Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$15.29$15.29
FREE delivery: Thursday, Nov 16 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $6.97
Other Sellers on Amazon
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
96% positive over lifetime
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Talent is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else Paperback – May 25, 2010
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | — | $10.98 |
Purchase options and add-ons
Since its publication ten years ago, businesspeople, investors, doctors, parents, students, athletes, and musicians at every level have adopted the maxims of Talent Is Overrated to get better at what they’re passionate about. Now this classic has been updated and revised with new research and takeaways to help anyone achieve even greater performance.
Why are certain people so incredibly great at what they do? Most of us think we know the answer—but we’re almost always wrong. That’s important, because if we’re wrong on this crucial question, then we have zero chance of getting significantly better at anything we care about.
Happily, the real source of great performance is no longer a mystery. Bringing together extensive scientific research, bestselling author Geoff Colvin shows where we go wrong and what actually makes world-class performers so remarkable. It isn’t specific, innate talent, nor is it plain old hard work. It’s a very specific type of work that anyone can do—but most people don’t.
What’s more, the principles of great performance apply to virtually any activity that matters to you. Readers worldwide have been inspired by this book’s liberating message: You don’t need a one-in-a-million natural gift. Better performance, and maybe even world-class performance, is closer than you think.
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPortfolio
- Publication dateMay 25, 2010
- Dimensions5.45 x 0.64 x 8.35 inches
- ISBN-101591842948
- ISBN-13978-1591842941
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A profoundly important book.” —Dan Pink, author of A Whole New Mind
“What an exciting book!” —Ram Charan, coauthor of Execution
“I rejoice! What Geoff says comports totally with my own experiences in sports, law, and business.” —Herb Kelleher, founder, Southwest Airlines
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Mystery
Great performance is more valuable than ever- but where does it really come from?
It is mid-1978, and we are inside the giant Procter & Gamble head- quarters in Cincinnati, looking into a cubicle shared by a pair of twenty-two-year-old men, fresh out of college. Their assignment is to help sell Duncan Hines brownie mix, but they spend a lot of their time just rewriting memos according to strict company rules. They are clearly smart: One has just graduated from Harvard, the other from Dartmouth. But that doesn't distinguish them from a slew of other new hires at P&G. What does distinguish them from many of the young go-getters the company takes on each year is that neither man is particularly filled with ambition. Neither has any kind of career plan or any specific career goals. Every afternoon they play waste-bin basketball with wadded-up memos. One of them later recalls, "We were voted the two guys probably least likely to succeed."
These two young men are of interest to us now for only one reason: They are Jeffrey Immelt and Steven Ballmer, who before age fifty would become CEOs of the world's two most valuable corporations, General Electric and Microsoft. Contrary to what any reasonable person would have expected when they were new recruits, they reached the absolute apex of corporate achievement. The obvious question is how.
Was it talent? If so, it was a strange kind of talent that hadn't revealed itself in the first twenty-two years of their lives. Was it brains? These two were sharp but had shown no evidence of being sharper than thousands of their classmates or colleagues. Was it mountains of hard work? Certainly not up to that point.
And yet something carried them to the heights of the business world. Which leads to perhaps the most puzzling question, one that applies not just to Immelt and Ballmer but also to everyone in our lives and to ourselves: If that certain something turns out not to be any of the things we usually think of, then what is it?
Look around you.
Look at your friends, your relatives, your coworkers, the people you meet when you shop or go to a party. How do they spend their days? Most of them work. They all do many other things as well, playing sports, performing music, pursuing hobbies, doing public service. Now ask yourself honestly: How well do they do what they do?
The most likely answer is that they do it fine. They do it well enough to keep doing it. At work they don't get fired and probably get promoted a number of times. They play sports or pursue their other interests well enough to enjoy them. But the odds are that few if any of the people around you are truly great at what they do-awesomely, amazingly, world-class excellent.
Why-exactly why-aren't they? Why don't they manage businesses like Jack Welch or Andy Grove did, or play golf like Tiger Woods did, or play the violin like Jascha Heifetz did? After all, most of them are good, conscientious people, and they probably work diligently. Some of them have been at it for a very long time-twenty, thirty, forty years. Why isn't that enough to make them great performers? It clearly isn't. The hard truth is that virtually none of them has achieved greatness or come even close, and only a tiny few ever will.
This is a mystery so commonplace that we scarcely notice it, yet it's critically important to the success or failure of our organizations, the causes we believe in, and our own lives. In some cases we can give plausible explanations, saying that we're less than terrific at hobbies and games because we don't take them all that seriously. But what about our work? We prepare for it through years of education and devote most of our waking hours to it. Most of us would be embarrassed to add up the total hours we've spent on our jobs and then compare that number with the hours we've given to other priorities that we claim are more important, like our families; the figures would show that work is our real priority. Yet after all those hours and all those years, most people are just okay at what they do.
In fact the reality is more puzzling than that. Extensive research in a wide range of fields shows that many people not only fail to become outstandingly good at what they do, no matter how many years they spend doing it, they frequently don't even get any better than they were when they started. Auditors with years of experience were no better at detecting corporate fraud-a fairly important skill for an auditor-than were freshly trained rookies. When it comes to judging personality disorders, which is one of the things we count on clinical psychologists to do, length of clinical experience told nothing about skill-"the correlations," concluded some of the leading researchers, "are roughly zero." Surgeons were no better at predicting hospital stays after surgery than residents were. In field after field, when it came to centrally important skills-stockbrokers recommending stocks, parole officers predicting recidivism, college admissions officials judging applicants-people with lots of experience were no better at their jobs than those with very little experience.
The most recent studies of business managers confirm these results. Researchers from the INSEAD business school in France and the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School call the phenomenon "the experience trap." Their key finding: While companies typically value experienced managers, rigorous study shows that, on average, "managers with experience did not produce high-caliber outcomes."
Bizarre as this seems, in at least a few fields it gets one degree odder. Occasionally people actually get worse with experience. More experienced doctors reliably score lower on tests of medical knowledge than do less experienced doctors; general physicians also become less skilled over time at diagnosing heart sounds and X-rays. Auditors become less skilled at certain types of evaluations.
What is especially troubling about these findings is the way they deepen, rather than solve, the mystery of great performance. When asked to explain why a few people are so excellent at what they do, most of us have two answers, and the first one is hard work. People get extremely good at something because they work hard at it. We tell our kids that if they just work hard, they'll be fine. It turns out that this is exactly right. They'll be fine, just like all those other people who work at something for most of their lives and get along perfectly acceptably but never become particularly good at it. The research confirms that merely putting in the years isn't much help to someone who wants to be a great performer.
So our instinctive first answer to the question of exceptional performance does not hold up.
Our second answer is the opposite of the first, but that doesn't stop us from believing it fervently. It goes back at least twenty-six hundred years, to the time of Homer:
Call in the inspired bard Demodocus.
God has given the man the gift of song.
That's from the Odyssey, one of many references in it and the Iliad to the god-given gifts of various characters. We've changed our views on a lot of important matters since then-how the planets move, where diseases come from-but we have not changed our views on what makes some people extraordinarily good at what they do. We still think what Homer thought: that the awesomely great, apparently super- human performers around us came into this world with a gift for doing exactly what they ended up doing-in the case of Demodocus, composing and singing. We use the same words that the ancient Greeks used, simply translated. We still say, as Homer did, that great performers are inspired, meaning that their greatness was breathed into them by gods or muses. We still say they have a gift, which is to say their greatness was given to them, for reasons no one can explain, by someone or something apart from themselves.
We believe further that such people had the great good fortune to discover their gift, usually early in life. While this explanation of great performance obviously contradicts the just-work-hard explanation, it's much more deeply rooted and in some ways is more satisfying. It explains why great performers seem to do effortlessly certain things that most of us can't imagine doing at all, whether it's forming a strategy for a multibillion-dollar company or playing the Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto or hitting a golf ball 330 yards. The natural-gift explanation also explains why extraordinary performers are so rare; god-given talents are presumably not handed out willy-nilly.
This explanation has the additional advantage of helping most of us come to somewhat melancholy terms with our own performance. A god-given gift is a one-in-a-million thing. You have it or you don't. If you don't-and of course most of us don't-then it follows that you should just forget now about ever coming close to greatness.
Thus it's clear why most of us don't dwell on the mystery of great performance. We don't think it's a mystery. We've got a couple of explanations in our head, and if it ever occurs to us that the first one is clearly wrong, well, the second one is what we really believe anyway. And the nicest thing about the second explanation is that it takes the matter of great performance out of our hands. If we were really a natural at anything, we'd know it by now. Since we're not, we can worry about other things.
The trouble with this explanation-except it isn't trouble, it's excellent news-is that it's wrong. Great performance is in our hands far more than most of us ever suspected.
New Findings on Great Performance
It turns out that our knowledge of great performance, like our knowledge of everything else, has actually advanced quite a bit in the past couple of millennia. Scientists began turning their attention to it in a big way about 150 years ago, but what's most important is the growing mountain of research that has accumulated in just the past forty years. When this book was first published, that research was little known outside of a small group of academics; most people's beliefs about great performance were the same as Homer's. The findings were strikingly clear and obviously important. They just hadn't made their way into people's heads.
Interest in the reality of great performance has since exploded. This surge in interest has triggered an avalanche of books and articles-some of them accurate and helpful, others quite misleading-prompting a secondary avalanche of new research. On the whole, these newer studies have overwhelmingly supported the key findings of the foundational research. A few studies have sought to disprove the big-picture thesis of the work (and of this book). About the best that can be said for such studies is that they succeeded in attracting media attention, which in some cases seemed to be their primary purpose. But a close look shows that these studies mostly "debunk" claims that the foundational research never made, or that their data do not support the conclusions the authors draw, as we shall see.
More important, the debate has moved beyond the scientific journals and into the real world, where there really is no debate. The new findings about great performance are revolutionizing the way people everywhere learn new skills. People and organizations worldwide have used the principles described in this book to get better at all manner of pursuits: playing video games, drawing pictures, drawing a handgun (from its holster), trading stocks, inserting a needle into a patient's vein, writing software, writing a story, selling anything, learning American Sign Language, teaching math, taking photographs, performing psychotherapy, playing countless sports and musical instruments, and much else. In many cases the performance improvements are dramatically greater than any advances previously achieved. Ordinary people are discovering for themselves that the researchers' findings are powerfully valid. Conducted by scientists around the world, who have looked into top-level performance in a wide array of fields, including management, chess, swimming, surgery, jet piloting, violin playing, sales, novel writing, and many others, these hundreds of research studies have converged on some major conclusions that directly contradict most of what we all think we know about great performance. Specifically:
¥ The gifts possessed by the best performers are not at all what we think they are. They are certainly not enough to explain the achievements of such people-and that's if these gifts exist at all. Some researchers now argue that specifically targeted innate abilities are simply fiction. That is, you are not a natural-born clarinet virtuoso or car salesman or bond trader or brain surgeon-because no one is. Not all researchers are prepared to accept that view, but the talent advocates have a surprisingly difficult time demonstrating that even those natural gifts they believe they can substantiate are particularly important in attaining great performance.
¥ Going beyond the question of specific innate gifts, even the general abilities that we typically believe characterize the greats are not what we think. In many realms-chess, music, business, medicine-we assume that the outstanding performers must possess staggering intelligence or gigantic memories. Some do, but many do not. For example, some people have become international chess masters though they possess below-average IQs. So whatever it is that makes these people special, it doesn't depend on superhuman general abilities. On that score, a great many of them are amazingly average.
¥ The factor that seems to explain the most about great performance is something the researchers call deliberate practice. Exactly what that is and isn't turns out to be extremely important. It definitely isn't what most of us do on the job every day, which begins to explain the great mystery of the workplace-why we're surrounded by so many people who have worked hard for decades but have never approached greatness. Deliberate practice is also not what most of us do when we think we're practicing golf or the oboe or any of our other interests. Deliberate practice is hard. It hurts. But it works. More of it equals better performance. Tons of it equals great performance.
While there's a lot to be said about deliberate practice, a few initial observations are key:
¥ Deliberate practice is a large concept, and to say that it explains everything would be simplistic and reductive. Critical questions immediately present themselves: What exactly needs to be practiced? Precisely how? Which specific skills or other assets must be acquired? The research has revealed answers that generalize quite well across a wide range of fields. It certainly seems daunting to seek a common explanation for greatness in both ballet and medical diagnosis, for example, or insurance sales and baseball, but a few key factors do seem to account for top performance in those realms and many more.
Product details
- Publisher : Portfolio; Updated edition (May 25, 2010)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1591842948
- ISBN-13 : 978-1591842941
- Item Weight : 7.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.45 x 0.64 x 8.35 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #41,299 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #77 in Job Hunting & Career Guides
- #882 in Success Self-Help
- #1,103 in Personal Transformation Self-Help
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Geoff Colvin, is Fortune's senior editor-at-large and has written hundred of articles for the magazine including its popular column Value Driven. He lectures widely and is the regular lead moderator for the Fortune Global Forum. Colvin graduated Harvard cum laude with a B.A. in economics, and received his M.B.A. from New York University's Stern School. His first book, Talent Is Overrated, earned global acclaim and was a Wall Street Journal, BusinessWeek, and New York Times business bestseller. www.GeoffColvin.com
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Filled with interesting facts, this is the map for those who already visualize a high standard goal. Based on scientific research, you can rest assure that you will find the whole truth about what it really takes to achieve greatness. The basic premise is that those who started earlier in life have a greater chance of becoming the next superstars in their fields. The right kind of practice, not talent, is what sets super-achievers apart from the rest.
You will find examples of people who were able to go beyond average performance. Of course the strongest point the research suggests is that you need not have special talents. Isn't that great! Isn't that a great relief! No matter who you are, no matter if you have no talent at all, still you can become great!
The most fascinating example in this book is that of the Polgar's sisters. Polgar was an European scientist that decided to conduct an experiment on his children. He wrote a book about how anyone can become a genius and he decided to prove his theory with his daughters -hence the Polgar's sisters. After many years of very specific training the sisters went on to become the first women to hold chess grand master titles in the history of humanity!
So, with this book you can become a great achiever! The keys to stardom in any field are right here! The secrets are right here! Or are they not? Let's move on to...
Be aware that the book will be of special interests to those who are already on the path to greatness. The research suggests that unless you started very early in life practicing what you want to become great for, then you are pretty much in a huge disadvantage since you would have to practice a great more deal than most professionals practice. Only to catch up!
But professionals have been doing the activity for so long that they are trained to practice a great deal. An amateur is very unlikely to sustain that level of practice with out reaching exhaustion very quickly.
If your interest is to become better at what you do there are other books you could use that are more targeted to the average person. Two examples would be "One small step can Change Your life - the Kaizen way" or "Mastery". Both books can help just about anyone without the extreme demands of super-achievers. By the way, in my opinion both books have a more positive approach to self improvement than what I read in this book.
I really don't want to become great, I just want to enjoy the process and constantly improve my performance. It might not show but there is a slight difference between wanting to become great just for the sake of it, and wanting to improve because you actually love your activity.
Why be obsessed on becoming great? Why not just do what you like and devote your time and effort to it because you love it.
The point I'm trying to make here is that this book might not be beneficial to people with low self-esteem.
Life has much more to offer than just becoming "great". You don't need that kind of success to be valuable. Only passion should drive your art.
To sum up:
This book might be good for you if you are already in love with what you do and you do it to the exhaustion and you want to learn how to train better, and if you have very specific goals and if you are relatively young and if you are willing to sacrifice or devote most of your time and energy to achieving that goal.
This book is not for you if you don't care about becoming "great". If you understand the differences between being successful and be greatly acknowledged in one field.
Successful people are "complete" people. They have balance in their life, they have good relationships, healthy eating habits, exercise, they enjoy an evening in nature or in art and they enjoy their profession, their practice. They are not completely obsesed with one goal, and certainly not with greatness.
In a certain way it makes sense, people that devote their entire life to become "famous" or "great" or "champions" or "superachievers" very often don't build healthy relationship, don't devote time to their spirit. In reality, they are not successful, because they are not really happy and because they don't have real balance in their life.
Now, that doesn't mean super-achievers are not complete. I think many superstars are actually very complete persons. They have plentiful lives. But they didn't strive for greatness. They became great because of their love for their activity, their respect for their activity and their self respect.
Just enjoy your profession or sport or art! Practice, practice, practice! But for the love of it! Practice not because of what you can get from your practice, but to try to give your best to your practice! Life is too short! Live plentifully! If you are to become great, good, if not, good as well!
That's an area the author could have developed a great more deal. He could have written about the social and psychological consequences of working to become a super-achiever.
If you have more important things to do or if you don't have much time to devote to an activity or if you are not relatively young then you might not benefit from this book.
My advice is that you go first to Kaizen and Mastery. If after that you still feel the need to take your performance to a greater level then get this book or search for the original research articles online.
Another great book is "Way of the peaceful warrior" and its movie "Peaceful warrior" It is just about how to take out all that "success" trash that limits us instead of helping us improve. If you are interested in this subjects, I think you might very well enjoy the movie. It is based on a true story.
One Small Step Can Change Your Life: The Kaizen Way
Mastery: The Keys to Success and Long-Term Fulfillment
Way of the Peaceful Warrior: A Book That Changes Lives
Other reviews on Amazon have done an excellent job of providing details from the book, so I'll just summarize Colvin's one Big Idea: what separates world-class performers from those who aren't is something called deliberate practice. This is the big secret that this book reveals. What is deliberate practice? It is practice over a 10-year period that is designed specifically to improve performance, can be repeated a lot, has continuously available feedback, is highly demanding mentally, and isn't much fun.
So What?
That's the question we should ask about all such Big Ideas. The "So What?" of Talent is Overrated is that Colvin and others have unlocked part of the mystery of how we achieve greatness. Part of the "So What?" is also that Colvin helps debunk the myth of genius. Genius can often be a convenient excuse. After all, if I haven't been born with a certain gene or genius, then I'm not accountable for having reached certain goals. The concept of genius may become (but certainly doesn't have to be) part of our larger cultural flight from responsibility. Colvin doesn't argue his point this way, but this is an important application of his research.
For these reasons, Talent is Overrated is a very challenging and motivating book. On the one hand, we have a large part of the answer about what is necessary to achieve greatness. On the other hand, we may not like the answer.
Let me address the issue of Colvin's ideas and evidence. Colvin's research is solid and can't be denied. Therefore, we would be wise to understand and apply what he has taught. Some of the other Amazon reviews rightly mention that Colvin's research is, in fact, based on the research of by K. Anders Ericsson and others.
This is important in 2 ways. First, although Colvin's research is not original, it is significant. The article by Ericcson, et al. in the Harvard Business Review is fairly brief and doesn't elaborate or give examples. Colvin's examples of people that fascinate us, like Mozart and Tiger Woods, are important to us receiving what he teaches. Ericcson's book, The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance is more academic and original, but also more inaccessible. Colvin's work is an important popularization of Ericcson's work that has brought this important research to a much larger audience.
I want to address 2 other issues: what Colvin leaves out and how us mere mortals can make use of his research.
First, a few important warnings about Talent is Overrated. What Colvin writes is true and yet not complete. Human achievement is not solely the product of deliberate practice. An athlete or musician may spend the requisite 10 years of deliberate practice with the right coaches and yet not become world class. However, it is certain that if the 10 years are spent wisely, that person will have achieved at very high level. Ericcson's research emphasizes 2 other aspects that Colvin does not give enough weight to: deliberate practice must be accompanied by a succession of great coaches, as well as by a family or strong support system. A lack of either of these may help explain why some who labor diligently for 10 years never approach the very top.
Second, where does this leave the rest of us, those who will never become world class? Rather than despairing that somehow we may miss out by not having had the right parents with enough money pushing us early enough, we should apply Colvin's wisdom to our lives in a way the fits with our own vision of life.
Everyone who would pursue world-class excellence must ultimately ask the question: "Is it worth it?" The entire life of an Olympian, for example, must be dedicated to just one thing. For the single person, such single-focused dedication may be possible. But is it wise to pursue anything to this degree if one is married and has children? What else, possibly more valuable, must be sacrificed to become world-class?
Even if you don't become world-class in your chosen pursuit, the motivation to excel makes the idea of deliberate practice a worthy one. It turns out that the concept of compound interest applies to much of life and that those who start early and are diligent will bear much fruit.
My particular pursuit in life is that of a disciple of Jesus Christ, and deliberate practice has relevance here. I may not become a world-class teacher or writer as I'd like to, but my pursuit of my highest goal in life should be carried out with the same diligence, intensity, and passion as those who pursue music, art, or sports. In the religious life, or the pursuit of any ultimate goal, deliberate practice must be accompanied by a succession of great coaches, as well as by a family or strong support system. And anything that is of lasting value is likely to take a lot of time, be highly demanding, and will often not be much fun.
Interestingly enough, even teenagers can benefit from these idea. I used parts of Talent is Overrated in a high school Biblical Ethics class I taught, and it intrigued and challenged my students.
My advice is to read this book, ingest its one Big Idea, and then get to work in applying it to your own vision and passion!
Top reviews from other countries
Talent is overrated gives dozens of examples of great performance based on deliberate practice, gives referenced notes of every paper or research named in the book and takes the time to argue why some ways of training work better than others.
The author gives some advice on how to use this on companies and teams, how to avoid what most organizations do to destroy any chance of great performance and deliberate practice. This part is very interesting if you are starting a business or planning to do so.
I am sorry for those who claim, after reading it, that talent is necessary to achieve greatness, because they just won't have any of it. In fact, I could place a bet here: you, the naysayers, go and ask any great performer, go and ask any great sportsman, any business "prodigy", any "talented" musician or scientist. Tell them that they are the best in their fields because they had a "gift", tell them that they didn't work HARDER AND BETTER (which is more hours but also, and more importantly, well planned time and objectives) than anybody else. They will laugh at the idea.
Michellangelo Buonarroti, arguably the greatest artist of all time, said: "If they knew how much work it takes, they wouldn't call it genius". But, you know, he also said (or they say he said) something that made him unable to believe in such as thing as "Talent", he said "criticize by creating". So I will try to help instead of arguing on the internet, which I found is not the best way for deliberate practice:
I recommend this book for those trying to excel in any field, and would recommend this other books in particular, as they helped me a lot:
Never Let Go: A Philosophy of Lifting, Living and Learning For those trying to be something at sports. This book gives good advice, but not easy to follow tips. This is deliberate practice.
E-myth Revisited: Why Most Small Businesses Don't Work and What to Do About It This is a classic most of you already know, read it if you are trying to run a successful business.
Eat That Frog!: Get More of the Important Things Done, Today! Very short and easy to read, but worth every single word. A deliberate practice manual. Recommended for everyone.
Surely You're Joking Mr Feynman: Adventures of a Curious Character as Told to Ralph Leighton Feynman was a genius, or so called. He surely was one of the greatest minds of the last century, but you will learn (and have lots of fun on the way) that he was trained, raised from his early years, to be a curious mind, to be eager to learn WHY everything happened. This book is also a very important read if you are looking for deliberate practice, other books teach you what to do, this one tells you to have fun with it.
Doch es gibt auch andere Geheimnisse. Wie zum Beispiel den kongenialen Partner, mit dem jemand dann im Duo große Erfolge feiert. So wie das Dream Team Bill Gates und Paul Allen.
Für alle, denen vermeintlich der passende IQ zur galaktischen Performance fehlt, sei gesagt, dass dieser auch hinderlich sein kann. Dies sogar in größerer Dimension, z.B. in Summe innerhalb von großen Firmen. Als Beispiel könnte man hier SONY nennen. In den 80er und 90er Jahren war die Firma DIE Referenz in der Unterhaltungselektronik und ein Sammelbecken für die Spitzenköpfe der Branche. Dennoch waren es die Nerds von Apple, bis dahin eher unbekannt in der Unterhaltungselektronik, die aus dem MP3-Player die bahnbrechende Erfindung iPod gemacht haben. Manchmal sind es eben die Undergogs, die große disruptive Entwicklungen anstoßen. Während die einen am Ende ihr Expertendasein eher einengt und mit Scheuklappen arbeiten lässt, punkten die anderen mit Offenheit, Unbedarftheit, Mut, Frechheit oder Phantasie.
Abgerundet wird das Buch durch allerlei andere Fragestellungen zum Thema, etwa warum die Weltrekorde in sportlichen Disziplinen immer besser werden. An den Genen kann dies definitiv nicht liegen, denn der Gen-Pool verändert sich im Verlaufe von wenigen Generationen kaum. Hier sind es viel mehr moderne, deutlich effizientere Trainingsmethoden und ein ganzheitlicher Ansatz, der z.B. auch neueste Erkenntnisse rund um die Ernährung berücksichtig.
Das Buch ist kein Handbuch "How to become a Super Hero" und auch keine Rechtfertigung, dass der einzelne es gar nicht schaffen konnte, mangels passender Voraussetzungen. Es zeigt vielmehr, dass Top Performer über Jahre reifen und stets einen hohen persönlichen Einsatz bringen. Sie machen einfach, mit hoher Motivation und reichlich Frustrationstoleranz. Sie haben ihre Ziele vor Augen und beschäftigen sich wenig mit den Möglichkeiten des Scheiterns. Wir können von diesen Stars lernen. Einige ihrer Geheimnisse verrät Geoff Colvin.
It is critical to understand what is meant by "deliberate practice" as I suspect for many of us this will be a key learning. Deliberate practice is an activity designed to specifically improve performance, often with a teacher's help; it can be repeated a lot; feedback on results is continuously available; it highly demanding mentally; and it isn't much fun. There are great examples of what it is NOT and I can empathize with much of the anecdotal comments from my years of trying to master playing the drums. Understanding how to design deliberate practice is clearly key.
The book covers how this can impact organisations as well as individuals. Chapter 9 covers innovation and how deliberate practice can impact the creative process.
As the previous reviewer has commented, some of the material covered in this book also gets a mention in Malcolm Gladwell's latest book (Outliers), however, I found this book more interesting and definitely more practical. It leads the reader to a conclusion as well as providing practical ideas about how to improve your own and your company's performance.
But probably best of all, I found it inspiring and upbeat. Great reading. Highly recommended.
Der Autor zitiert zur Untermauerung seine These eine Reihe von Studien. Ich habe mir diese Studien - sofern sie frei zugänglich waren - heruntergeladen und ebenfalls gelesen. Soweit ich das überprüft habe gibt Colvin den Inhalt auch korrekt wieder.
Ich kann allerdings nicht beurteilen, ob es andere Studien gibt, die zu einem gegenteiligen Resultat kommen.
Solange Colvin unmittelbar beim Thema bleibt ist das Buch ausgezeichnet. Leider tut er das nicht immer. Predigen gehört zum Amerikanischen Wesen. Wie doch unsere Organisationen und unser Leben überhaupt besser und wir glücklicher wären, wenn man diese Erkenntnisse umsetzen würde. Man merkt da auch den Fortune-Journalisten. Das fand ich ein bisserl nervig.
Im Großen und Ganzen ist es aber ein durchaus gelungenes und lesenswertes Buch.
P.S.: Der Titel dieser Besprechung ist ein Zitat aus:
Ch. Donninger, K. Manhart: Der PC lernt Schach, Das Spiel der Könige. DOS April 1997.













