Buy new:
$11.50$11.50
FREE delivery: Friday, Dec 9 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used:: $1.71
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $1.99 shipping
94% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
& FREE Shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
There Is No Planet B: A Handbook for the Make or Break Years 1st Edition
| Mike Berners-Lee (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Enhance your purchase
- ISBN-101108439586
- ISBN-13978-1108439589
- Edition1st
- PublisherCambridge University Press
- Publication dateFebruary 28, 2019
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.76 x 8.5 inches
- Print length302 pages
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
From the Publisher
Editorial Reviews
Review
'This is a massively entertaining compendium of bite-sized facts … It’s also massively important, given the current state of the planet.' Bill McKibben, author of Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?
'Who should read There is No Planet B? Everyone. Mike Berners-Lee has written a far-ranging and truth-telling handbook that is as readable as it is instructive.' Elizabeth Kolbert, The New Yorker and author of The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History
'This clearly written and organized book is so sensible and useful that it becomes an unexpected aesthetic pleasure as well as a guide to action. No matter how much you already know, this book will help orient you to where we are now on this, the only planet we have (I can testify that Mars won’t do). It would be best if everyone read it.' Kim Stanley Robinson, author of the Mars trilogy and New York 2140
'A much-needed, critically important, straight-talking handbook for absolutely everyone on our long-suffering planet. We ignore it at our peril.' Mark Carwardine, co-author (with Douglas Adams) of Last Chance to See
'Mike has created a wonderfully abundant buffet-table of knowledge about sustainability and you can enjoy it all at one sitting or benefit from visiting for bite-size chunks. Either way, you’ll come away wiser, healthier and also entertained. In our household, we noticed people couldn’t resist picking up a draft copy for a quick look and dipping in for far longer than they’d expected. Mike doesn’t preach, instead he shares his insights with warmth and wit, and his book could not be more timely.' David Shukman, BBC Science Editor
'I absolutely love this book. If you’ve ever felt overwhelmed by the scale of the global challenges we face, then read this book. There Is No Planet B is full of practical guidance, evidence-based and robust, yet completely accessible, and sets out the difference any one of us can make. In an increasingly complex and confusing world, this book stands out as a beacon of common sense, clarity and - crucially - hope.' Caroline Lucas, Member of Parliament for Brighton Pavilion
'It asks all the searching and systemic questions I want to ask as humanity peers over a precipice … and has a bloody good go at answering them with data, experience and integrity.' Pooran Desai, Bioregional and Oneplanet.com
'Mike Berners-Lee has a unique ability to communicate vital information on some of the world’s most pressing challenges. In this highly readable book, he shows how severe our problems are, but also what we can do to reduce the threats we face.' Chris Goodall, author of Ten Technologies to Fix Energy and Climate
'What is amazing and unique about this wonderful book is that it simultaneously addresses the practical every day questions troubling so many of us in these turbulent times while also clearing away the fog obscuring our paths into the future. And it does so in beautifully clear language. This truly is The Handbook we all need to flourish on our small planet.' Stewart Wallis, Executive Chair, The Wellbeing Economy Alliance
'… it is intended as a sort of Alexa to tell you how to live in a more planet-friendly fashion … The book is as jargon-free as possible to ensure maximum reach, while endnotes hold details for the technically minded. Amazingly, it manages to make the complexities of planet-scale economic and environmental interconnectivity fun: a platter of potential doom, served with a smiley face and sparkler … There is no Planet B is a rallying cry for a generation worried that they will inherit a world shorn of nature’s wonders and of the freedoms and opportunities we take for granted. Buying the book and adopting its key guidelines and mindset will go a long way to ensuring the planet we hand on may just be liveable.' Adrian Barnett, New Scientist
'Books about climate change usually make for grim reading. It is refreshing, then, to come across one that takes a different approach, presenting itself as a 'handbook' for how humanity can thrive in dark times … The book is full of lists of what individuals can do to help the planet (such as eating less beef and voting for politicians who understand climate change) … Berners-Lee’s greatest contribution is that he tackles this head on, taking a panoramic approach that runs from geeky facts about energy efficiency to musings about how to create a more truthful culture … The central question that the book addresses, though, is probably the greatest issue of our time: how can we keep living happily on this planet? As the world continues to warm, it is a question that will become ever more urgent. Berners-Lee does not have all the answers, but certainly makes a noble start.' Leslie Hook, Financial Times
'This is, both organizationally and substantively, every bit what its author claims it to be, an ‘evidence-based practical guide to the make or break choices we face now'. … All his expertise, in both subject matter and presentation, is on display in this new book … the operational handbook on how to move forward. This book will satisfy the experts, enlighten the concerned (or merely interested), and motivate the activists.' G. T. Dempsey, Geo Lounge (www.geolounge.com)
'Fascinating, insightful, important and entertaining. We need books and thinkers like this to inspire people to act now, not only to motivate a debate. This book is full of useful insights and advice on how you and I can make a difference, every day. Climate change is no longer a distant threat, but a visible reality. With a deep and wide ranging analysis this book sparks the activist in all of us.' Jesper Brodin, CEO of Ingka Group
'Will resonate most with those who are already deeply focused on the climate system, the impact people are having on it, and our path forward.' Paul Higgins, Physics Today
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press; 1st edition (February 28, 2019)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 302 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1108439586
- ISBN-13 : 978-1108439589
- Item Weight : 13.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.76 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,170,353 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #290 in Environmental Studies
- #1,283 in Climatology
- #2,986 in Environmental Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Mike Berners-Lee is author of the timely best-sellers 'There Is No Planet B' and 'How Bad Are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything'. An expert in sustainability, he is a professor at Lancaster University, UK and founder and director of Small World Consulting, which is a world leader in the field of supply chain carbon metrics and management. He has made numerous speaking, radio and television broadcast appearances to promote public awareness of climate change issues. About his book, 'The Carbon Footprint of Everything', Bill Bryson wrote: "I can't think of the last time I read a book that was more fascinating, and useful and enjoyable all at the same time".
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Seriously, the central problem with this book is its combination of facts and sly editorializing. Rather than simply lay out probabilities and point to salient areas of concern, the author is unrelenting is his assurance that “facts” are “facts” and he that he knows exactly what to do about each and every one of them. Could it be that the author who is so very certain that his stance is scientifically sound has become the willing victim of the Dunning-Kruger effect?
Global warming is a thing, yes. But the earth-system is plastic and dynamic and thus a more plastic and dynamic approach to its ramifications and challenges would have been nice to see. Being bombarded by lists of problems simply atomizes and compartmentalizes, as though all the issues related to global warming should be equally concerning. The attempt seems to be to induce hand wringing and high anxiety as well as to push readers to be 24/7 on the job of climate change mitigation. It is a bit like imagining that the response to Mississippi flooding ought be building our own sump pumps and never flushing the toilet. Statistical hyperbole is like any form of rhetorical grandstanding, meant to impress rubes and one’s parents.
Berners-Lee gives a very accurate look at the demands humanity puts on the environment and clears up several myths and misrepresentations that are now commonplace. We have all heard about deforestation for the expansion of soybeans. What we are not informed about is that the soybeans that are grown are not for human consumption but to feed livestock. Livestock are poor converters of plant protein to animal protein. Give up meat completely? No there is no need grass-fed, and free range can use land that is unproductive for farming. Alternative energy sources such as solar can easily meet our current energy demands, but our increased demand for energy will require every square mile of land to meet our requirements by 2100. Of course, efficiency and technology will improve over time, but efficiency seems to create even higher demand. People get the idea that increased efficiency means you can use it more. If my new car gets 35mpg and my old car only got 17 mpg I can use it twice as much or buy another vehicle.
Berners-Lee finds the loopholes that many people miss when talking about food production or energy use. Is nuclear power too dirty to use? Is my electric car really a coal-burning vehicle (coal is used to produce electricity that powers the vehicle)? And is it worse than an oil-powered vehicle? Is fracking safe? Is wealth disparages hurting things overall? There is No Planet B offers a thought proking and sometimes scary outlook for the future. It is not a smooth read all the way through and can easily be read by topic and skipped through. The subject matter is compartmentalized and can be easily jumped through to the issues of interest. There Is No Planet B is a well-done and realistic critique of man versus the planet.
This is a blueprint that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez should’ve borrowed from and turned to as a realistic plan for narrowing the industrial footprint. Not just what she thinks should be stopped or changed, but HOW it can be changed in simple steps and larger steps taken globally.
This is a well written book, easy to read, easy to understand, and even has a teasing sense of humor to it.
Top reviews from other countries
The book is packed full of information that is clearly explained and supported with numerous graphs, tables, charts and graphics. It is well organised and discusses topics such as should I buy an electric car, when might we emigrate to another planet and what 14 things should a politician know about climate change.
The book stands out from others on a similar subject because it looks at the problems we all face from several different angles. It looks at the day to day things and also the wider questions of economics and social values.
A very interesting and entertaining read that I would recommend to anyone who wants a realistic and well considered discussion around climate change and the environment.
The problem arose from our insatiable appetite for energy obtained from burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) which follows an exponential growth and which for the last 50 years averaged an annual growth of 2.4%; burning of fossil fuels results in carbon dioxide emissions which have a steady annual growth of 1.8% which means that emissions have been doubling every 39 years. The increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere results in an increase in temperature. It is estimated that it is reasonably safe to experience an increase in temperature of 1.5 degrees centigrade but a 2.2% increase is risky. With the present long-term trend of 1.8% annual growth in carbon dioxide, it seems to overshoot the 1.5 degrees target between 2030 - 2040. We are presently in the Anthropocene - the era in which we are big and powerful compared to our fragile planet, and in which we suddenly need to go about life in completely different way if we do not want things to go terribly wrong. The drastic measures we have to take globally and immediately to address the environmental crisis are described in a later part of the review.
Other serious environmental consequences we are experiencing include: a massive decline in biodiversity; the acidification of oceans due to increased levels of carbon dioxide which reduces the ability of sea life to produce shells and skeletons with a potential collapse of marine life and; the worrying fact of billions of tonnes of plastic floating in the oceans.
The book examines the carbon footprint in Agriculture and food. In this regard the average farm animal converts just 10% of the calories it eats into meat and dairy foods; the conversion rate is better when you don't kill the animal but instead take its eggs and milk. Gram for gram, soya beans has more of almost every essential nutrient than beef or lamb. But when you feed one to a cow or sheep, you get about one tenth of the weight back in meat.
The single most important change will be an amazingly simple dietary shift towards less consumption of meat and dairy products, with particular focus on reducing beef and lamb.
What has to be done:
We urgently need a working global agreement to leave the fossil fuel in the ground. Piecemeal action by individuals, companies and countries would not cut carbon dioxide emissions on their own because of rebound effects (rebound effects describe the unfortunate tendency of saving in one place, only to get counteracted by adjustments elsewhere in the system). The easiest place to put the breaks is at the point of extraction. Extracting and burning fossil fuel has to become too expensive, illegal or both.
Massive increase in renewables and all particularly of solar energy because other renewables such as wind and hydroelectric are and will remain of minor significance. Nuclear fission energy is contested because of the very long half-life of the relevant radioactive material while nuclear fusion may not be available in the near future.
We need to manage other greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrogen oxide through less animal production, especially ruminant animals (e.g cows and sheep) and judicious use of fertilizers.
Shifting our diet from animal and dairy products, particularly red meat.
Finally, we have to develop methods to take carbon dioxide back out of the atmosphere.
He takes as read the view that current atmospheric temperature increases are essentially caused by human GHG emissions and that, unless they’re reduced significantly and urgently, the consequences could be extremely damaging. He assumes that, broadly speaking, that’s the position of most policymakers and that therefore the challenge is to find ways of overcoming the serious obstacles impeding the reductions widely agreed to be necessary. That probably reflects current Western scientific and political orthodoxy, although there are scientists in the West who hold other views: for example that the consequences of increased emissions have been exaggerated. However, despite Mike’s claim that ‘every significant country’ agrees with his assumption, I believe that almost certainly doesn’t reflect the position of the leaders of major non-Western countries.
He says that a new, enforceable agreement to ‘keep it in the ground’ must be agreed. And, although he doesn’t minimise the difficulty of achieving that, he obviously sees it as doable. But is it? A problem is that developing countries – led by major emerging economies such as China, India and South Korea and big OPEC countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia – are determined, in accordance with Article 4.7 of the 1992 UN Framework Convention in Climate Change (UNFCCC), to give ‘first and overriding priority’ to economic development and poverty eradication. And they’re pursuing that by burning fossil fuels. A consequence is that they’ve adamantly rejected, for over 20 years, all efforts by EU and US climate negotiators to persuade them to accept a share of responsibility for emission reduction. That’s why the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference failed and why the 2015 Paris Agreement, by confirming and enhancing the UNFCCC Article 4.7 principle, was a dud – it did not, as Mike suggests, make progress towards an enforceable deal. Yet developing countries comprise about 82% of humanity and are the source of about 65% of increasing global emissions. Given that history, the idea that it would be possible to negotiate a universal legally-binding agreement, not just that emissions are reduced but that their use is essentially stopped altogether, seems fanciful. Is China, which for example has just started to operate a 1,837 km railway that will carry 200 million tonnes of coal annually and is in the process of building over 250 new airports by 2035, really likely to agree to abandon all that?
It’s not widely understood that, when Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Agreement, he proposed that it would re-enter the Agreement if it was renegotiated so that big emerging countries accepted an obligation to reduce their emissions. Yet, although that doesn’t go nearly as far as requiring them to ‘keep it in the ground’, his proposal was rejected by other Western leaders. And, even if these leaders could, after all, be persuaded to accept the idea of renegotiation, there’s no evidence that the leaders of non-Western countries are likely to reverse their position. Quite the opposite: in an August 2019 press conference, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa reaffirmed their commitment to ‘the full implementation of the Paris Agreement adopted under the principles of the UNFCCC’.
Mike’s belief that a universally binding ‘keep it in the ground’ agreement is possible is, I suggest, wishful thinking. Does that mean we’re doomed? Not necessarily: our best hope, it seems to me, is that the widely held Western view that increased emissions would lead to catastrophe is unnecessarily alarmist. The Chinese, Indians, Russians and others who are clearly not seriously worried about increased GHG emissions are not foolish. And they don’t wish to tip humanity into disaster any more than we do.
Also the whole thing about not having kids was very patronising, especially as he already has some. The elephant in the room are the developing countries of course.
No real concrete solutions either. Disappointed overall.
I would think anyone serious about not destroying the planet while simultaneously not destroying the economy should have done more about nuclear power.









