Qty:1

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Starrett PT05116 Coupling With 3/16" Hole for Last Word Dial Test Indicators

5.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Price: $5.83 & FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details
Only 13 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
2 new from $5.83

Specifications for this item
Brand Name Starrett
Part Number PT05116
System of Measurement Inch
UPC 049659705560
EAN 0049659705560
Number of Items 1
UNSPSC Code 41113600


Frequently Bought Together

  • Starrett PT05116 Coupling With 3/16" Hole for Last Word Dial Test Indicators
  • +
  • Starrett PT13301 Double Jointed Attachment for Last Word Dial Test Indicators
Total price: $28.93
Buy the selected items together

Product Features

  • Attachments for Nos. 711 series last word dial test indicators

Product Description

No. PT05116 coupling slips over the long and short arm No. PT07104F and the shank of No. PT13175 universal friction holder to permit offset.

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 1.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item can be shipped to select countries outside of the U.S. Learn More
  • ASIN: B0006J4GRS
  • Item model number: PT05116
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #291,345 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific)

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By Paul O on March 19, 2016
Verified Purchase
Nice accessory for the Last Word indicator.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
great product, fast shipping!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse