Spider-Man 2 (Extended Edition)

 (15,735)
7.42 h 15 min2004X-RayPG-13
Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) gives up his crime-fighting identity of Spider-Man in a desperate attempt to return to ordinary life and keep the love of MJ (Kirsten Dunst). But a ruthless, terrifying new villain, the multi-tentacled Doc Ock, forces Peter to swing back into action to save everything he holds dear.
Directors
Sam Raimi
Starring
Tobey MaguireKirsten DunstJames Franco
Genres
Science FictionFantasyAdventureAction
Subtitles
English [CC]
Audio languages
English
Rentals include 30 days to start watching this video and 48 hours to finish once started.
Add to Watchlist
Add to
Watchlist
By ordering or viewing, you agree to our Terms. Sold by Amazon.com Services LLC.
Write review

More details

Supporting actors
Alfred MolinaRosemary HarrisDonna Murphy
Producers
Laura ZiskinAvi Arad
Studio
Columbia Pictures
Rating
PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned)
Content advisory
Violencealcohol usesmokingfoul languagesexual content
Purchase rights
Stream instantly Details
Format
Prime Video (streaming online video)
Devices
Available to watch on supported devices

Reviews

4.8 out of 5 stars

15735 global ratings

  1. 85% of reviews have 5 stars
  2. 10% of reviews have 4 stars
  3. 4% of reviews have 3 stars
  4. 1% of reviews have 2 stars
  5. 1% of reviews have 1 stars
Sorted by:

Top reviews from the United States

mdkReviewed in the United States on July 9, 2020
5.0 out of 5 stars
Real Deal Spidey
Verified purchase
The best Spider-Man movie, bar-none. I prefer Toby Macguire's Spidey by far over the entertaining, but ultimately flat MCU Spider-Man, who's basically just Tony Stark's executive assistant. The character of Spider-Man, while something of a trickster, always had a huge streak of sadness buried within. Macguire's hangdog face always conveyed that perfectly. MCU Spidey by comparison is just another vacuous Gen Z kid with zero gravitas. Anyway, this is a great superhero movie but it's too bad studio-suit meddling reached a fever pitch a few years later, resulting in the mess that was Spider-Man 3. And don't even get me started on the two interim "AMAZING SPIDER-MAN" movies, especially the second one. I still have no clue what those were supposed to be.
13 people found this helpful
StevieReviewed in the United States on September 21, 2020
3.0 out of 5 stars
Movie Is 5 Stars... But This Specific Version IS NOT 4K!!!
Verified purchase
Please note that Spider-Man 2 is not only one of the best superhero movies made, but Spider Man 2 is hands down, one of the best OVERALL movies EVER made.... This critique though is only relegated to video quality in 4K.

Basically, the purchase of this movie is kind of my fault, but is a mistake that anyone can easily make due to the labeling on the package and product page. I purchased this movie thinking that it was an actual 4K movie that requires a 4K player to produce 4K quality on my 4K TV and unfortunately this movie is not an actual 4K movie.

Just know that "Mastered in 4K" doesn't mean "4K Video Output"... Once again.... This IS NOT an actual 4K movie!
9 people found this helpful
Brandon S.Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2021
2.0 out of 5 stars
James Franco cries for 2hrs and 7 mins
Verified purchase
The Sam Raimi Spider-Verse is, to me, the most well choreographed mess the early 2000's produced. I grew up loving these films but a quick trip down memory lane was all it took to realize just how much of a hot mess this trilogy actually was which explains why it's produced countless memes throughout the years.

I felt constant cringe and second hand embarrassment watching this film between James Franco's (Harry Osborn) non-stop crying, the awkward facial expressions Tobey Maguire (Spider-Man/Peter Parker) has every time he needs to articulate bodily strain without words and the lackluster head-tilt performance Kirsten Dunst (Mary Jane Watson) (always) delivers. The only performances that were enjoyable for me were Willem Dafoes (Green Goblin/Norman Osborn) brief cameo at the very end which lasted roughly 2 minutes, Peters landlord Elya Baskin (Mr. Ditkovich) and J.K. Simmons (J. Jonah Jameson) which couldn't save an otherwise flop of a film.

Even Alfred Molinas (Doc Ock/Dr. Otto Octavius) performance was entirely forgettable and the inhibitor chip malfunction that led to metal tentacles controlling him right up until the very end fell flat and left me confused. Were the tentacles controlling him or was it his own grief/fear of failure that caused him to go from a man of science and poetry to an ego maniac that completely disregards human life to accomplish his goals? Hard to tell.

All that being said though, the writing and direction are there (I guess) but the execution and poor use of CGI really didn't distract from the cast and their abysmal performances. I understand that CGI was still young at the time of this films release but I swear it was as bad as the Pear scene from Attack of the Clones.
6 people found this helpful
joel wingReviewed in the United States on December 31, 2020
3.0 out of 5 stars
Conflicted Parker does he want to be a superhero or boyfriend?
Verified purchase
Spider Man 2 is about Peter Parker facing up to his responsibilities of being a superhero. Did, he really want to do that with his life or would he rather be with MJ and go to school? So far it was impossible for him to balance all of those aspects of his life. He was failing school because he was always late and tired due to being Spider-Man. He still loved MJ but he couldn’t be with her because he was afraid she’d be hurt if anyone knew his secret identity. At one point the pressure becomes too much and he gives up his supersuit to be just Peter Parker. Sometimes it seems like the movie spends too much time on the Parker-MJ dynamic however and loses track of the fact that it’s a superhero story.

The bad guy in Spider-Man 2 is Dr. Octopus. He’s a classic example of the mad scientist. They did a really good job with the effects on his eight arms. Again, if they hadn’t done so much on Parker’s love life there would have been more time on the antagonist.

Overall the Spider Man sequel is a good watch, it just could have done better if it had edited down Parker’s love life.
C
4 people found this helpful
TeaTheTeaReviewed in the United States on November 9, 2021
5.0 out of 5 stars
Nostalgia Bomb
Verified purchase
This movie is absolutely one of my favorite super hero movies. The combination of satisfying acting and goosebump inducing music from Danny Elfman gave me one of the best movie experiences when I was a kid, and still gives me an amazing experience today. The struggle of Peter in this movie gives the audience a way to empathize with him. Do we do whats right? Do we do what we want? Do we do whats easy? This will always be a favorite.
4 people found this helpful
Y. C. M.Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2022
5.0 out of 5 stars
Perfect family night movie
Verified purchase
Ok, who doesn’t know Peter Parker??? Don’t want to give away spoilers but Peter is bitten by a spider and becomes Spider-Man and this is the story of what happens after. Spider-Man is a household name and as he faces villains he is truly one of the best characters in the Marvel universe.

Spider-Man movies tend to have a great narrative and more of a connection to younger audiences.

Great movie! Action packed.
2 people found this helpful
CheyReviewed in the United States on October 5, 2022
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great movie!
Verified purchase
If I’m having a rough day, I can always rely on Spider-Man to help me out. No matter the universe we travel to with spidey, he effortlessly swings into action and grasps the attention of my son quicker then Harry wanting revenge. 🙌🏻 After traveling the full multiverse with my son, we are most definitely ready for a tear in the space time continuum. Thank you Tom Holland, Andrew Garfield, and of course the OG himself, Tobey Maguire. 👏🏻
One person found this helpful
JohnAroundTheCornerReviewsReviewed in the United States on July 23, 2015
5.0 out of 5 stars
EIGHT extra minutes -- enough that I"m glad I watched both versions of "Spider-Man 2" (and 2.1)
Verified purchase
"Spider-Man 2.1" is, for all practical purposes, the director's cut for Spider-man 2.

This movie is identical to Spider-Man 2, except for 8 added minutes of content, and possibly some rearrangement of other minutes (though I don't remember any of that happening). Knowing other "director's cuts" that I have watched (zealously at times), there may have been some content in the earlier movie that was not in the second. For this reason, I generally purchase every version of a movie, usually two if there is a director's cut, or in the case of Christopher Reeve's Superman, three versions (theatrical, two-night television event (Lester's Cut), and Donner's Director's Cut (2006).

I highly recommend that you purchase both Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 2.1 (and of course, the other movies that "Spider-Man" swung his web for.

John
7 people found this helpful
See all reviews