Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Sustaining the Law - Joseph Smith's Legal Encounters Hardcover – February 12, 2014
- Print length563 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBYU Studies
- Publication dateFebruary 12, 2014
- Dimensions6 x 1.5 x 9 inches
- ISBN-10193889670X
- ISBN-13978-1938896705
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Product details
- Publisher : BYU Studies; Illustrated edition (February 12, 2014)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 563 pages
- ISBN-10 : 193889670X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1938896705
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.5 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,121,216 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,257 in Mormonism
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Mormons instead of the confidence man he was. JS was the type of personality who was narcissistic who needed to control others into
doing his desires and commands. He used the excuse that god was telling him what to do. The authors constantly refer to the so-
called revelations from god. There is no neutral position from these writers--JS is almost always right. JS claimed in the 12th Article of Faith that "We believe in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law." JS certainly did not include himself in the "we" and he eventually gathered enough dictatorial powers into his person when he controlled Nauvoo, IL where he was mayor, general of the militia, chief justice, head of the Mormon Church. He gave himself, with the consent of the Nauvoo Councel, total economic powers whereby he had a monopoly there to cross the Mississippi River.
Not every chapter in the book deals with crimes or alledged crimes. The publication and securing the copyright for THE BOOK OF
MORMON was certainly no crime but I would state that the entire claim regarding the burial and finding of the so-called golden plates
could constitute a crime under New York laws regarding disorderly persons or jugglers finding buried treasure. JS's motive in the
pretense of the golden plates being a history of the Israelites in America (Nephites) and the surviving Lamanites (the American
Indians) was to make a profit by duping his victims. JS started his criminal career as a glass-looker who pretended he could see
buried treasure under the surface of the earth and he was paid for it. He never found any such treasure and there were enough
witnesses who could testify to his scam. He was brought to a preliminary hearing in 1826 at South Bainbridge, NY at the court of Albert
Neely, Jr. where Peter Bridgeman accused him of this scam. Here Gordon Madsen claims that JS was acquitted. Nothing could be
further from the truth. The court only had the power to determine whether there was enough evidence to try JS of the crimes of which he
was accused. There was no trial. Either the judge decided that JS was too young or he let JS go on his own recognizance. The
documents show that there was enough evidence to charge JS as a con-man and that Constable De Zeng had a mittimus (warrant) "to
take him" (arrest JS). The full story can never be known in the absence of documentation. JS was later charged with the same crimes
in the same town in 1830. Madsen claims that JS was acquitted but the defense claimed that the statute of limitations had expired
which is not the same as "not guilty."
One of the most serious charges against JS was in Ohio where he created the Kirtland Safety Society Bank (later the anti-bank) without
the required Ohio state license. Jeffrey Walker claims that he did not need the required license to create the bank (or whatever one
calls it) but Walker calls it a private joint stock company and therefore legal. Walker never mentions the fact the JS had hundreds of
thousands of dollars worth of notes printed with the name of the bank on it and JS did not have the required amount of gold specie to
back up these paper notes. Eventually JS and Signey Rigdon were found guilty and fined each $1000. The guilt of JS is in his act to
flee Ohio and the law and he headed to Missouri where indeed JS would find himself in a lot of legal trouble. There Governor Boggs
was wrong to drive out the Mormons or exterminate them but the JS apologists never mention that Sidney Rigdon (with JS's blessings)
called for the extermination of apostates and enemies (and their families) of Mormonism.
The history in Illinois and especially Nauvoo gives a deep insight into the power grab of JS who could not tolerate opposition and
exposure of the marriage crimes which violated the Illinois marriage and bigamy laws. William Law and others created the NAUVOO
EXPOSITOR and exposed JS's violations of the bigamy laws which made if illegal to marry a second person when the first spouse had
not died or been divorced from. It was a felony to marry a second wife or husband, knowing the first one was still alive. That person
(in this case JS) could be sentenced to at least 2 years and/or fined $1000 (Criminal Code of IL: 11th Division, Section 118). We now
know that JS had several dozen other wives.
More important is the order of JS and the Nauvoo Municipal Council to the town marshal to destroy the NAUVOO EXPOSITOR which
had published its first edition exposing what JS was doing and what he intended to do. JS simply could not tolerate opposition or
being exposed of his polygamous activities. The printing press was destroyed and the type scattered and as many published pages
being burned. Dallin Oaks tries to make the case it was legal for the Council to declare the EXPOSITOR as a nuisance since their
claims might lead to a Mormon mob going after the newspaper. Oaks states that the destruction of the press was illegal but it should have been closed down. Oaks made a major error in only quoting Article VIII, Section 22 of the 1818 Illinois Constitution which basically states that "printing presses shall be free to every person . . . and every citizen may freely speak, write, and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty."
Dallin Oaks never mentions Section 23 of Article VIII which states that "in all indictments for libels the jury shall have the right of
determining both the law and the fact, under the direction of the courts in other cases." There was no trial of the owners of the
EXPOSITOR or a jury decision. The destruction of the newspaper was decided by JS and his cronies on the Council which was illegal
under the Illinois Constitution. It was one of the last illegal actions on the part of JS and shows that he had no respect for the laws of
the state and that in his own mind, he was the law. It would lead to his death at Carthage jail.
