| Kindle Price: | $7.95 |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Tainted by Suspicion: The Secret Deals and Electoral Chaos of Disputed Presidential Elections Kindle Edition
Election Day goes into overtime!
Disputed presidential outcomes are rare but hardly unprecedented. Learn the full story behind most controversial elections in U.S. history when almost half the voters were convinced their new president was selected rather than elected.
The voter fraud, the voter suppression, the backroom deal making, the scandals, the follies and the mudslinging going back to the Founders reads like a political thriller that reveals:
- How Alexander Hamilton, Henry Clay and two Supreme Court Justices played kingmakers.
- Why Thomas Jefferson actually owes the presidency to his disloyal vice president, Aaron Burr.
- What Andrew Jackson's campaign can tell us about Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.
- How Richard Nixon actually did challenge the 1960 election results - indirectly - while making it appear he didn't.
- Why pundits and pollsters in 2000 predicted Al Gore would win the Electoral College and George W. Bush would win the popular vote.
- What if these elections had swung the other way? A glimpse at how America and the world would have changed.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 3, 2016
- File size1340 KB
Editorial Reviews
Review
·"Author Fred Lucasdoes a marvelous job of taking the reader on a somewhat shocking and alwayseye-opening journey through U.S. history, casting a watchdog light in truejournalistic form on the political bickering, backstabbing and shenanigans yourhistory classes don't teach." - Cheryl Chumley, author,Washington Times columnist
·"Even history buffsare likely to discover a plethora of new facts and perspectivesby perusingLucas's analysis ... anyone who reads "Tainted bySuspicion" will bewiser for the effort. - American Thinker
·"The book is apolitical thrill ride through the four wildest election aftermaths in U.S.history." - MRC TV
·"Tainted bySuspicion is rich in detail, mesmerizing and meaty. You think politics today istough? You ain't seen nothing till you've read Fred Lucas's Tainted bySuspicion. Engrossing. Must Read. A page turner. " - CraigShirley, Presidential Historian, author of Last Act: The Final Years andEmerging Legacy of Ronald Reagan
·"For fans ofPresidential politics, this is a must-read. For those that are just curiousabout how convoluted American politics can get, this is a worthyintroduction." - DWD's Reviews
·"Fred Lucas hasperformed a valuable service amid a tumultuous election year in reminding usall of our four most controversial elections, contests settled only by theintervention of other branches of government while many in the nation criedfraud. He does so in a book that moves easily between a well-researched work ofhistory and a novel-like examination of what might have been if the outcome hadgone the other way. Overall, it's a timely and welcome reminder of how earliercitizens struggled to 'make America great.'" - George Condon,Chief White House Correspondent for National Journal, co-author of The WrongStuff: The Extraordinary Saga of Randy "Duke" Cunningham, the MostCorrupt Congressman Ever Caught
·"I've sat next toFred in the White House briefing room for years, and have known for quite sometime that he's a diligent reporter and gifted writer. Tainted by Suspicionreflects those skills -- this is really a terrific read. It's important forAmericans to understand that election controversies are nothing new -- and goall the way back to the beginning. Fred covers a lot of ground and he covers itwell. Jefferson-Adams in 1800, Jackson-John Quincy Adams in 1824, Hayes-Tildenin 1876 and Bush-Gore in 2000 - and more - these are great stories and Fredbrings history to life. Great book and highly recommended." - PaulBrandus, USA Today columnist, West Wing Reports, author Under This Roof: TheWhite House and the Presidency
·"Fred Lucas' newbook, Tainted by Suspicion, examines some of the rigged/contested presidentialelections in American history. It's a book I enjoyed and recommend toeveryone." - Jeff Dunetz, editor of The Lid
·"Fred Lucas provesone of my favorite points. We should never let young people of America know howfun history can be because if they ever found out what it can do for the mind,for the soul, for the fantasy, for the dinner party, if they ever found outhistory's true potential, our teaching resources would be overwhelmed. I neverhad this idea before but I wish I had. How about a book on the four mostcontroversial elections we've ever had." - Barry Farber, memberof the National Radio Hall of Fame, author of "Cocktails withMolotov," and talk radio host.
·"Each chapterengages the reader with both telling anecdotes and insightful analysis.Throughout the book are apt references to the 2016 primary and generalelections. ... Tainted by Suspicion provides an excellent, accessible view ofour political past with valuable lessons for us today. - MichaelZak, author of "Back to Basics for the Republican Party."
·"For the seriouselection enthusiast, Mr. Lucas's well documented book shines the light onpolitical shadiness of the past and illuminates the path of perceptive fans ofthe present election cycle." - Anthony Sadar, author of"In Global Warming We Trust: Too Big to Fail."
·"Lucas writes in ahighly readable style, and includes several pertinent anecdotes about eachelection. This isn't a dry reading of history but an engaging, often funny (inhindsight only; it wasn't funny when the elections happened), and informativereview of some of the most controversial elections in American history."- Faith, Fiction, Friends
About the Author
Before going to Washington, he reported on state capitols in Kentucky and Connecticut. He earned his Master's at Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and Bachelor's at Western Kentucky University.
He lives in Northern Virginia with his wife Basia.
Product details
- ASIN : B01ETYTESQ
- Publisher : Stairway Press (May 3, 2016)
- Publication date : May 3, 2016
- Language : English
- File size : 1340 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 322 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,239,744 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Fred Lucas is the Manager of the Investigative Reporting Project at The Daily Signal. He is an award-winning journalist and veteran White House correspondent who has written and reported for Fox News, Newsweek, National Review, History Magazine Quarterly, The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, TheBlaze, Townhall, The Federalist, The National Interest, The American Spectator, The American Conservative, and other outlets. Before going to Washington, he reported on state capitals in Kentucky and Connecticut. He earned his MS at Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and BA at Western Kentucky University. He lives in Northern Virginia with his wife, Basia.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Lucas writes in a highly readable style, and includes several pertinent anecdotes about each election. This isn’t a dry reading of history but an engaging, often funny (in hindsight only; it wasn’t funny when the elections happened), and informative review of some of the most controversial elections in American history.
In 1800, Federalist John Adams was seeking a second term while Thomas Jefferson was seeking a first. The mud was liberally flung by all sides. But because of how the electoral college counted votes at the time, Jefferson and his vice-presidential running mate Aaron Burr ended up with exactly the same number of votes. Intrigue followed, as the Federalists attempted to support Burr and so deny that radical Jefferson the presidency.
In 1824, it was Adams’s son, John Quincey Adams, battling Andrew Jackson. Henry Clay, who wanted the presidency himself, would end up denying it to Jackson. It was an ugly, mudslinging campaign (and would be repeated with different results in 1828).
The 1876 election, between Republican Rutherford Hayes and Democrat Samuel Tilden, was another electoral cliffhanger. Passions rose so high that newspaper publisher Joseph Pulitzer editorialized for the arming of 100,000 men to take Washington by force and put Tilden in the White House (yes, one might call that news media bias). A special commission of senators, congressmen, and Supreme Court justices was formed to make a decision – and a deal was cut between the Republicans and southern Democrats to give the White House to Hayes in return for the end of military occupation of four southern states in Reconstruction.
And Lucas goes on to include the 1960, 2000, and 2016 presidential campaigns.
The author makes or implies a number of summary points:
• In general, no election was “stolen.” America survived the controversies, although potential violence was close in both 1800 and 1876 (and remember that 1876 was the nation’s centennial celebration).
• It’s awful to go through one of these controversies, but it has happened before. Events can indeed appear to be heading for social and political convulsion. But, so far at least, the United States has gotten through its controversial and disputed elections.
• In a few cases, a different outcome would have made a significant difference – Al Gore would likely have nominated more liberal justices for the Supreme Court than George W. Bush did. But in many of these examples cited, the differences might have been surprisingly small.
Lucas is the White House correspondent for The Daily Signal. He’s covered the White House for other publications for a number of years, and writes regularly on politics for Fox News, The Weekly Standard, and other publications. He received a bachelor’s degree from Western Kentucky University and a master’s degree from Columbia University.
“Tainted by Suspicion” allows us to look past today’s headlines and breaking news stories on television and keep some perspective. It’s also a fascinating account of many of the presidential election controversies the United States has experienced.
Lucas provides a close-up look at the elections of 1800, 1824, 1876, and 2000, with additional coverage and insight for 1888 and 1960. He provides the setting for each of these races, a brief biography of each of the key players and how their candidacies evolved, the controversy that surrounded each of the elections, and most intriguingly, “Election What-Ifs.” The “What-Ifs” explore how events might have transpired if the loser had instead won and served a four-year term. Lucas even explores what the next election might have been like: whether the alternate universe winner would have run for re-election and won and who might have opposed that winner (perhaps the What-If loser). He also explores how successful that President might have been and other longer term consequences. These sections for each election are a great fit for those who enjoy the “Election What-Ifs” portion of David Leip’s online Atlas Forum. As an example, he explores how history might have unfolded if Gore had taken office in 2001. How might his response to 9/11 differed from that of Bush and would the invasion of Iraq have gone forward? Would Gore have been re-elected and who might his opponent have been in 2004? He even speculates that a two term President Gore could well have precluded Obama being nominated or elected in 2008.
For the 1960 election, he explores who actually won the popular vote that year, mostly based on the unusual Alabama voting where the winning electors were split 6 unpledged (ultimately voting for Senator Harry Byrd) and 5 pledged for JFK. Most sources (i.e., Roper, Leip, White, Wikipedia, ProCon, etc.) credit all the Democratic popular votes in Alabama to JFK instead of splitting them proportionally between Unpledged and JFK. If the latter, perhaps more logical approach is used, Nixon actually comes out ahead nationally by ~60,000 votes instead of losing by ~110,000 votes. Lucas also explores fraud that might have occurred in very closely contested states (most notably Missouri and New Jersey) and definitely did occur in Texas and Illinois.
I found his coverage of the 1876 election to be the most insightful as the events leading up to the contesting of the results for Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon are thoroughly recounted as well as the formation of the Electoral Commission. Even more intriguing are the various “What-Ifs” he presents, to include the impacts on Reconstruction and Civil Rights over the next 90 years (depending upon whether Hayes or Tilden were to win).
One small suggestion which might have added to Lucas’ book would have been to have included electoral vote and popular vote tables or perhaps some maps showing state-by-state results. For me, this is not a problem as I can easily navigate to these over the internet, but for a highly visual person, I think they would find them beneficial.
