Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
93% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
83% positive over last 12 months
Follow the Author
OK
Tactics, 10th Anniversary Edition: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions Paperback – November 26, 2019
|
Gregory Koukl
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$16.30 | $17.49 |
-
Print length288 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherZondervan
-
Publication dateNovember 26, 2019
-
Dimensions5.3 x 0.65 x 8 inches
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an AtheistPaperback$19.79$19.79FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical WorldHardcover$17.99$17.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Another Gospel?: A Lifelong Christian Seeks Truth in Response to Progressive ChristianityPaperback$15.29$15.29FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian ConvictionsPaperback$20.66$20.66FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Wednesday, Sep 8
On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and PrecisionPaperback$18.99$18.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Stealing from God: Why Atheists Need God to Make Their CasePaperback$12.66$12.66FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an AtheistPaperback$19.79$19.79FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Tactics Study Guide, Updated and Expanded: A Guide to Effectively Discussing Your Christian ConvictionsPaperback$14.99$14.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Another Gospel?: A Lifelong Christian Seeks Truth in Response to Progressive ChristianityPaperback$15.29$15.29FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Mere ChristianityPaperback$12.99$12.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
The Story of Reality: How the World Began, How It Ends, and Everything Important that Happens in BetweenPaperback$13.99$13.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus: A Devout Muslim Encounters ChristianityPaperback$13.79$13.79FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
From the Publisher
Completely Updated and Expanded
This completely updated and expanded edition includes:
- Updates and expansions of existing tactics
- Addition of an all-new tactic
- New chapter on Mini Tactics filled with simple maneuvers to aid in discussions.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
"Let Greg be your mentor as you master new approaches to talking with others about Jesus." – Lee Strobel |
"The authoritative treatment of how to employ strategies in conversations with unbelievers. Tactics is not just another apologetics book.” – J.P. Moreland |
"Tactics will revolutionize your conversations with non-Christians.” – Sean McDowell |
Editorial Reviews
Review
Greg Koukl is a master tactician. I know of no one who is more conscientious in his efforts to communicate effectively and winsomely his Christian faith. In this book Greg shares with us his tried and true methods, skills honed through continual practice and revision. Mastering his tactics will make you a more effective ambassador for Christ. -- William Lane Craig Author of Reasonable Faith―Christian Truth and Apologetics
Just as a course on tactics is a requirement at all military academies, so too Greg Koukl’s Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions should be required training for all Christians and churches. Koukl has made a worthwhile contribution to the literature on apologetics by teaching us how to say what we say. Witty and winsome, this resource is as fun to read as it is to put into practice. -- Hank Hanegraaff Host of the “Bible Answer Man,” author of Christianity in Crisis: The 21st Century and The Complete Bible Answer Book, Collector’s Edition
C. S. Lewis once said, “Any fool can write learned language. The vernacular is the real test.” In this book Greg Koukl passes Lewis’s test with flying colors. There are many great arguments in favor of the Christian faith, but many of them are accessible only to professional apologists and philosophers. Koukl has developed a memorable and practical way to translate these arguments so that all Christians can become winsome and persuasive apologists in everyday conversations, no matter what their day jobs. This book should be required reading for every thoughtful Christian. -- Jay Wesley Richards Coauthor of The Privileged Planet
If you enjoy apologetics, Greg’s book Tactics is not only a required read, but simply a delightfully entertaining resource. In fact, just try and put it down! Especially for those who struggle with relevant ways to relate to non-Christians while presenting Christian truth, this volume provides many proven methods of natural, non-confrontational dialogue where the purpose is often to simply give an unbeliever something to think about, what Greg calls placing a stone in someone’s shoe. Featuring remarkably simple techniques that are easily and fruitfully applied, this incredibly insightful book is one I highly recommend. -- Gary R. Habermas Distinguished Research Professor, Liberty University Author of The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus
With the advantage of a lifetime of experience, Greg Koukl has written what must be considered THE authoritative treatment of how to employ various strategies in conversations with unbelievers about the Christian faith. Tactics is not just another apologetics book. It is a sensitive, well-written, widely illustrated treatment of actual situations that often come up when believers share their faith. Koukl not only reminds us that it is not enough to know why you believe, but it is also crucial to know how to communicate those beliefs by adapting to various situations. And Tactics shows precisely how to do that. -- J. P. Moreland Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Talbot School of Theology, and author of Kingdom Triangle
Greg Koukl has been using the methods offered in this book for many years with our Summit students and to great effect. His suggestions, illustrations, and witnessing approach work. This is a well-written, practical, and timely book. -- David Noebel Founder and President, Summit Ministries
In this wise and compelling book, Greg Koukl---who has thought long and hard about not only what to say but how to say it---provides a game plan for equipping believers through an artful method of careful thinking and winsome conversation. If you struggle with how to talk about your faith and respond to questions and objections in a meaningful and effective way---and most of us do---there is no better book to buy, read, and put into practice. I could not recommend it more highly! -- Justin Taylor “Between Two Worlds” blog; Editor, Suffering and the Sovereignty of God and The Supremacy of Christ in a Postmodern World
Greg Koukl is a wise, seasoned, front-lines apologist. I am happy to recommend a book so full of practical insights and careful guidance for skillfully, winsomely defending the Christian faith. -- Paul Copan Author of True for You, but Not for Me and Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up?
Tactics is the book I’ve been waiting for! I love engaging non-Christians in conversation, but in the back of my mind I often think, “What if I get stuck and don’t know what to do?” Greg helped me put that fear to rest and gave me practical tools to artfully maneuver in conversations. I enthusiastically recommend Tactics. It will revolutionize your conversations with non-Christians. -- Sean McDowell Author of Ethix, coauthor of Understanding Intelligent Design and Evidence for the Resurrection
When I want someone who can help me train ambassadors for Christ, the first person I call is Greg Koukl. Now his proven ideas are in this book. I wish I had known these tactics twenty years ago. They are some of the best I’ve ever seen to help Christians be more effective ambassadors for Christ. Trust me---if you read Koukl’s advice and learn his methods, your impact for Christ will skyrocket. -- Frank Turek Author of I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist
Greg Koukl is a master of the ideas that undergird the Gospel and one of the finest Christian communicators on the planet. He has spent many thousands of hours in front of the most difficult skeptics and their toughest questions and has developed very effective techniques to bring the truth to the surface of any conversation with love and grace. I have learned so much over the years by studying his persuasive yet respectful approach to giving reasons for faith. This book presents his methods in a way that is engaging and accessible to every believer. I hope Christians in churches all over the country gather together to study this important book and learn to stand firm for the Gospel in these dark times. -- Craig J. Hazen, PhD Founder and Director, Graduate Program in Christian Apologetics, Biola University
About the Author
X
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 0310101468
- Publisher : Zondervan; Anniversary edition (November 26, 2019)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- Item Weight : 10.7 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.3 x 0.65 x 8 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#3,234 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3 in Evangelism
- #8 in Christian Apologetics (Books)
- #10 in Christian Discipleship (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Chad Williams
Former U.S. Navy SEAL
Author of SEAL of God
By Chad Williams on November 26, 2019
Chad Williams
Former U.S. Navy SEAL
Author of SEAL of God
Instead of hiding your faith, or swinging for the fences in a super awkward way, Greg Koukl will show you how to make a small but meaningful difference in lots of conversations. Over time, that adds up!
If you're tired of the guilt, shame, fear, and paralysis that often surrounds many approaches to evangelism, then you will want to read Tactics instead.
Tactics will teach you how to plant seeds for the gospel. Once you read the book, it will seem so easy! And that's what makes the book so brilliant. If we each just plant seeds - really, that's it - then we can trust that God will raise up a harvest in his timing.
I strongly recommend getting, reading, and sharing Tactics with your friends and family.
C1: Diplomacy or D-Day In this chapter Greg makes a very good point about not attacking other people’s beliefs but to be diplomatic. This is indeed a good plan of action as attacking anyone’s emotionally held beliefs can lead to a strongly emotional reaction. Greg gives an example of a pagan he encountered where he asked her several questions about her beliefs. She rethought her beliefs based on his questions which cast doubt on why she believed these things. I have seen this before with people who practice epistemology. It is an effective way to get people to examine their beliefs using gentle questioning. Greg then states this requires 3 skills: 1 knowledge, an accurately informed mind; wisdom, and 2 artful method; and 3 character. These are good qualities to have if you are trying to convince people of something. Greg states, “My goal, rather, is to find clever ways to exploit someone’s bad thinking for the purpose of guiding her to truth…” Perhaps Greg should consider that his thinking about his religious beliefs may be equally as bad.
C2: Reservations In this chapter Greg states, “I have a general rule: If anyone in the discussion gets angry, you lose.” This is excellent advice. Discussions should be 2 sided, cordial, and informative for BOTH parties involved. Greg then asks the question of how we can distinguish truth from error and goes on to state: “the mind, not the Bible, is the very first line of defense god has given against error.” Again, I am pleasantly surprise by this statement. The bible is demonstrably not a reliable pathway to truth as anyone can interpret it anyway, they please. He then states that our tool is reason. He then gives this key principle: “Without god’s work, nothing else works; but with god’s work, many things work. Under the influence of the holy spirit, love persuades. By the power of god, the gospel transforms. And with Jesus at work, arguments convince.” This statement is not reasonable. Greg, please demonstrate your god exists or else you are just making an unverified claim. Greg then goes on to state that he doesn’t set out to convert anyone but instead just to put a “rock in his or her shoe.” I understand this as asking questions which make people consider their beliefs in a rational way may not change their mind in the moment, but it can contribute to the pool of information they currently have and may lead to seek out additional information to discover if their beliefs are true. This is how I went from being a Christian to an agnostic atheist.
C3: The Columbo Tactic. This tactic is about asking questions which causes people to more seriously consider their beliefs, so they can provide an answer. I feel this is a great way to have a conversation about beliefs. This will allow you (and the other person) to better understand why he/she holds these beliefs; which can lead to them understanding the potential flaws in their beliefs. Greg then comments on the 3 basic ways to use this method: 1. Gather information, 2. Reverse the burden of proof, 3. Lead the conversation. I have no issues with 1 or 3, however if YOU are the one making a claim; attempting to reverse the burden of proof is dishonest. Greg recommends asking the question “what do you mean by that?” This is good advice. Asking clarifying questions is extremely helpful in avoiding miscommunication and poor assumptions about the other person’s position.
C4: Columbo Step 1: Gathering information: Greg suggests opening conversation with casual dialogue, general questions and showing sincere interest in the person and his/her ideas. The goal is to gather as much information as possible about the person’s convictions (beliefs). Greg suggests a key question of “What do you mean by that?” It is a good clarifying question which helps people to stop and consider their statements, thereby further considering their beliefs. In Greg’s words, “First, you don’t want to misunderstand the person you’re talking with. Second, you don’t want to misrepresent him. Third, you don’t want him to misunderstand himself.” This is good advice for any initial conversation with anyone, it helps you get to know the person.
C5 Columbo Step 2, Reversing the Burden of Proof: Greg opens by stating “Some people think Christians are the only ones who need to answer for their beliefs. Of course, we should be able to give reasons for what we think is true. But we are not the only ones; others should be able to do this, too.” I agree, but ONLY IF the other people are making a claim. Greg later states, “But there is a difference between giving an explanation and giving evidence the explanation is actually true.” I fully agree! Greg can you do this for your religious beliefs? Then Greg moves on to 3 factors to determine if a claim is true: “Is it possible? Is it plausible? Is it probable?” How do we determine if it is possible, plausible and/or probable? We compare it to our current understanding of reality! Let’s take an example: From Numbers 22, Balaam’s talking donkey. Is it possible that a donkey spoke in a human created language? From our current understanding of reality, No. Is it plausible this occurred in reality? No. Is it probable? Absolutely Not. So, is it possible this story was fictional? Yes! Is plausible this was a fictional story? Yes!. Is it probable this was a fiction story written by humans? Yes! Greg goes on to make another good suggestion, when you don’t have answers you can reply “Let me think about it.” This is a good way to end the conversation; but you should actually think about it and perhaps do some research on the topic then come back to the person at a later date to continue the conversation. This should not be used just as a means of escape.
C6: Two Reliable rescues: Here Greg provides ways of getting out of situations where you are awkwardly on the defensive and he calls them “the Professor’s Ploy” and “Getting Out of the Hot Seat.” In the Professor’s Ploy Greg provides the ridiculous stereotyped strawman situation where you have an angry atheist college professor who is out to crush the religious faith of any Christian student. Greg suggests turning the tables by asking the professor questions in a curious and respectful way with the goal of shifting the burden of proof for claims the professor is making. This is just reemphasizing the Columbo tactic. With the Getting Out of the Hot seat is facing an aggressive challenger for whom you are ill prepared. Again, Greg suggests using Columbo questions to avoid having to provide your own information. Then end the conversation politely and tell the person you will think about it. This SHOULD give you more time to research the topics and get back to the person. But, if you were outgunned, will you actually do that? Or will you simply avoid further conversation with that person (which has happened to me several times in the past – In several cases I have been told that the subject of religion is officially off limits with that person.)
C7: Columbo Step 3, Using Columbo to make a point: In this chapter he discusses asking “leading” questions to guide the conversation in the direction you want it to go. Again, I have no issue with this plan of action. But then he goes on to describe encounters where he used this tactic; but so far most of his examples are conversations with people who have very little understanding of the topics being discussed. His goal is to expose weaknesses or flaws in the other persons beliefs. If there are flaws, then they should be exposed, and there are many in Christian beliefs.
C8: Perfecting Columbo: In this chapter he discusses how you can be better prepared for these conversations by: anticipating what may come up in these conversations, reflecting after conversations, and practicing your response while reflecting. I have no issues with this. It is always good to be prepared.
C9: Turnabout: Defending against columbo: Greg goes on to discuss how to defend against Columbo. He suggests politely stopping the conversation and taking it back up at a future date, so he can think about it and be better prepared. He suggests that if someone is using a question as more of a statement to simply ask the What do you mean by that question. Again, I have no issue with these suggestions.
C10: Suicide: Views That Self-Destruct: This chapter was mildly interesting. Greg speaks of self-contradictory statements. I guess Greg wants his readers to be aware of these types of statement during augments.
C11: Practical Suicide: Greg speaks of views which simply fail when applied to real life; for example: “It is wrong to say people are wrong.” I have seen such arguments and have no issue with calling people out when they are made. For my example: “The Christian god is omnibenevolent ((of a deity) possessing perfect or unlimited goodness) and Just (based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair) AND god created hell (a place regarded in various religions as a spiritual realm of eternal evil and suffering) and sends people there for eternity based on the rules he created (Eternal suffering for finite breaking of his rules – explicitly being unable to believe based on religious faith).
C12: Sibling Rivalry and Infanticide: In this chapter Greg covers more self-defeating arguments. Simply put, sibling rivalry is when someone makes 2 points which conflict and defeat each other. Infanticide is another example where the first part of the statement is in direct conflict with the second part of the statement: “He said out loud that vocal cords do not exist” for example. Again, I have no issue with any of this. Yet, Greg bring up the “Argument from Evil” which is strawman argument. I would never refer to this argument as the argument from “Evil” (profoundly immoral and wicked) which implies intent from an intelligent agent. I would refer to it as the problem of suffering. So, there is much human suffering in the world that is not caused by humans (disease, parasites, natural disasters, birth defects, just to name a few). We humans work very hard to minimize the suffering caused by these elements which are out of our control. Yet, if there is an all loving god, one would expect to not see this type of suffering that must have been created by this all-powerful entity. Why would an all loving god create parasites that bore into people’s eyes and make them blind? Why would an all loving god create cancer? Don’t get me wrong, I can’t believe in a god as I don’t have sufficient evidence to do so. So, I accept the world as it is and do not blame anything for the suffering in this world as it is out of our control. We humans just have to continue to work to find ways to alleviate as much suffering as possible (thank you science!). I work to do this in my life, I expect others to do the same and I would expect a god to be held to the same standard. Greg goes on to talk about “scientism” which is a statement that science is the only reliable method of knowing the truth. Yet another strawman. The only way we humans can know truth is though observation, experience and comparing/testing (with other humans) to our understanding of reality.
C13: Taking the Roof Off: Greg speaks of a simple tactic of trying to put yourself in a position where you can take on the other person’s view point and follow it to its natural conclusion. This way you can understand if it leads to irrational and/or inaccurate conclusions. Again, I have no issue with this and often use it. Then Greg goes on with some apologetics arguments. One of them is about guilt. He asks, “Why do we all feel guilty. We feel guilty when we do things (or neglect to do thing) which has a negative impact to human wellbeing (good = getting closer to a desired result; bad = getting further away from a desired result). The natural response is to feel bad as you would understand that you would feel bad if the situation was reversed, as well as there being potential real-world consequences for your actions. Now I can use this tactic on Greg’s argument that guilt leads to morality and morality leads to a supernatural entity who magically inserted moral laws into human brains. Now Greg has made a claim and MUST demonstrate this entity exist, has the power to insert these moral laws into human brains, and these laws are what is causing us to feel guilt.
C14: Steamroller: In this chapter Greg speaks of how to deal with a steamroller. I have had several experiences with Christian steamrollers. These people get defense when discussing a topic to which they have strong emotional attachment. So, during the discussion they will interrupt and attempt to switch topics before you can give a full response; because they really don’t want to hear what you have to say. Greg’s advice (1. Nicely ask to stop and let you finish your reply, 2. Use shame by asking explicitly for courtesy, and 3. Stop the conversation.) All of this is good advice and I have done this prior to reading this book.
C15: Rhodes Scholar: Greg suggests you must be careful when listening to information provide by anyone. If someone tells you what they believe you have been provided with information, but you must assess that information to determine its factual accuracy. When the person explains why they believe and how they came to the conclusion; you have more information to help you determine the factual accuracy of the statement. In other words, you should question everyone; even people who claim to be experts. I recommend that when you hear a claim, regardless of the source, you do your own research to locate as much information as possible to determine if it is factually accurate. Try not to be bias with your sources. Then Greg goes on to criticize science, but he blatantly misrepresents the situation. Methodological Naturalism is a strategy for studying the world, by which scientists choose not to consider supernatural causes; even as a remote possibility. This is because, while it is possible supernatural causes may exist, we currently have no means to investigate using any known method. If a supernatural event was able to be investigated, and the cause was able to be determined, it would then fall into the realm of the natural. If we can determine explanations for observable phenomenon in our shared reality, then there is no need for a supernatural explanations. If anyone is claiming there is a supernatural cause for a phenomenon, that person MUST demonstrate (in a verifiable way) that the cause they are proposing actually exists. Can Greg do this for any of the supernatural claims made in the bible?
C16: Just The Facts, Ma’ma: (Fact: a thing that is known to be proved to be true) More good advice that Greg won’t apply to his own religious beliefs. I agree that facts trump any arguments. Here is my definition of truth: The degree to which a proposition aligns with reality and can be verified by its predictive power. The force humans call gravity exists in our shared reality, this is a fact. I can demonstrate gravity exists by dropping a coin and it will fall toward the center of our planet. I can verify my experiment by having other people do the same experiment and getting the same results. I can the predict that if I drop that coin 1000 times I will have the same results every time, and then confirm my prediction by conducting that experiment successfully. Can Greg do this for his religious beliefs? Greg uses this chapter for more apologetics for which I do not have enough space to address.
C17: Inside Out: In this chapter Greg preaches against moral relativism. He further preaches on how we are “unique and marvelous creatures bearing God’s imprint” and that we all know that to be true. I have to ask: Greg, how do you know that to be true (factually accurate)? Can you demonstrate the god in which you believe factually exists in our shared reality? Can you demonstrate (in any verifiable and objective way) that this god has imprinted anything on humans? As for moral relativism: Greg, can you demonstrate (in a verifiable and objective way) that your god exists and has inserted his morality into humans? What method or mechanism are you using to determine the factual accuracy of your claims? Our morals do not require an external, supernatural explanation. We are a social species. We survive an thrive based on cooperation. We understand pain (suffering) and pleasure (wellbeing). We seek to reduce suffering and increase pleasure because it is beneficial to us personally and to the human race overall. This has a clear natural explanation; humans who naturally cooperate with other humans more often lived and procreated, those who did not more often died prior to procreation. A natural explanation is always more probable than a supernatural explanation.
C18: Mini-Tactics: Greg starts with his “what a friend we have in Jesus” mini-tactic. This is how to handle tough questions which may contradict Christian doctrine. For example, if someone asks for his opinion on same sex marriage he can reply, “Since I am a follower of Christ, my view on marriage is the same as Jesus’ view…” While true, it is replying like a child (Hey, don’t blame me for my beliefs! Jesus is the one who made up these rules, I just follow them.) Greg, can you demonstrate in a verifiable and objective way that Jesus was god and our savior (or even that the miracle working god-man described in the bible was a real person)? His “Sticks & Stone” mini-tactic is for people who try to label you with nasty names (bigot, homophobe, racist, etc). Greg suggests you ask for a definition of the word. Ok, but remember the definition may still apply to you because of your beliefs and your behaviors associated to those beliefs. Next, “Moving Toward the Objection” mini-tactic. Yes, you should honestly and assertively address the objections made just be aware that you will need to do so with more than just unverified claims. Next, “The Watch Your Language” mini-tactic. This one is simple, yes don’t use Christion jargon when speaking to others. It is better to common language which will be more familiar to the person to whom you are speaking. Next, “The Power of “SO?” mini-tactic: Replying with “SO?” when the assertion or claim is not relevant. I like this one. I use this one often. It is dismissive, yet can prompt the person to stop, think about what they said, and perhaps rephrase or dismiss it.
C19: More Sweat, Less Blood: In this chapter Greg gives 8 tips on how to proselytize. Be ready, keep it simple, avoid religious language and spiritual pretense, focus on the truth of Christianity not just its personal benefits, give reasons, stay calm, if they want to leave let them leave, and don’t let them leave empty handed. I have no issues with this advice. I would add, don’t just focus on the truth of Christianity, but be prepared to demonstrate that what you are saying is factually accurate in a verifiable and objective way. This same rule applies for giving your reasons. If you are simply making claims I will NOT be able to believe you unless you can substantiate those claims. If you claim Jesus came back from biological death, be ready to demonstrate the truth of that claim. The bible is not evidence for the truth of that claim, it is only evidence that someone wrote down that claim. I require more evidence than you making an extraordinary claim which you read in a book written by primitive, extremely superstitious, scientifically ignorant men with their own personal and political agendas.
Top reviews from other countries
The author holds fundamentalist views on issues like evolution, science, abortion, and the bible, and in his many conversations, which can be seen on YouTube, he teaches and uses these strategies.
I find his approach problematic, because the author uses what are in effect linguistic tricks, to divert attention away from his own opinions, directing the conversation so as to undermine, discredit, or attack his ''opponent''. Although this can be an effective course of action in the short term, in the long term it ultimately fails. This is because, at least in this authors case the actual arguments, for example on the dating of the gospels, or the evidence against evolution, are for all except the most fundamentalist Christians, discredited. In fact this book would be appeal to any variety of fundamentalist, as it is about closing down, rather than engaging in genuine discourse.
Perhaps he has only had debates with people who have not thought about their position and understanding of the universe. But its pretty awful.
There's a few interesting snippets, but all the scenarios where he 'beats' his interlocuter seem contrived.
It seems he has studied arguments/challenges against his position for a while, and it tried to flip them around. But it doesn't work.
More items to explore
I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an AtheistPaperback$19.79$19.79FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Mama Bear Apologetics® Study Guide: Empowering Your Kids to Challenge Cultural LiesPaperback$11.99$11.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Cold-Case Christianity for Kids: Investigate Jesus with a Real DetectivePaperback$9.99$9.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Stealing from God: Why Atheists Need God to Make Their CasePaperback$12.66$12.66FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2
Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the GospelsPaperback$13.00$13.00FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Sep 7Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Is God a Moral Monster?: Making Sense of the Old Testament GodPaperback$14.39$14.39FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Sep 2




