Buy new:
$10.34$10.34
FREE delivery:
May 26 - 31
Ships from: SellerSisters Sold by: SellerSisters
Buy used: $9.50
Other Sellers on Amazon
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill Paperback – August 17, 2004
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Abridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Purchase options and add-ons
For four years, Jessica Stern interviewed extremist members of three religions around the world: Christians, Jews, and Muslims. Traveling extensively—to refugee camps in Lebanon, to religious schools in Pakistan, to prisons in Amman, Asqelon, and Pensacola—she discovered that the Islamic jihadi in the mountains of Pakistan and the Christian fundamentalist bomber in Oklahoma have much in common.
Based on her vast research, Stern lucidly explains how terrorist organizations are formed by opportunistic leaders who—using religion as both motivation and justification—recruit the disenfranchised. She depicts how moral fervor is transformed into sophisticated organizations that strive for money, power, and attention.
Jessica Stern's extensive interaction with the faces behind the terror provide unprecedented insight into acts of inexplicable horror, and enable her to suggest how terrorism can most effectively be countered.
A crucial book on terrorism, Terror in the Name of God is a brilliant and thought-provoking work.
- Print length400 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherEcco
- Publication dateAugust 17, 2004
- Dimensions5.31 x 0.9 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100060505338
- ISBN-13978-0060505332
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchasedin this set of products
Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary AmericaPaperback - Lowest Pricein this set of products
The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir PutinPaperback - Highest ratedin this set of products
Moment of Truth: The Nature of Catastrophes and How to Prepare for ThemPaperback
Editorial Reviews
From The New Yorker
Copyright © 2005 The New Yorker
Review
“A significant addition to a growing shelf of timely books on terrorism.” — Christian Science Monitor
“Stern’s firsthand encounters bring a valuable and much-needed perspective to the problem of religious violence.” — Publishers Weekly
“Timely and compelling.” — Booklist
“Wise and Thorough.” — Christopher Dickey, Newsweek
About the Author
Jessica Stern is a leading expert on terrorism and trauma. Stern is the coauthor with J. M. Berger of ISIS: The State of Terror and the author of Denial: A Memoir of Terror and Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill, selected by the New York Times as a notable book of the year. She has held fellowships awarded by the Guggenheim Foundation, the Erikson Institute, and the MacArthur Foundation. She was a Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellow, a national fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, and a fellow of the World Economic Forum. Stern is a research professor at Boston University. Prior to teaching, she worked in government, serving on President Clinton’s National Security Council Staff and as an analyst at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Product details
- Publisher : Ecco (August 17, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 400 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0060505338
- ISBN-13 : 978-0060505332
- Item Weight : 1 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.31 x 0.9 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #385,825 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #333 in Middle Eastern Politics
- #365 in Church & State Religious Studies
- #392 in Terrorism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Jessica Stern is one of the foremost experts on terrorism. She serves on the Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law. In 2009, she was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship for her work on trauma and violence. Jessica is a member of the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. She was named a Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellow, National Fellow at the Hoover Institution, fellow of the World Economic Forum, and a Harvard MacArthur Fellow.
She has authored TERROR IN THE NAME OF GOD: Why Religious Militants Kill, selected by the New York Times as a notable book of the year; THE ULTIMATE TERRORISTS; and numerous articles on terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. She served on President Clinton’s National Security Council Staff in 1994–95 (read a May 1995 letter and July 1995 letter from the President and this note from the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs expressing their gratitude for her work and contribution).
Jessica was included in Time magazine’s series profiling 100 people with bold ideas. The film, “The Peacemaker”, with Nicole Kidman and George Clooney, was based on a fictional version of Jessica’s work at the National Security Council. Her new book, DENIAL: A Memoir of Terror, is now available, published by Ecco, a HarperCollins imprint. She lives in Cambridge, MA.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I had a number of complaints with the book. First, the book is largely narrative. Stern spends a great deal of time narrating how her interviews were arranged, who set them up, her preparations for the interviews including what she wore and what gifts she brought along, where she stayed, what food she was served, the physical appearance of her interlocutors, their general demeanor, and the sights, sounds and smells of her surroundings. This was not what I was primarily interested in when I picked up this book. I was hoping for a book more heavily weighted toward theory rather than narrative.
Second, the excerpts of interviews that Stern provides are often quite short and superficial. In terms of informational content they did not seem to me to go beyond what you would get from reading the newspaper or watching cable news. According to the introduction, Stern was very interested in how religion, which is supposed to inspire people to do good (and often does), could also inspire people to do evil. We learn that members of terrorist groups do not believe they are committing evil. They generally have a narrative that justifies their behavior as defensive (defending unborn babies, defending Muslims against Israel, Christians, India or the West, etc.). But this is common knowledge. I don’t think it required a book or lengthy interviews to achieve this insight.
Third, the introduction to the section on terrorist organizations made me hopeful that the second half of the book would be more theoretical. Stern divides terrorist organizations into virtual networks, lone wolfs, command organizations and hybrids. She says that groups face trade-offs: virtual networks are harder to shut down because the cells are not as connected but they generally lack the capability to carry out really high impact attacks. I was disappointed to find that the second half of the book was basically the same as the first. Each chapter was simply a narrative, including some excerpts from interviews, but virtually nothing was said about the organizational features of the groups whose leaders she was interviewing, how they function or what trade-offs they face (with the exception of the final chapter on Al-Qaeda).
The book did provide some historical information that was interesting. I learned some things about Indonesian politics and I learned about the symbiotic relationship between the Pakistani intelligence services, the madrassahs and the jihadi organizations in Pakistan. However, when I purchased this book I had a number of questions I was interested in. What are the primary psychological motivations for terrorist behavior? What are the historical, social, economic, ideological and psychological causes for terrorist behavior? Which causes are most important in explaining terrorist behavior? Are “irrational” psychological motivations the most important variable in explaining terrorist behavior or are ideological factors (content of religious beliefs) more important or should we view terrorists as rational actors who adopt terrorism as a rational strategy in pursuit of specific ends?
The answers that this book provided did not seem to me to go beyond the level of folk psychology. On the basis of this book alone I would have to conclude that the field of terrorism studies has a long way to go before it reaches a genuine scientific understanding of what motivates terrorist behavior. Admittedly, it is not going to be an easy science to develop. It is difficult to get reliable data since we have to rely on the testimony of terrorists who are willing to talk to researchers, but who often lie during interviews and may not fully understand their own motives, and there are a lot of variables (psychological, social, political, economic, historical and ideological) to tease apart. Plus, the sciences that a field like this relies on for its background theories (psychology, sociology, economics, religious studies) are themselves still in their infancy and struggling to develop core theories that are scientifically reputable.
Perhaps at the moment providing a narrative understanding of terrorist behavior is the best we can do. This book was published in 2003, and I imagine our understanding of terrorism has developed since then, but based solely on this book I would have to conclude that terrorism studies as a discipline has not progressed much beyond arm-chair folk explanations. I was hoping for a bit more. I am going to be reading some more books on terrorism in the near future and if I come across any that I think do a better job answering some of the questions I had, and that motivated me to pick up this book in the first place, I will provide links to them here.
Recommended alternatives:
Added 2/10/17: I just finished reading Understanding Terror Networks by Marc Sageman. It provides a network analysis of the global Salafi jihad, including a brief history of the movement and an analysis of its structure. It has a lot of good information about the global Salafi jihad and Sageman also comes to some interesting conclusions. For example, Sageman concludes that social bonds are more important than ideology in explaining an individual's decision to join the global Salafi jihad (and he points out that lone individuals almost never join on their own, people usually join as part of a clique). It was not the most exciting reading, and it did not fulfill all of my expectations, but I would definitely recommend it.
Added 8/13/2017: An excellent book on suicide terrorism in particular is Robert Pape's book Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism . Pape compiled a database of every known suicide terrorist attack and had a team of researchers gather, analyze and breakdown the data. His primary thesis is that the vast majority of suicide terrorist attacks - which are the most deadly form of terrorist attack - are carried out, not by lone wolfs, but in organized campaigns that are based on nationalist goals of self-determination. Foreign military occupation, not religious ideology, turns out to be the biggest risk factor for suicide terrorism. Pape backs up his arguments with a wealth of data and illuminating charts. Highly, highly recommended.
More work is needed to understand why fundamentalism is so resurgent in the modern era, but this book introduces you to the soldiers, some fresh from the battlefields of their so-called holy wars. Here in their own words is the chilling response to the question of the masses when these atrocities occur: Why?
Also worthy: Richard Rhodes, 'Why They Kill' (A study of murderers based on interviews); Robert Pape, 'Dying to Win' (the strategy of terrorism).
Top reviews from other countries
Investigating an attack on the CIA and asking whether the attack was a jihad, she receives the answer: "No. This was a religious duty. But not jihad. I am not sure whether God will reward me for what I did." (P 176) With answers such as this, usually delivered by seemingly rational people, probably over coffee, it is a inner-world which puzzles, frightens and alienates most people. During four years of its preparation, Stern penetrates deeply this world in this well-researched and carefully organised book. In addition to the interviews, she builds the scene carefully, creating the atmospheres in which the interviews were conducted, atmospheres which would have frightened most people. Not Stern. She pursues her quarry with intellectual and physical vigour. As an American (she lectures at Harvard), she considers much of her evidence from that standpoint, e.g. "In Egypt, Pakistan, Palestine, the Persian Gulf, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Indonesia and increasingly, Africa, a virulent anti-Americanism is gaining ground." (P 286) This edition is a 2003 investigation re-published, with additions and alterations, in 2004. A great deal has happened since then, much of which vindicates her conclusions.
The book is organised into two, each with five sub-divided sections: Part One - Grievances That Give Rise to Holy War, Part Two - Holy War Organisations, ending with recommendations and 80 pages of notes and an index.
This was a brave venture for an academic to undertake, suggesting that relationships were not as complicated in 2003, e.g. for a western lady to travel throughout the Middle East investigating fundamentalism. Having read it, I was still uncertain about my thoughts on fundamentalism and, despite all the interviews and the evidence, I did not understand it any better. (It is not my first book on this subject.)
However, I am pleased I read it and would recommend it to anyone trying to understand fundamentalist terrorism and what can be done by Governments to make their people safer. One worrying conclusion I reached is that the "war on terror" will be no conventional war and that, ultimately, unless our intelligence services are very effective, there is little we can do apart from constant vigilance and, of course, re-education.
Review edited and previous incorrect dates corrected 10/8/2013











