Hill Climb Racing 2 Industrial Deals Beauty Little FIres Everywhere STEM nav_sap_hiltonhonors_launch Learn more about Amazon Music Unlimited Get 10% cashback on thousands of musical instruments with your Amazon.com Store Credit Card Starting at $39.99 Grocery Handmade Tote Bags Home Gift Guide Off to College Home Gift Guide Book a house cleaner for 2 or more hours on Amazon Transparent Transparent Transparent  Introducing Echo Show Introducing All-New Fire HD 10 with Alexa hands-free $149.99 Kindle Oasis, unlike any Kindle you've ever held GNO Tailgating ToyHW17_gno

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Showing 1-9 of 9 reviews(Verified Purchases). See all 18 reviews
on March 23, 2015
A really fantastic account of the effort to put a price on carbon up through the Copenhagen summit in 2009. Pooley is hardly an objective observer -- he's a clear cheerleader for the climate change movement. That said, he has a really solid grasp on the players and the substance of the issues. He's not shy about his affection for Fred Krupp and the team at EDF, which warps his perspective mildly -- rarely does he view any of EDF's actions as ill-advised. One of the book's strengths is how far it reaches into the past -- the detail around the acid rain cap is essential to telling this story, and Pooley does it well. If you like helpful detail in your political procedurals, you'll like this one -- most books will just tell you that "Waxman finally cut a deal." The book shows and tells: "Waxman finally cut a deal, based around a compromise that...."
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 10, 2010
If you're interested in climate change and climate policy, and if you have a laser-beam focus on the United States context and limited interest in what transpires outside, Eric Pooley's book is a must-read. It's not perfect - it is a joirnalist's account, not a historian's, and thus has a few too many magazine-profile-esque potted biographies; it is also very much focussed on the activities of the main sources who cooperated with Pooley. If you're a climate sceptic, or a red-blooded enviro who disdains compromise with markets and corporations, you will bristle at Pooley's point of view, which is pro-climate action, pro-market and pragmatic, and entirely overt. There's really no picture of what was happening outside the US - international meetings are described only in terms of other countries' responses to US action and inaction - but as an account of the long and unfinished road to US climate legislation this is an entirely essential book.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 8, 2013
This short review does not do this book justice; The other positive reviews say it well. This is a riveting (and yes, long and detailed) book about the history of the effort to get (as well as to stop) climate laws from being enacted in the US. The book covers in detail players from all sides as well other related subjects. It spends a lot of time following (relating the history and the efforts of) the Environmental Defense Fund (where Pooley went to work about a year or so after finishing this book) and about Fred Krupp, it's longtime leader. Highly recommended!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on November 19, 2014
Terrific book. Incredible research. How Pooley was able collect such a treasure trove of insights into the origins of the climate battle is mind boggling. This is a must read for anyone interested in global warming and the way forward.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on July 11, 2010
Pooley has done an excellent job of researching in great detail most of the principal participants in the political war to save the planet. Besides describing Al Gore's extensive Alliance for Climate Protection, EDF's Fred Krupp, NRDC, and Jim Rogers - CEO of Duke Energy, one of the largest coal electric utilities - but still a true believer in climate change, and their USCAP group which worked out the only realistic way forward for the US on climate with the Waxman-Markley cap-and-trade bill that gives huge free offset donations to coal companies mainly to reduce the shock to their customers of higher electric bills, but also to support carbon capture for "clean" coal, Pooley also describes the many groups in opposition to this bill, not only from the Republican right, but also from environmental groups on the left like Greenpeace, and the Sierra Club which opposed the many large donnations to the coal utilities. He also describes the many underhanded techniques used by the skeptics or "Denialosphere" which included cherry picking from scientific reports - reporting only facts supporting their arguments, scare tactics about ultra high electric rates and loosing our standard of living - most of which were outright lies!

Pooley also describes melting arctic tundra which is releasing methane that is twenty times more potent than CO2!!

Most important, he points out that this war is not over yet, and many more concerned citizens must get involved. This book was published before the Deep Horizon BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. Many more of us should use that as an even more compelling reason to move away from coal and petrochemicals and toward many more US jobs with clean renewable energy in the future.
0Comment| 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on July 2, 2010
Whether you're new to environmental policy, or old hat, Climate War provides an excellent history of the political struggles over climate change from the 60s and 70s through today. Whereas many authors feel the need to re-explain and re-interpret the science behind climate change, Eric Pooley presumes the reader's familiarity, and cuts directly to the narrative - describing climate's rocky road as a wedge issue and political eight ball as public opinion has been manipulated over the decades.

The only thing that has become more certain over time is the science behind climate change. Pooley's writing offers a nuanced and multifaceted read on the policy and public relations strategy. This writing will only become more important now, as the political branches, polarized news media, corporations, and general public gear up for another ridiculously theatrical fight over climate policy. Perhaps most useful is Pooley's historiography on the practice from environmental economics known as Cap and Trade. Pooley shows how Cap and Trade has been used in the past to resolve battles over acid rain, and lets some of the hot air out of the arguments of some on the right who suggest that C&T is a tax (it's not) and that it is designed to singlehandedly destroy the economy (the exact opposite is true).

The book does a great job of recognizing climate change as a truly non-partisan issue. Pooley gives time to the failures and successes of both Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, lefty environmentalists and righty libertarians. Pooley makes heroes of those who seek to reconcile views, and base solutions on strong science and economics. The only villains in this story are those "Deniers," fundamentalists who, like those who denied the link between tobacco and cancer, have failed to present a logically or scientifically consistent point of view, and instead, have manipulated public opinion to block progress at any cost.
11 comment| 33 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on July 13, 2010
For those who have been on the fringes of the climate battle now for two decades, or for those who will become involved as it continues to unfold in the coming decades, this is must reading. Pooley takes you behind the scenes at critical meetings and events, and shows why this issue has become so contentious and difficult for the U.S. political system to address.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 28, 2010
Wonky, wonky, wonky. If you are a policy wonk, you will love this book. If you follow the politics of global warming and are not a climate "skeptic", you will love this book. If you listen to National Public Radio, follow politics, and think the political process is interesting, you will probably love this book. If you are a climate change "skeptic", why bother reading this book? You'll probably disagree with the author about 90 percent of the time, and then think you've wasted your money.

The title of the book is a little misleading. The book really doesn't go back very far in "the climate war", only covers the United States, and covers very little of the rest of the world. The title of the book should have been "How the 2009 American Climate Bill was Defeated". That's what the whole book is about. As such, it is a bit depressing for those of us who think something should be done at the national level to reduce greenhouse gas emissions sooner rather than later. Admittedly, when the author started writing the book, he thought it would have a different ending, one in which a meaningful climate bill was successfully passed. However, because no such bill looks feasible currently (2010); the effect of reading the book is to be reminded just how powerful the coal and petrochemical industries really are. I sincerely hope this last statement becomes out-dated soon.

The book gets a maximum 5 of 5 stars for its depth and effort, and from what I can tell, extreme accuracy and fair reporting of climate change politics in America. Having said that, it's not perfect.

A few of the book's limitations:
1) The author does not touch upon the science of global warming, he assumes anybody reading the book is probably familiar with the basic science behind human-caused warming. The author is not a global warming skeptic, although he doesn't appear to be in the "imminent extinction of humanity" camp either.

2) The author writes about the U.S. as if it were the center of the world.

3) Although the author writes extensively on cap and trade, he doesn't actually do a very good job of explaining what it is. A nice graphic would have helped - cap and trade is actually a nuanced and not very inherently obvious concept for those new to it - I believe the author is so immersed in cap and trade politics, he forgot that the average person really does not understand the concept of cap and trade.

4) The author appears to believe that nothing bad should ever happen to the all-mighty corporate business interests, whether or not they are destroying human health or a livable environment. (He's quite an apologist for maintaining existing business practices so that no economic disruption occurs.)

Perhaps the biggest question I have about the author is whether or not he really believes carbon capture and sequestration (storage) is feasible. The author appears to endorse that coal-burning power plants can actually reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by successfully capturing the carbon dioxide, then transporting it and storing it underground or under the ocean, where it is safely kept out of the atmosphere. Unfortunately, carbon capture and storage is the most cynical, manipulative, false "solution" to reducing greenhouse gas emissions that exists today. The coal industry wants you to believe in "clean coal", which simply does not exist and cannot exist with current technology. The reason why "clean coal" is mentioned by industry is to lull people into a false sense of security that there is "a solution". However, anybody who has spent more than one hour researching feasibility of carbon capture and storage will tell you that it's just not going to happen in the next 50 years. Anybody telling you something differently is trying to sell you a bill of goods. I'm not exaggerating, just do your own research.

If "clean coal" will not exist, then instead of complaining, I would suggest the U.S. Senate and Congress to get serious about reducing greenhouse gases by requiring mandatory energy efficient buildings, and passing a minimum gas mileage of 70 mpg by the year 2020 vehicle model year (not as difficult as it sounds). Further, coal power plants can be replaced by power plants operating on natural gas, wind, solar, and nuclear (gotcha on that one, maybe). Even painting roofs white can cut down dramatically on air-conditioning in the summer - ever wonder why they whitewashed the houses in hot Mediterranean villages?

I suppose my main criticism of the book is that Mr. Poole seems to fervently believe in the power of the free market to solve problems, even global warming. However, this almost religious and blind belief in capitalism is what got the world into the environmental mess we are in. I suggest "more of the same" will not get us out of the hole we've dug ourselves into. Perhaps more intelligent planning will get us out of the hot state of affairs we are in.
0Comment| 16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 15, 2017
Awful book on liberal climate agenda. Stay away!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse