Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Stalin and the Kirov Murder First Edition
Stalin and the Kirov Murder, written by the much acclaimed author of Harvest of Sorrow, is the first book-length examination of the case. Robert Conquest chronicles this story of political misfeasance and cover-up on the eve of what may be the first disclosure by the U.S.S.R. of the actual facts of the case. Though an interrogation was conducted in 1934, and over the next few years a purge charged thousands with complicity in the case, a number of unusual circumstances leading up to the murder were never properly explained. Why, for instance, was the assassin, who had twice been arrested in possession of a weapon, allowed unguarded in the building where the Leningrad government officials had their offices? As Roy Medvedev, a Leninist dissident, later explained, "The investigation was carried out in complete violation of the law, of common sense, of the desire to find and punish the real culprits."
A later investigation, conducted under Khrushchev, produced 200 volumes of documents but was never made public. Now, 54 years after the crime was committed, glasnost has prompted a new examination of this singular crime--one that will perhaps reveal the truth about the case for the first time.
Based on all the available evidence, including official documents as well as the reports of numerous Russian defectors, Conquest has written a fascinating, at times chilling account of the murder and its aftermath. He concretely establishes what has long been rumored--that Stalin not only sanctioned Kirov's assassination, but used it as a justification for the terror that culminated in 1937 and '38.
- ISBN-100195055799
- ISBN-13978-0195055795
- EditionFirst Edition
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateJanuary 5, 1989
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.81 x 0.81 x 8.56 inches
- Print length164 pages
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Stalin: Breaker of NationsHardcover$14.45 shippingGet it as soon as Tuesday, Dec 31Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Stalin Against the JewsArkady VaksbergHardcover$14.57 shippingGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 2Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
The Last Days of StalinPaperback$12.66 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 1988 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From School Library Journal
- Barbara Batty, Port Arthur I.S.D., TX
Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc.
About the Author
Robert Conquest, Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, is author of Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; First Edition (January 5, 1989)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 164 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195055799
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195055795
- Item Weight : 10.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.81 x 0.81 x 8.56 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,098,398 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4,554 in United States History (Books)
- #8,263 in Russian History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star53%28%19%0%0%53%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star53%28%19%0%0%28%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star53%28%19%0%0%19%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star53%28%19%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star53%28%19%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018
Reviewed in the United States on December 28, 2009
Conquest began this book with a brief summary of Kirov's murder. Conquest also raises troubling questions re this murder such as why Kirov's NKVD body guards were mysteriously absent during the assassination. Conquest asked the same question when he wrote, "Or, to put it another way, who gave him (the assassin) his chance, and why?"
Conquest gave a brief pricise of Kirov, the popular Soviet leader in Leningrad. According to Conquest and then contemporary Soviet officials there was a fierce political brawl brewing between older Bolsheviks and Stalin for power. According to Conquest dissention arose over the mass famine deaths in the Ukraine between 1928-1934 and failed Five Year Plans especially The Baltic/White Sea Canal project which achieved little at the expense of thousands of lives. In other words, there were good political reasons for Stalin wanting to get rid of Kirov and the Old Bolsheviks. Readers can glean from this book that Stalin's enemies vastly underestimated Stalin's cunning and ruthlessness. As an aside, Stalin's enemies should have been more alert as they were all partners in crime.
Conquest then dealt with the trial of Nicolayev who assassinated Kirov. When Nicolayev was asked why he committed the murder, he is supposed to have answered, "Ask them," meaning members of the Leningrad NKVD (the Soviet Secret Police). According to the record, Nicolayev was silenced. Other witnesses who may have presented embarrassing evidence died in mysterious auto accidents which NKVD men later admitted over twenty years later were staged murders. An interesting side bar that Conquest made is that Nicolayev was twice arrested for carrying a hand gun only to be released without formal charges. A good question is why, prior to murdeing Kirov, was Nicolayev not prosecuted for these law violations.
Immediately after Kirov's "trial" Soviet state police investigations expanded which resulted in over 1600 of Lenin's followers facing staged trials and excutions. Some of those accused were charged with being White Guards (supporters of the Czar), Trotsky's supporters, etc. Many of these "trials" were held In Camera or in secret because of fears that public trials would be too embarrassing at the time (1935). As Conquest noted, the trials got little attention from the Soviet Press (Pravda). Yet the number of arrests grew to over a hundred thousand which was mild compared to what was to come.
While some of those arrested were tortured and shot or sent to what are known as the Gulag Archepelago (the Siberian concentrqtion camps), a few important defendants were treated very well even though they lived in the Kolyma Camp in far Eastern Siberian. These few "convicts" lived well and were treated almost as honored guests. Their sentence to Kolyma was political because of little chance of contact with the "outside" world. Yet, when the Soviet purges gained full strenght in 1937, these prisoners were shot.
As Conquest made clear, the trials and purges from 1937-1953 were more carefully planned. Up to 1935, there were embarrassing contradictions whereby defendants were plotting at two different places at the ssme time. Conquest wrote that one allgeged plot was started in a Copenhagan, Denmark hotel which was actually demolished in 1917 long before the alleged plot was hatched. Defendants were often promised that if they lied and perjured themselves, their lives would be spared. Yet, they were shot. The situation was so dangerous that a 1935 law held family members guilty for what relatives did even if the family members were ignorant of any "crimes." As one Soviet citizen noted, peoples' lips were frozen for fear of false reports to the secret police. One poor soul was arrested when he finally heard that Kirov was killed a few years earlier. This unforunate fellow responded that someone died every day. He was arrested and sentenced to 10 years in a concentration camp because this innocent statement was construed as a threat to Stalin's life.
With the expansion of the purge trials and concentration camp brutality, there were few public trials. Most of those arrested were secretly arrested and shot. Or they were tortured to death. One noted Old Bolshevik who was publicly tried and shot was Bukharin. When Stalin was once asked about the contradictions and obvious perjury being reported in the Western Press, Stalin's response was, "They'll swallow it." Unfortunately Stalin was right.
The late sections of the book treated the actual events re Kirov's murder and subsequent events. Khrushchev revealed some of the truth in his fameous 1956 Secret Speech and in a more public presentation in 1961. Samizdat presses in the Soviet Union and Easter Europe plus Medevev's book LET HISTORY JUDGE further implicated Stalin in Kirov's murder. Conquest was clear that the Cui Bono (Who Benefits) theory alone did not implicate Stalin. However, other events and the logic of events that followed clearly implicated Stalin in Kirov's Murder. Some have questioned Stalin's guilt re the Kirov Murder because those accused later were going to shot regardless of their testimony. However, as Conquest wryly noted, they knew that being shot was much more preferable to being tortured to death.
Robert Conquests' book STALIN AND THE KIROV MURDER is a good case study that those in political power will resort to anything to enhance political power. This was not new in Russian History. To get some understnading of Stalin, the Kirov Murder, mass terror, etc. one should read Thucydides' (c. 460 BC-c. 400 BC) to understand how desire for political power will override family relations and destroy civilized behavior. This book was published in the 1980s, and the fall of Big Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe may produce sources and documents that will confirm Robert Conquest's book titled STALIN AND THE KIROV MURDER.
Reviewed in the United States on July 21, 2009
Summarising, if you are looking for a brief overview of what the Kirov muder MIGHT have been as deduced by the available evidence in the late 1980's, read this book. If you are looking for a solidly documented analysis of the murder and its use by Stalin and his supporters, try looking for a book written after the Soviet archives were open in the late 80's and early 90's.
Reviewed in the United States on August 17, 2008
Of course, as always with Stalin, there was a subplot. Bolshevist leaders from all over the Soviet Empire had voted to replace the frightening Stalin with the supposedly more moderate Kirov. Anyway, Kirov was dead and the raging Stalin set about systematically and cynically to ferret out the antirevolutionary killers. It was much like throwing a stone into the water. There's the initial splash and then rings of wavelets spread out from the center. There are the initial arrests with torture, confessions and executions. The next tier of suspects are arrested with torture, confessions and executions. Then the third tier ad infinitum. Before it is over, more than one million Communist Party members die and the Soviet officer corps--with the death of 50% of the officer class--are dead, lubricating the way for the Nazi invasion.
How could it happen? It happened with the death of Kirov. Conquest offers fascinating evidence that Kirov's murder--and the murder of hundreds of thousands--was Stalin's doing.
Ron Braithwaite author of novels, "Skull Rack" and "Hummingbird God", on the Spanish Conquest of Mexico
Reviewed in the United States on October 22, 2014
Mr. Conquest seems to have don an exhaustive study of all the available information in 1988 regarding the events of a half century earlier. Like all governments, there are many secrets, and the USSR had more than most. I doubt that anyone will know the details of what really happened and why in 1934, and this is probably the best that will ever be done.
