States faces when trying to deal constructively with Iran... and vice versa. Unfortunately, the situation has little promise of being resolved anytime soon.
Back in 2008, when Barack Obama was campaigning to be the 44th President of the United States, he made a solid commitment to engage with his nation's adversaries and enemies if and when he was elected to office. Diplomacy was the new way forward in dealing with the Iranian conundrum and it worked, at least at first. Obama was to find himself facing opposition from all angles, forcing through another series of sanctions against the nation he was originally aiming to create dialogue with.
This is a short but detailed book, Trita Parsi presents an easily readable account of where Obama failed in his diplomacy with Iran. A bright start was ultimately flawed by indecision, mistrust, domestic opposition (in Iran also), a lack of political will towards warmer relations, fraudulent elections and duplicitous allies reheating old ideas. And that is where Parsi hits the nail on the head; a lack of political will in both the United States and Iran to engage in diplomacy and revert to the reassuring feeling of entrenched animosity, dominated this latest attempt to end thirty years of distrust between the United States and Iran.
As Parsi rightly points out, this needs to change if any progress is to be made towards a reconciliation.
AND3.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadalibro esaustivoCalificado en Italia el 13 de mayo de 2013Molte dichiarazioni importanti, e retroscena diplomatici pieni di originalità. Parsi affronta in modo esaustivo la diplomazia tra usa e Iran evidenziando gli aspetti meno conosciutiMolte dichiarazioni importanti, e retroscena diplomatici pieni di originalità. Parsi affronta in modo esaustivo la diplomazia tra usa e Iran evidenziando gli aspetti meno conosciuti
Gilda F5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaInformativeCalificado en Reino Unido el 17 de julio de 2015If you are interested in politics in general and Midle East politics in particular, then you should read this book. It is the most honest account of events that I have read since "The Treacherous Alliance" by this author. I usually find that books are written from...Ver másIf you are interested in politics in general and Midle East politics in particular, then you should read this book. It is the most honest account of events that I have read since "The Treacherous Alliance" by this author. I usually find that books are written from the writer's point of view and researched from afar in the libraries, but this book is from the actors, players point of view who actually were there when the events took place. I enjoyed reading this book and it helped me to understand the dirty world of politics a bit better. I look forward to a new book from this author.If you are interested in politics in general and Midle East politics in particular, then you should read this book.
It is the most honest account of events that I have read since "The Treacherous Alliance" by this author.
I usually find that books are written from the writer's point of view and researched from afar in the libraries, but this book is from the actors, players point of view who actually were there when the events took place. I enjoyed reading this book and it helped me to understand the dirty world of politics a bit better. I look forward to a new book from this author.
N. Gotti5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaExcellent BookCalificado en Reino Unido el 14 de abril de 2020Amazing book, with truly interesting first hand insight into the process that lead to the signing of the JCPOA. Good context considering current administration.Amazing book, with truly interesting first hand insight into the process that lead to the signing of the JCPOA. Good context considering current administration.
Escribir una opinión
Cómo funcionan las opiniones y calificaciones de clientes
Las opiniones de clientes, incluidas las valoraciones de productos ayudan a que los clientes conozcan más acerca del producto y decidan si es el producto adecuado para ellos.Más información sobre cómo funcionan las opiniones de clientes en Amazon





