Buying Options
| Kindle Price: | $4.99 |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Socialism Is Evil: The Moral Case Against Marx's Radical Dream Kindle Edition
| Justin Trask Haskins (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $12.96 | — |
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
In Socialism Is Evil: The Moral Case Against Marx’s Radical Dream, conservative columnist and think tank research fellow Justin Haskins examines the moral perils of Marx’s socialism and explains why if socialism were to be imposed in its fullest form, it wouldn’t just damage people’s freedoms, it would obliterate them. Haskins argues it would be dangerous to attempt to create Marx’s utopian socialist world, and even more importantly, that such an attempt would be so highly immoral that it could reasonably be called “evil.”
In Socialism Is Evil, Haskins makes the moral case against socialism and also describes in detail what socialists believe, the differences between socialism and communism, why Marx’s socialism will never be completely adopted, and why even the more moderate European-style socialism, called “democratic socialism” by some, is highly immoral and anti-American.
Many socialists are kind, generous people with good intentions, but sometimes, good intentions can create devastating results. Socialism Is Evil briefly tackles some of the most important moral controversies surrounding Marx’s socialism, providing supporters of individual liberty with the tools they need to stop the rise of socialism in its tracks.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateSeptember 1, 2018
- File size691 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Justin Haskins is currently the executive editor of The Heartland Institute, one of the nation's leading free-market think tanks. Justin graduated summa cum laude from the University of Richmond in 2010 and from Regent University in 2011 with an M.A. in government with a focus on international relations. Haskins finished his second M.A. from Regent University, this time in journalism, in 2015. Haskins has been published hundreds of times in major American publications, including U.S. News and World Report, the Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, Forbes, TheBlaze, New York Post, Reason.com, and many others. Haskins' work has also been featured by numerous media outlets, including Fox News, New York Times, and the Glenn Beck Radio Program
--This text refers to the audioCD edition.Product details
- ASIN : B07GRHZCPR
- Publisher : The Henry Dearborn Institute for Liberty; 1st edition (September 1, 2018)
- Publication date : September 1, 2018
- Language : English
- File size : 691 KB
- Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 107 pages
- Page numbers source ISBN : 0999735527
- Best Sellers Rank: #506,190 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #234 in Communism & Socialism (Kindle Store)
- #996 in Communism & Socialism (Books)
- #1,414 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Justin Haskins is a widely published writer and political commentator and the editorial director and research fellow at The Heartland Institute, a national free-market think tank. Haskins is also the editor-in-chief of StoppingSocialism.com, one of the world’s largest and most influential publications devoted to challenging socialism.
Haskins writes a column for FoxNews.com, serves as a contributor to The Hill and Townhall, and has appeared on television and radio more than 200 times, on shows like Tucker Carlson Tonight, Fox & Friends, and the Glenn Beck Program.
Haskins is the author of the Amazon best-selling book Socialism Is Evil: The Moral Case Against Marx’s Radical Dream (2018), and he served as the first contributor to Glenn Beck’s Arguing with Socialists (2020), a New York Times best-selling book.
Haskins has been published more than 800 times in major digital and print publications, including The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, Forbes, Newsweek, and National Review, among many others. His writing has also been featured or discussed by The Rush Limbaugh Show, Glenn Beck Radio Program, The New York Times, Drudge Report, The Heritage Foundation, the White House, and Newsmax, which named Haskins one of “Top 30 Republicans Under 30” in 2017. In 2016, Haskins was named to MediaDC’s “30 Under 30” list of young and influential leaders on the right.
Haskins is author or co-author of three Heartland Policy Briefs, all of which received significant media attention: “The American Health Care Plan” (2021), “Estimating the Income Tax Hikes Required to Pay for Bernie Sanders’ Medicare-for-All Plan” (2019) and “Debunking the Scandinavian Socialism Myth: An Evaluation of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden” (2019).
Haskins has also co-authored several national surveys conducted by Rasmussen Reports, one of America’s leading pollsters.
Haskins graduated from the University of Richmond (Richmond, VA) in 2010. In 2011, Justin earned his M.A. in government with specializations in international relations and American government from Regent University (Virginia Beach, VA), and he earned a second M.A., this time in journalism, from Regent in 2015. Haskins was inducted into the Philadelphia Society in 2018.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
[Note: this review should be taken with a grain of salt, (as everything online should be lol) because it was written by an anarcho-syndicalist middle-schooler]
The first thing wrong with this book is that it almost entirely attacks classical Marxist socialism. Haskins states this up front. This is a straw man argument. By now everybody understands that Marxism doesn't work; that is, anybody who remembers the collapse of the USSR. Gorbachev wasn't a dumb guy, and he was a committed Marxist. He had to dissolve the regime because they tried to make it work and it was a futile effort. Perhaps Reagan's defense buildup accelerated its demise by forcing the USSR to maintain unsustainable levels of military spending, but the USSR was doomed long before Reagan came along. The book is so concentrated on criticizing an helpless enemy that it is essentially useless.
This book is touted as being unique because it does not argue that socialism doesn't work (as most conservative-libertarian writers do), but rather makes a "moral case" against socialism that it offends the modern (enlightenment) notion of human dignity. That is, socialism necessarily demands draconian enforced limits on freedom. This is actually not a new idea, people! Read your history; you will find that this is exactly what Churchill argued against his socialist rivals for the P.M. office in the years following WW2.
Haskins makes the point that under socialism some people are compelled to go along with government policies that go against their moral convictions. This is why socialism is immoral. This argument too is nothing new. People who must live together in a society (or a particular place, or any other organization) have always had to make compromises in order to get along harmoniously. This is a necessary condition for any group of humans who must co-exist together. Perhaps what he is saying that under socialism this stricture is inordinately severe. Unfortunately he does not spend alot of effort making this case. Just because some people in society will object to the popular will is evidence enough that socialism is immoral, and that's that. Weak case.
Haskins spends a few pages criticizing the so-called "European socialism" (aka "democratic socialism" among those who do not understand what democracy is or where it came from) as practiced in countries like Germany and France. But he explains that he's not going to criticize those systems explicitly; rather he goes on to criticize specific programs and policies -- principally the single-payer (national government) health care systems (this applies to the UK and Canada as well). The problems inherent in socialized medicine are well known, so this is all well and good but quite a timid approach. As well, Haskins doesn't mention the problems with it peculiar to Canada (which admittedly is not a european country, geographically at least), namely, that the h.c. system north of the border continues only because Canadians must travel to the good o' U.S. of A for the care their own system cannot give.
Haskins neglects the so-called "Nordic socialism" that prevails in Norway, Sweden, Denmark etc.. An even stronger case against socialism can be made here. The two most obvious arguments: 1) comparing these countries against the USA is comparing apples and oranges. The Nordic countries have populations under 10 million, and their populations are very nearly homogenous (same race, religion, language, culture). Transplanting Nordic socialism to the "multicultural" USA, with its long turbulent social history, is such an impossibility that the notion is ridiculous. 2) the Nordic countries are, in all the important categories, hardly leaders in western civilization. No technological innovations have come from the Nordics; they in fact have been "free riding" on American research & development for the past, oh, forever! The only exceptions that come to mind are Volvo cars (now owned by the Chinese, if you can believe that!) , and Nokia in Finland (and now they don't even make their own phones, they licensed Android!). About the only bright light remaining in europe's far north is Sweden's Saab (maker of the Gripen fighter jet (with a turbofan engine supplied by General Electric)). Nope, Nordic socialism has only produced a welfare state that hobbles their few productive citizens. Haskins is right about them but doesn't make the case in this book.
The above (pertaining to the Nordics) can be said to some extent of the larger european countries France and UK. Their populations are under 67 million each (Germany's is 83 million), and despite recent influxes of middle easterners, are well near homogeneous demographically and culturally (though nowhere near so much as the Nordics). Let's be aware that most of their immigrants are from the other european nations. Let's also keep in mind these countries unlike America have suffered severe terrorist attacks in recent years (no surprise). Also: these economies are less than competitive than they should be (except Germany, see below), and the most available reason would be their socialist policies which hinder their most productive citizens, as with the Nordics, but to a somewhat lesser extent. (one major exception I will admit is the Airbus consortium which is competitive with Boeing, but only with big socialistic government subsidies).
As for Germany, which is a leader in high tech manufacturing (most prominently in automobiles and industrial equipment), no one has made the case that her success is due to socialism or in spite of socialism. Further, German corporations are just as ruthless in their outsourcing to low-wage developing countries (notably China) as their American counterparts, and this goes far to explaining German economic success.
So this book gets three stars at best. It's not bad but it's not real good either. Maybe someone new to the debate would feel more enthusiastic about it that this reviewer.
Now, about capitalism. Yep, for all its warts, it is the best system. At least so far. Those of you who have read Marx will remember that this is exactly what he wrote, too! So nothing really new there. The real question is: can mankind devise a system of human organization that is better, with fewer flaws and more fairness ??? I won't go into that here, but the fact is that capitalism too is an evil system. And anyone who disagrees, just refer to Peter Joseph's three Zeitgeist films, and his book on the New Human Rights Movement.
The real issue is the one that George Orwell made the central theme of his monumental 1984: p-o-w-e-r. Lord Acton said it succinctly: Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely. And its corollary: Power Corrupts. Any system of human organization, capitalism, socialism, or anything else, has to deal with the central fact of anthropology: the dominance hierarchy. Somebody (or some tiny coterie of power elites) always comes out on top, get corrupted by the power going to his fat little head, and tyrannizes the common people for his own gain and/or satisfaction. Philosophers throughout all human history, at least as far back as Plato and Aristotle, have dealt with this issue. So to treat the matter thoroughly, this author should go on and write Capitalism is Evil. Judging from this book, I don't think he's capable of it. Too bad for us seekers of wisdom...keep looking for a better author/thinker.


