Hill Climb Racing 2 Industrial Deals Beauty Best Books of the Month Shop new men's suiting nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Learn more about Amazon Music Unlimited PCB for Musical Instruments Starting at $39.99 Grocery Handmade Tote Bags Book a house cleaner for 2 or more hours on Amazon Transparent Transparent Transparent  Introducing Echo Show Introducing All-New Fire HD 10 with Alexa hands-free $149.99 Kindle Oasis, unlike any Kindle you've ever held Trade in. Get paid. Go shopping. Tailgating ToyHW17_gno



There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Showing 1-10 of 19 reviews(Verified Purchases). See all 42 reviews
on April 19, 2015
A massive undertaking to both write and to read, this work is at once a personality sketch, a social satire, a philosophical exposition and a story of some personal odyssey. It is all of the above, not always successful in all manners at any given time, but ultimately successful in each manner to a good extent through much of the work.
It is by far easiest to talk of the odyssey of Ulrich the protagonist, himself battered to and fro through various situations on his way to some destiny. He is not meant to be some clever and successful Ulysses seeking his Penelope, but is a traveler of uncertain direction and goal. He has many characters to deal with along the way that others may discuss and of which I will not generally speak further. Plot is not a strong suit of this novel so much as intrigue, argumentation and debate and inconsistency.
The Social Satire is quite worthy of comparison with those of Jane Austen at more personal levels, Cervantes on dualistic argumentation with Ukrich opposed to a noble, his sister, his cousin, a general, his best friend and even the daughter of a stock broker friend and her friends in terms that reflect the debates between a Quijote and his Sancho Panza. Ever an idealist, if often quite inconsistently so-even within some paragraphs and in response to the same partner-Ulrich makes impractical and often nebulous arguments, many far from valid, but rather often trailing off with a loss of substantially.
I see the Vienna of this work, and the other Austrian locale of the Third Part (2nd Volume of this set) as a social metaphor for the idea of Scientific understanding of its day. Try to follow me here, please!
Substance of matter had become first Atomic, then Relativistic and even was becoming Quantum. At each turn, reality was becoming less fixed, particle versus wave, solid versus probabilistic and mass versus energy or maybe both. Such seems to be the Vienna of Ulrich as well.
It is not that Ulrich or his compatriots do not have goals, intentions or paths, but that they are the manner of chimeric, changing from one moment to another based upon some background. Motives and objects for almost everybody here have lost materiality. A planned celebration for the 70th Anniversary of the Emperor is a central task of the book's middle part and moves this way and that to no clear solution. Nobody really has the foggiest idea of what to do with this and all propose continuing tasks that administratively proceed almost nowhere of any certain direction. Meanwhile, a prominent task is to further one's position within the pecking order of the committee or to further the position of one's parties (Arnheim, the General Stumm and others). The one party who wants no part in the whole business, Ulrich himself, is found to be the most essential by most all of the characters to either use as a means of getting information, advancement or bracing for some vague sensation of being overwhelmed (count Leinsdorf). It is truly hysterical that Ulrich gets more extricated in the events as he tries to separate himself from it and even brings his nymphomaniac occasional lover into the mix in her aim of trying to secure her own aims.
As the novel moves along, or alternatively gets bogged down in philosophy, often both at the same time, one realizes that everything for most everybody involved is in total flux. It is as if Ethics are present in a Quantum Ethics sense, any path from A to B can and is often sought in turn and without precedence to others. Things move along not as they should, but as they will, almost at random.
A significant exception here, also in its own hysterical sense is that of Moosbrugger, an outsider to the plot who is an intellectually-deprived, violent criminal with multiple past crimes and a recent murder. He is a part of the concerns of some characters, though peripheral to the action. He is not clearly in control of his actions, but he is yet the only character capable of decisive action! It is as if the very notion of decisive action in this society has become both criminal and psychiatrically pathological!
I have maybe given away some of the business of the novel here, but I feel that it is a social commentary, which while may be controversial in its statement here, is a major subtlety in understanding Musil's work.
As a Scientist, even having written on Mach's work, and with Ulrich as a Mathematical and Scientific mind, it is rather reasonable to assume that Musil was able to see his Society in the metaphorical context of the various ways that Science was seeing much of the World about it. As most people are neither conversant in regards to those ideas of Mach, Einstein or Schroedinger; there is some likelihood that they might have difficulty appreciating a similarly complex and ever-morphing business of how life and it's actions are to be viewed. It may not have the linguistic complexities of Finnegan's Wake, but it is nonetheless rather imposing in its own self-extricated foundation. It is far from surprising that Musil could not easily formulate some conclusion to this work. He may have had Nazi persecution as a problem, but even without that, how is one to define some end to a rather indecisive take on who we are and where we are going? Ulrich is not meant to achieve the end of his odyssey; it can have no end as it has no boundaries.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 26, 2016
Musil identifies essentialism with a society suffocating within its past regime. The characters are diverse bringing a dichotomy based opinion. Musil gives depth and attention to detail that allows the reader to read then evaluate.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 14, 2017
It is great but tough sledding for a non-intellectual like me.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on November 17, 2013
Musil's writing has the quality of originality that one finds only in the very best writers. His language is compelling, his ideas completely free of cant and cliche. I'm hooked.
0Comment| 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on January 8, 2017
You need this book!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 8, 2015
Amazing novel.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 30, 2015
Big ideas, boldly and beautifully written.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on August 18, 2014
A little to cerebral for my pedestrian tastes. Well written - but a tiring labyrinth...
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on October 29, 2013
The writing is superb, the ideas universal, the story compelling. Highly recommended for anyone interested in great literature. Better than Proust.
0Comment| 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on October 1, 2015
Though widely regarded by literary critics as one of the giants of twentieth century literature, the Austrian writer Robert Musil remains relatively little known in this country. The two lengthy volumes of “The Man Without Qualities”, his magnum opus, appeared in German in the early 1930’s but were not published in English until 1953. He was at work on a third volume when he died in Switzerland in 1942 at the age of 61.

Set in culturally teeming pre-World War I Vienna, surrounded by an ancient but troubled and restless empire, the novel revolves around the life and thoughts of one Ulrich, a sarcastic observer of the decadent aristocratic set within which he moves. This is essentially a novel of ideas, and as such is far from an easy work to read. The limitless cultural and philosophical reflection is held together by only a thin and rambling narrative. But aphorisms abound the pondering and contemplation are often provocative and occasionally brilliant. Sample:
“If [someone] is told that something is the way it is, then he thinks: Well it could probably just as easily be some other way. So the sense of possibility …[is]….to attach no more importance to what is than to what is not.”

I remained enthralled despite the philosophical headwinds and continued through most of Volume One. Given sufficient energy, I intend to return to it and Volume Two after a period of rest.

Footnote: It has been said that a translation, like a mistress, can be faithful, or beautiful, but not both. The prose in this translation is often awkward and lumpy. I assume, therefore that it is faithful.
0Comment| 12 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse