Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
The Supremacists: The Tyranny Of Judges And How To Stop It Hardcover – July 1, 2004
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
A detailed diagnosis and cure . . . puts the issue of judicial supremacy on our front burner where it should be. -- David Limbaugh, attorney and author
A vital book . . . must-reading for citizens concerned about preserving our constitutional republic and our freedom. -- Edwin Meese III, former U.S. Attorney General
Small in size but huge in importance, "The Supremacists" is must-reading. -- Thomas Sowell, senior fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
About the Author
PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY, the head of Eagle Forum, is one of the most effective grass-roots political leaders in American history. After setting the stage for the conservative ascendancy in the Republican party with her landmark book A Choice Not an Echo, she stunned the political establishment by stopping the Equal Rights Amendment in its tracks. A lawyer and mother of six, Phyllis Schlafly writes a nationally syndicated column, and her daily radio commentary is broadcast on stations across the country. Her most recent book was Feminist Fantasies (Spence, 2003).
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As an attorney I know from experience that there is one rule that trumps all other rules: judges do as they please. We have a Nevada supreme court which ruled that an amendment to the Nevada constitution was, effectively, unconstitutional and therefore refused to enforce it.
There is no doubt that judges see their branch of government as superior in authority to the legislative and executive - combined. They do not recognize the other two branches of government as legitimate checks and balances to their own power.
The Supremacists is a compelling review of the problem we face today, Phyllis Schlafly sets forth some useful ideas to reverse our slide into judicial tyranny. Her only fault is that she does not go far enough.
Phyllis takes you through watershed judical pronouncements by
subject and summarizes simialr cases to give the reader a focused understanding of rulings by subject. If you are in a hurry and are looking for a quick, but telling understanding in diverse areas of law--this book is helpful and a good primer for those who want to an introduction to the originalist or texualist view point of judical interpretation.
I bought the book because I am doing research on abortion and I needed a practical grasp of the underlying social and political climate that coalested into the convuluded judical reasonings behind that fateful Roe decision. I feel that this book, rounded out my view and I gained a fuller understanding of the interrelated issues.
Men In Black by Mark Levin gave a chronoloical approach to the devolution of the renegage court--where Pat Robertson's Courting Disaster gave the religious and social context of the constitution's framers to give tremendous depth of understanding into the thinking and background of that brilliant God-given documentation. His book peers into the soul of the constitutional writers and I gained a new revelation and appreciation of the indispensibility of the Christian faith as absolutely critical to the success of our nation.
This book rounded out my understanding, reinforced introductory legal concepts so I was better able to grasp the guiding principles and reasonings of the clandestine supreme court.
Her thesis is simple. For the past fifty years liberal judges have moved beyond the strict interpretation of law to the creation of law. They have become legislators, and have sought to impose their leftist bias on the rest of the community. The rule of law has thus been replaced by the rule of judges: judges who are unelected and unaccountable, foisting their vision of the good society on a hapless citizenry.
Instead of viewing the US Constitution as a document that meant certain things by its authors, the activists speak of a "living and evolving Constitution" that can be taken to mean different things at different times. The original intent of the framers of the Constitution is jettisoned and trendy interpretations are read into the documents. The judges in fact are writing their own biased opinions into the law.
But the American system of government was meant to include a clear separation of powers. In addition to the judiciary, there was the legislative and the executive wings of government. Not only was the judiciary not meant to be in the business of creating laws, but it was also designed to be the least powerful of the three branches of government. Schlafly shows that in many ways it now has become the most powerful.
Indeed, this book shows that our judges have imposed taxes, dismantled laws that protect internal security, rewritten laws on the conduct of elections, and redefined the institution of marriage, to name but a few examples of judicial activism.
Moreover, they have invented so-called rights to such things as abortion, same-sex marriage, and public funding of pornography. As Schlafly rightly notes, such social and political policies should be made by our elected representatives, and not by our unelected judges.
Schlafly documents how this momentous change to our governance has come about. She notes that the infamous Dred Scott decision of 1857 really started the ball rolling on judicial tyranny. The Supreme Court made this pro-slavery decision by striking down a Federal law which forbade slavery in certain parts of America. Abraham Lincoln, the champion of emancipation, was appalled at the decision, and the attempt by the Court to make public policy.
Nearly one hundred years went by before a new bout of judicial activism erupted, this time under the Warren Court. Chief Justice Earl Warren wasted no time in asserting judicial supremacy, with a number of established laws overturned, and controversial social upheaval initiated, as in his challenges to school prayer and obscenity laws. The trends started by Warren have pretty much continued unabated during the past five decades.
Schlafly charts this half century of activism, with detailed chapters on such things as the courts' promotion of feminism, pornography, and its all-out assault on the institution of marriage. Concerning the latter, this book makes clear that both liberal judges and homosexual activists know that their agenda will never be implemented by the ballot box. The will of the people must be side-stepped by the use of judicial activism. Thus the war against marriage that we are now embroiled in.
In addition to various state judiciaries rejecting the will of the people on the marriage debate, the federal courts as well have waded into these debates. Justice Scalia has bemoaned the activism of his colleagues, saying they are making the Constitution and the nation unrecognisable.
Schlafy reminds us that homosexuals can marry just as anyone else can, but on the same terms. Everyone is equally banned from marriage because of certain age, relationship, and sex requirements. The truth is, most homosexuals do not want marriage. What they do want is full public acceptance and approval, and they are using the activist courts to achieve their aims.
Schlafy concludes this volume by offering some proposals to stop the judicial supremacists. These include allowing Congress to take its impeachment powers seriously, and to work to restore the balance of powers with its system of checks and balances. Above all, ordinary citizens must take an interest in the courts and court decision, becoming informed on how America was meant to be governed. They must become involved, and raise their voices about these unwelcome trends.
And this book serves as an important rallying cry to that end. In order for "we the people" to be truly sovereign, the warnings of this book need to be widely declared and heeded.