Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion
Audible Audiobook
– Unabridged
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $22.75 | $22.74 |
- Kindle
$12.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your 3-Month Audible trial - Hardcover
$9.9448 Used from $1.35 9 New from $18.00 2 Collectible from $27.99 - Paperback
$8.00 - $16.8935 Used from $4.02 26 New from $13.47 - Audio CD
$22.751 Used from $22.74 2 New from $22.75
The Pulitzer Prize-winning history of the Scopes Trial and the battle over evolution and creation in America's schools
In the summer of 1925, the sleepy hamlet of Dayton, Tennessee, became the setting for one of the 20th century's most contentious courtroom dramas, pitting William Jennings Bryan and the anti-Darwinists against a teacher named John Scopes, represented by Clarence Darrow and the ACLU, in a famous debate over science, religion, and their place in public education. That trial marked the start of a battle that continues to this day - in cities and states throughout the country.
Edward Larson's classic Summer for the Gods - winner of the Pulitzer Prize in History - is the single most authoritative account of this pivotal event. An afterword assesses the state of the battle between creationism and evolution, and points the way to how it might potentially be resolved.
- Listening Length10 hours and 47 minutes
- Audible release dateOctober 3, 2017
- LanguageEnglish
- ASINB075Z7ZDZ6
- VersionUnabridged
- Program TypeAudiobook
Read & Listen
Get the Audible audiobook for the reduced price of $12.99 after you buy the Kindle book.
Prime Member Exclusive Offer
3 Months Free
$0.00$0.00
- For a limited-time, get Audible Premium Plus free for 3 months.
- You'll receive 1 credit a month to pick ANY title from our entire premium selection to keep forever (you'll use your first credit now).
- You'll also get UNLIMITED listening to select audiobooks, Audible Originals, and podcasts.
- After 3 months, $14.95/mo. Cancel online anytime.
Buy with 1-Click
-12% $18.29$18.29
People who viewed this also viewed
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
People who bought this also bought
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
Related to this topic
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment
Audible Audiobook
Product details
| Listening Length | 10 hours and 47 minutes |
|---|---|
| Author | Edward J. Larson |
| Narrator | Brian Troxell |
| Whispersync for Voice | Ready |
| Audible.com Release Date | October 03, 2017 |
| Publisher | Hachette Audio |
| Program Type | Audiobook |
| Version | Unabridged |
| Language | English |
| ASIN | B075Z7ZDZ6 |
| Best Sellers Rank | #86,181 in Audible Books & Originals (See Top 100 in Audible Books & Originals) #33 in Law History #125 in Evolution (Audible Books & Originals) #443 in Philosophy & Social Aspects of Education |
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Thanks to the Spencer Tracy and Gene Kelly classic, I had a vague familiarity with the infamous "Monkey Trial," an event that pitted (so I was led to believe) closed- and simple-minded obscurantist Christian fundamentalists against sympathetic, open-minded progressives in a decisive battle over religious freedom in America, a clash in which the latter triumphed clearly and completely. Edward Larson demonstrates in this brilliant 1998 Pultizer Prize-winning piece that the truth of the trial is far different, far more subtle and profound, than the story the entertainment industry delivered for popular consumption half-a-century ago.
To begin with, the trial began (and ended) mainly as a cheap publicity stunt orchestrated by a few leading out-of-towners in the sleepy east Tennessee hamlet of Dayton. The defendant, local high school biology teacher John Scopes, was approached about volunteering to challenge the new anti-evolution legislation in response to an open offer of support from the recently established ACLU in far away New York City. Scopes readily agreed, seeing the trial as a fun summertime lark, while other town citizens saw dollar signs associated with hosting a high profile, controversial trial. The actual issue at hand - the teaching of Darwin's theory of evolution in public schools - was of limited matter to the main participants. This is a far cry from the scene depicted in "Inherit the Wind," where the Scopes character is dragged out of the classroom and thrown into jail, a howling town mob supposedly looming around him, threatening to lynch him for his blasphemous lectures.
Larson also puts the views of William Jennings Bryan - the lead celebrity prosecutor, known to many liberals and Christian conservatives alike as "The Commoner" and "The Peerless Leader" - into fuller relief and perspective. The author shows that his opposition to teaching Darwin in public schools and the fundamental question he wanted addressed in the trial are far deeper than a simple literal interpretation of Genesis. First, Bryan and many leading anti-evolutionists believed that Darwinism had a pernicious effect on society, not only undermining traditional Christian beliefs, but also positively degrading the moral fiber of the nation. One of the great turn-of-the-century liberals, Bryan championed women's right to vote, unionized labor, and various anti-colonial, anti-war causes. He opposed the teaching of evolution because of the mentality and behavior he believed it promoted. The barbarity of colonialism and the First World War was for him and his supporters a clear and dreadful example of what happens when men and nations live by the laws of Darwin rather than Christ. "The Darwinian theory," he wrote, "represents man as reaching his present perfection by the operation of the law of hate - the merciless law by which the strong crowd out and kill off the weak." Darwinism was, in his view, a "cruel doctrine" that robs civilization of pity and mercy. And, he was always quick to point-out, it was still a theory and should not be taught as "fact."
His second point - and the central issue of the trial in his opinion - was the basic and essential question: who decides what is taught in the public schools? "The real issue," he noted, "is not what can be taught in public schools, but who shall control the education system." He later commented: "The right of the people speaking through the legislature, to control the schools which they create and support is the real issue as I see it." In other words, if 90% of Tennesseans believed in Creationsim at that time, which they did, and if Darwin's theories are both deleterious and an unproven hypothesis (obviously highly debatable), why shouldn't the people of Tennessee be able to at least contain the teachings of evolution in the schools that that they fund? That is, teach Genesis along side Darwin, while noting that evolution is a theory.
I live in Northern California. My friends and neighbors are universally progressive. I've introduced this topic in casual conversation (I like to talk about the books that I am reading) and have sought to challenge knee-jerk reactions. I like to present this hypothetical case: In 1996 Harvard authors Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray whipped up a firestorm of controversy with their study "Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life," that argued (and I'm simplifying here, so don't tear me apart in the comments) that Asians are, on average, naturally more intelligent as measured by IQ than Caucasians, who are, again on average, more intelligent than Blacks and Hispanics. Many, quite naturally, found these findings repugnant and rejected them out-of-hand no matter the rigor of the research methodology. Now imagine if the state of California decided to teach this racial IQ theory in high school biology class, citing the overwhelming scientific and statistical evidence to support it. What would you do? Bryan's basic argument was "that the majority should oversee content of public school instruction, at least with the respect to the teaching of `unproven' theories that profoundly influenced social and spiritual values." If this statement concerned the example above, would you disagree?
Let's move from the prosecution to the defense. "Inherit the Wind" portrays Darrow as the hero, a great lawyer and an even greater humanist, who, in the final act, after defending Bryan and his right to maintain his "fool religion," thoughtfully weighs the Bible and "The Origin of Species" in his hands and, after some deep contemplation, thrusts them both into his briefcase. In reality, Larson writes, Darrow's participation dramatically upset the ACLU's entire plans for the trial and, if anything, undermined the position of the defense. "Neither Scopes in particular nor free speech in general mattered much to Darrow," Larson writes, "and this troubled many within the ACLU leadership." If Bryan saw recent history as the danger of Darwinian competition, the ACLU was troubled by the threats on civil liberties introduced during the First World War and by the Red Scare of the early 1920s. The Scopes trial offered them an opportunity to strike an early blow in defense of individual freedom. But once Darrow volunteered to participate in the trial - an offer the publicity-seeking folks in Dayton couldn't possibly refuse given Darrow's national reputation as the most controversial and celebrated defense lawyer in the land, like OJ Simpson's legendary defense team all wrapped into one - he dictated the theme and tempo of the trial; the ACLU lost all control over "their" trial. The ACLU wanted to win an important case for academic freedom; the pugnacious and stridently atheist Darrow wanted to publically eviscerate the hated Bryan and his Christian faith. Worse still, for many Americans at the time Darrow embodied the awful end-state of a world without Christian charity and principles: a rude, mean-spirited, amoral ogre who most recently saved Leopold and Loeb from the death penalty in Chicago by arguing that they were not responsible for their horrific murder-for-fun of Bobby Franks because they were helplessly swayed by the writings of Nietzsche. In the end, the epic interrogation of Bryan by Darrow on the trial's final day, which was planned and not extemporaneous as depicted in "Inherit the Wind," merely exposed "Bryan's empty head and Darrow's mean spirit."
In closing, I learned a lot - an embarrassingly lot - from this book. It was a stark and sobering reminder to question popular, cinematic tales. For anyone upon whom "Inherit the Wind" has left a lasting impression, you owe it to yourself to read this book. It is far more than simply a matter of a which type of "fish" - Jesus or Darwin - you have stuck on the back of your car.
This books chronicles the advent of trial in the Chemists Shop in Dayton Tenessee when a few leading citizens --- neither clever or passionate Darwinians, nor particularly blathering, foaming at the mouth fundamentalists --- unabashed opportunists who wanted to put an declining town on the map with the trial of the century. Scopes over sodas with both sides decides that he will "have a go" at making it a test case as to whether evolution can be taught in Tennessee -- so much for the repression.
From these humble beginnings starts a third rate farce with everyone wanting to get in on the act. Some were legitimate entities, such as the ACLU lawyers -- very dedicated and committed people -- perhaps the true heros of this saga. But others such as Darrow and Bryan, although obviously acting from deeply held emotions offered no basis to defend their beliefs. Darrow offerred little evidence of what we would know as natural selection, and Bryan could not defend his belief in a Biblical interpretation of the creation ofthe earth as given in Genesis.
The real argument became a legal one with Bryan defending the rights of the majority to teach whatever taxpayers thought they wanted to teach (whether it was correct or not!), majoritism, and Darrow defending the right of people to teach scientific based education, because it was unreasonable to teach majority held opinion if it was at odds with elementary understandings of Science. And this is where the debaters dug in their heels.
Bryan, nor anyone else, could prove that Genesis was true. Darrow could prove evolution, but that did not make him correct if the majority of people, choosing ignorance over fact, chose not to believe it.
The book does a good job at describing the minutea of the defence and cross-exacmination, the legal cases of both sides, and the trail itself. It also does a good job in describing the pre and post Scopes legal challenges launched by both causes in America.
Although the creationists were plain wrong, this is not a simple story of the light of science versus a bunch of southern rednecks. There are a lot of interesting vignettes: although Bryan did defend his idea of bible creationism, he was also worried about the evolving "science" of Eugenics and he rightly forsaw the potential to use evolution to relegate people into different classes as result of "proper" and "improper" breeding; some Southern Black churches also defended the prosecution on similar grounds. This was just the beginning of the hayday of Eugenics and Naziism, where transmogrified understandings of Evolution underwrote some horrible ideologies.
This book took the Pulitzer in History. It is not that good in my estimation. Fair and well researched, yes, but at times the narrative drags as Larson gets bogged down in legal historical details (such as the chapter called "Jockeying for Position"). Larson is a lawyer and confines himself to law and history. There is no review of natural selection as it was then interpreted, and, as Larson points out, Darrow had only a vague notion of its intrisic reasonableness. Darrow actually cited and conducted the trail on a largely (mistaken) notion of Lamarkian evolution --- a common enough mistake -- still.
This is a book that I enjoyed, but it didn't set my heart racing. It offers an depressing read on the quintessentially American experience: how a society relatively free, a bastion of most scientific enlightenment and knowledge can allow such ignorance of science to the degree that people actually believe in a literal interpretation of Biblical allegory in the 20th and the 21st Century....and how Americans can allow both to be exploited for political grandstanding.














