Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Studies in the Gospel of Mark Paperback – June 19, 2012
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
Hengel makes many major points in this book. Mark, he argues, was "written at a clear geographical distance from Palestine...Numerous Latinisms point to an origin in Rome" (p 29). Furthermore, "the connection between Peter and Mark, which in fact goes back to the first century and is attested independently" (p 47) is too strong to be debated.
Hengel rejects the argument that Mark is a "conglomerate of anonymous, popular and collective tradition" (p 47).
He notes that the name Peter in 16.7 and later at the end forms an "inclusio, through which the evangelist deliberately...is stressing the unique significance of Peter" (p 51).
As far as the title, Hengel insists that the lack of the smallest shred of any other name for the gospel is important. "The unanimity of testimony to the titles of the Gospels, for which there are still no variants of any kind in this early period, rules out a late origin" (p 66) for the title.
Although some scholars have argued that the Second Temple Jews were careless about titles, and that writings were frequently anonymous, in fact, from the time of Ben Sira, in 180 AD, the use of titles became frequent.
As for the early Christians, "The earliest Christian writings--the letter of Paul--bear the name of a real author. This is a feature...of earliest Christianity" (p 73), as shown by I Clement and the letters of Ignatius.
The early church derived from Second Temple Judaism a belief that oral tradition was as valid and the equal of scriptural tradition.Read more ›