- Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account
Follow the Author
OK
The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science- and Reality Hardcover – Download: Adobe Reader, April 1, 2012
|
Chris Mooney
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$9.99 | $14.81 |
-
Print length336 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherWiley
-
Publication dateApril 1, 2012
-
Dimensions6.46 x 1.17 x 9.31 inches
-
ISBN-101118094514
-
ISBN-13978-1118094518
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Sign up now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
The Republican War on SciencePaperback
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and ReligionPaperback
Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our FuturePaperback
It Was All a Lie: How the Republican Party Became Donald TrumpHardcover
The Closing of the Liberal Mind: How Groupthink and Intolerance Define the LeftPaperback
The War on Science: Who's Waging It, Why It Matters, What We Can Do About ItPaperback
Products related to this item
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Republican War on Science by Mooney, Chris (2005) HardcoverHardcover
Authoritarian Nightmare: Trump and His FollowersHardcover
It Was All a Lie: How the Republican Party Became Donald TrumpHardcover
The Founding Myth: Why Christian Nationalism Is Un-AmericanHardcover
Donald Trump v. The United States: Inside the Struggle to Stop a PresidentHardcover
The Closing of the Liberal Mind: How Groupthink and Intolerance Define the LeftHardcover
Special offers and product promotions
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Inside Flap
Part of the answer lies with motivated reasoning—the psychological phenomenon of preferring only evidence that backs up your belief—but in The Republican Brain, Mooney explains that is just the tip of the cognitive iceberg. There is a growing body of evidence that conservatives and liberals don't just have differing ideologies; they have different psychologies. How could the rejection of mainstream science be growing among Republicans, along with the denial of expert consensus on the economy, American history, foreign policy, and much more? Why won't Republicans accept things that most experts agree on? Why are they constantly fighting against the facts? Increasingly, the answer appears to be: it's just part of who they are.
Mooney explores brain scans, polls, and psychology experiments to explain why conservatives today believe more wrong things; appear more likely than Democrats to oppose new ideas; are less likely to change their beliefs in the face of new facts; and sometimes respond to compelling evidence by doubling down on their current beliefs.
The answer begins with some measurable personality traits that strongly correspond with political preferences. For instance, people more wedded to certainty tend to become conservatives; people craving novelty, liberals. Surprisingly, openness to new experiences and fastidiousness are better predictors of political preference than income or education. If you like to keep your house neat and see the world in a relatively black and white way, you're probably going to vote Republican. If you've recently moved to a big city to see what else life has to offer, you're probably going to vote Democrat. These basic differences in openness and curiosity, Mooney argues, fuel an "expertise gap" between left and right that explains much of the battle today over what is true.
Being a good liberal, Mooney also has to explore the implications of these findings for Democrats as well. Are they really wishy-washy flip-floppers? Well, sometimes. Can't they be just as dogmatic about issues close to their hearts, like autism and vaccines, or nuclear power? His research leads to some surprising conclusions.
While the evolutionary advantages of both liberal and conservative psychologies seem obvious, clashes between them in modern life have led to a crisis in our politics. A significant chunk of the electorate, it seems, will never accept the facts as they are, no matter how strong the evidence. Understanding the psychology of the left and the right, Mooney argues, should therefore fundamentally alter the way we approach the he-said-he-said of public debates.
Certain to spark discussion and debate, The Republican Brain also promises to add to the lengthy list of persuasive scientific findings that Republicans reject and deny.
From the Back Cover
"Nothing short of a landmark in contemporary political reporting."
—Salon.com
"Mooney has bravely tackled a gigantic and complex topic."
—The Washington Post
"The Republican War on Science does score some major hits when it takes on ideological campaigns against embryonic stem cell research and for intelligent design."
—The New York Sun
"Mooney's very readable, and understandably partisan, volume is the first to put the whole story, thoroughly documented, in one place."
—Publishers Weekly (starred review)
"Addresses a vitally important topic and gets it basically right."
—The New York Times
"Chris Mooney [is] one of the few journalists in the country who specialize in the now dangerous intersection of science and politics. His book is a well-researched, closely argued, and amply referenced indictment of the right wing's assault on science and scientists. In almost every instance, Republican leaders have branded the scientific mainstream as purveyors of 'junk science' and dubbed an extremist viewpoint—always at the end of the spectrum favoring big business or the religious Right—'sound science.' Rightists argue that the consensus itself is flawed. Then they encourage a debate between the consensus and the extremist naysayers, giving the two apparently equal weight. Thus, Mooney argues, it seems reasonable to split the difference or simply to argue that there is too much uncertainty to, say, ban a suspect chemical or fund a controversial form of research."
—Scientific American
"A careful reading of this well-researched and richly referenced work should remove any doubt that, at the highest levels of government, ideology is being advanced in the name of science, at great disservice to the American people."
—Neal Lane, former Director, National Science Foundation
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Wiley; 1st edition (April 1, 2012)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1118094514
- ISBN-13 : 978-1118094518
- Item Weight : 1.23 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.46 x 1.17 x 9.31 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#236,793 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #221 in Political Parties (Books)
- #576 in Ecology (Books)
- #892 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As Mooney stresses, Liberals need to stop assuming that conservatives are just ignorant or misinformed, and that if they (the conservatives) are just presented with correct information and the supporting evidence, they will change their minds. He does correctly note that liberals and conservatives process information differently, as supported by sociological and psychological studies, but the studies he applies to conservatives also applies to liberals. In my experience many conservatives were once liberals, thus know the other side because they were once on that side, but few liberals have much direct favorable knowledge of the other side. This is especially true of the evolution worldview. I have read much of what Mooney wrote about science and creationism and it is clear he had read little on the other side. This is obvious when he makes the following irresponsible claim: “conservatives have placed themselves in direct conflict with modern scientific knowledge, which shows beyond serious question that global warming is real and caused by humans, and evolution is real and the cause of humans. If you don’ accept either claim, you cannot possibly understand the world or our place in it” (p. 7) Mooney has obviously not read very much, if any, of the enormous literature on the other side. This problem is documented in the books Silencing the Darwin Skeptics and Censoring the Darwin Skeptics, both on Amazon.
The standard belief among the far left is that our political gridlock is caused by big-business and money. The current villains are the Koch brothers, Sheldon Adelson, and Monsanto. The author's previous book adhered to that belief. This book examines the role of Right-Wing Authoritarian Motivated Reasoning in politics. He is forthright in stating his political views and acknowledges that Neuroscience is a new discipline with insights that are tentative but have not yet reached the status of widespread acceptance by the scientific community.
Others have outlined the book's topics. My 4-star rating is based on the following small issues:
1. The author uses concept of System 1 and System 2 thinking without attribution. "Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman is the seminal work in this field. Published in October, 2011, Mooney may have missed the book, but this lapse bothered me.
2. End Notes don't link easily to the Kindle edition text.
The Closing of the Liberal Mind has an excellent review of the history of the whole concept of “liberal” starting with the French Revolution, and only starts to lay on some questionable right wing ideology midway through chapter 3. If you are discerning enough to see through the very types of bias the author is arguing against (like George W Bush’s falsehoods after 9/11 being largely a liberal phenomena, like the “sexual revolution” being portrayed via Woodstock hippies rather than Comstock Law and pre contraception pill sexual repression) – the book’s historical review, and lists of who stood on which side of which interpretation of “liberal” is hard to find anywhere else.
The Republican Brain takes a different tack and reviews modern psychology and neuroscience for why people tend to think and act as they do. One good thing about Republicans: they tend to keep their lawns and yards neater than Democrats (and therefore for me – make better neighbors). As in “The Closing of the Liberal Mind” – you have to dismiss a few things (like the case against capital punishment for murders as being a “bias”), but overall (for me) I found it had fewer things to dismiss than “Closing of the Liberal Mind”.
Finally – if you want to try to mediate between the two explanations of moderate to hard core ideology – try Charles Murray’s “Coming Apart”. Take the test in chapter 4 to find out what shapes your world view.
Top reviews from other countries
The science of why they deny science is all too clear.
Required reading for anybody with a brain.
While the topics are few, they are powerful and should lead all political extremes to a greater understanding of why such a great divide exists between us. Liberalism attracts and maintains persons who are not only far more curious than their conservative brothers but are also more easily swayed if the data shows that their initial conclusions are not exact. Conservatism, on the other hand, attracts persons who are more single minded and, being so, present themselves in a more self-assured manner. Or more easily stated; liberals seek out data and from that develop a conclusion whereas conservatives develop a conclusion based on scant data and then, in turn, seek out data that will confirm this original stance. The 'whys' of this dynamic most certainly are not well defined at this point but lean towards a combination of both nature and nurture. Physiology and psychosocial development both enter into the molding of this part of one's personality.
The author, on the other hand, offers a style of writing that is very distracting. He continually inserted comments about how a topic will be dealt with in a latter chapter. That served as nothing more than an annoying diversion and distraction from what he was trying to explain at the time. Secondly, there is a great amount of repetition and `pulp-filler' that made the text a highly tiresome read at times. The basic conclusion of this text was repeated ad nauseum throughout. "We heard you the first time! We really did!" If his rambling wordiness was in fact totally eliminated the topics that were actually discussed could have been presented in less than 100 pages. But, I guess you cannot sell a book that is that small but, maybe again, that was the purpose for the wordiness to begin with. More money is made selling books than simply distributing pamphlets.......
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
The Republican War on SciencePaperback
Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous ManMary L. Trump Ph.D.Hardcover
On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth CenturyPaperback
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and ReligionPaperback
The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American PoliticsHardcover
SupplyAID RRS-KN95-5PK KN95 Protective Mask, Protection Against PM2.5 Dust. Pollen and Haze-Proof, 5 Pack
There's a problem loading this menu right now.

