| Digital List Price: | $17.99 |
| Kindle Price: | $9.49 Save $8.50 (47%) |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
South Park and Philosophy: Bigger, Longer, and More Penetrating (Popular Culture and Philosophy Book 26) Kindle Edition
- Kindle
$9.49 Read with Our Free App - Paperback
$9.9934 Used from $1.50 20 New from $9.99 1 Collectible from $9.95
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherOpen Court
- Publication dateAugust 31, 2011
- File size1053 KB
-
Next 3 for you in this series
$45.20 -
Next 5 for you in this series
$67.18 -
First 30 for you in this series
$391.45
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- ASIN : B005IG4WZU
- Publisher : Open Court (August 31, 2011)
- Publication date : August 31, 2011
- Language : English
- File size : 1053 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 320 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,583,751 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #473 in Television History & Criticism
- #1,536 in TV History & Criticism
- #2,602 in Popular Culture
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The majority of the political and ethical essays are by Richard Hanley, the anthology's editor, who is fairly liberal and shares many ethical opinions with fellow Australian philosopher Peter Singer. If you're acquainted with Singer's work - and especially if you've read Practical Ethics - then much of the applied ethics material will be familiar.
Hanley's positions are often incendiary. In "White Jews Can't Jump," he argues in favor of permitting performance-enhancing drugs in sports. And in "Animal Protein," Hanley argues that eating baby animals may be an ethically acceptable alternative to eating the adult animals produced in factory farming, and that eating human fetuses and infants may sometimes be permissible. Both of these chapters are virtually guaranteed to piss off most people who read them. I think they are Hanley's best contributions to the volume; they are certainly his most memorable.
The contributors' attitude toward is secular and irreverent. One highlight of the religion section is Richard Dalton's "Pussy Epistemology Is No Match For A Dick," a sort of defense of Richard Dawkins's public atheism. Parker and Stone get some well-deserved flak here: Dalton easily demolishes the shallow version of pluralism ("no one answer is ever the answer") that underlies Parker and Stone's criticism of Dawkins.
The rest of the chapters are a mixed bag. One of the most satisfying essays in the book is Tom Way's "Douching Your Truth Canal," a sort of paean to critical thinking and a well-deserved excoriation of douchebags like John Edward. Other strong points of the mixed bag include Sophia Bishop's chapter on time travel and Randall Auxier's piece on education reform. However, Auxier's essay on Kenny, death and existentialism is high on armchair psychology and low on both psychological evidence and philosophical argument.
South Park and Philosophy is written in the spirit of South Park itself. The contributors are gleefully profane and blasphemous, and they pour scorn on bad arguments, even when those arguments come from the show itself. If you don't want to read opinions that stray from the ideology of South Park, you may want to look elsewhere. But if you want a smartassed, trash-talking collection of essays on South Park and some of the most inflammatory issues that the show tackles, this is a good read.
1- stay away from this book and
2- your a pussy.
I consider myself liberal for what it's worth, as does this author, but this book is a thinly veiled cash grab on South Park's notoriety and a forum for him to express his opinions. That being said, if you love eating up atheist materialist red meat there is plenty in here for you to chew on, including some opinions that you might find surprising.
All in all, I would skip this book if you're paying with your own money.
The few essays that weren't penned by Hanley seem like their authors actually watch the show. But as far as philosophic essays go, they aren't enough to redeem Hanley's idiocy.
I have been a huge fan of the Popular Culture and Philosophy series since the first Matrix book. I couldn't wait to read this when it came out, but it was an utter disappointment. South Park is perhaps the TV show with the most philosophic potential, but I haven't seen anyone capitalize on it yet. The other "pop culture and philosophy" South Park book gets terrible reviews as well, so I guess we just have to wait for Matt and Trey to write a book!
Bottom Line:
If you are looking for a book to expand upon Matt and Trey's philosophy, this sadly is not it. However, if you think South Park is funny because Kenny dies and Cartman says dirty words, then this might be for you.
About the only part of the book I liked was some of Hanley's thoughts on religion; but a lot of these were so rude that any fair-minded person would conclude that atheists were all jerks.
Avoid this book and watch the programmes instead.





