Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Steering Business Towards Sustainability Paperback – June 1, 1995
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Capra’s idea of ecology has developed over many years. It is rooted in the insights he exposed in his previous four books, and thus we can say this present book is solidly grounded in research. In addition, Capra leaves no doubt that it’s not just a technocratic idea, but an intrinsically spiritual concept. He also credits those, religions and peoples, who have practiced ecological thinking long before the birth of the United States of America:
—When the concept of the human spirit is understood as the mode of consciousness in which the individual feels connected to the cosmos as a whole, it becomes clear that ecological awareness is spiritual in its deepest essence. It is therefore not surprising that the emerging new vision of reality, based on deep ecological awareness, is consistent with the so-called perennial philosophy of spiritual traditions, whether we talk about the spirituality of Christian mystics, that of Buddhists, or the philosophy and cosmology underlying the American Indian traditions. /3
Capra reminds us of the fact that when restructuring our economies, we should learn from nature, instead of feeling superior over nature. Ecoliteracy is one of the notions Capra is currently lecturing about, and Gunter Pauli, the co-editor of this reader is one of Capra’s truest collaborators, himself an authority on ecology in Germany. Within the concept of ecological literacy, Capra seems to give the highest importance to the term sustainability, and he comprehensively explains what this term means:
In our attempts to build and nurture sustainable communities we can learn valuable lessons from ecosystems, because ecosystems are sustainable communities of plants, animals, and microorganisms. To understand these lessons, we need to learn nature’s language. We need to become ecologically literate. (...) Being ecologically literate means understanding how ecosystems organize themselves so as to maximize sustainability./4
Many of us have yet to understand why our modern technologies are so much in conflict with nature’s setup, and this is a fact that is barely elucidated in the mass media. Non-educated people, and even entrepreneurs who have not been exposed to academic study are usually at pains with understanding the deeper reasons of this conflict. Capra, referencing Paul Hawken, The Ecology of Commerce, Harper, 1993, elucidates it:
—The present clash between business and nature, between economics and ecology, is mainly due to the fact that nature is cyclical, whereas our industrial systems are linear, taking up energy and resources from the earth, transforming them into products plus waste, discarding the waste, and finally throwing away also the products after they have been used. Sustainable patterns of production and consumption need to be cyclical, imitating the processes in ecosystems./5
Back in Antiquity, there was barely a need for people to learn systems thinking because they were naturally aligned with the logic of nature, as they were living with nature, and not on top of nature, as we do today. We can also say that we as modern city dwellers have lost our continuum, as it was expressed with much emphasis by Jean Liedloff in The Continuum Concept. Besides, Capra informs us about how we should apply ecology in our daily lives, and what it teaches us. There are seven principles to learn that Capra calls Principles of Ecology and that he explains one by one:
All members of an ecosystem are interconnected in a web of relationships, in which all life processes depend on one another.
The interdependencies among the members of an ecosystem involve the exchange of energy and resources in continual cycles.
Solar Energy, transformed into chemical energy by the photosynthesis of green plants, drives all ecological cycles.
All living members of an ecosystem are engaged in a subtle interplay of competition and cooperation, involving countless forms of partnership.
Ecological cycles have the tendency to maintain themselves in a flexible state, characterized by interdependent fluctuations of their variables.
The stability of an ecosystem depends on the degree of complexity of its network of relationships; in other words, on the diversity of the ecosystem.
Most species in an ecosystem coevolve through an interplay of creation and mutual adaptation.
The long-term survival of each species in an ecosystem depends on a limited resource base. Ecosystems organize themselves according to the principles summarized above so as to maintain sustainability./6
Capra also explains very well the feedback-looping that we find is a typical feature of living systems. The understanding of feedbacking by constant parameter change as a response to a given stimulus is crucial for the understanding of the cyclic nature of all life. This is one of the points modern scientists are really at pains with because their thought structure simply is too linear.
It’s exactly this widely unpredictable feedback-looping that is inherent in the current paradigm of ecological destruction. This dangerous situation is worsened by the general lack of ecological literacy regarding the possible effects of large disturbances, such as ozone hole, deforestation, global warming and desertification.
Our knowledge also is insufficient to make ecological solutions work effectively even once ecology-friendly policies are implemented by governments and organizations. It is not enough to see the dangers and implement good new laws for protecting nature, we also need to see how the damage already done will interact with our new policies; this is so because it’s not taken for granted that our best-intended tactics of healing nature are going to work. For insuring this, we have to learn much more about feedback-looping in natural systems, and we need to learn how nature heals herself.
For example, it has been shown that the planting of new trees does not per see heal the damage that deforestation has done to our planet. It’s all in the why and how of planting trees, where, how many, and in what mixture of species that the wisdom lies. On the other hand, it has been seen in Indonesia, one of the worst hit countries by deforestation, that huge areas that were deforested began to grow trees without anybody doing anything about it! Later research showed that the conditions had been ideal for trees to grow again, but nobody really knew why in other places, where at first sight conditions were very similar, this was not the case.
We definitely have to develop humility, given our dreadful ignorance in the face of the complexity level of nature, at all phases of evolution. We are simply not trained in complexity thinking, and our schools and universities destroy the little of complexity we have developed naturally as children as a result of free play. It is freedom that is at the basis of building complexity, not discipline, it is permissiveness, not repression. Here is where our morality clearly stares grimly in nature’s face because nature is amoral. If theologians will ever grasp this dimension is not my concern, but as scientists we should definitely do away with our projections upon nature and at the same time get all our senses and our emotional intelligence ready for receiving the messages of nature. Nature communicates when we are ready to listen, and it will tell us how we can help healing the damage we have done to her over the last five thousand years of patriarchal ignorance.
This book together with 'Hidden Connections (2002)' and 'The Web of Life (1996)' teaches the basics of understanding nature’s complexity. It also teaches us the importance of diversity, a concept that at present is rather shunned by mainstream politics, while liberal phases, as it was the case through the 1970s, foster higher levels of cultural diversity. Nature shows us that this is not just a random development but that it’s diversity on which side is intelligent and life-fostering behavior, and not uniformity. This is so, inter alia, because diversity fosters flexibility, and vice versa, while uniformity entails rigidity. What does loss of biodiversity on the planet mean for our future as a human race?
Yet it’s a fact that in most developing countries technologies for recycling and for healing the badly afflicted metropoles are costly and not as accessible and readily available as in wealthy high-tech nations. Only truly supportive cultural and technological exchange between rich and poor countries can help changing this dim picture. Whatever our personal opinions are in the face of these huge global problems, that also our next generations will be burdened with, we have to keep an open mind and learn, and change our rigid positions.
Fritjof Capra and Wolfgang Pauli have given in this reader very useful suggestions that can be taken as starting points for deeper study, as the field of investigation is huge, and never-ending. Nature’s complexity is perhaps the single most important topic of study for 21st century science, and I hope I can contribute a little to it by my own efforts. As for the authors of this book, they surely have done their very substantial contributions!