Buy new:
$29.95$29.95
$11.31 delivery
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$17.75$17.75
Delivery Tuesday, July 23
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: BookstoreSteve
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap Paperback – December 17, 2019
Purchase options and add-ons
In any objective field of science, if a theory fails the predictive requirement, then that theory is discarded. But in climate research not everything is at is appears. Exposed is the greenhouse gas chimera--mythical sky dragon.
The world has witnessed a frenzy of unverifiable claims that human emissions of a trace gas--carbon dioxide--are causing unprecedented global warming. Despite the relentless rise of levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), global temperatures refuse to show any statistically meaningful rise.
The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap reveals in forensic detail how the evidence relied upon by policymakers and environmentalists to swell alarm is mostly untrustworthy and bungled secret science manufactured by a clique of well-funded government researchers.
Long-held assumptions are depicted as fact, while unknowns and uncertainties, which should have been declared, are unethically cloaked in a veneer of confident predictions of impending doom and gloom.
Herein, unpicking this dilemma is a stellar team of authors and researchers--the Slayers of sky dragons. Among them are some of the world's foremost scientists. They include Dr. Tim Ball, the internationally renowned climatologist; Dr. Pierre R. Latour, a world-leading expert on carbon dioxide recently honored with a lifetime achievement award in science and Dr. George V. Chilingar, among the world's most decorated applied scientists who served the United Nations with distinction as science adviser.
The most astonishing conclusion reached, after thorough examination of all the evidence, is that carbon dioxide more likely cools, not warms our planet. It is the polar opposite of what consensus claims have told us. The biggest climate threat we face isn't warming, but a new ice age!
- Print length352 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherStairway Press
- Publication dateDecember 17, 2019
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.96 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-101949267067
- ISBN-13978-1949267068
Product details
- Publisher : Stairway Press (December 17, 2019)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 352 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1949267067
- ISBN-13 : 978-1949267068
- Item Weight : 1.21 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.96 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,671,153 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,252 in Rivers in Earth Science
- #2,398 in Weather (Books)
- #3,841 in Climatology
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
However this book says that the "greenhouse effect" does not exist. It claims that a cooler object (CO2) in the atmosphere cannot make something warmer (Earth). But the greenhouse effect is not that CO2 heats the Earth, it is that CO2 and other greenhouse gases act as a "jacket" to reduce the amount of heat lost by Earth.
The major greenhouse gas is water vapor, which humans do not influence. All the CO2 in the atmosphere contributes only 5% of the greenhouse effect. And of that 5%, the majority of CO2 comes from natural sources such as decaying vegetation and release of CO2 trapped in soil and oceans. Historic ice core records have shown that when the Earth warms, probably due to the Sun, CO2 levels rise hundreds of years later, as the warmth causes the natural sources to release some of their trapped CO2. To say CO2 causes warming is about like saying that using umbrellas causes rain.
Top reviews from other countries
In this book a Canadian Climatologist defeats in the British Columbia Superior court the kingpin of this so called climate change.
A must read
Foremost, the GHG concept does NOT break the second law of thermodynamics - something the authors seem to take great relish in claiming.
The second law relates to equilibrium thermodynamics, i.e. NET flows of energy.
Net flows of heat will of course equilibrate an overall seen movement of radiation down a gradient, but that does not imply heat does not also go the other way. To claim such (as they do) would imply spooky action at a distance, i.e. the lower temp source does not emit in that direction as it "knows" about the other end of the gradient. Of course, it does not! It simply provides an insulating-like effect, and slows the overall (net) RATE OF COOLING of the higher temperature "end".
It is true that CO2 will not "heat up" the earth's temperature by driving NET heat UP the equilibrating gradient to earth - however by slowing the cooling rate it increases AVERAGE temperatures OVER TIME as earth cools. This means that night-time temps in particular are warmer with GHG presence than without, as the cooling at night is more noticeable. The same effect happens with clouds insulating at night to a much higher degree. Would they deny clouds insulate? Anyone knows this fact.
This is a fundamental error and misconception about the 2nd Law in their hypothesis ("spooky kinetics" vs real equilibrium thermodynamics).
With CO2 this effect is non-linear and the greatest insulation effect is in the first 20ppm. Additional 20ppm's provide less and less warming effect to the point where we are (400ppm) where the effect is almost negligible, due to absorption band saturation (any more is basically "unemployed" as all the IR it can absorb in its limited absorption bands is absorbed, and there is no more left in that region).
So overall this probably does more harm than good to global warming scepticism as a serious topic.