Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Follow the Author
OK
The Soul of Battle: From Ancient Times to the Present Day, How Three Great Liberators Vanquished Tyranny Paperback – April 17, 2001
| Victor Davis Hanson (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
Examining in riveting detail the campaigns of three brilliant generals who led largely untrained forces to victory over tyrannical enemies, Hanson shows how the moral confidence with which these generals imbued their troops may have been as significant as any military strategy they utilized. Theban general Epaminondas marched an army of farmers two hundred miles to defeat their Spartan overlords and forever change the complexion of Ancient Greece. William Tecumseh Sherman led his motley army across the South, ravaging the landscape and demoralizing the citizens in the defense of right. And George S. Patton commanded the recently formed Third Army against the German forces in the West, nearly completing the task before his superiors called a halt. Intelligent and dramatic, The Soul of Battle is narrative history at it’s best and a work of great moral conviction.
- Print length496 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAnchor
- Publication dateApril 17, 2001
- Dimensions5.25 x 1.05 x 7.95 inches
- ISBN-100385720599
- ISBN-13978-0385720595
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Buy it with
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Inside Flap
Examining in riveting detail the campaigns of three brilliant generals who led largely untrained forces to victory over tyrannical enemies, Hanson shows how the moral confidence with which these generals imbued their troops may have been as significant as any military strategy they utilized. Theban general Epaminondas marched an army of farmers two hundred miles to defeat their Spartan overlords and forever change the complexion of Ancient Greece. William Tecumseh Sherman led his motley army across the South, ravaging the landscape and demoralizing the citizens in the defense of right. And George S. Patton commanded the recently formed Third Army against the German forces in the West, nearly completing the task before his superiors called a halt. Intelligent and dramatic, The Soul of Battle
From the Back Cover
Examining in riveting detail the campaigns of three brilliant generals who led largely untrained forces to victory over tyrannical enemies, Hanson shows how the moral confidence with which these generals imbued their troops may have been as significant as any military strategy they utilized. Theban general Epaminondas marched an army of farmers two hundred miles to defeat their Spartan overlords and forever change the complexion of Ancient Greece. William Tecumseh Sherman led his motley army across the South, ravaging the landscape and demoralizing the citizens in the defense of right. And George S. Patton commanded the recently formed Third Army against the German forces in the West, nearly completing the task before his superiors called a halt. Intelligent and dramatic, "The Soul of Battle is narrative history at it's best and a work of great moral conviction.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Anchor; Reprint edition (April 17, 2001)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 496 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0385720599
- ISBN-13 : 978-0385720595
- Item Weight : 14.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.25 x 1.05 x 7.95 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #58,744 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #61 in Historical Study Reference (Books)
- #64 in History Encyclopedias
- #80 in Military Strategy History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
About the author

Victor Davis Hanson is Professor of Greek and Director of the Classics Program at California State University, Fresno. He is the author or editor of many books, including Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom (with John Heath, Free Press, 1998), and The Soul of Battle (Free Press, 1999). In 1992 he was named the most outstanding undergraduate teacher of classics in the nation.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
That is unambiguously what happened in the three wars "The Soul of Battle" is about -- the Peloponnessian rebellion against the Spartans with Thebes' help in 370-369 BC, the American Civil War and the Second World War. Hanson is able to tell almost the whole story of the first of these fights because his central character, Epaminondas (how do you pronounce that?) was in overall command. Epaminondas' achievement, based on the percentage of Greek society directly mobilized or liberated by his campaign, was probably the most impressive of the three, and Montaigne called him the greatest Greek ever. It was also the one I knew the least about. Fourth-century Greece prior to Philip was a black hole to me before I read this book, so I owe Hanson.
With the American Civil War and World War II, Hanson is focused on a single general (William T. Sherman and George S. Patton respectively) and his argument that they were the most influential of any of their peers, at least on the latter stages of their respective conflicts. Both generals sought deep penetrations around the enemy to cut him off and to demoralize the enemy society, instead of smashing into the enemy army head-on. With Patton, the idea that the army is NOT the enemy's center of gravity in any conflict, which Hanson clearly had been promoting with his chronicles of Epaminondas and Sherman, sort of breaks down as it was not up to Patton to destroy German infrastructure and elite property, at least while he was fighting in France (most of the duration of his march).
The section on Patton will probably be the most controversial, but Hanson is actually building on the arguments of previous historians of World War II when he argues that the 11 months of fighting necessary to bring Germany down after D-Day are not so much the result of Wehrmacht excellence as of incompetent American leadership that failed to reinforce Patton's success. At the time he and a few others devised the invasion of northwest Europe, Eisenhower would have been reasonably sure that only the atomic bomb would end German resistance as the plan was not to take western Germany until 1946!
One can't help but think as one reads Hanson's account of Patton's march that perhaps Eisenhower and Bradley forgot the dictum, "No plan survives first contact with the enemy." Eisenhower comes across in this narrative as a better President than a general (and had Patton lived to write his memoirs even that might have been taken away). His crucial (though far from his only) mistake was gambling on Montgomery rather than Patton to end the war in September 1944.
So why am I deducting one star from my review? Go back to the first paragraph (or in Hanson's book, the epilogue). Hanson sees war as the best, if not the only, corrective to evil in the world. Just before the quote I have made the title of my review, he argues that failing to destroy Saddam Hussein's Iraq in 1991 was an unforgivable moral (more than strategic) lapse. (The book was written in 1999, one year after the neoconservatives first began to ramp up their campaign for the destruction of Iraq.) The entire book is written to frustrate and belittle modern pacifists and liberals, much like his "Carnage and Culture" that I read 18 years ago. I could never give such a philosophy my unrestrained support. Only when it's absolutely necessary, like war itself.
It is more an examination of the importance of a general's character and psychological make-up than the details of what took place within each battle.
Victor Davis Hanson is a scholar with a perspective of war that most writers neglect. I highly recommend this book and all of Victor Davis Hanson's other books (I've read four thus far.).
One of the things I enjoyed most about this work was how the author compared and contrasted the three marches of liberation. How the three generals shared some very similar obstacles, and very different ones, as well. And how they accomplished their missions. For me, it gave me a deeper understanding and appreciation of what they did.
If it wasn't for these three men, world history would have been changed to the worse. On a personal note, if it wasn't for one of them, Patton, my sisters and I might not even exist. My father, when he was a child, along with his parents and brother, were Slavic "guests" on the Nazis in a few of their concentration camps. They were among those many liberated by Patton and his 3rd Army.
Top reviews from other countries
The book is about non-conformist generals who were able to convince their men, coming from a democratic and free society, to march against an enemy consisting of slaveholders in order to free the slaves.
The theme of the book doesn't convince me. I am not a moralist. I find it difficult to assign the moral high ground to one side the conflict. The history is written by those who are victorious. To compare these three generals and their marches can be done but I think it is a bit farfetched.
I found the real value of the book not lying in the central theme of the book, but in the details of the descriptions and explanations. At one point he describes why the hoplite way of fighting was a very efficient way of waging war. At another point he describes the military tactics of Patton. These details are the reason why I kept on reading. No battles are described. What can be read are the political realities the generals had to deal with. The reasoning behind the actions of the generals. Lots and lots of details.
I enjoyed reading the book and after reading the book I had become a bit more knowledgeable. That is all what can be asked from a book that is written to inform.
Ilias Ajax is presented as fearless, powerful, combative, loyal, loved by his soldiers, and self-sacrificing. When Achilles died, Agamemnon, the King of the Greeks, is uncertain whether to give Achilles’ armour to Ajax or to Odysseus, as recognition for heroic war efforts. Odysseus is the tricky, unstable, illoyal, opportunistic inventor of the Wooden Horse. Being a better communicator, Odysseus finally gets the trophy. The question refers to what is of higher value: Hard-work or cleverness? Self-sacrifice or opportunistic behaviour? Loyalty or inventiveness? Role model or personal ambition? The question is important because the leadership values of an organisation can be recognised by those who get the recognition for outstanding achievements. Victor Davis Hanson gives George S.Patton the merits he deserves in crushing the Nazis and winning World War II.
Hans H.Hinterhuber
In "Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise to Western Power" hat er dies am Beispiel ausgewählter Schlachten zu belegen versucht, in diesem Buch geht es nun um drei ausgewählte Heerführer, die ihre Truppen nicht nur zum Sieg geführt, sondern dabei auch noch einen moralischen Triumph über das Böse erfochten haben. Bei den drei Generälen handelt es sich um den Thebaner Epaminondas, der die Hegemonie Spartas endgültig brach und dabei die seit Jahrhunderten als Staats-Sklaven unterdrückten Heloten befreite, William T. Sherman, der im amerikanischen Bürgerkrieg durch seinen Marsch in das Herz der Konföderation den Kampfeswillen des Südens brach sowie George Patton, dessen Truppen entscheidend zum Sieg der Allierten über Nazi-Deutschland im Westen beitrugen.
Wer Hansons Stil mag (ich gehöre zu dieser Gruppe), wird auch dieses Buch schätzen. Der Autor macht kein Geheimnis daraus, dass er alle drei Generäle für bedeutender als ihre zeitgenössischen Kontrahenten oder Mitstreiter hält, wahrt ihnen gegenüber aber kritische Distanz und verheimlicht auch nicht die fragwürdigen Charaktereigenschaften. Besonders der heute fast vergessene demokratische Heerführer Epaminondas erfährt hier die verdiente Gerechtigkeit. Ein sehr lesenswertes Buch.







