The Supreme Court: An Essential History Text is Free of Markings Edition
| Peter Charles Hoffer (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Williamjames Hull Hoffer (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| N. E. H. Hull (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Similar books based on genre
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court DecisionsKermit HallHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jul 15Only 6 left in stock (more on the way).
Nine Scorpions in a Bottle: Great Judges and Cases of the Supreme CourtPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jul 15
A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution: Revised EditionPeter IronsPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jul 15Only 15 left in stock (more on the way).
A History of the Supreme Courtthe late Bernard SchwartzPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jul 15
The American Supreme Court, Sixth Edition (The Chicago History of American Civilization)PaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jul 15
"Have To" History: Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Stuff You Don't Really Want To Know (But For Some Reason Have To) About The Most Important Cases In Supreme Court HistoryDallas KoehnPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jul 15
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
From the Back Cover
"The single most readable and reliable narrative history of the U.S. Supreme Court yet written."--Stanley N. Katz, editor of the Encyclopedia of Legal History
"A refreshingly case-oriented survey of the Court's work, with lively vignettes of the individual justices."--William M. Wiecek, author of Liberty under Law: The Supreme Court in American Life
"Indispensable for the layperson and a rich banquet for the scholar as well."--Laura Kalman, author of The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism
About the Author
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 0700615385
- Publisher : University Press of Kansas; Text is Free of Markings edition (September 6, 2007)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 504 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780700615384
- ISBN-13 : 978-0700615384
- Item Weight : 2.02 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1.75 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #567,867 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #208 in Constitutional Law (Books)
- #233 in Courts & Law
- #580 in Legal History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Williamjames Hull Hoffer is a professor of history at Seton Hall University in South Orange, New Jersey, USA. He is a graduate of Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Harvard Law School, and Johns Hopkins University. He has also authored and co-authored several books on U.S. legal history with university presses. Most recently, he has self-published a book with Amazon's KDP service on how recent U.S. history has influenced George R. R. Martin, his writings, in particular his "A Song of Ice and Fire" book series, and the show it inspired, "Game of Thrones", entitled "Passing Beneath the Shadow: An Unauthorized Journey into George R. R. Martin's Game of Thrones America".
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The second part was not as well-written but did a good job of discussing the political nature of the appointments.
The third part was not nearly as well conceived as the first two. In this part the author made references to court cases without spelling out what the case was about. The author of the third section is unabashed in hero worship of Warren. I wound up just skimming the last half of the third portion.
The index is incomplete. A case may be cited many times in the text but is only listed in the index in one place. This makes it difficult to follow how case is treated beyond its initial location in the book.
Overall, this is not a bad overview of the court's history. It is a good place to get a feel about what the court has gone through and how some of its cases and philosophy have changed with the times. Unfortunately, there is not much detail. There are some cases that are hugely influential and historically important (Marbury v. Madison, Roe v. Wade, etc.) and even though they get more space than other cases, there is still not that much detail. Also, law cases, especially by the time they get to the Supreme Court, can be immensely complicated. Books can be written about each case. So I think it is by the very nature of the subject matter that it is hard to write a detailed overview. There is too much to be written about.
One thing that is clearly shown is the variable nature of the court. There is no consistent philosophy guiding the court throughout its history. Many biases and prejudices enter into each justices' decisions. One wonders if it is just luck that we haven't gotten too many tyrants on the court trying to wield power over the other branches. Maybe it is lack of legitimacy that stops them. But that also means they can't do too many things that are unpopular--which is what we need a court for, isn't it?
What kind of check do the other branches of government really have on the Supreme Court? When they are confirmed, they're there for life. Politics always plays a role. We should confirm them based on their resume more than their politics. Intelligent, deliberate judges might make decisions that are controversial, but they will be well thought-out decisions.
This book is a good place to provoke those questions. But I think it mainly serves to whet a reader's appetite for deeper tomes that delve into the cases in detail or the judges and their philosophy. All in all, a good place to start.

