- Series: Transforming American Politics
- Paperback: 448 pages
- Publisher: Westview Press; Exp Upd edition (September 25, 1998)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0813318890
- ISBN-13: 978-0813318899
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 1 customer review
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,662,030 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Still Seeing Red: How The Cold War Shapes The New American Politics (Transforming American Politics) Exp Upd Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
From Library Journal
The first reaction to this work might be, "Another book on the Cold War?" But White (politics, Catholic Univ. of America) adds new features to this well-known landscape. Building on his The Fractured Electorate (1980) and The New Politics of Old Values (Univ. Pr. of New England, 1990. 2d ed.), he makes his main point: that domestic politics since 1945 was shaped by America's enmity toward the USSR and its Communist system. What makes White's book a little better than most is that he artfully weaves into his story numerous polls conducted during the Cold War consistently revealing that most Americans applauded a tough approach to the Soviets and that both political parties competed strenuously for the title of tougher on the Commies. With the Cold War over, White points out that the United States has no obvious enemy, which has led, he believes, to increased domestic acrimony. This thoughtful critique of how foreign affairs can dictate domestic politics is recommended for academic and larger public libraries.?Edward Goedeken, Iowa State Univ. Lib., Ames
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Kirkus Reviews
A thorough and thoughtful study, but not the one suggested by the title. White (Politics/Catholic Univ.) provides an excellent political history of the Cold War era, with painstaking research supporting a well-written, intelligent presentation of rather familiar material. Certainly, no one will dispute his assessment of the Cold War's impact on domestic politics in the 1950s80s: Republicans were the primary beneficiaries because they were able to paint liberals as soft on communism, and Cold War concerns and rhetoric invaded the discussion of every political issue. But the focus suggested by the book's subtitle, on the impact of Cold War politics on the postCold War era, is largely absent. White's examination of this era follows from a foray into the most picked- over subject of political research, the evolution of contemporary political parties. His conclusions are sensible and, again, familiar: A party system with meaningful, programmatic parties has disappeared; presidential campaigns have come to focus on character rather than issues; presidential contests are now fought over the corpse of the Republican rather than the Democratic party; presidential and congressional elections have become increasingly separated in their focus and results. These observations constitute solid historical description, but as political analysis they fall prey to a common dilemma. While it is unavoidably the case--and consequently of limited interest--that an era will shape its successor, determining how it does so requires identifying causal relationships between the two eras. White's work is suggestive but ends at a good place to start. An explanation of how and why we are ``still seeing red,'' rather than a summary of the ways that we are, would have been more welcome and original. Talented author, mistargeted effort. -- Copyright ©1997, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Top customer reviews
There is a straight line of continuity from McCarthyism to the Red Scare of 1920, and beyond that to the anti-IWW scare prior to WWI and the anti-anarchist craze in the wake of the Chicago Haymarket bombing of 1886. Linked to the anti-radical rhetoric were not only powerful business interests and their militant anti-labor stand, but even longer currents of anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic Know-Nothingism - as well as perennial racism and white supremacy.
Thus Professor White also does not dig deeper analytically, to ask WHY America is anti-Communist. He is content to take the formulation of "liberal American values" vs. Communist totalitarianism pretty much at face value. Those of us who lived through the period will agree, like it or not, that despite the liberal rhetoric anti-Communism served to protect deeply conservative, even reactionary values. Like "anti-terrorism" now, with its Patriot Act, anti-Communism served to criminalize dissent. Thus Martin Luther King could be seriously branded a "Communist agent" by the supreme national policeman, J. Edgar Hoover; or anti-war protestors were labeled "un-American traitors" for disagreeing with their government; or Nazi collaborators from Eastern Europe could find shelter in the U.S. as seekers of freedom from Captive Nations; or branding non-alignment of Third World nations "the same as Communism," justifying old patterns of conquest in new guise; that discrimination, blacklisting, and clandestine surveillance in violation of the most fundamental liberal principles were justified in the name of "defending freedom"; or how this defense of freedom was intimately linked to the rising profits of the military-industrial complex and the oil industry.
Professor White is right in his title: America is "still seeing red." The Cold War lives on in the rhetoric of Dubya Bush and his Washington Politburo. But without America's long legacy of anti-radicalism, knee-jerk conservatism, and anti-intellectualism, the post-WW II Cold War era itself could not have been possible.