Buying Options
| Print List Price: | $17.00 |
| Kindle Price: |
$10.99
Save $6.01 (35%) |
| Sold by: |
Macmillan
Price set by seller. |
Follow the Author
OK
Submission: A Novel Kindle Edition
|
Michel Houellebecq
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who bought this item also bought
Serotonin: A NovelKindle Edition
Whatever: A Novel (Serpent's Tail Classics)Kindle Edition
The Elementary ParticlesKindle Edition
The Map and the Territory (Vintage International)Kindle Edition
The Possibility of an IslandKindle Edition
In the Presence of SchopenhauerKindle Edition
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Serotonin: A NovelKindle Edition
Whatever: A Novel (Serpent's Tail Classics)Kindle Edition
The Map and the Territory (Vintage International)Kindle Edition
The Elementary ParticlesKindle Edition
In the Presence of SchopenhauerKindle Edition
H. P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against LifeKindle Edition
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Submission may be the most relevant book of the year." ―Daniel D'Addario, Time
"Houellebecq is considered a great contemporary author, and one cannot be said to be keeping abreast of contemporary literature without reading his work . . . What prevents me from reading Houellebecq and watching von Trier is a kind of envy ― not that I begrudge them success, but by reading the books and watching the films I would be reminded of how excellent a work of art can be, and of how far beneath that level my own work is." ―Karl Ove Knausgaard, The New York Times Book Review
“The political elements of Submission are so comically exaggerated that it's hard to take them very seriously . . . This is the novel's big joke. It's designed to agitate the right by suggesting the right may have a point about the erosion of France's national culture, and to tweak the left by lending ironic credence to the right's fears . . . The only time Houellebecq seems not to be joking is when Francois speaks about literature . . . Whatever it says or doesn't say about Europe and Islam, Submission is a love letter to the novel itself.” ―Christian Lorentzen, New York Magazine
“Houellebecq's recent work―especially The Map and the Territory, one of the finest novels of the 21st century―is elegant, sad, all the more discomfiting in that we never quite know how much subtlety to credit the author with. Houellebecq writes on shifting sands. But I think he might just be permanent.” ―Michael Robbins,The Chicago Tribune
“In Submission, Houellebecq is no less afraid to foment than in previous works, but his audacity serves a purpose that may not be immediately evident. His goal in this quasi-dystopian novel is to cast a light on contemporary French society and the deficiencies he perceives and to suggest that the future he predicts isn't wholly beyond the realm of possibility . . . A challenging satire that, at its best, is subtler than its author's reputation might lead you to expect.” ―Michael Margas, The San Francisco Chronicle
“Houellebec's deadpan comedic edge . . . defies the reader to find the line between parody and philosophy . . . What Houellebecq has done in Submission is hold up a mirror to his readers. The charge is that he inflames animosity by depicting a Muslim-influenced France as something of which Europeans should be frightened. But he puts readers and critics in the position of having to specify what exactly is frightening about this France.” ―S. Mark Heim, The Christian Century
“Michel Houellebecq: butcher. Messy slaughterer of sacred cows. Disembowler of all modes of political correctness, from the myth of the modern male's respect for women to the laughable fiction of the liberal Westerner's respect for non-Western cultures. That's the story, anyway. Like most good stories, it isn't true, for the most part . . . [Submission] is a work of genius, sure―with Houellebecq that goes without saying. But it's not a slaughterhouse. It's a upper-middle-class supermarket, brightly but not harshly lit, stocked with sushi, expensive cheeses, organic vegetables, olive oils, and honeys. It's not food for thought. It's an empty stomach. It's heartbreaking. It's utopia.” ―Micaela Morrissette, Bomb
“The prose, which never fails to be consistent and accessible, continued to impress page after page . . . Perhaps the highest achievement of [Submission] is the way it manages to be a satire with a core of deep humanism running through it.” ―Popmatters
“Extraordinary . . . if there is anyone in literature today, not just in French but worldwide, who is thinking about the sort of enormous shifts we all feel are happening, it’s [Houellebecq].” ―Emmanuel Carrere, Le Monde
“A work of real literary distinction . . . [Houellebecq] has been the novelist who has most fearlessly and presciently tackled the rise of Islamic extremism in recent years . . . He is a writer with a gift for telling the truth, unlike any other in our time – I’ve been consistently saying he is the writer who matters most to me for many years now. I’ve read Submission twice in the last week with ever growing admiration and enjoyment. There’s been no English-language novel this good lately. With Submission Houellebecq has inserted himself right into the centre of the intellectual debate that was already raging in France about Islam and identity politics . . . There is nobody else writing now more worth reading.” ―David Sexton, Evening Standard
“Houellebecq has an unerring, Balzacian flair for detail, and his novels provide an acute, disenchanted anatomy of French middle-class life . . . Houellebecq writes about Islam with curiosity, fascination, even a hint of envy.” ―Adam Shatz, London Review of Books
“[Submission's] moral complexity, concerned above all with how politics shape-or annihilate-personal ethics, is singular and brilliant . . . This novel is not a paranoid political fantasy; it merely contains one. Houellebecq's argument becomes an investigation of the content of ideology, and he has written an indispensable, serious book that returns a long-eroded sense of consequence, immediacy, and force to contemporary literature.” ―Publishers Weekly (starred review)
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B00VE732VM
- Publisher : Farrar, Straus and Giroux (October 20, 2015)
- Publication date : October 20, 2015
- Language : English
- File size : 495 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 257 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#189,116 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #253 in French Literature (Books)
- #415 in Literary Satire Fiction
- #522 in Satire
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It focuses on the 2022 presidential elections where the two main contenders are the anti-immigrant National Front and the Muslim Brotherhood. Most people are either resigned to a Muslim takeover or want to resist it. Houellebecq predicts that the two centrist parties, who have dominated French politics since World War II, will fall apart at this time. These are the center-left Socialist Party and the center-right Union for a Popular Movement (renamed The Republicans since the book was written). But we now know that the French electorate already abandoned these two main parties in 2017 and elected the independent Macron as president (who has since formed a party called The Republic on March).
In 2022 the presidential election results in the usual runoff between the top vote getters where the National Front got the most votes followed by the Muslim Brotherhood. The question is whom will the two centrist parties support. It turns out that the only party which wants to save France is the National Front. The centrist parties have always wanted to have France just be a part of the European Union so they throw their support to the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood has a similar objective in that it wants France to be the first victory in forming a European Caliphate. As usual the public follows the elites and the Muslims win.
The Muslims waste no time in transforming France and the mainstream parties follow. The Muslims' objective is to make France family-centered so they drastically cut the welfare budget which allows single people to live alone off the welfare system. Meanwhile they strengthen welfare subsidies to families. Then they transform education by making mandatory state education end at age 14. All high schools and universities are privatized which means they have no government support. Most of them become Muslim as Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia fund them. All teachers have to be Muslims at the Muslim schools. Polygamy is enacted but is limited to four wives and all Muslim women have to wear veils. The irony here is that most of the reforms follow the right wing agenda except for the preservation of France.
The Sorbonne becomes a Muslim university, everyone is fired, and only Muslims can be hired. So the professor is faced with the choice of whether he wants to become a Muslim to get back into the Sorbonne. Since he is a renown professor he is offered three times his former salary. This is enough for three young wives. He decides to go along with the trend and becomes a Muslim as it is the best deal available.
Nevertheless the Muslims realize that they still need to play by the rules of democracy for now. The next presidential election is scheduled for 2027. The public is resigned to the attitude that what must happen will happen so continued Muslim rule is most likely.
Meanwhile it is now 2018 and it seems that France cannot possibly become a Muslim state by 2022 as the book predicts. But if you look at 2032 or 2042 it is much more possible. Islam is a growing and confident culture while Western Europe is mired in self-loathing and guilt-mongering with its native population declining. Its culture of extreme individualism has diminished its birth rate and made way for a Muslim takeover. All this confirms the point made by the famous historian Toynbee that civilizations usually die by suicide.
As your man is indeed a man of straw whose only reasons for living are carnal lust, high status and money he takes the offer. Who does he represent? He represents the liberal politically correct elites who who have overwhelmed the academies in the West as well the media elites, and the leftist politicians. The message is this: when the boogie man comes calling these people will roll over for an easy life and pee upon morality, upon national pride and upon the achievements of their ancestors.
Don't trust them.
Top reviews from other countries
Essentially this novel is a portrait of a dying and demoralised culture being replaced by a culture that is both vigorous and ambitious. The only criticism I would make of the book is that Michel Houellebecq does not openly point out the supreme irony that France, a nation where being an atheist was once a necessary precondition of being made welcome in intellectual circles...where atheism was a kind of cultural fashion statement...will almost certainly be the first Western European nation to fall under an Islamic dispensation. I see a dark humour in all of this. So would Anthony Burgess, who would have loved this novel.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
There's a problem loading this menu right now.
