Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Starrett 119 Alloy Steel Bench Block, 4-7/8" Diameter, 1-1/2" Size

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $178.00 & FREE Shipping. Details
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
2 new from $178.00

Specifications for this item
Brand Name Starrett
Part Number 119
System of Measurement Inch
Material Type Alloy Steel
UPC 049659504910
EAN 0049659504910
Item Weight 5.8 pounds
Number of Items 1
UNSPSC Code 41111600


Product Features

  • 4-7/8" diameter x 1-1/2" high with ten oversize holes from 1/8-7/8" diameter and two v-grooves at right angles

Product Description

The starrett bench block is a good choice for all-around machine shop and tool room use when a larger, heavy-duty block is required. This block weighs five pounds. The base is hex-shaped, so the block to be held rigidly in a vise. It is made from alloy steel, hardened, and ground, top and bottom.

Product Details

  • Item Weight: 5.8 pounds
  • Shipping Weight: 5.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Domestic Shipping: Currently, item can be shipped only within the U.S. and to APO/FPO addresses. For APO/FPO shipments, please check with the manufacturer regarding warranty and support issues.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • ASIN: B0006J4E3Y
  • Item model number: 119
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #247,299 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific)
  • Manufacturer’s warranty can be requested from customer service. Click here to make a request to customer service.

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
Real good platform, fits in a vise really well
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse