Book Review: State of Terror: How Terror Created Modern Israel by Thomas Suarez
This was an interesting read and one that should theoretically speaking be read more often than it is. In this book, Suarez attempts to prove the dark history of Israel’s inception and founding. There is something very interesting about this: Suarez takes using firsthand sources to a new level. Suarez scoured declassified CIA, MI5, and IDF memos and documents. His endnotes are comprehensive, with over 600 works, documents, and memos cited. Seriously, no one has done this when discussing this topic. Suarez has proven to be have a more historiographically sound than most PhD’s in history.
The book is, of course, arranged chronologically, starting with the first idea of making Palestine into a state for Jewish people. There are a few themes to the book, though:
1. According to the sources cited from the CIA and British Intelligence, all violence was initiated by Jews, not Arabs. As such, all retaliation by Arabs, whether rightful or not, should be considered self defense. See page 51 were the British repudiate all Jewish claims of self defense.
2. Ben-Gurion, the essential founder of the Israeli settler colonist project, was very clearly not in favor of saving Jews that were in harm’s way in Nazi Germany. He was willing to sacrifice all of their lives for his colonist project. As a matter of fact, during the years 1939-1944, the majority of assassinations carried out were of other Jews who were critical of Zionism.
3. Throughout the Israeli efforts, they were instructed by their leaders to instigate Arab retaliation, so that they can use that retaliation in their PR campaigns in the U.S. and elsewhere. The failure of this method was witnessed until the 1950’s when true Arab retaliation started. This so happens to coincide with when the European settlers in Palestine turned their focus from British Mandate officials to Palestinians, as Palestinians now were their barrier to conquest of the frontier.
4. Many Jewish witnesses commented that Israeli ways were Nazi-esque. An example is Dr. Paul Nathan, who described a Russian pogrom model of terrorism against Palestinians. (Pg. 29) Another example is Holocaust survivor Robert Weltsch, who claimed “we know what Nazism is,” when discussing Zionism. (Pg. 70) Consider also what Lord Moyne says about who the Nazis are (Pg. 98)
5. The Israeli project is based on racism, not justice. Weizmann, for example, says that Jews should never level with Arabs politically. (Pg. 40) This point is further proved by the King-Crane Report which stated that the Zionist goal was “a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine.” (Pg. 44) Indeed, their violence was not only directed to Arab Muslims, but also Arab Jews and Christians.
6. Israel did not care for displaced persons after the holocaust. Actually, they looked down at them and considered them lowly. When the Irgun infiltrated DP camps in various parts of Europe, survivors described them as abusive, physically and verbally, to any of those who did not agree with Zionist goals.
7. Israel achieved its goals through intimidation and bribery. The Israeli Lobby in Washington and the use of force made Israel come to existence, nothing more and nothing less. In many instances, British and CIA documents call Israeli acts of violence, “terrorism.”
8. After 1949 and the end of the British Mandate, focus of Israel was directed at Palestinians. Even after many agreements to the distribution of land, unfairly of course, Israel had no plans to stop annexing land and stealing lands owned by Palestinians. They even resorted to terrorist attacks to blame on Arabs. This is proven by declassified documents. Their mass murder was also inexplicable in the intelligence documents.
This is the best book about the means and methods employed by Israel to conquer Palestine. I highly recommend reading it.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$16.20
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
SuperBookDeals---
Sold by:
SuperBookDeals---
(36094 ratings)
86% positive over last 12 months
86% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
$22.00
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
californiabooks
Sold by:
californiabooks
(7373 ratings)
90% positive over last 12 months
90% positive over last 12 months
Only 3 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$23.33
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
Book Depository US
Sold by:
Book Depository US
(912469 ratings)
89% positive over last 12 months
89% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
Send link
Processing your request...
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Flip to back
Flip to front
State of Terror: How Terrorism Created Modern Israel Paperback – September 15, 2016
by
Thomas Suarez
(Author)
|
Thomas Suarez
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
-
Print length288 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherOlive Branch Press
-
Publication dateSeptember 15, 2016
-
Dimensions6 x 1 x 9 inches
-
ISBN-101566560683
-
ISBN-13978-1566560689
An Amazon Book with Buzz: "Antoni: Let's Do Dinner" by Antoni Porowski
Let’s Do Dinner is an invitation into Antoni’s easy kitchen Learn more
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Suárez (Palestine Sixty Years Later) passionately and meticulously exposes the terrorism committed by Zionist groups in Palestine from the post-WWI era of the British Mandate through the early years of the Israeli state. Though not a historian by trade, Suárez ably presents material from British archives, Zionist documents, and other sources to chronicle the relentless onslaught of kidnappings, shootings, and bombings committed by Zionist terror organizations. Suárez outlines the ideological origins and racialized basis of the Zionist political movement and details how groups such as Irgun and Lehi—‘the terror gangs of the Mandate era’—spared few to achieve their political aims, targeting native Palestinians, British authorities, and ‘uncooperative’ Jews in Palestine; even WWII refugees and Jewish victims of Nazi crimes were considered fodder for Zionist political aims. He demonstrates the centrality of coercion and terror to the eventual establishment of the Israeli state and argues that the ongoing ‘conflict’ between Israel and the Palestinians is less an intractable collision between historic enemies than it is ‘the single story’ of political Zionism’s ‘underlying linear violence’ and ‘its determination to expropriate all of Palestine for a “Jewish” settler nation predicated on blood descent—“race.”’ Much of Suárez’s work recounts episodes of violence rather than offering analysis, but it is nevertheless an impressive display of historical excavation.”
“A tour de force, based on diligent archival research that looks boldly at the impact of Zionism on Palestine and its people in the first part of the 20th century. The book is the first comprehensive and structured analysis of the violence and terror employed by the Zionist movement and later the state of Israel against the people of Palestine. Much of the suffering we witness today can be explained and connected to this formative period covered thoroughly in this book.”
“A chronicle of Zionist sins since the beginning of the ‘settler project’ in the 1920s to the 1956 Suez Crisis. London-based professional violinist and author Suárez (Palestine Sixty Years Later, 2010, etc.) is careful to first define Zionist ‘terrorism’ before he launches into his systematic, chronological account of how it played out in the Jewish settling of Mandatory Palestine. If terrorism means the violent targeting of civilians, then the ‘ethno-national movement of Zionism,’ which accomplished the appropriation of non-Jewish land over many decades, even if it meant ‘making life so miserable for [Palestinians] that they [left] “of their own accord,”’ certainly fit the bill. Moreover—and this is where Suárez is most sharply provocative—the early Zionists also targeted Jews themselves, such as pressuring post–World War II displaced persons to settle in Palestine as well as kidnapping Jewish orphans to keep them from being raised Christian. Not surprisingly, the author blames Europe’s Zionist leaders—Chaim Weizmann, David Ben-Gurion et al.—for propounding an extraordinary kind of messianism, a biblical Israel that was ‘not subject to norms applicable to the rest of the world.’ Suárez concentrates on the highly organized violence of Hagana splinter groups Irgun and Lehi from 1939 through the founding of the state: both were anti-Palestinian and anti-British. Yet these terrorist groups also targeted Jewish ‘traitors.’ The author emphasizes the anti-Semitic nature of Zionism in creating ‘a permanent state of emergency’ for which a Jewish state in Palestine was the only answer. Eventually, the book becomes a lengthy litany of Zionist terrorist attacks and the employment of ‘confusion and war weariness’ to push for its political objectives, namely to assume all of Palestine and not just what was granted at Partition in late 1947. The author’s theme is that Partition, and thus statehood, was essentially gained by Zionist terrorism. A relentless, hard-hitting, ultimately one-note polemic.”
“A tour de force, based on diligent archival research that looks boldly at the impact of Zionism on Palestine and its people in the first part of the 20th century. The book is the first comprehensive and structured analysis of the violence and terror employed by the Zionist movement and later the state of Israel against the people of Palestine. Much of the suffering we witness today can be explained and connected to this formative period covered thoroughly in this book.”
“A chronicle of Zionist sins since the beginning of the ‘settler project’ in the 1920s to the 1956 Suez Crisis. London-based professional violinist and author Suárez (Palestine Sixty Years Later, 2010, etc.) is careful to first define Zionist ‘terrorism’ before he launches into his systematic, chronological account of how it played out in the Jewish settling of Mandatory Palestine. If terrorism means the violent targeting of civilians, then the ‘ethno-national movement of Zionism,’ which accomplished the appropriation of non-Jewish land over many decades, even if it meant ‘making life so miserable for [Palestinians] that they [left] “of their own accord,”’ certainly fit the bill. Moreover—and this is where Suárez is most sharply provocative—the early Zionists also targeted Jews themselves, such as pressuring post–World War II displaced persons to settle in Palestine as well as kidnapping Jewish orphans to keep them from being raised Christian. Not surprisingly, the author blames Europe’s Zionist leaders—Chaim Weizmann, David Ben-Gurion et al.—for propounding an extraordinary kind of messianism, a biblical Israel that was ‘not subject to norms applicable to the rest of the world.’ Suárez concentrates on the highly organized violence of Hagana splinter groups Irgun and Lehi from 1939 through the founding of the state: both were anti-Palestinian and anti-British. Yet these terrorist groups also targeted Jewish ‘traitors.’ The author emphasizes the anti-Semitic nature of Zionism in creating ‘a permanent state of emergency’ for which a Jewish state in Palestine was the only answer. Eventually, the book becomes a lengthy litany of Zionist terrorist attacks and the employment of ‘confusion and war weariness’ to push for its political objectives, namely to assume all of Palestine and not just what was granted at Partition in late 1947. The author’s theme is that Partition, and thus statehood, was essentially gained by Zionist terrorism. A relentless, hard-hitting, ultimately one-note polemic.”
About the Author
Thomas Suárez's previous works include Palestine Sixty Years Later, Early Mapping of the Pacific, and Early Mapping of Southeast
Asia, this last work considered the standard text on the subject. A professional violinist, Suárez is a former faculty member of Palestine's National Conservatory of Music.
Asia, this last work considered the standard text on the subject. A professional violinist, Suárez is a former faculty member of Palestine's National Conservatory of Music.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Olive Branch Press (September 15, 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1566560683
- ISBN-13 : 978-1566560689
- Item Weight : 1.35 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#801,696 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,044 in Israel & Palestine History (Books)
- #1,065 in African Politics
- #1,451 in Middle Eastern Politics
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.8 out of 5 stars
4.8 out of 5
44 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2019
Verified Purchase
18 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2020
Verified Purchase
Great read. Uncommon sense.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2018
Verified Purchase
This book should be required reading in any high school or college course that purports to have an honest study of the history of the Middle East, the transformation of Zionism from a 19th century fantasy into a settler colonial state project, and the West’s role in creating the nations that resulted from dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2017
Verified Purchase
A thoroughly documented account of the campaign of terror waged by Zionist organizations in Palestine in the 1940s against British, Palestinians, and also many Jews who refused to cooperate with the Zionists. The author, who draws on British archives, shows that the crucial role played by this campaign in inducing the British to withdraw and creating the State of Israel. He also illuminates many hitherto poorly known aspects of Zionist violence, such as the kidnapping of Jewish children orphaned by the Holocaust for forcible transfer to Palestine. Please read and digest.
33 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2017
Verified Purchase
To know and really understand Jewish terrorism up to the and during the creation of the State of Israel, this book is a must read. Even if you think you know about the Haganah, the Stern Gang and the Irgun, this carefully documented book will still shock you with its violence. Jewsih terrorists bombed, murdered fellow Jews, the British, and of course, the Palestinians. Israel has not changed at all from its evil start.
33 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2017
Verified Purchase
This is an absolute requirement for everyone interested in
the terrorism by Zionists. It's about time. Well documented.
I recommend it to all. (Illan Pappe:"A tour de force!").
The list of terrorist attacks can at times be
repetitive as author confesses. However since the
information not commonly known, it is a must.
Written with a passion. Read with a passion.
the terrorism by Zionists. It's about time. Well documented.
I recommend it to all. (Illan Pappe:"A tour de force!").
The list of terrorist attacks can at times be
repetitive as author confesses. However since the
information not commonly known, it is a must.
Written with a passion. Read with a passion.
19 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2017
Verified Purchase
Well researched, cutting edge analysis, needs broad circulation to challenge the Trump/Netanyahu myth that Israel want's peace. DW
22 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2017
Verified Purchase
I recommend this book to all Americans. It explains not only the past but the current exertion of zionist control - over the US and the planet in general.
20 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
J. Miller
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very well researched and a very readable book.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 14, 2019Verified Purchase
I've always been nunplussed as to why the UK enjoys a special relationship with Israel after the United Nations has stated repeatedly that Israel is the world's worst human rights violating country on earth. There is no country on earth that exhibits such disgusting and obnoxious behavior as does Israel, behaviour I have borne witness to first hand; it has been so habitual over the last thirty years, it is now ingrained into Israel's international identity.
I find it difficult also to understand how foreign policy works with regards sanctions that are imposed on other countries. Iran for example recently had severe sanctions reimposed buy President Trump for abiding by a nuclear fuel enrichment treaty to the letter that had been organised by President Obama. Iran had shown interest in behaving perfectly well, yet hypocritically we enjoy a special relationship with Israel, which as the UN states is the worst human rights violating country on earth. How is this justifiable? What effect does this cack-handed bent diplomacy have on global affairs do you think?
The problem Israel faces with this is soon to be known as rational anti-semitism. The word 'semite' actually refers to old semitic tribes who lived around most of the Middle East and most of the top half of Northern Africa, however the jews seem to have adopted it to refer to themselves whenever it suits them in any adverse sense. Israel is unique in the world because Israel, acording to themselves, is the home of the jewish people. Jews entertain a foolish notion that they are God's chosen people, they believe in this so much and have convinced themselves of it, they have "documents to prove it", they says, that in reality are not worth the paper they're printed on. Nine tenths of jewish history and theology is in infact Egyptian. Nonetheless because of this unique connection between Israel as a country and Israel as a religion, when the the UN states - as it has - that Israel is the world's worst human rights violating country, people will look at that objectively and say that 'the jews' are the world's worst human rights violating people. They cannot be faulted for this.
Does no one believe that instead of sending weapons to this place and sponsoring it with aid, that we should infact be declaring war on it? Palestine, Gaza and the West Bank are civilian populations and their very lives are at stake due to the illegal land theft and settlement developments that have been going on there since the 1960s. They have every right to fight back. This nomenclature of 'terrorist organisation' is purely subjective and philosophical and it is wearing thin when it comes to foreign policy of western countries when they want to justify some war; some 'terrorist organisations' have been literally created over night by the west in order to justify some war. In fact most western wars over the past fifteen years or so have been against some 'terrorist orgaisation', or against some country that purports to harbour some 'terrorist orgaisation'. The completely implausible 'terrorist attack' that was 9/11 was pinned onto someone called Bin Laden, a Saudi Arabian who no one had ever heard of, so the US decided to flatten Iraq even though Sadam Hussein was a secular ruler. Israel uses illegal weapons to murder civilians on a daily basis. Israeli snipers shoot children. Israeli snipers shoot journalists. Israeli checkpoint guards tip elderly people out of the wheelchairs. Israeli soldiers shoot Palestinian children in their feet at point-blank range whilst they're actually being held down by other Israeli soldiers. People who club together to fight back against this are NOT terrorists. If you don't own a copy of the Goldstone Report I'm sure there will be a copy in your local library, or you can buy one off Amazon.
If it's 'anti-semitic' to be against this behaviour, then the meaning of 'anti-semite' will eventually warp over time to mean anti-warcrime, anti-murder, anti-genocide, anti-aparthied, anti-ethnic cleansing etc. You get the idea.
I don't condone war on any scale, but what western governments call a terrosist organisation is basically a civilian army, what they insist on calling it doesn't matter, they should also know that the more effort they put into trying to ram this idea down our throats that some organisation is a terrorist one, the more people are likely to disbelieve it. The UN is a very credible organisation that has said Israel is the world's worst human rights violating country on earth, so does that make the UN anti-semitic?
I live in the UK, and the UK government does not have my permission to cultivate a special relationship with Israel on my behalf. Israel's foreign policy is not acceptable on the world stage. You cannot expect people to like your country if you sidle up to the problem child bully country of the world - Israel - and support it no matter what it does whilst at the same time you impose sanctions on countries who abide by their treaties to the letter.
Why does Britain enjoy a special relationship with the world's worst human rights violating country on earth?
I find it difficult also to understand how foreign policy works with regards sanctions that are imposed on other countries. Iran for example recently had severe sanctions reimposed buy President Trump for abiding by a nuclear fuel enrichment treaty to the letter that had been organised by President Obama. Iran had shown interest in behaving perfectly well, yet hypocritically we enjoy a special relationship with Israel, which as the UN states is the worst human rights violating country on earth. How is this justifiable? What effect does this cack-handed bent diplomacy have on global affairs do you think?
The problem Israel faces with this is soon to be known as rational anti-semitism. The word 'semite' actually refers to old semitic tribes who lived around most of the Middle East and most of the top half of Northern Africa, however the jews seem to have adopted it to refer to themselves whenever it suits them in any adverse sense. Israel is unique in the world because Israel, acording to themselves, is the home of the jewish people. Jews entertain a foolish notion that they are God's chosen people, they believe in this so much and have convinced themselves of it, they have "documents to prove it", they says, that in reality are not worth the paper they're printed on. Nine tenths of jewish history and theology is in infact Egyptian. Nonetheless because of this unique connection between Israel as a country and Israel as a religion, when the the UN states - as it has - that Israel is the world's worst human rights violating country, people will look at that objectively and say that 'the jews' are the world's worst human rights violating people. They cannot be faulted for this.
Does no one believe that instead of sending weapons to this place and sponsoring it with aid, that we should infact be declaring war on it? Palestine, Gaza and the West Bank are civilian populations and their very lives are at stake due to the illegal land theft and settlement developments that have been going on there since the 1960s. They have every right to fight back. This nomenclature of 'terrorist organisation' is purely subjective and philosophical and it is wearing thin when it comes to foreign policy of western countries when they want to justify some war; some 'terrorist organisations' have been literally created over night by the west in order to justify some war. In fact most western wars over the past fifteen years or so have been against some 'terrorist orgaisation', or against some country that purports to harbour some 'terrorist orgaisation'. The completely implausible 'terrorist attack' that was 9/11 was pinned onto someone called Bin Laden, a Saudi Arabian who no one had ever heard of, so the US decided to flatten Iraq even though Sadam Hussein was a secular ruler. Israel uses illegal weapons to murder civilians on a daily basis. Israeli snipers shoot children. Israeli snipers shoot journalists. Israeli checkpoint guards tip elderly people out of the wheelchairs. Israeli soldiers shoot Palestinian children in their feet at point-blank range whilst they're actually being held down by other Israeli soldiers. People who club together to fight back against this are NOT terrorists. If you don't own a copy of the Goldstone Report I'm sure there will be a copy in your local library, or you can buy one off Amazon.
If it's 'anti-semitic' to be against this behaviour, then the meaning of 'anti-semite' will eventually warp over time to mean anti-warcrime, anti-murder, anti-genocide, anti-aparthied, anti-ethnic cleansing etc. You get the idea.
I don't condone war on any scale, but what western governments call a terrosist organisation is basically a civilian army, what they insist on calling it doesn't matter, they should also know that the more effort they put into trying to ram this idea down our throats that some organisation is a terrorist one, the more people are likely to disbelieve it. The UN is a very credible organisation that has said Israel is the world's worst human rights violating country on earth, so does that make the UN anti-semitic?
I live in the UK, and the UK government does not have my permission to cultivate a special relationship with Israel on my behalf. Israel's foreign policy is not acceptable on the world stage. You cannot expect people to like your country if you sidle up to the problem child bully country of the world - Israel - and support it no matter what it does whilst at the same time you impose sanctions on countries who abide by their treaties to the letter.
Why does Britain enjoy a special relationship with the world's worst human rights violating country on earth?
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Arn Strohmeyer
5.0 out of 5 stars
Niki Eideneier über Arn Strohmeyers Kreta-Buch
Reviewed in Germany on February 13, 2018Verified Purchase
„Zehn längere und kürzere Kapitel von insgesamt 117 Seiten sind in einem fast winzigen Buch enthalten, einer Miniatur in Format und Schrift, aber ein exzellentes, großartiges und begeisterndes Buch, voller, auch harter, Wahrheiten, aber mit sehr guten Kenntnissen, eigenen Erkenntnissen und Forschungen vor Ort, sowie auch mit einem ehrlichen Gefühl für die Menschen Kretas, ihren Charakter, die Sorgen und Freuden, ihr Schaffen und ihre Beschäftigungen, für die Kultur und den Alltag, für ihre Geschichte. (…)
Allein aus den Titeln der Kapitel ist die Vielfalt der Themen ersichtlich, die Strohmeyer behandelt. Und das scharf kritische Vorwort führt uns direkt in den Geist des Buches: "Man muss die Behandlung dieses kleinen südeuropäischen Landes im Zusammenhang mit der gegenwärtigen Krise als moralischen Tiefpunkt der deutschen Politik ansehen…" Und der Inhalt hat diese und ähnliche Kritiken von ihm ständig als Hintergrund.
Der Inhalt besteht aber nicht nur aus erlebten oder imaginären Geschichten, ich möchte - wenn es die Form erlauben würde - diese 10 Kapitel als 10 Essays betrachten und zwar als literarische Essays, denn sie lassen sich leicht und locker lesen, als wären sie Erzählungen, von einem Schriftsteller niedergeschrieben, die neben den Informationen, die sie liefern, auch "Diaskedasi", Vergnügen im altgriechischen Sinne, bereiten.
Der auf Kreta allgegenwärtige Mythos wird nicht nur modern gedeutet und seine Symbolik erklärt, sondern mit der heutigen Wirklichkeit in Verbindung gebracht, einer Wirklichkeitsdarstellung, die keinen Rückzieher macht vor falscher Romantik, wie sie oft die eiligen Touristen empfinden, und vor übertriebener Begeisterung. Alles wird sorgfältig recherchiert und belegt, aber auf eine Art, die sonst für ein Sachbuch schwer zu finden wäre.“
Allein aus den Titeln der Kapitel ist die Vielfalt der Themen ersichtlich, die Strohmeyer behandelt. Und das scharf kritische Vorwort führt uns direkt in den Geist des Buches: "Man muss die Behandlung dieses kleinen südeuropäischen Landes im Zusammenhang mit der gegenwärtigen Krise als moralischen Tiefpunkt der deutschen Politik ansehen…" Und der Inhalt hat diese und ähnliche Kritiken von ihm ständig als Hintergrund.
Der Inhalt besteht aber nicht nur aus erlebten oder imaginären Geschichten, ich möchte - wenn es die Form erlauben würde - diese 10 Kapitel als 10 Essays betrachten und zwar als literarische Essays, denn sie lassen sich leicht und locker lesen, als wären sie Erzählungen, von einem Schriftsteller niedergeschrieben, die neben den Informationen, die sie liefern, auch "Diaskedasi", Vergnügen im altgriechischen Sinne, bereiten.
Der auf Kreta allgegenwärtige Mythos wird nicht nur modern gedeutet und seine Symbolik erklärt, sondern mit der heutigen Wirklichkeit in Verbindung gebracht, einer Wirklichkeitsdarstellung, die keinen Rückzieher macht vor falscher Romantik, wie sie oft die eiligen Touristen empfinden, und vor übertriebener Begeisterung. Alles wird sorgfältig recherchiert und belegt, aber auf eine Art, die sonst für ein Sachbuch schwer zu finden wäre.“
RH
5.0 out of 5 stars
Every statement is backed up by a legitimate reference.
Reviewed in Canada on January 25, 2018Verified Purchase
Every statement is backed up by a legitimate reference. A very honest and truthful account of "The State of Terror"
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
bohy françois
5.0 out of 5 stars
Les écailles nous tombent des yeux
Reviewed in France on July 18, 2017Verified Purchase
Excellent travail de longue haleine très bien documenté.
Ou l'on découvre que la terreur et sa mise en oeuvre : le terrorisme, sont consubstantiels à la création de l'état d'Israël. Cela renverse radicalement le point de vue sur la Palestine et les Palestiiens. Il faut faire de la publicité pource livre.
Ou l'on découvre que la terreur et sa mise en oeuvre : le terrorisme, sont consubstantiels à la création de l'état d'Israël. Cela renverse radicalement le point de vue sur la Palestine et les Palestiiens. Il faut faire de la publicité pource livre.
Mrs M.
5.0 out of 5 stars
An eye-opener, must read book!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 1, 2017Verified Purchase
This book, based on meticulous research of previously mostly unseen British archive documentation, uncovers the carefully constructed myths about the foundation of Israel - a brutal, planned terrorist assault by colonial zionists on the indigenous Palestinian people, and the British forces and administration of the British Mandate of Palestine. Even other, non-zionist Jews were ruthlessly targeted in the drive to steal another people's land.
Buy and read this excellent book, uncover the truth, then help seek justice and peace. Without justice for the many wrongs documented in this book, there can be no peace. Thanks.
Buy and read this excellent book, uncover the truth, then help seek justice and peace. Without justice for the many wrongs documented in this book, there can be no peace. Thanks.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: group theory




