Buy new:
-8% $23.96$23.96
Delivery Monday, November 18
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$19.69$19.69
Delivery Tuesday, November 19
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: G&V SOLUTIONS
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China's Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem Hardcover – Illustrated, August 12, 2014
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length368 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPrometheus
- Publication dateAugust 12, 2014
- Dimensions6.33 x 1.05 x 8.98 inches
- ISBN-10161614940X
- ISBN-13978-1616149406
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
China Tribunal Judgment: Independent Tribunal into Forced Organ Harvesting from Prisoners of Conscience in ChinaSir Geoffrey Nice QCPaperback$17.04 shipping
How I Survived a Chinese "Reeducation" Camp: A Uyghur Woman's StoryHardcover$12.62 shippingOnly 13 left in stock (more on the way).
Final Battle: The Next Election Could Be the LastHardcover$13.08 shippingGet it as soon as Tuesday, Nov 19Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Slaughter
Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China's Secret Solution to its Dissident Problem
By Ethan GutmannPrometheus Books
Copyright © 2014 Ethan GutmannAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-61614-940-6
Contents
Chapter 1: The Xinjiang Procedure, 9,Chapter 2: The Peaceable Kingdom, 31,
Chapter 3: An Occurrence on Fuyou Street, 73,
Chapter 4: Snow, 109,
Chapter 5: The Events on Dragon Mountain, 131,
Chapter 6: Alive in the Bitter Sea, 159,
Chapter 7: Into Thin Airwaves, 191,
Chapter 8: The Nameless, 217,
Chapter 9: Organs of the State, 253,
Chapter 10: A Night at the Museum, 287,
Afterword, 309,
Appendix: A Survey-Based Estimate of Falun Gong Harvested from 2000 to 2008, 317,
Acknowledgments, 323,
Notes, 329,
Index, 357,
CHAPTER 1
THE XINJIANG PROCEDURE
To figure out what is taking place today in a closed society such as China, sometimes you have to go back a decade, sometimes more.
One clue might be found on a hilltop near southern Guangzhou, on a partly cloudy autumn day in 1991. A small medical team and a young doctor starting a practice in internal medicine had driven up from Sun Yat-sen Medical University in a van modified for surgery. Pulling in on bulldozed earth, they found a small fleet of similar vehicles—clean, white, with smoked glass windows and prominent red crosses on the side. The police had ordered the medical team to stay inside for their safety. Indeed, through the side window of the van, its occupants could see lines of ditches—some filled in, others freshly dug—suggesting that the hilltop had served as a killing ground for years.
Thirty-six scheduled executions would translate into seventy-two kidneys and corneas divided among the regional hospitals. Every van contained surgeons who could work fast: fifteen to thirty minutes to extract. Drive back to the hospital. Transplant within six hours. Nothing fancy or experimental; execution would probably ruin the heart.
Right after the first shots the van door was thrust open and two men with white surgical coats thrown over their uniforms carried a body in, the head and feet still twitching slightly. The young doctor noted that the wound was on the right side of the chest, as he had expected. When a third body was laid down, he went to work.
Male, forty-ish, Han Chinese. While the other retail organs in the van were slated for the profitable foreigner market, the doctor had seen the paperwork indicating this kidney was tissue-matched for transplant into a fifty-year-old Chinese man. Without the transplant, that man would die. With it, the same man would rise miraculously from his hospital bed and go on to have a normal life for twenty-five years or so. By 2016, given all the immunosuppressive drug advances in China, they could theoretically replace the liver, lungs, or heart—maybe buy that man yet another ten to fifteen years.
The third body had no special characteristics save an angry purple line on the neck. The doctor recognized the forensics. Sometimes the police would twist a wire around a prisoner's throat to prevent him from speaking up in court. The doctor thought it through methodically. Maybe the police didn't want this prisoner to talk because he had been a deranged killer, a thug, or mentally unstable. After all, the Chinese penal system was a daily sausage grinder, executing hardcore criminals on a massive scale. Yes, the young doctor knew the harvesting was wrong. Whatever crime had been committed, it would be nice if the prisoner's body were allowed to rest forever. Yet was his surgical task that different from an obstetrician's? Harvesting was rebirth; harvesting was life, as revolutionary an advance as antibiotics or steroids—or maybe they didn't want this man to talk because he was a political prisoner.
Nineteen years later, in a secure location, the doctor laid out the puzzle. He asked that I keep his identity a secret.
The first experimental organ transplants were carried out in China during the 1960s. Organ harvesting of criminals condemned for capital offenses began on a small scale in the late 1970s. Beginning in the mid1980s, Chinese medical transplant expertise accelerated with the help of new immunosuppressive agents that could effectively tamp down the new host's tendency to reject foreign tissue. Suddenly organs once considered scraps no longer went to waste. It wasn't public knowledge exactly, but Chinese medical schools taught that many otherwise wicked criminals volunteered their organs as a final penance.
Chinese medical authorities admit that the lion's share of transplant organs originate with executions, but no mainland Chinese doctors, even in exile, will normally speak of performing such surgery. To do so would remind international medical authorities—the World Health Organization, the Transplantation Society—of an issue they would rather avoid not China's horrendous execution rate or the exploitation of criminal organs, but rather the systematic elimination of China's religious and political prisoners. Yet even if this doctor feared consequences to his family and his career, he did not fear embarrassing China, for he was born into an indigenous minority group, the Uyghurs.
Behind closed doors, the doctor (and practically every other Uyghur witness I spoke with) calls this vast region in China's northwest corner (bordering India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia) "East Turkestan." The Uyghurs are ethnically Turkic, not East Asian. They are Muslims with a smattering of Christians, and their language is more readily understood in Tashkent than in Beijing. The importance of "East Turkestan" is that the name references a future independent nation. Uyghurs have had different ideas about the composition of such a state over the years, with the possibilities ranging from an Islamic republic (following the Cultural Revolution when the Red Guards literally turned mosques into pigpens) to a Soviet protectorate (until the Soviet Union collapsed) or, most promising, a "Uyghurstan" that would take its place among the new Central Asian nations. At the top leadership level, Rebiya Kadeer speaks about a Western-style democracy.
By contrast, Beijing's name for the so-called Autonomous Region, Xinjiang, literally translates as "new frontier." The Chinese conflict with the Uyghurs over that land is China's longest running territorial war. When Mao invaded in 1949, Han Chinese constituted only 7 percent of the regional population. Following the flood of Communist Party administrators, soldiers, shopkeepers, and construction corps, Han Chinese now constitute the majority, the mass migration creating a rationale for suppressing Uyghur language and culture, most vividly seen in the bulldozing of vast historic centers of ancient Silk Road cities such as Ghulja, Karamay, and Kashgar. Originally driven by cotton, Maoist modernization principles, and countering the Soviets, the Chinese expansion is now fueled by the party's calculation that Xinjiang will be its top oil and natural gas production center by the end of this century.
To protect this investment, Beijing traditionally depicted all Uyghur nationalists—violent rebels and nonviolent activists alike—as proxies for the US Central Intelligence Agency. Shortly after 9/11, that conspiracy theory was tossed down the memory hole. Suddenly China was, and always has been, at war with al Qaeda-led Uyghur terrorists. No matter how transparently opportunistic the switch, the American intelligence community saw an opening for Chinese cooperation in the war on terror, and they signaled their acquiescence by allowing Chinese state security personnel into Guantánamo to interrogate Uyghur detainees.
While it is difficult to know the strength of the claim that detainees were connected to al Qaeda, the basic facts are these: During the 1990s, when the Chinese drove the Uyghur rebel training camps from neighboring countries such as Kazakhstan and Pakistan, some Uyghurs fled to Afghanistan, where a portion became Taliban soldiers. Nor is there little question that the level of violence within Xinjiang, and indeed within China, has increased in recent years. Both Uyghur separatists and the Chinese internal military apparatus play a part, yet because the party bureaucracy controls the Web (the Internet in Xinjiang was shut down for six months following the Urumqi riots of July 2009) as well as Western reporters' physical access to Xinjiang, the Chinese narrative is dominated by lurid—and unverifiable—stories such as that of the 2014 Kunming train-station massacre, while hundreds of enforced disappearances of young Uyghur males—verifiable but relatively dull from a Western editor's perspective—rarely penetrate the Western consciousness.
The party intends to frame the Uyghurs as international terrorists. And yet, even as the Chinese government claims that Uyghurs constitute an Islamic fundamentalist threat, the fact is that I've never met a Uyghur woman who won't shake hands or a man who won't have a drink with me. Nor does my Jewish-sounding name appear to make anyone flinch. In one of those vino veritas sessions, I asked a local Uyghur leader if he was able to get any sort of assistance from groups such as the Islamic Human Rights Commission (where, as I found during a brief visit to their London offices, veiled women flinch from an extended male hand, drinks are forbidden, and my Jewish surname is a very big deal indeed). "Useless!" he snorted, returning to the vodka bottle. So if Washington's goal is to promote a reformed China, then taking Beijing's word for who is a terrorist is to play into the party's hands.
Xinjiang has long served as the party's illicit laboratory. In the midsixties, the Chinese military conducted atmospheric nuclear testing in Lop Nur that resulted in a significant rise in cancers in Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital. In several tests, live prisoners were apparently placed at varying distances from ground zero to measure the effects of the blasts and fallout. At some point during the last decade, the Communist Party authorized the creation in the Tarim Desert of another grand experiment—the world's largest labor camp, roughly estimated to hold fifty thousand Uyghurs, religious prisoners, and hardcore criminals. In between these two ventures, the first organ harvesting of political prisoners was implemented. And again, Xinjiang was ground zero.
Every Uyghur witness I approached over the course of two years –police, medical, and security personnel scattered across two continents –related compartmentalized fragments of information to me, often through halting translation. With the exception of the surgeon who opened this chapter, who is still an active medical professional in China, those who asked me to conceal their identities by using a pseudonym in my writing ultimately agreed to my request that they openly testify if the United States Congress called upon them to do so—and they did this even while they acknowledged risks to their careers, their families, and, in several cases, their lives. Their testimony reveals not just a procedure evolving to meet the lucrative medical demand for living organs, but the genesis of a wider atrocity.
In 1989, not long after Nijat Abdureyimu turned twenty, he graduated from Xinjiang Police School and was assigned to a special police force, Regiment No. 1 of the Urumqi Public Security Bureau. As one of the first Uyghurs in a Chinese unit that specialized in "social security"— essentially squelching threats to the Communist Party—Nijat was employed as the good cop in Uyghur interrogations, particularly the high-profile cases. I first met Nijat—thin, depressed, and watchful—in a crowded refugee camp on the outskirts of Rome.
Nijat explained to me that he was well aware that his Chinese colleagues kept him under constant surveillance. But Nijat presented the image they liked: the little brother with the guileless smile. By 1994 he had penetrated all of the government's secret bastions: the detention center, its interrogation rooms, and the killing grounds. Along the way, he had witnessed his fair share of torture, executions, even a rape. So his curiosity was in the nature of professional interest when he questioned one of the Chinese cops who had come back from an execution shaking his head. According to his colleague, it had been a normal procedure –the unwanted bodies kicked into a trench, the useful corpses hoisted into the harvesting vans, but then he heard something coming from a van, like a man screaming.
"Like someone was still alive?" Nijat remembers asking. "What kind of screams?"
"Like from hell."
Nijat shrugged. The regiment had more than enough sloppiness to go around.
A few months later, three death row prisoners were being transported from detention to execution. Nijat had become friendly with one in particular, a very young man. As Nijat walked alongside, the young man turned to Nijat with eyes like saucers: "Why did you inject me?"
Nijat hadn't injected him; the medical director had. But the director and some legal officials were watching the exchange, so Nijat lied smoothly: "It's so you won't feel much pain when they shoot you."
The young man smiled faintly, and Nijat, sensing that he would never quite forget that look, waited until the execution was over to ask the medical director: "Why did you inject him?"
"Nijat, if you can transfer to some other section, then go as soon as possible."
"What do you mean? Doctor, exactly what kind of medicine did you inject him with?"
"Nijat, do you have any beliefs?"
"Yes. Do you?"
"It was an anticoagulant, Nijat. And maybe we are all going to hell."
* * *
I first met Enver Tohti—a soft-spoken, husky, Buddha of a man—through the informal Uyghur network of London. I confess that my first impression was that he was just another émigré living in public housing. But Enver had a secret.
His story began on a Tuesday in June 1995, when he was a general surgeon at Urumqi Central Railway Hospital. Enver recalled an unusual conversation with his immediate superior, the chief surgeon: "Enver, we are going to do something exciting. Have you ever done an operation in the field?"
"Not really. What do you want me to do?"
"Get a mobile team together and request an ambulance. Have everyone out front at nine tomorrow."
On a cloudless Wednesday morning, Enver led two assistants and an anesthesiologist into an ambulance and followed the chief surgeon's car out of Urumqi going west. The ambulance had a picnic atmosphere until they realized they were entering the Western Mountain Execution Grounds, which specialized in killing political dissidents. On a dirt road by a steep hill the chief surgeon pulled off and came back to talk to Enver: "When you hear a gunshot, drive around the hill."
"Can you tell us why we are here?"
"Enver, if you don't want to know, don't ask."
"I want to know."
"No. You don't want to know."
The chief surgeon gave him a quick, hard look as he returned to the car. Enver saw that beyond the hill there appeared to be some sort of armed police facility. People were milling about—civilians. Enver sarcastically commented that perhaps they were family members waiting to collect the bodies and pay for the bullets and the team responded with increasingly sick jokes to break the tension. Then they heard a gunshot, possibly a volley, and drove around to the execution field.
Focusing on not making any sudden moves as he followed the chief surgeon's car, Enver never really did get a good look. He briefly registered that there were ten, maybe twenty bodies lying at the base of the hill, but the armed police saw the ambulance and waved him over.
"This one. It's this one."
Sprawled on the blood-soaked ground was a man, around thirty, dressed in navy blue overalls. All convicts were shaved, but this one had long hair.
"That's him. We'll operate on him."
"Why are we operating?" Enver protested, feeling for the artery in the man's neck. "Come on. This man is dead."
Enver stiffened and corrected himself. "No. He's not dead."
"Operate then. Remove the liver and the kidneys. Now! Quick! Be quick!"
Following the chief surgeon's directive, the team loaded the body into the ambulance. Enver felt himself going numb :Just cut the clothes off. Just strap the limbs to the table. Just open the body. He kept making attempts to follow normal procedure—sterilize, minimal exposure, sketch the cut. Enver glanced questioningly at the chief surgeon. "No anesthesia," said the chief surgeon. "No life support."
The anesthesiologist just stood there, arms folded—like some sort of ignorant peasant, Enver thought. Enver barked at him. "Why don't you do something?"
"What exactly should I do, Enver? He's already unconscious. If you cut, he's not going to respond."
But there was a response. As Enver's scalpel went in, the man's chest heaved spasmodically and then curled back again. Enver, a little frantic now, turned to the chief surgeon. "How far in should I cut?"
"You cut as wide and deep as possible. We are working against time."
Enver worked fast, not bothering with clamps, cutting with his right hand, moving muscle and soft tissue aside with his left, slowing down only to make sure he excised the kidneys and liver cleanly. Even as Enver stitched the man back up—not internally, there was no point to that anymore; all he could do was make the body look presentable—he noticed the blood was still pulsing. He was sure the man was still alive.
(Continues...)Excerpted from The Slaughter by Ethan Gutmann. Copyright © 2014 Ethan Gutmann. Excerpted by permission of Prometheus Books.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : Prometheus; Illustrated edition (August 12, 2014)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 368 pages
- ISBN-10 : 161614940X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1616149406
- Item Weight : 1.3 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.33 x 1.05 x 8.98 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #370,439 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #199 in Human Rights Law (Books)
- #277 in Human Rights (Books)
- #374 in Asian Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

RECENT UPDATES:
- Ethan Gutmann was nominated for the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize
- Signature identified The Slaughter as one of the top 25 "best books on China"
In 2004, Gutmann’s book, Losing the New China, exposed American corporate collusion in the construction of China’s controlled Internet, and contributed to Congress cross-examination of Yahoo, Microsoft, Google and Cisco Systems.
Following David Kilgour and David Matas’ seminal 2006 report, Bloody Harvest, Gutmann began an independent investigation into Chinese state-sponsored organ harvesting of Falun Gong, interviewing over 100 refugees, doctors, and law enforcement personnel over a six-year period. The Slaughter, published in 2014, profiled several doctors who had either participated in live organ harvesting in China or had contact with mainland hospitals exploiting Falun Gong organs (his full email correspondence with Dr. Ko Wen-je can be downloaded at: www.ethan-gutmann.com/ko-wen-je-interview/). Documented a pattern of “retail organs only” Falun Gong physical examinations, Gutmann established that similar tests were administered to Tibetans, Uyghurs, and House Christians.
While the Chinese medical establishment confessed in 2006 that China’s transplants depended on death-row prisoner organs, the leadership consistently denied exploiting religious and political prisoners and claimed that China was exclusively relying on voluntary organ donors by 2015. Yet in the Summer of 2016, Kilgour, Matas and Gutmann released a report demonstrating that Chinese transplant volume was six to ten times higher than Chinese official claims. Gutmann was invited to testify in Washington, London and Brussels, while Congressional and European Parliament resolutions explicitly condemned China’s organ harvesting of prisoners of conscience. With the New York Times, CNN, and the Times of London reporting on the issue for the first time, international medical societies that had been supportive of the Chinese official claims of reform, such as The Transplantation Society, publicly admitted that the Chinese medical system had “appalled” the world. In short, by the end of 2016, Beijing had lost the argument.
Ethan Gutmann wishes to thank the National Endowment for Democracy, the Earhart Foundation, and the Peder Wallenberg family for funding, and Leeshai Lemish and Jaya Gibson for research assistance. He also wishes to acknowledge critical support from Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting, End Organ Pillaging, Benedict Rogers from Christian Solidarity Worldwide, Matthew Robertson from the Epoch Times, and Miss Canada, actress Anastasia Lin. Finally, he would like to acknowledge the courage of witnesses throughout the world who risked it all to get the truth out.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book well-researched, well-documented, and critical of all evidence. They describe the writing style as candid, vivid, and witty. Readers also mention the pacing is very moving and touching. Additionally, they describe the content as shocking and frightening.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book's research quality excellent. They say it's well-documented and critical of all the evidence. Readers also mention the book coincides with all the factual information available.
"well written and convincing first hand research. well documented evidence that shows the limitless..." Read more
"...The Slaughter is also critical of all the evidence that comes its way, encouraging the reader to see the situation with the same eye...." Read more
"...This book coincides with all the factual information available...." Read more
"...Exceedingly well researched and frightening in its implications, it's a book that should be read anyone who cares about China, about freedom of..." Read more
Customers find the writing style candid, incredibly vivid, and detailed. They also describe the book as witty, insightful, and fascinating.
"well written and convincing first hand research. well documented evidence that shows the limitless..." Read more
"...The writing style is candid and incredibly vivid, with a wealth of eloquence and poise that can more than serve the appetite of a reader who..." Read more
"Witty, insightful and deeply human look into a horrible crime against humanity that still goes on to this day...." Read more
"...Very detailed and specific accounts. Very persuasive. My heart is hurting." Read more
Customers find the pacing of the book very moving, persuasive, and touching.
"...be a clinical if horrifying, straight-forward account, into an intensely moving, and engaging narrative - it brings the human, moral perspective..." Read more
"Brilliant and moving. This is more than a story about killing, organ harvesting, etc...." Read more
"...Very detailed and specific accounts. Very persuasive. My heart is hurting." Read more
"Very moving and a must read for ANY human!" Read more
Customers find the content shocking and frightful. They say it's a well-researched expose that shows how organ harvesting takes place.
"...By itself, a shocking expose that shows how the organ harvesting allegations are true...." Read more
"...Exceedingly well researched and frightening in its implications, it's a book that should be read anyone who cares about China, about freedom of..." Read more
"lwell researched to the point that it is beyond deniability anymore. Shocking, & a must read for everyone in the political arena" Read more
"Touching, shocking" Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
What Gutmann offers in his book, and which I find particular valuable, is a critical enquiry into the persecution (one gets the feeling that he is not seeing the world through rose-tinted glasses), and a number of salient points (backed with reasons/evidence) that he mentioned regarding the events leading up to, and during the persecution itself. E.g.
1. the 1999 April sit-in which looks like it was very likely staged by the CCP to give a "beseiged" appearance (to provide grounds for the ensuing crackdown in July that year),
2. the infamous Tiananmen immolation incident in 2001 was also very likely staged as well, with the CCP single-sidedly providing the account, reasons, and backgrounds of those involved "within (a rather absurd) 2 hours". Gutmann noted many other dubious aspects of this incident, concluding that "The police knew what was going to happen, and the centerpiece of the tableau - a Falun Gong mother forcing her a child to burn on Tiananmen Square - was an outright deception"
3. personal accounts of the many (I think it was more than 50) interviews he conducted with survivors, perpetrators and those who were otherwise involved. I especially liked the vivid way in which Gutmann interlaced his narrative with those accounts, bringing what might otherwise be a clinical if horrifying, straight-forward account, into an intensely moving, and engaging narrative - it brings the human, moral perspective into what is essentially a horror story.
In conclusion, I'd highly encourage those who are curious about organ harvesting (e.g. it's gross, but is this REALLY taking place?), and/or people who are interested in a critical, non-practitioner account of the persecution of Falun Gong (how, why, and what [happened]). I'd also encourage anyone who reads this to help do their part (all of us can do something!):
a) help sign the petition against forced organ harvesting at [...]
b) mention this issue to your elected representative,
c) spread the word :), apart from The Slaughter, Bloody Harvest, and Hard to Believe, the US has also recently passed a resolution (HR 343) condemning organ harvesting.
As mentioned in the Hard to Believe movie trailer, it is no longer a question of whether this is taking place or not, but rather, whether we are going to put up with it.
PS There is a recent update to The Slaughter / Bloody Harvest - please check out [...]
PPS If you are curious as to how a government can possibly conduct such atrocities against its own people, you might want to check out the "9 commentaries" on the Chinese Communist Party (look at the facts presented within, not just the tone in which it is written), which is freely available on the web. To see/predict how one reacts, one merely has to look at his/her past (actions).
Although the illegal harvesting of prisoner's organs could never be justified, it would be somewhat easier to understand if the prisoners in question were hardened criminals (serial murderers, serial rapists, child molesters, etc.). The puzzling thing is that these prisoners are the opposite of hardened criminals. In fact, they are part of a peaceful group. I cannot imagine why the Chinese government would find them so threatening. That is the part that makes no sense to me. They were not trying to overthrow the government, indoctrinate the people, or otherwise be subversive. If they were going to target anyone, I would think it would be more logical to target the folks on death row and not the ones being condemned for simply practicing their faith.
Can you imagine that happening in America? Someone needs a heart or kidney and their DNA profile is fed through the Jail/Prison system looking for an inmate match. When a match is found the inmate "disappears".
Something similar did happen in America except it was organs illegally harvested from dead people in funeral homes. One of the culprits was a man named David Sconce with the Lamb Funeral Home in California. There was a book called "Chop Shop" but I think it is out of print now. If you can get a hold of that book I would highly recommend it.
Another guy was Michael Mastromarino who operated a legal tissue bank but operated it in an illegal manner. Mastromarino harvested organs and tissue from bodies without consent from the survivors and removed material from people with cancer, H.I.V. and other diseases. He then forged paperwork, including consent forms and death certificates, to make the cause of death and age acceptable. The police began investigating irregularities at the Daniel George & Son Funeral Home in Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, in 2005. News reports included lurid details, like what the police called a secret room in the funeral home equipped with specialized surgical equipment; leg bones replaced by PVC pipe so bodies would appear intact at viewings. I think there is a documentary on either Prime or Netflicks that talks about this.
While those two examples are awful--that is nothing in comparison to what they are doing in China by illegally taking organs from LIVING prisoners. There has to be an extra hot place in Hell for people who do things like that.
inhumanity possible in a country with totalitarian government
Top reviews from other countries
While the world apathetically watches, the CCP is rounding up and making big money of these prisoners of conscience. The carved out bodies are plastinated and sold for those who want for medical research and worse still for "Bodies World" and other exhibition of plastinated bodies that are touring North America and the world over. And people naively pay money to go see these bodies that the families would like to have given a resting place and a peaceful burial.
A MUST READ.
As someone who grew up in a Communist country I welcome the crimes of the Chinese regime are laid bare. Some pages are really hard to read, you need a break every now and then, calm down your pounding chest and only then carry on.
btw, to see a film in the similar spirit of the clash between conscience (in this case a righteous cop) and totalitarian power, see the Czech film In The Shadows - http://www.intheshadowfilm.com




