Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
On the Logic of the Social Sciences (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought) Paperback – August 15, 1990
- Print length220 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateAugust 15, 1990
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions0.5 x 6 x 9 inches
- ISBN-109780262581042
- ISBN-13978-0262581042
![]() |
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
& quot; Written in 1967 as an exercise in selfclarification, On the Logic of the Social Sciences is unmatched in its scope, insights, and impact. The point of departure for Habermas' twenty-year effort to reconstruct critical social theory, it is an indispensable aid to understanding his recent work on the theory of communicative action. The book also stands on its own as one of the best general overviews of the field, and should be required reading for students of the methodology and philosophy of the social sciences.& quot; -- James Schmidt, Boston University.
"Written in 1967 as an exercise in selfclarification, On the Logic of the Social Sciences is unmatched in its scope, insights, and impact. The point of departure for Habermas' twenty-year effort to reconstruct critical social theory, it is an indispensable aid to understanding his recent work on the theory of communicative action. The book also stands on its own as one of the best general overviews of the field, and should be required reading for students of the methodology and philosophy of the social sciences."--James Schmidt, Boston University.
Review
From the Back Cover
About the Author
Shierry Weber Nicholsen teaches environmental philosophy and psychology in Antioch University Seattle's M.A. Program on Environment and Community and is a psychoanalytic psychotherapist in private practice in Seattle. She has translated several works by Theodor Adorno and Jürgen Habermas.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 0262581043
- Publisher : The MIT Press (August 15, 1990)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 220 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780262581042
- ISBN-13 : 978-0262581042
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 13.1 ounces
- Dimensions : 0.5 x 6 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,816,562 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,973 in Social Sciences Methodology
- #2,862 in Epistemology Philosophy
- #50,338 in Sociology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop review from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
He wrote in the Preface, “This review of literature pertaining to the logic of the social sciences was written in the mid-1960s, when analytic philosophy of science, with its program for a unified science, still largely dominated the self-understanding of sociologists. It contributed to the basic changes in that situation that took place in the following decade… This review was written for a particular reason. One reason for its cursory character is that I am not a specialist in this area. Moreover, the logic of research has always interested me only in connection with questions of social theory… The theory of communicative action that I have since put forward… treats the presupposition of action oriented to mutual understanding independently of the transcendental preconditions of knowledge.”
He says, “When we call the abstraction of need satisfaction and deprivation ‘reward and punishment,’ we are referring to a system of prevailing norms; and no matter how elementary the drives we distinguish qualitatively from one another by referring to ‘enemies,’ ‘prey,’ and ‘sex’ may seem to us, we shall never arrive at such a thing as drives that have not been linguistically interpreted.” (Pg. 73)
He concludes the second chapter with the statement, “Only when split-off motives and deeply internalized rules have been understood in their objective connection with the rational compulsions of collective self-preservation on the one hand and the irrational compulsions of superfluous authorities on the other, when they have been reconciled with subjectively meaningful motives in the minds of the acting subjects themselves, can social action develop as truly communicative action. But a theory that does not incorporate this understanding will make unreflected predeterminations in a matter about which we have no a priori certainty; it will be making methodological decisions about whether we more closely resemble animals or gods. Those who have prematurely concluded that we resemble gods lead their heroes through a back door into the animal realm again. The acting subjects whose intentions have been acknowledged suddenly find themselves and their cultural values yoked in systems that respond only to the fundamental biological values of survival and efficient adaptation.” (Pg. 88)
He observes, “there are no uninterpreted experiences, neither in everyday life not, especially, within the framework of scientifically organized experience. Standards of measurement are rules in accordance with which everyday experiences that have been interpreted in ordinary language are reorganized and transformed into scientific data. No such interpretation is fully determined by the experienced material itself. It could be the case that we transform sensory experiences into data through measurements differently than we communicative experiences. Perhaps the modes of transformation are different in the sciences of action than in physics; and perhaps as a consequence the relationship of data and theories is different in the latter than it is in the former.” (Pg. 97)
He states, “General linguistics is, however, not the only alternative to a linguistic analysis that proceeds historically and immerses itself in the plurality of language games without being able to justify the language of analysis itself. To break through the grammatical boundaries of individual linguistic totalities we need not follow [Noam] Chomsky and leave the dimension of ordinary language. It is not only a theoretical language’s distance from the primary languages that can guarantee the unity of analytic reason in the pluralism of language games.” (Pg. 143)
He notes, “There is good reason to conceive language as a kind of metainstitution on which all social institutions depend. For social action is constituted only in ordinary-language communication. But clearly this metainstitution of language as tradition is dependent in turn on social processes that cannot be reduced to normative relationships. Language is also a medium of domination and social power. It serves to legitimate relationships of organized force.” (Pg. 172)
He concludes the book with the statement, “the framework of a general interpretation, however saturated it may be with prior hermeneutic experience and however much it may have been confirmed in individual interpretations, retains a hypothetical moment. The truth of historically oriented functionalism is confirmed not technically but only practically, in the successful continuation and completion of a formative process. Here we are again confronted with the problem of that singular relationship to theory of practice that since the eighteenth century has appeared wherever the logic of inquiry has involved the intention of enlightenment.” (Pg. 189)
Not one of Habermas’s “major works,” this book will nevertheless have some value for anyone studying Habermas and the development of his thought.




