Qty:1

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Starrett 672-2 Universal Back for 25 & 2600 Series Indicators

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $94.00 & FREE Shipping. Details
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
2 new from $74.99

Specifications for this item
Brand Name Starrett
Part Number 672-2
System of Measurement Inch
UPC 049659528879
EAN 0049659528879
Item Weight 4.96 ounces
Number of Items 1
UNSPSC Code 41111630

Dial Indicators

Dial Indicator
View our selection of dial indicators featuring professional brands including Mitutoyo, Starrett, and more. See more.

Product Features

  • Fits starrett series: 25 Dial indicators and 2600 electronic indicators

Product Description

Featuring a universal ball joint attached to the end of a gooseneck shank, these attachments make it possible to position an AGD indicator at any desired setting. The indicator can be rotated 360 degree and angularly up to 90 degree and locked in the desired position by tightening a single knurled nut. Straight shank is 3/8" (9.5mm) in diameter.

Product Details

  • Item Weight: 5 ounces
  • Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item can be shipped to select countries outside of the U.S. Learn More
  • ASIN: B0006J4HU4
  • Item model number: 672-2
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #543,609 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific)
  • Manufacturer’s warranty can be requested from customer service. Click here to make a request to customer service.

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
A-1
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse