Buy new:
$5.00
This item cannot be shipped to your selected delivery location. Please choose a different delivery location.
Only 20 left in stock - order soon.
$$5.00 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$5.00
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
This item cannot be shipped to your selected delivery location. Please choose a different delivery location.
Ships from
College-Books-Direct
Ships from
College-Books-Direct
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Returnable Yes
Resolutions Eligible for refund or replacement
Return Window 30 days from delivery
Refund Timelines Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here.
Late fee A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’.
Restocking fee A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to seller error. See details here.
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Returnable Yes
Resolutions Eligible for refund or replacement
Return Window 30 days from delivery
Refund Timelines Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here.
Late fee A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’.
Restocking fee A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to seller error. See details here.

Return instructions

Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information.
Read full return policy
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other sellers on Amazon
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Rightful Place of Science: Disasters and Climate Change Paperback – November 13, 2014

4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars 50 ratings

There is a newer edition of this item:

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$5.00","priceAmount":5.00,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"5","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"00","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"EtuNWea1u6Uf1VT%2FmKdXtfO33SUknC6xA1UNEFX717T9c49mFI8UuyeONnw0NiEzIIsJMhEFU8qGQzGxYTgtXYEqPRDb3nk4NV44y19ZkZxXqC%2F4JlbvpD%2FK1T126%2BWOPIZ8tZ0mXMQ%2BOTuQkgDGpHIIJNqjDRBwf9gM40ECLIqcWa36se3Wcg%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

In recent years the media, politicians, and activists have popularized the notion that climate change has made disasters worse. But what does the science actually say? Roger Pielke, Jr. takes a close look at the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the underlying scientific research, and the data to give you the latest science on disasters and climate change. What he finds may surprise you and raise questions about the role of science in political debates.

The Rightful Place of Science is a book series published by Arizona State University's Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, and edited by G. Pascal Zachary. The series explores the complex interactions among science, technology, politics, and the human condition.

Editorial Reviews

Review

Despite mounting evidence to the contrary, the conviction that climate change is already increasing weather-related natural disaster losses is strengthening. In Disasters and Climate Change, Roger Pielke, Jr. lays out the evidence with his usual cogency and invites readers to come to their own conclusions. A valuable and timely contribution. --Prof. John McAneney, Managing Director, Risk Frontiers, Macquarie University

While Roger Pielke, Jr. and I hold quite different views on the policy implications of climate change, we are in agreement that the public is not well served by the politicization of climate science or by excessive emphasis on the role of global warming as a contributor to today's weather disasters. I found his short volume on these topics to be highly informative, engaging, and thought provoking. --Prof. John Michael Wallace, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington

Roger Pielke, Jr.'s book shines a welcome beacon of light on the science of climate change and extreme weather events. Whilst underlining the importance of human-caused climate change, he argues forcibly, in agreement with the IPCC, that such changes in climate cannot be seen as increasing the intensity and frequency of hydro-meteorological disasters, and thus damage related to extreme events. A thought-provoking read! --Dr. Peter J. Webster, President, Atmospheric Section: American Geophysical Union and Professor, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology

About the Author

Roger Pielke, Jr. has been on the faculty of the University of Colorado since 2001 and is a Professor in the Environmental Studies Program and a Fellow of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES). At CIRES, Roger served as the Director of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research from 2001-2007. Roger's research focuses on the intersection of science and technology and decision making. In 2006 Roger received the Eduard Brückner Prize in Munich, Germany for outstanding achievement in interdisciplinary climate research. Before joining the University of Colorado, from 1993-2001 Roger was a Scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Roger is a Senior Fellow of the Breakthrough Institute. He is also author, co-author or co-editor of seven books, including The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, published by Cambridge University Press in 2007. His most recent book is The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell you About Global Warming (September, 2010, Basic Books).

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Consortium for Science, Policy, & Outcomes (November 13, 2014)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 124 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0692297510
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0692297513
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 12.6 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5 x 0.28 x 8 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars 50 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Roger A. Pielke
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Roger A. Pielke, Jr. has been on the faculty of the University of Colorado since 2001 and is a Professor in the Environmental Studies Program and a Fellow of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES). At CIRES, Roger served as the Director of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research from 2001-2007. Roger's research focuses on the intersection of science and technology and decision making. In 2006 Roger received the Eduard Brückner Prize in Munich, Germany for outstanding achievement in interdisciplinary climate research. Before joining the University of Colorado, from 1993-2001 Roger was a Scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Roger is a Senior Fellow of the Breakthrough Institute. He is also author, co-author or co-editor of seven books, including The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics published by Cambridge University Press in 2007. His most recent book is The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell you About Global Warming (September, 2010, Basic Books).

Customer reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
50 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the book has good information and a well-written review of an important question.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more
7 customers mention "Content"7 positive0 negative

Customers find the book has good information, providing lots of support to the thesis. They also say the book provides plenty of evidence from many recorded interviews.

"...The main meat of the book provides plenty of evidence from many recorded and referenced sources to support its negative answer to its main..." Read more

"read this book for a class, but it had some good information in it." Read more

"...It also provides an interesting examination of what happens when you put forward the majority view in an area where the science is contested...." Read more

"...Purple does a great job at staying on the point and providing lots of support to his thesis." Read more

7 customers mention "Writing style"7 positive0 negative

Customers find the writing style well-written and crisp. They also describe the book as an excellent, short, and crisp book on climate change.

"This is a well written short review of an important question...." Read more

"...It's an excellent, short, crisp book on climate change that describes the consensus science and provides extensive examples of what is said on this..." Read more

"...Its not what you think it is. A great read." Read more

"Perhaps the leading expert on the subject - a very approachable small text...." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on October 16, 2015
This is a well written short review of an important question. It's written by a man who has spent his life studying the question, and who has a good and fair understanding of it. He sets out the context well before defining the exact question he can answer by scientific means (by means of reasonably accurate measurements, and awareness of their strengths and limitations.) He's writing against scientists, advocates and politicians who are overstating the science, and going beyond the evidence. He sees that "In recent years advocates for action on climate change have enlisted disasters as a leading theme of advocacy campaigns... A turn to this strategy has occurred despite a broad consensus in the scientific literature that the evidence for connections between climate change and disasters is incredibly weak." He considers one of Barack Obama's speeches in 2013 and says of it, "I knew that several (but not all) of the claims he made were just plain wrong- they were not supported by the state of the research. In fact, some were contradicted by that research." He also records "My surprise was that my colleagues were asking me to downplay and to even misrepresent my own research because it was being viewed as inconvenient in the advocacy effort on climate change." Considering another context where information was being misused he quotes Robin Cook on the lead up to the Iraq War, "Instead of using intelligence as evidence on which to make a decision about policy, we used intelligence as the basis on which to justify a policy on which we had already settled." and John Kay, "Whatever initial misconceptions spin doctors may promote, reality will out."

Pierce is writing this book to correct a misconception- one that has gone round the world whilst the truth is getting it boots on.

The specific question he asks is, "Have disasters become more costly because of human-caused climate change?" He describes the information and dat he uses to answer this question. He uses data on weather events and records of insurance company payments and uses them to see if the patterns match or not. His conclusion is that,
"All we can say is that the record of disaster losses is fully explainable by changes in society. There is at present no evidence that human caused climate change is responsible for any part of the global increase in disaster costs. We cannot say there is no such influence.
But as I have explained on many occasions, from a practical standpoint a signal that may exist, but which cannot be detected, is indistinguishable from a signal that does not exist...
Science is concerned with evidence, not with supporting pre-existing beliefs."

The main meat of the book provides plenty of evidence from many recorded and referenced sources to support its negative answer to its main question.

This is a good book showing well how to use scientific evidence to answer a well defined question. He also rightly warns against, "But efforts to intensify public opinion through apocalyptic visions of weather-gone-wild or appeals to scientific authority, instead of motivating further support for action, have instead led to a loss of trust in campaigning scientists."

He concludes, "But the false link between disasters and climate change also distracts us from the many politically pragmatic and economically sensible justifications for accelerating the transition to clean cheap energy."

This book brings a clear scientific eye to a large amount of evidence and shows us how it looks, and where we should be looking for answers that might help people. The noise elsewhere is a distraction from clear thought. We owe Roger Pielke a debt of gratitude for taking the risk to provide us with this clear account.
Comment Comment | Permalink
5 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2019
read this book for a class, but it had some good information in it.
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2015
The Rightful Place of Science: Disasters and Climate Change (2014) by Roger Pielke Jnr provides an excellent overview of the scientific consensus on extreme weather events and climate change. It also provides an interesting examination of what happens when you put forward the majority view in an area where the science is contested.

Pielke Jnr is an expert on the use of science in politics and on disasters and climate change. He's been involved with the IPCC in a number of their reports. He also says something that many climate activists do not want to hear, which is the IPCC view that extreme weather costs have not increased due to climate change. Costs have gone up due to more people living by coastlines and increasing value of housing, but as, the IPCC Special Report on Extreme Weather states:

Long-term trends in economic disaster losses adjusted for wealth and population increases have not been attributed to climate change, but a role for climate has not been excluded.

While climate change may, in future, lead to a signal in extreme weather events at this point according to the consensus it has not. This point is something that is made in more detail in the book.

Pielke Jnr goes into detail about how writing about this point led to political pressure being applied to stop him writing for the statistically inclined 538 website. He also says how climate scientists have told him not to make this point because it isn't helpful even if it is true.

The book also extends into points about the Kaya Identity and the failure of 20 years of climate activism to reduce C02 emissions. He describes the immense challenge of decarbonizing the economy and the requirement that to meet targets for 2050 the world would require one nuclear power station per day or equivalent. The points made in this section are those made by the Breakthrough Institute.

It's an excellent, short, crisp book on climate change that describes the consensus science and provides extensive examples of what is said on this aspect of climate change.
8 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2018
He's OK, and scientists have to be aware of what they're doing, but the international scientific community now knows that we're facing the end of civilization, or maybe even extinction, if we don't undertake desperate action. It's not clear that this ivory-tower writing is very useful under such situations.
One person found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
meteoadvanced
5.0 out of 5 stars Fakten gegen den AGW Fanatismus!
Reviewed in Germany on October 27, 2016
hier werden die "Klima Machenschaften" einiger Regierungen aufgezeigt und der ganze Klimawandelwahnsinn ins rechte Licht gerückt. Für alle noch nicht völlig verblendeten Klimaschützer herzlich zu empfehlen, aber auch an alle, die noch an seriöser Forschung interessiert sind
Albert de Koninck
5.0 out of 5 stars Science vs. Ideology
Reviewed in Canada on June 1, 2015
The book is a science-based look at disasters and climate change. In the case of disasters, analysis of the data shows that the growing impact is chiefly due to increased settlement in areas that are subject to severe storms. If the data is normalized by removing the effect of the increasing population in disaster zones, the resulting time series shows no trend.

The basic problem in discussing climate change, the author indicates, is the intrusion of ideology into the discussion. On the one hand, the left wants to attribute any change in climate to human influence, while the right want to deny any human influence. Anyone taking a data-based scientific approach risks being denigrated by both sides.

The author's research was financed by insurance and re-insurance companies, who have no axe to grind in this.

All in all, this is a well-written clear book about an important area.
3 people found this helpful
Report
Siena
5.0 out of 5 stars Riguroso y fácil de leer
Reviewed in Spain on May 11, 2016
En 110 páginas de texto, de tamaño DIN-A5, el autor (una autoridad en el estudio de desastres naturales y sus consecuencias) hace un análisis riguroso sobre su posible correlación, o no, con el cambio climático.

Incluye numerosas referencias a pie de página, cuando dita datos o estudios.

Libro de fácil lectura (en inglés, eso sí), muy recomendable para interesados en el tema.
One person found this helpful
Report
Dr. P. R. Lewis
5.0 out of 5 stars Honest Roger
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 11, 2015
The small recent (2014) book from renowned climatologist Roger Pielke seeks to demystify the relation between climate change and the incidence of natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornados and forest fires. He concludes that after many years examining the evidence, that there is no link at all between the two. This in itself is an interesting conclusion because many people are trying to convince us that disasters are increasing frequency and severity, and it is all our fault for burning too many fossil fuels. It is said by the same people that the CO2 produced is adding to the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and so trapping more heat when the sun shines on our planet. The theory is highly questionable since CO2 is a very minor gas in the air, and the greenhouse effect is produced more by water vapour. Pielke accepts it however, but the proceeds to demolish the idea that any such alleged climate change has produced wilder and more damaging weather. The book should be read by all who support the attempts by various governments and the UN to restrict carbon fuel usage, and the hysterical cries they make about allegedly increasingly extreme weather. There is no evidence for such worsening weather at all,according to Pielke, despite all their attempts to cherry-pick the data, and highlight recent events such as Hurricane Sandy and recent floods in the UK. Although a very short book, the book is highly recommended for its honesty and clarity in an increasingly politicized debate.
15 people found this helpful
Report
Peter F Gill
5.0 out of 5 stars Roger cuts a number of climate alarmist links and substitutes ...
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 5, 2015
Roger cuts a number of climate alarmist links and substitutes well researched science. As a result and in spite of being a supporter of the AGW notion he will be vilified by those that seek any means to justify their intended ends.
7 people found this helpful
Report