Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Tenured Radicals, Revised: How Politics has Corrupted our Higher Education Paperback – May 1, 1998
| Price | New from | Used from |
| Paperback, May 1, 1998 | $7.01 | — | $3.03 |
- Kindle
$14.20 Read with Our Free App - Paperback
$7.0117 Used from $3.03 1 Collectible from $19.24
- Print length266 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIvan R. Dee
- Publication dateMay 1, 1998
- Dimensions5.1 x 0.78 x 7.96 inches
- ISBN-101566631955
- ISBN-13978-1566631952
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchased | Lowest Pricein this set of products
The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed AmericaPaperback - Highest ratedin this set of products
Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Higher EducationHardcover
Editorial Reviews
Review
A bravado performance of critical journalism...vivid, amusing, dismaying. (Robert Alter Newsday )
All persons serious about education should see it. (Allan Bloom, author of The Closing of the American Mind )
A withering critique. (Jonathan Yardley Washington Post Book World )
Mr. Kimball names his enemies precisely...this book will breed fistfights. (The New York Times )
Product details
- Publisher : Ivan R. Dee; Revised edition (May 1, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 266 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1566631955
- ISBN-13 : 978-1566631952
- Item Weight : 8.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.1 x 0.78 x 7.96 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #9,850,376 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #11,615 in Adult & Continuing Education (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The subtitle, "How Politics Has Corrupted Our Higher Education", is to me a little misleading. Yes, liberal arts education in the United States has become highly politicized, which is a significant part of the problem. But the roots of the problem are deeper. They rest, at bottom, in a misguided renunciation of the notions of objectivity and truth; instead, everything is relative (although, ultimately, that is an impossible, self-contradictory position). Related to this development, and re-enforcing it, is a radical, totalitarian egalitarianism. In this brave new world of rampant relativity, not only are all ideas of equal worth and value, so too are all cultures and all individuals. (One can subscribe to the notion that all individuals are equal under the law or in the eyes of the Lord, but one is deluding himself if he thinks that all people are equally equipped and inclined to contribute to society in equal measures.)
Kimball makes these points, though in a somewhat roundabout fashion. He proceeds much like a counter-punching boxer. He raises a point of doctrine from one of the trendy schools of thought that have taken over the Academy -- deconstruction, post-structuralism, new historicism, or some other postmodernist variety of the "Left Eclecticism" -- and then he either mocks or refutes it, sometimes both. The book is not optimally organized. It tends to be somewhat scattershot. And it certainly is polemical, although it is less polemical and less tendentious than most of the academics whom Kimball criticizes. Plus, the polemical tone makes TENURED RADICALS more readable (just as the flamboyant rhetoric of those tenured radicals is what enchants many of their disciples).
The book could be better. (So, too, could the printing job by publisher Ivan R. Dee; there are a handful of rather glaring typos.) Two of the chapters (Three and Five) could be cut or skipped with no appreciable loss. Kimball is not always fair, but then neither are most of those whom he skewers. Nor is Kimball always convincing when he attempts to explain how the current sad state of affairs came about. Still, TENURED RADICALS is well worth reading, especially if you subscribe to, or are concerned about, any of the following movements or shibboleths:
* Multiculturalism;
* Contemporary pop culture is a proper, even a preferred, subject of college education; Plato, Shakespeare, and Kant, on the other hand, can and should be disregarded as DWEMs (dead white European males);
* Universities should effectuate social and political change;
* Politically correct speech codes;
* Race, class, and gender are important, perhaps the only, prisms for academic inquiry;
* Decisions on the constitution of university faculties -- as to hiring, promoting and granting tenure -- should be based more on ideological like-mindedness than intellectual vigor or scholarly accomplishment;
* Disinterested intellectual inquiry is an illusion, as is objectivity, as is truth;
* The indeterminacy of meaning;
* All reading is ideological;
* There are no facts, only interpretations (to which Kimball responds, "Is that a fact?");
* Choosing between Shakespeare and Jacqueline Susann is "no different from choosing between a hoagy and a pizza", to quote Houston A. Baker, Jr., who is the chief knave in TENURED RADICALS.
This attack began, oddly enough, in Plato's day as Plato had the good sense to recognize the seductive appeal of rhetoric and could reject it in favor of elevating the reality behind that rhetoric over the rhetoric itself. Kimball notes that over the next two millenia most philosophers have succeeded in avoiding this pitfall--at least until this century when Jacques Derrida began to unravel the meaning of meaning by imputing to it a foundation of relativism that says in essence that human beings can never "know" anything for certain because of unvoidable biases, prejudices, and ideologies. Kimball takes an interesting tack by structuring much of his book in the form of academic conferences in which he attends and by using his trusty tape recorder captures the very words and intonations of speakers who rail against the very jobs that pay them such lofty paychecks. Kimball is a very witty and funny writer. As these academic deans speak their deconstructionist jargon, Kimball will then translate into plain English. As he does so, he, like Dorothy in Oz, swoops away the linguistic curtain that hides speakers who literally exhibit a gross lack of the very essentials that they are expounding.
Kimball is aghast at the willingness of academia to abandon the canon of Great Books. He notes that it is bad enough to suggest that this canon be discarded but that it is infinitely worse to replace it with second and third rate works that are represented only because the authors fall into an acceptable mixture or racial, ethnic, and gender divisions. Kimball also plays devil's advocate by examining the defense of academia against charges that this radicalization of curricula has rendered our nation's humanities departments largely irrelevant. Their defense, he notes, usually takes the tack of a call for "diversity" when the overwhelming number of courses offered today are anything but.
In TENURED RADICALS, Roger Kimball is not optimistic that there will be any significant changes anytime soon. The philosophical mind rot has embedded itself too deeply. For those who still believe that there are still some universal sentiments worth learning, then this book is invaluable reading.



