Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$18.95$18.95
FREE delivery: Friday, May 12 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $10.39
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
80% positive over lifetime
+ $3.99 shipping
93% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism Updated Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
Purchase options and add-ons
On February 19, 2009, CNBC commentator Rick Santelli delivered a dramatic rant against Obama administration programs to shore up the plunging housing market. Invoking the Founding Fathers and ridiculing "losers" who could not pay their mortgages, Santelli called for "Tea Party" protests. Over the next two years, conservative activists took to the streets and airways, built hundreds of local Tea Party groups, and weighed in with votes and money to help right-wing Republicans win electoral victories in 2010.
In this penetrating new study, Harvard University's Theda Skocpol and Vanessa Williamson go beyond images of protesters in Colonial costumes to provide a nuanced portrait of the Tea Party. What they find is sometimes surprising. Drawing on grassroots interviews and visits to local meetings in several regions, they find that older, middle-class Tea Partiers mostly approve of Social Security, Medicare, and generous benefits for military veterans. Their opposition to "big government" entails reluctance to pay taxes to help people viewed as undeserving "freeloaders" - including immigrants, lower income earners, and the young. At the national level, Tea Party elites and funders leverage grassroots energy to further longstanding goals such as tax cuts for the wealthy, deregulation of business, and privatization of the very same Social Security and Medicare programs on which many grassroots Tea Partiers depend. Elites and grassroots are nevertheless united in hatred of Barack Obama and
determination to push the Republican Party sharply to the right.
The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism combines fine-grained portraits of local Tea Party members and chapters with an overarching analysis of the movement's rise, impact, and likely fate.
- ISBN-100190633662
- ISBN-13978-0190633660
- EditionUpdated
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateAugust 1, 2016
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.1 x 0.8 x 6.1 inches
- Print length272 pages
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Lowest Pricein this set of products
Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme InequalityPaperback - Highest ratedin this set of products
White Identity Politics (Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology)Paperback - Most purchasedin this set of products
Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a NationPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
"[E]xceptionally informative." -- Timothy Noah, The New York Times Book Review
"The authors pepper firsthand anecdotes with extensive-and at times weighty-statistical and polling data...A timely study of a contemporary movement and its far-reaching effects on politics and policy." --Kirkus Reviews
"Readers interested in grassroots political organizations, the influence of outside interests on political parties, or the Tea Party itself, as well as those whose leanings fall elsewhere on the political spectrum will find this an eye-opening book." --Library Journal
"This is an indispensable guide to the Tea Party phenomenon, and also an excellent demonstration of the power of first-hand research to add a richness of understanding that survey results can't provide. By spending patient time with Tea Party activists around the country, Skocpol and Williamson have been able to create a far fuller picture of the Tea Party than we have had before." --Nicholas Lemann, Dean, and Henry R. Luce Professor of Journalism, Graduate School of Journalism, Columbia University
"This important book will draw fire from both the political left and right, for contrary to the denunciations of liberal commentators, the Tea Party is not a motley collection of racist crazies. And contrary to the praise of conservative commentators, the Tea Party is not a pure grass-roots citizens' movement. Skocpol and Williamson provide a much-needed dose of analysis that begins to balance out the polemics that dominate discussion of the Tea Party." --Morris P. Fiorina, Wendt Family Professor of Political Science, Stanford University
"Skocpol and Williamson have produced the richest, most nuanced portrait of the Tea Party since it burst onto the political scene in early 2009. Drawing on a wealth of observational, interview, survey, and web-based research, their analysis and presentation is both sympathetic with the participatory ethic of the Tea Partiers and critical of the way they have been used by conservative advocacy groups and press outlets to breed misinformation and shift the Republican agenda sharply to the right. A must-read book for the 2012 election season." --Thomas Mann, Brookings Institution, co-author of The Broken Branch: How Congress is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track
"An interesting look at an influential political movement." --Booklist
"[A] fine-grained nuance and thoughtfulness that resonates." -- Publishers Weekly
"Until three years ago, we knew the tea party as a long-ago event in Boston Harbor, aimed at a government across the Atlantic. In 2010, a new tea party stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific and was aimed directly at Washington. That event changed the Republican Party, the United States Congress, and the Obama presidency. This book delves deeply into what happened in 2010, why it happened, and what the Tea Party means for the future of American politics. It's a book every student of American politics should read." -Mickey Edwards, author of The Modern Conservative Movement
"...the best academic work on the Tea Party" - David Frum, The Daily Beast
"Skocpol and Williamson have provided us with an excellent roadmap to trace where it came from, where it has been, and where it might be going." --Contemporary Sociology
About the Author
Theda Skocpol is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University, a member of the National Academy of Sciences, and past president of the American Political Science Association.
Vanessa Williamson is a PhD candidate in Government and Social Policy at Harvard University. Previously, she served as the Policy Director for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; Updated edition (August 1, 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0190633662
- ISBN-13 : 978-0190633660
- Item Weight : 12.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 9.1 x 0.8 x 6.1 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,079,572 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #628 in Political Parties (Books)
- #1,358 in Democracy (Books)
- #2,204 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Theda Skocpol is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University, a member of the National Academy of Sciences, and past president of the American Political Science Association.

Vanessa Williamson is a PhD candidate in Government and Social Policy at Harvard University. Previously, she served as the Policy Director for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
That is, Tea Partiers are heavily dominated by Americans averaging around 60 years old, overwhelmingly white, who feel--by reason of their age and generation--that they are superior citizens (perhaps the last "real Americans") who deserve huge, big-government, tax-funded benefits through Social Security and Medicare... but that younger Americans as a whole are leeches undeserving of ANY public benefits such as college grants and health care. By their own views in polls and statements, Tea Partiers express appalling racist, anti-immigrant, and anti-youth prejudices characteristic of the pre-civil-rights era they moslty grew up in. Unfortunately, polls and surveys (which YouthFacts details, [...]) show the Tea Party represents the views of a majority of senior citizens who are angry, hostile, and unwilling or unable to adapt to modern America's racial diversification.
Every older generation since Hesiod (700 BC), and probably long before, has bitterly criticized its young. But the Tea Party and most aged Americans represent something new: elders who support ultra-reactionary policies and GOP candidates aimed at disowning younger America--their grandchildren's generation. That a wealth of social statistics show today's more diverse younger Americans have among the lowest rates of crime, violence, suicide, violent death, early pregnancy, dropout, and other ills (and richly deserve more, not slashed, investment) is ignored by Tea Partiers who only trust information derived from inside their own heads--that is, their impressions, feelings, fears, and narrow media that reinforce them. This is a scary book, all the more so because they authors were not out to do a hatchet job on the Tea Party, but let their research and TP's own views speak for themelves.
Writing about the Tea Party in this way does a great disservice to the book, the authors, and the Tea Party itself. The authors categorically fail to portray the Tea Party’s arguments and concerns in the best possible light before inspecting their arguments and placing them under scrutiny. Rather, Skocpol and Williamson routinely take an issue from the Tea Party platform, site an independent study to show that Tea Party members are outside of what the writers define as “normal” either directly or by insinuation, and then produce a quote from a fearful, misinformed, or under read Tea Party member. This is not how one produces an academic study on a rising and powerful political movement; this is how one sells books to people looking only to confirm their preconceived notions about one of the most powerful populist movements in the 21st century. A movement which has been consistently vilified by the political, intellectual and media left since they first won their first primary. As such, Williamson and Skocpol failed to “g[et] beyond stereotypes and preconceptions,” as they claimed was their mission statement in the introduction to the book. Instead they made half hearted attempts to do so before falling to the habit of using the interviews from the most extreme, radical, fearful and misinformed to sell books rather than using the interviews from the possibly boring, reasonable folks who make up a majority of the Tea Party.
That said, I thought this was an enthralling analysis and well researched book that gives us a well rounded background of the Tea Party as well as a fascinating picture of the growth and traction of movements in general; that is, the inception of the tea party movement and how momentum can be built and fueled (even fabricated?) by media and special interest groups-- as well as the role of democratic participation and political process that are intertwined as a result. Skocpol leaves us asking very thoughtful questions and the need for further research on the conundrum, which she asks--- on the one hand civic engagement and active participation in our political system is a good thing, but how good is it if it is driven by completely false assumptions and inciting propaganda? While Skocpol's leanings are pretty clear, the depiction of the genuine Tea Party folks were balanced, and felt myself able to better empathize with the well intentions of the movement, rather than the caricature impression I have always had.
My only criticism is that I only wish there was an epilogue of some sort, to have Skocpol's analysis on the aftermath of the 2012 election rather than end where it had ended.
Top reviews from other countries
The book examines the connection between conservative lobby groups, Fox News and the Tea Party. The usual conspiracy crowd will make much of this and see little else. But the authors make it clear that the Tea Party is a genuine grassroots movement, not simply a fabrication by Big Money. On the other hand, it is easier to sustain a movement with lots of money available and a TV network dedicated to your cause.
The demographic of Tea Party members can be described as older, whiter, more affluent, better educated (please lose the ignorant red-neck image) and more religious than other Americans. For a movement based on self-reliance and small government, is it surprising how many members depend on their social security payments. This is symbolized by the slogan, “Keep the governments hands off my Medicare,” but they actually do know where the money comes from. They distinguish between programs whose recipients (people like them) have earned the benefits from handouts to freeloaders (people not like them).
Tea Party is about preserving what they see as the greatness of America’s past. Its members have great reverence for the U.S. Constitution, giving it almost the same status as the Bible. They have transferred their Bible study techniques directly to the constitution. And like the Bible, they interpret it liberally (if you forgive the irony of using this word) according to their pre-conceptions, for example ignoring the separation between church and state. The authors point out that the Founding Fathers were mainly Deists, far from being fundamentalists, and Tea Party positions resemble those who fought against the constitution, and secessionists during the Civil War.
As individuals, Tea Party members are kind and considerate with those whom they personally encounter. But everyone else is subjected to crude stereotyping, including their own children who are seen as lazy and entitled. Unfortunately the Revealed Truth of their religion leads to absolute certainty about everything else, so they see no need to reach out and understand other viewpoints. Thus the people who do not trust government spend all their time trying to influence that same government, often to coerce the people they disagree with.
The Tea Party phenomenon strikes me as a right wing version of the 1960’s. There is the same insular self-righteousness attitude, while it is really our interests (as we pretend to care about the greater good) attitude, and even some of the same tactics. The authors report, “Indeed, some Tea Party members are explicit about borrowing from the left. A number of our interviewees cited the work of Saul Alinsky, the famed community organizer and author of Rules for Radicals.” The difference is the hippies believed in a fantasy future, while the Tea Party longs for an idealized past.
Read this book to understand the people who make up the Tea Party movement as decent, intelligent, well-motivated individuals. It is very difficult to shift the thinking of a group of people with mutually reinforcing beliefs. But the information in this book suggests that people can be reached on a personal basis, if approached with respect and a genuine attempt to understand where they are coming from.









