The assumption that a divided world of competing states, such as the Westphalian system that arose in Europe (and which still holds today in the modern world), must be the stable state is challenged in this work. The situation of ancient China during the Spring & Autumn period and the Warring States period is used as a counterexample for how the balance of power can be tipped irrevocably leading to one state becoming supreme and absorbing or conquering others. The example of the kingdom of Qin (which went on to conquer its neighbors and create a unified China) is examined at length both for how it employed self strengthening methods to increase its own economic and military strength, and how it dealt with its enemies who naturally attempted to balance against Qin's rise.
Then an examination is conducted of Europe and why a similar situation did not arise of one state ultimately becoming strong enough to overcome the balance of power to unify Europe. In contrast to Qin, Victoria Hui argues early European kingdoms employed self weakening methods, that may have enabled swift short term raising of military strength but at the expense of long term loss of state revenue and loss of state power to intermediaries. The classic examples include taking out loans from merchants (often secured against future tax revenues), tax farming, and use of hired mercenaries. It is argued these short term expedients were the easiest ways in the more heavily monetized economy of Europe at the time, as compared to the Warring States period of ancient China. So whereas Qin and its neighbors were forced to extend the state apparatus wider and deeper to the local level to extract extra taxes and levies for its wars, in turn building up the centralized state and national armies, European rulers ended up dissipating their power through inefficient and unreliable mercenary forces, and landing themselves so deeply in debt that the ruler could become effectively hostage to others.
The second part of Victoria Hui's argument centers on the use of ruthless strategems. While both Europe and ancient China had its fair share of intrigues, alliances, and treacheries, she argues that Europe never reached the scale of bloodshed that the Chinese Warring States reached, not just in the numbers of killed but the purpose of war. The wars of national annihilation did not take place in Europe, and ended up in usually exchanges of territory or settling of succession issues. Tying in to her first point, Victoria Hui argues that the self weakening expedients practiced by the monarchs of early Europe led to inconclusive wars and states weakened to the point that no major state could get sufficient advantage over another to the point of truly being able to conquer and absorb another major state. The example of Napoleon is used as an example where a European power did attempt to adopt self strengthening measures that lead to a brief period of dominance in Europe, but which ultimately could not be sustained due to the long term weaknesses inherited from the self weakening measures of pre-Revolutionary France.
All in all it is a fascinating work and undermines some of the underlying assumptions of some followers of international relations today, which is dominated by a viewpoint that is very Western in focus and which assumes that a self balancing Westphalian system is the "natural" or stable state of affairs. The unification of the Chinese Warring States into one state and one dynasty demonstrates how fragile a balance of power can be, how it is not necessarily a stable equilibrium, and how a tipping point can be reached beyond which one state emerges as the "universal Leviathan". Victoria Hui is good in that she does not make any particular value judgments or moral arguments about either state of affairs, merely that the differing outcomes in China and Europe show how neither outcome can be viewed as "obvious" or "inevitable" in a system of competing nation states.
War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe Illustrated Edition
by
Victoria Tin-bor Hui
(Author)
| Victoria Tin-bor Hui (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
ISBN-13: 978-0521525763
ISBN-10: 0521525764
Why is ISBN important? ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
More Buying Choices
There is a common belief that the system of sovereign territorial states and the roots of liberal democracy are unique to European civilization and alien to non-Western cultures. The view has generated popular cynicism about democracy promotion in general and China's prospect for democratization in particular. This book demonstrates that China in the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods (656-221 BC) consisted of a system of sovereign territorial states similar to Europe in the early modern period. It examines why China and Europe shared similar processes but experienced opposite outcomes.
Frequently bought together

- +
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
One of these items ships sooner than the other.
Choose items to buy together.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Victoria Hui is perhaps the only person in the international relations field capable of writing such a sophisticated comparative history of the Chinese and European state systems. This book is pioneering in its efforts to bring Asia ina to the study of macro-historical change in world politics. She demonstrates expert command of Chinese and European sources, international relations theory, and social science research design. The result is a provocative argument about the importance of strategic amorality, ruthlessness, and resource mobilization in state building, and about why ancient Chinese states outperformed European states in these areas." Alastair Iain Johnston, Harvard University
"Victoria Hui has successfully executed a stunningly bold macro-historical comparison, while bringing to light the workings of a fascinating international system. Scholarship on state making and system transformation in ancient China and modern Europe and, indeed, in other international systems, past, present, and future must contend with her arguments and evidence."
William Wohlforth, Dartmouth College
"Dr. Hui offers us a challenging reinterpretation of modern European history by a bold and original comparison with the period of state formation in China. In doing so, she challenges some dominant theories both in the theory of state formation and in international relations theory. The boldness of the method will provoke controversy, but nothing could be more valuable, for both historians and political scientists, than to understand European history in comparative perspective. This unusual work will be of great interest, not only to students and scholars of European and Chinese history, but also to those concerned with understanding contemporary global politics."
Michael Freeman, University of Essex
"It is rare to encounter an analysis as attentive to detail and method, yet broad in the scope of its implications as that by Victoria Tin-Bor Hui. Her book embarks on a macro-historical study of world politics and provides a sophisticated comparative history of the Chinese and European state systems... It is the kind of book that is bound to trigger debate and it invites (if not beckons) its readers to pursue further the ideas discussed on its pages."
Emilian Kavalski, University of Alberta, Political Studies Review
"Victoria Hui's stimulating book represents an important contribution to the fields of political science, sociology and history that can be read with profit by Europeanists and Sinologists alike." - Thomas Ertman
"Victoria Hui has successfully executed a stunningly bold macro-historical comparison, while bringing to light the workings of a fascinating international system. Scholarship on state making and system transformation in ancient China and modern Europe and, indeed, in other international systems, past, present, and future must contend with her arguments and evidence."
William Wohlforth, Dartmouth College
"Dr. Hui offers us a challenging reinterpretation of modern European history by a bold and original comparison with the period of state formation in China. In doing so, she challenges some dominant theories both in the theory of state formation and in international relations theory. The boldness of the method will provoke controversy, but nothing could be more valuable, for both historians and political scientists, than to understand European history in comparative perspective. This unusual work will be of great interest, not only to students and scholars of European and Chinese history, but also to those concerned with understanding contemporary global politics."
Michael Freeman, University of Essex
"It is rare to encounter an analysis as attentive to detail and method, yet broad in the scope of its implications as that by Victoria Tin-Bor Hui. Her book embarks on a macro-historical study of world politics and provides a sophisticated comparative history of the Chinese and European state systems... It is the kind of book that is bound to trigger debate and it invites (if not beckons) its readers to pursue further the ideas discussed on its pages."
Emilian Kavalski, University of Alberta, Political Studies Review
"Victoria Hui's stimulating book represents an important contribution to the fields of political science, sociology and history that can be read with profit by Europeanists and Sinologists alike." - Thomas Ertman
Book Description
This book, first published in 2005, explores why China and Europe's development of state systems began similarly but experienced opposite outcomes.
About the Author
Victoria Hui is a visiting Assistant Professor in Political Science at the University of Notre Dame. She holds an Assistant Professor in Political Science position at the University of Illinois. She received a PhD from Columbia University and has received fellowships from the Olin Institute at Harvard University, the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University, the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, and the Institute for the Study of World Politics.
Start reading War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern... instantly on your Kindle Fire or on the free Kindle apps for iPad, Android tablet, PC or Mac. Don't have a free Kindle app? Get yours here
Learn new cuisines with virtual cooking experiences
Amazon Explore Browse now
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press; Illustrated edition (July 4, 2005)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 294 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0521525764
- ISBN-13 : 978-0521525763
- Item Weight : 1.06 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.98 x 0.7 x 8.98 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,176,089 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,573 in Asian History (Books)
- #2,210 in International Diplomacy (Books)
- #2,327 in International Relations (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
13 global ratings
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2013
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 21, 2009
Go to the Cambridge UP site on this book:
http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521525764
Prize Winner
Winner, 2006 Jervis-Schroeder Award for Best Book in International History and Politics, American Political Science Association
Winner, 2005 Edgar S. Furniss Award, Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Ohio State University
Reviews by Political/Social Scientists:
* Boucoyannis, Deborah, in Comparative Political Studies 39, 6, 2006, pp. 787-790.
* Ertman, Thomas, in The China Quarterly 187, 2006, pp. 798-800.
* Kavalski, Emilian, in Political Studies Review 4, 3, 2006, pp. 378-379.
* Nexon, Daniel, "Review Article: The Balance of Power in the Balance," World Politics 61, 2, pp.330-359.
* Sinno, Abdulkadeer, Perspectives on Politics 5, 1, 2007, pp. 186-187.
* Zhang, Feng, International Affairs 83, 1, 2007, pp. 201-203.
Reviews by Historians:
* Di Cosmo, Nicola, "Review Article: A Comparative Model of War and State Formation," in International History Review 28, 4, 2006, pp. 794-797.
* Graff, David A., in The Bulletin of the School of Oriental & African Studies 69, 3, 2006, pp. 491-492.
* Perdue, Peter C., in'Journal of Global History 2, 1, March 2007, pp 120-121.
* Waley-Cohen, Joanna, in Journal of Interdisciplinary History 37, 3, 2007, pp. 506-507.
* Wallacker, Benjamin E., Journal of Asian History 42, 1, 2008, pp.97-98.
* Wood, Alan T., in American Historical Review 111, 4, 2006, p.1133.
http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521525764
Prize Winner
Winner, 2006 Jervis-Schroeder Award for Best Book in International History and Politics, American Political Science Association
Winner, 2005 Edgar S. Furniss Award, Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Ohio State University
Reviews by Political/Social Scientists:
* Boucoyannis, Deborah, in Comparative Political Studies 39, 6, 2006, pp. 787-790.
* Ertman, Thomas, in The China Quarterly 187, 2006, pp. 798-800.
* Kavalski, Emilian, in Political Studies Review 4, 3, 2006, pp. 378-379.
* Nexon, Daniel, "Review Article: The Balance of Power in the Balance," World Politics 61, 2, pp.330-359.
* Sinno, Abdulkadeer, Perspectives on Politics 5, 1, 2007, pp. 186-187.
* Zhang, Feng, International Affairs 83, 1, 2007, pp. 201-203.
Reviews by Historians:
* Di Cosmo, Nicola, "Review Article: A Comparative Model of War and State Formation," in International History Review 28, 4, 2006, pp. 794-797.
* Graff, David A., in The Bulletin of the School of Oriental & African Studies 69, 3, 2006, pp. 491-492.
* Perdue, Peter C., in'Journal of Global History 2, 1, March 2007, pp 120-121.
* Waley-Cohen, Joanna, in Journal of Interdisciplinary History 37, 3, 2007, pp. 506-507.
* Wallacker, Benjamin E., Journal of Asian History 42, 1, 2008, pp.97-98.
* Wood, Alan T., in American Historical Review 111, 4, 2006, p.1133.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2010
Hui's War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe makes for an extremely good read. The book compares the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods (656-215 BCE) in China, which culminated in a single consolidated state, to the early modern period (1495-1815 BCE) in Europe, which did not. Hui argues that the two similar systems produced different results due largely to the presence and absence of a set of factors which she terms state-strengthening and state-weakening. The book has three main sections. Section one covers the period of history in China; section two, the period in Europe. Section three compares the two systems, ruling in and out various political, economic, and social factors that could account for the difference in outcomes. In addition to its being a stimulating read, the book provides a wealth of sources.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 2, 2016
One of the best books I've ever read about the topic. I think I've read it more than 10 times and created a board game based on it :)
Reviewed in the United States on June 19, 2016
Excellent perspective.
Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2012
Ancient China and early modern Europe are simply not comparable in many aspects. For example, geographical circumscription made competition among ancient China states a zero sum game. In contrast, modern Europe states could explore the new world. In addition, if the people could simply move away, the state would have less coercive power.
Two stars if one wants intellectual exercise.
Two stars if one wants intellectual exercise.
Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2008
This book has a great mix of theory and history. The arguments are convincing and well supported. A must read if you are interested in the dynamics of interstate systems and state formation.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2008
Thesis is very weak. It can't be anything but weak, since the documentation of the Spring and Autumn + Warring States period is very spotty, compared to premodern Europe. I can't really be sure of much of the political science aspects, since the disparity in source quality can lead to concious and unconcious cherry picking.
Where this book does work really well is as history. Comparing the two era gave me a window in understanding the motives of the participants in Ancient China, so I understood the general flow of the history much better.
Where this book does work really well is as history. Comparing the two era gave me a window in understanding the motives of the participants in Ancient China, so I understood the general flow of the history much better.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Gabriel Stein
5.0 out of 5 stars
Absolutely fascinating
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 14, 2020
This is an absolutely fascinating book about how states developed and how empires were formed. The author starts by noting that many historians believe that China was destined towards imperial unity, whereas Europe was destined to fragmentation. She then shows that this was by no means true. Why did things turn out as they did? This is highlighted by the difference between what the author calls ‘self-strengthening’ and ‘self-weakening’ reforms in the military, financial and administrative fields. The conclusion is that things could easily have turned out differently, making the reasons they didn’t a truly gripping read!
Mr. T. CULLIS
5.0 out of 5 stars
An excellent, thought provoking book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 11, 2011
The issues of how and why the Chinese and European civilizations developed such distinctive and often contrasting features is one of the most intriguing puzzles of history.
Hui identifies the formative stages in the development of international politics in each case, comparing the competition between states in early modern Europe c1495 - 1815 that led to a multi-state balance of power, with the Warring States era in China which in contrast culminated in the creation of a unified empire by the victorious Qin.
Hui challenges notions that the outcomes for either civilization were inevitable: the Qin were one of several states to adopt self-strengthening reforms in the Warring States era of Chinese history c656 - 221BC; the cultural homogeneity of China was not yet established and like in Europe geographical barriers could impede military expansion.
Hui examines the reasons why Spain and then France failed to establish hegemony in Europe. Their over-reliance on expensive mercenary soldiers, international banking houses and tax farmers were short term expedients which discouraged the development of strong state institutions and the fiscal machinery required to finance long wars, leading eventually to the bankruptcy of the Ancien Regime.
A unique and fortuitious conjuction of events around 1688 combined to nudge the English state in the right direction. The result was the combination of a powerful central state machinery with the checks and balances of Parliament, whose consent was required to levy taxation. The fiscal efficiency and pluralism of England allowed her to counter Napoleon's later attempts to conquer and unify Europe.
Hui's analysis moves to a deeper level when she argues that the existence of a balance of power in Europe has been beneficial in creating conditions conducive to the establishment of rights for individual citizens. During the Warring States era in China there are indications that rulers offered land and legal rights to citizens in return for consent to raising war taxes and military conscription. The Qin had also followed this pattern, but rapidly rescinded on this social contract as soon as they had eliminated all the rival states in 221BC.
This is also the best account that I have read of the Warring States era in China with a useful series of maps.
Hui identifies the formative stages in the development of international politics in each case, comparing the competition between states in early modern Europe c1495 - 1815 that led to a multi-state balance of power, with the Warring States era in China which in contrast culminated in the creation of a unified empire by the victorious Qin.
Hui challenges notions that the outcomes for either civilization were inevitable: the Qin were one of several states to adopt self-strengthening reforms in the Warring States era of Chinese history c656 - 221BC; the cultural homogeneity of China was not yet established and like in Europe geographical barriers could impede military expansion.
Hui examines the reasons why Spain and then France failed to establish hegemony in Europe. Their over-reliance on expensive mercenary soldiers, international banking houses and tax farmers were short term expedients which discouraged the development of strong state institutions and the fiscal machinery required to finance long wars, leading eventually to the bankruptcy of the Ancien Regime.
A unique and fortuitious conjuction of events around 1688 combined to nudge the English state in the right direction. The result was the combination of a powerful central state machinery with the checks and balances of Parliament, whose consent was required to levy taxation. The fiscal efficiency and pluralism of England allowed her to counter Napoleon's later attempts to conquer and unify Europe.
Hui's analysis moves to a deeper level when she argues that the existence of a balance of power in Europe has been beneficial in creating conditions conducive to the establishment of rights for individual citizens. During the Warring States era in China there are indications that rulers offered land and legal rights to citizens in return for consent to raising war taxes and military conscription. The Qin had also followed this pattern, but rapidly rescinded on this social contract as soon as they had eliminated all the rival states in 221BC.
This is also the best account that I have read of the Warring States era in China with a useful series of maps.




